Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
Alex Salkever looks at the new age of sports technology in a Business Week special report. Scouts have laptops. Coaches are viewing digital replays on DVD. Some nameless writer from Baseball Prospectus apparently got a job in the Toronto front office. It's a revolution, no question. But there's surprising resistance -- according to Michael Lewis, whose soon-to-be-published Moneyball is eagerly anticipated, "in the top ranks of baseball, many old salts continue to chafe at the scientific study of their beloved game."

The teams that really "get it" are still in the minority, though there's a trend among several other front offices toward gradually integrating new ideas with established methods. As someone on the older and saltier side of the ZLC spectrum, I feel compelled to point out that raw data, processing power and high-tech gadgets don't mean a thing, unless they are in the hands of someone who really knows the game. GIGO is the first thing I learned about computers, and it will always apply.
PC as MVP? | 1 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
_Jordan - Wednesday, April 16 2003 @ 05:39 PM EDT (#19456) #
I remember, all the way back in the summer of '83, reading an article in the now-defunct Sport magazine about Oakland manager Steve Boros and his efforts to introduce, as they called it, "computers in the dugout." They had a photo of a smiling Boros in an empty A's dugout, sitting next to some super-advanced machine like a Commodore 64 or something. The thrust of the article was that Boros could refer to this computer during the game to see what the best matchups between relievers and pinch-hitters would be, or to forecast where an opposing hitter would be likeliest to hit the ball. Standard procedure today -- heck, standard procedure in pre-game meetings ten years ago -- but the article had the same sort of air as the ones in Nature about cold fusion: skeptical and a little condescending. Earl Weaver was on hand to fuss and sputter that his 4 x 6 file cards held all that same information, anyhow. It was all very cute, in retrospect.
PC as MVP? | 1 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.