Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
Late inning losses suck.


I seem to remember a lot more off days in the first month of the season. However, the Jays have been playing a lot. They have only one off day scheduled between April 4th and May 6th (one Tiger game was postponed).

It's interesting - you look at the stats so far and things seem upside down. McDonald has the highest average on the team, Phillips is second, and Jason Smith is hitting .320. On the other hand Thomas, Zaun, Overbay and Wells are all under .250. You have to figure those will reverse themselves at some point. And even with that the Jays are the 3rd highest scoring AL team right now (the NY ARods are first, TB second).

The Jays hit the road after a 5-5 homestand that saw 2 tough losses. Burnett faces Cabrera tonight. This could be a 1-0 game or a 10-9 game. You can never be too sure what to expect out of either pitcher.

20 April 2007: Up is Down | 10 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
DiscoDave - Friday, April 20 2007 @ 10:50 AM EDT (#166237) #
Some random thoughts on the opening 3 weeks of the season.

The Rotation
Towers & Ohka:  Pitching just fine, actually quite well for a #4 & #5.  Later in June/July we can look at upgrading via trade or promotion (Percey??).

Burnett:  Has lacked command.  The start in Det. could be blamed on the weather, not the ones since.  We need him to reel off a few good starts more than we need to trade the surplus of young arms for a #2-3 starter.

Doc:  Sweetness.

Gus: Gutsy pitching.  Shook off the DUI to have a nice start.  Granted, he scares the hell out of me when he starts, but some how he keeps it together.

The Pen:
After the 2nd blown save I knew something was wrong with BJ.  The pen is weaker with BJ gone, but I have a feeling that Frasor will be good enough.  A trade later in the season should bolster the group if we are still in contention.  Relievers are always available at the deadline.

The O
#3 in the league but still not that scary.  Loosing Glaus hurts but Jmac and Smith have been playing over their heads with the bat, so right now it is a wash.  If, when??, we loose Troy again JP needs to hit the phones, hard.  Big Frank looks lost at the plate.  Every time Vernon swings at pitch 1 i want to strangle him.  Sparky looked good and his loss mean more than any of the other losses right now.  He added grit and determination to the team.  Lind will hit fine but Reed just has "that" quality to get er done.  Hill is raking at the plate, but has been a rollercoaster in the field & I can say the same for Rios. Clayton: Average D, below average bat, but better than the SS's we had last year.

Lets hope that JP does not panic after a couple tough losses and trade Lind or Purcey for a marginal upgrade in the rotation or at 3rd.

Four Seamer - Friday, April 20 2007 @ 11:10 AM EDT (#166238) #

Just a random thought, since I'm busy here at work (or so I'd like to believe, anyways), and I don't have the time to do the research.

Given the brutal weather conditions for much of this month, how much credit for the Jays' relatively strong offensive output should be given to the fact that they have played 13 of their 15 games indoors?  Maybe most other teams have too, but it's worth considering.

Mike Green - Friday, April 20 2007 @ 11:26 AM EDT (#166241) #
They've hit much better on the road than at home so far.  And their road games were in normally unfavourable hitting environments, Tampa and Detroit. The offence overall is almost exactly what I expected it to be (although the distribution of hits between John McDonald and Vernon Wells, for instance, is not)

I am not aware of research on the impact of humidity/temperature on the Rogers Centre, but anecdotally, the ball does seem to fly out in warmish, humid weather with the dome closed (as it did last April).  This year, our frigid "spring" has meant that the ball was not flying out until perhaps yesterday.

Mike Green - Friday, April 20 2007 @ 03:46 PM EDT (#166256) #
BBRef.com will have minor league stats with search capabilities by this summer.  Amazing!
robertdudek - Friday, April 20 2007 @ 04:37 PM EDT (#166263) #
Bizarre play in Cubs-Cards game. Excerpt from my blog:

The next batter attempts a bunt to sacrifice the runners [on first and second base] along, but pops it up right in front of homeplate. The St Louis catcher attempts to field the ball, but has to reach around the frozen in place batter/runner. The ball drops and the catcher picks it up and throws it to second base for the apparent force ahead of the sliding runner. The 2B then throws the ball to third base and the perplexed runner is tagged out. Now the throw over the first base (the batter still hasn’t moved) completes the apparent triple play to end the inning.

But hold on, the replay shows that the catcher tagged the batter before throwing to second, thereby negating the force at that base - so there should be a runner at second (he was never tagged) and two out.

The umpire sees it differently, calling the batter out for interference, killing the play on the spot. Only one out is recorded and the runners retreat to first and second; big break for the Cubs.


Never seen that before.




Mike Green - Friday, April 20 2007 @ 04:52 PM EDT (#166265) #
Here's the Wikipedia account of the Armbrister-Fisk play.  Apparently MLB stands by Barnett's intepretation of the rule.
robertdudek - Friday, April 20 2007 @ 05:20 PM EDT (#166268) #
Thanks Mike,

I wonder if this play is different (don't recall the specifics of the Armbrister play) in that the batter was standing in fair territory and didn't seem to be trying to run to first.

I don't think the interference was intentional, but perhaps the umpire saw it that way. The bunt (from a right handed batter) landed a foot in front of him and the catcher went around the batter's right side to field the ball, thus cutting off the runner's path to first base. I'm fairly certain that  had the runner not been in the way, the catcher would have caught the bunt on the fly.

robertdudek - Friday, April 20 2007 @ 05:31 PM EDT (#166269) #
http://bruce.mlblogs.com/bruce_markusens_coopersto/2005/06/1975_world_seri.html

Here is a nice description of the Fisk-Armbrister play.



Mike Green - Friday, April 20 2007 @ 05:32 PM EDT (#166270) #
You're welcome, Robert.  Bruce Markusen reported the Armbrister play in Cooperstown Confidential this way:


"Squaring himself into bunting position, Armbrister nubbed the ball in front of the plate. Perhaps not realizing that he had hit the ball into fair territory, Armbrister hesitated before breaking toward first. Just as he started running, Red Sox catcher Carlton Fisk stepped over home plate in an effort to field the bouncing bunt. Fisk and Armbrister collided, delaying the catcher’s pursuit of the ball. Once Fisk picked up the ball, he extricated himself from Armbrister with a sturdy glove-hand shove, set himself quickly, and hurtled a throw toward second base. The ball sailed high and to the right of Rick Burleson’s fully extended arm, tipping off the edge of the shortstop’s glove and carrying into center field. Fred Lynn retrieved the ball and unfurled a strong throw to third, but Geronimo slid into third just before Rico Petrocelli’s quick tag made contact with his body. Armbrister, in spite of his late start from the plate and his momentary tangle with Fisk, settled in at second base."

Intent is a difficult thing to divine, and keeps criminal lawyers busy.


Mike Green - Friday, April 20 2007 @ 05:33 PM EDT (#166271) #
Ha.  You win, Robert.
20 April 2007: Up is Down | 10 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.