Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
Last night I took the folks, visiting from Ohio, to The Ballpark in Arl ... er, excuse, me, as of last night, Ameriquest Field in Arlington. At least we know that whenever the Rangers do decide to "mortgage" the future for a pennant race, they'll have the right sponsor in place.

The Ballpark -- and yes, everyone will continue to call it that -- is a wonderful place. And enough happened in last night's game to make me not sorry at all we opted not to go tonight to watch the reconstructed arm of R.A. Dickey; of course, now Dickey will throw a one-hit shutout or something.

Anyway, here are a few notes and observations ...

The good thing about the stadium's name change is that each fan gets free equal-value tickets for any Monday-Thursday game the rest of the season and we had great tickets in the eighth row behind third base. With the folks heading back north, that means all three free tickets land in my wallet, about which I will not complaint. The "free ticket" exception, unfortunately, is the Yankees series -- those always sell out -- and it appears the Jays are only in North Texas for weekend games ...

So anyway, last night ...
The stars of the game, apologies to standing-ovation and game-winning-homer boy Pudge Rodriguez, were shortstops Carlos Guillen and Michael Young. Yankee Gods strike me dead if need be, but last night I said to my dad -- who was mere yards away from Joe D. the night he broke his ribs catching a Ted Williams near-homer -- that if I were the Rangers, I wouldn't trade Young even up for Derek Jeter right now ...

Joaquin Benoit -- this from my dad, who's never heard of him, much less seen him -- "he's got nasty stuff but looks like a mistake pitcher ... two or three a game get hit out." Right on point. Benoit could end up being a future Andujar winner, following the career path of similarly frustrating ex-Ranger (and ex-Jay) Esteban Loaiza ...

Hank Blalock -- I said this a couple of years ago on a Rangers BBS and got laughed off the place -- Hank Blalock has a really, really good chance to be George Brett ...

Jeremy Bonderman was awful and looked like Arlington Martin High School might have lit him up last night, given the opportunity ...

One of the most frustrating things about going to a game live is not getting all the information you are used to on TV; starting CF Laynce Nix left the game in the third inning, and all we heard was "Brian Jordan now in right for the Rangers. Mench to left. Dellucci to center." What, it would be too much for them to announce "Nix has a stomach virus and will be fine for tomorrow's game"? ...

Ugueth Urbina came into the game to close it down and when he was announced, the crowd didn't know what to do. He was something of a fan favorite here but if I had to guess, most fans in the balpark didn't realize he was now with the Tigers. There was a weird surprised silence when his name was announced, then a smattering of ... boos? "Oogs"? It was hard to tell ...

Jays fans won't like to hear this, but my mom said the Ballpark -- oops, Ameriquest Field -- was too loud all the time. It was a really nice night. Much of that was artificial, scoreboard-led random "Make Some Noise" hoo-ha, and the largest ovation except for Young's first-inning leadoff homer, was for Pudge's first at-bat. There were two groups of what sounded like high school kids trying to start chants all night -- one in the left field stands with "Let's Go Ran-gers" (and a failed "Full-mer" chant) and another group up by the center field grassy knoll (right, it probably shouldn't be nicknamed that so close to Dallas) with "Here we go Rangers" ... they didn't catch on stadium-wide, but they surely were audible.

I didn't make it out to a game locally last year, but the stadium feels different this year -- which has exactly nothing to do with the name change. And it's fun to go to a game where you only have mild rooting interest -- I like to see the Rangers win, but don't live and die with it -- so you can root for good baseball. We had good baseball last night; some great defense -- especially by Young -- and plenty of offense, an explosive beginning and a nail-biting ending ...

The Rangers may be 0-1 at "Ameriquest Field" and have fallen out of first place in the A.L. West, but there's a lot to like about a trip to The Ballpark ... sorry, the ballpark in Arlington.
Take Me Out to ... Ameriquest Field? | 7 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
_greenfrog - Saturday, May 08 2004 @ 03:49 PM EDT (#32316) #
I remember a trade rumour at the winter meetings a couple of years ago: JP apparently offered Vernon Wells and Chris Carpenter for Blalock. Interesting. I'm glad we still have Wells though.
_Andrew K - Saturday, May 08 2004 @ 03:58 PM EDT (#32317) #
... and with this article, MED leads the league in ellipses.
Craig B - Saturday, May 08 2004 @ 04:09 PM EDT (#32318) #
Thanks, Mick.

Now originally, Mick sent this around Da Box's internal mailing list (before I begged him to post it). And when he did, we had quite an interesting exchange...

I started off by saying...

"Hank Blalock is already George Brett. I don't see anything George could do that Blalock doesn't." (I later added "I forgot, of course. Brett stole 10-15 bases a year, Blalock won't do that. I think that's pretty minor...")

To which Mike D responded...

"Craig,

"I love you, but that's crazily premature. Adjusting for era, Brett's a flat-out legend.

"His OPS+ was over 130 on twelve occasions, including a 158, a 178, and a *202*. Blalock had an excellent season last year, and put up a 118.

"In raw numbers, they're comparable. But in context, Blalock has to get a whole lot more dominant.

[He loves me! He loves me! :)] Seriously, Mike's right of course, but I responded...

"Mike,

"I know what you're saying but George Brett at 22 hit .308/.356/.456 for a PRO+ of 125, basically what Blalock did last year. True, Blalock needs to develop "on the curve", but basically the two are the same player, right down to the terrible struggles in their first season. Brett wasn't much of a defender early in his career, Blalock is better at third at this point.

"The thing I remember most about Brett, like Blalock, was his incredible natural power despite not being very big (they are exactly the same size... Brett 6-0 and listed at 200, Blalock 6-1 and listed at 192). Brett had such power in his swing that he didn't have to swing for the fences to hit home runs, and Blalock has the same thing going for him. That's why Brett could hit 25 homers a year despite the Charlie Lau method. Blalock has that same thing going for him, and frankly I think he could use an approach that was a lot less aggressive at the plate, going with more pitches and trying to hit an extra 30 singles a year. He'll still get his homers.

"The similarities between the two are, in my mind, uncanny. Blalock probably won't ever be as good as Brett when he was at his best, but I have no doubt that you will be able to take Blalock's next eight seasons and mix them in with George Brett's career and no one will be able to tell them apart."

Anyway, I thought it was an interesting discussion. Mick asked me to repost it here.

Just to point out one thing, Blalock is stepping it up a small notch this year at the age of 23, as he's hitting .325/.370/.553 after .300/.350/.522 last year. Out of the top 20 hitters in the AL (measured by OPS) right now, only three are under 27. Those three are Travis Hafner (26), Juan Uribe (24 and a fair fluke), and Blalock, who's 23.

Salary and free agency considerations aside, I wouldn't trade him for any position player in the American League. Except A-Rod, I guess.
Mike D - Saturday, May 08 2004 @ 04:14 PM EDT (#32319) #
... and with this article, MED leads the league in ellipses

Andrew, you've forgotten about the Advance Scout columns. I'm like the Hank Aaron and Sadaharu Oh of ellipses, combined.

And just for good measure...a couple more...
Mike D - Saturday, May 08 2004 @ 04:40 PM EDT (#32320) #
Steering the conversation back to Blalock, I just think that a comparison to Brett involves more than similar production at a similar age, as great a compliment as that is.

Brett was a game-changer, an absolutely fearsome hitter around whom the entire game plan of the opposing club revolved. Blalock's a very fine hitter, but he's not pitched around the way Brett was. That said, Brett was not pitched around the way Bonds is. I think that the mark of whether Hank becomes George-like will be how he adjusts when pitchers start being really careful with him.

I also associate George Brett with longevity; he was a very, very fine hitter in each and every year of his career, save age 21 and ages 38-40. He put up tremendous numbers despite battling serious injuries every season, although a counterargument might well be that durability was a weakness of Brett's total value to his club.

Ultimately, my gut reaction is based on this: George Brett played in early '80s ballparks, against early '80s pitching, while lifting early '80s weights and eating early '80s food. He had early '80s technology with which to refine his swing and study opposing pitchers. And yet he put up numbers that would not only "fit in" today -- they'd be excellent today, especially for a third baseman.

To me, the bottom line is this: If Blalock keeps up his April/May production over the season, he only needs to keep producing on that level for another fifteen years. Then, we have ourselves another George Brett.

Although George did use an awful lot of pine tar.
_Mick - Saturday, May 08 2004 @ 09:22 PM EDT (#32321) #
... and with this article, MED leads the league in ellipses.

Andrew, dating back to my ill-fated correspondent days with ESPN.com and into my early days as Box regular, I was posting a semi-regular commentary called "Elliptical Information." Similarly, John Gizzi was using both venues for "Notes from Nowhere." Where Gizzi's choice of title was an homage to some littiritcher-type-guy, mine was bowing at the temple of the greatest journalist of our time, Larry "The" King.

And yes, I lead the league in irony, too.

To the debate at hand, I remember keeping a close eye on Brett in 1974ish (keeping in mind that "close eye" for an eight-year-old is a bit skittish) because there were rumours he'd be traded for Tony Perez when the Reds finally decided to move Dan Driessen to 1B.

That didn't happen, of course, but it did lead to my keeping a continued close eye on him ... and I have to say, rarely was a game plan "built around" stopping Brett, not until he made that run at .400 -- what was that, 1980? The teams he was on were just too good. Willie Wilson, Hal McRae, Amos Otis, Darrell Porter, Frank White ... these were legitimately great teams consistently stymied by the Thurman Munson Yankees.

I still believe Blalock has a good chance to become a Brett-like icon, his own recent public statement that he wanted to stay a Ranger for life, even at less than market value, so he could "be a guy like George Brett, one team his whole career" notwithstanding -- I don't think he was comparing more than the opportunity to stay in one place.

I hope he does. Sure, he'd look terrific in Yankee pinstripes, but I am personally hoping Laird-Teixeira-Soriano-Young-Blalock becomed the Yeager-Garvey-Lopes-Russell-Cey of the 2000's. Note that none of those Dodgers are in the Hall of Fame; but they do define LA for a whole generation of baseball fans.
Coach - Sunday, May 09 2004 @ 12:03 AM EDT (#32322) #
now Dickey will throw a one-hit shutout or something

Well, 15-15 late in the fourth quarter is something. Both teams must have gone for a 2-point conversion on the last TD. Dickey didn't survive the fourth, allowing only six earned runs, and he was the better starter tonight.

You also missed Soriano going 6-for-6, and a triple and a homer from Brett lite. I'm in the camp that says Blalock is reminiscent of a young Brett; that's no guarantee that he'll stay healthy and perform at that level for as long, but there are enough resemblances to make it seem possible.

Now it's in overtime, and the Tigers have elected to receive...
Take Me Out to ... Ameriquest Field? | 7 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.