Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine

In a recent thread here on Da Box, the self-awarely-named Cynicalguy ranted, "I remember [Richard Griffin] writing a column comparing the Jays all-time team vs the Expos all-time team and commenting that the Expos all-time team was better ... which was laughable."

Let's see if that holds up ...



For our purposes here, we will only consider Jays who played during the time the Expos actually existed, so no Aaron Hill and no Orlando Hudson who was in the big leagues only two and a half years before the move ... yes this is a bit unfair as it gives the Expos an eight-year jump on the baby Jays as a franchise, but you'll see that almost universally, the players listed below are from the "overlap" years.

For our position-by-position comparisons, eligibility-wise, those named have played with the team long enough to appear in at least one of the franchise's "counting stats" Top 10 lists as published by BaseballReference.org. Does this list miss anyone? Post your objections, corrections and compliments below ...

C:
This one's a no-brainer. Apologies to Ernie Whitt and Pat Borders, but Gary Carter is one of the top 10 catchers in MLB history. Advantage: Expos. (Expos up, 1-0).

1B:
A surprisingly weak position for the historial Expos, though Andres Galarraga was fine player -- better than, say, Willie Upshaw and John Mayberry, but lagging behind all of John Olerud, Fred McGriff and Carlos Delgado. Advantage: Blue Jays (Tied, 1-1).

2B:
The Expos had an awful lot of quality keystoners in their abbreviated history --Jose Vidro, Delino DeShields, Mike Lansing, Ron Hunt, even Dave Cash. But with apologies to Damaso Garcia, this spot goes to future Hall of Famer Roberto Alomar. Advantage: Blue Jays (Jays up, 2-1).

3B:
At the hot corner, Kelly Gruber was a fine player and Gance MullinIorg was one of the great platoons of all time, but neither lives up to either of Tim Wallach or Larry Parrish. Advantage: Expos. (Tied, 2-2).

SS:
Rounding out the infield at shortstop, Orlando Cabrera and Hubie Brooks were both All-Stars in the six-hole for Les Expos, but clearly the best Canadian franchise shortstop ever was Tony Fernandez. Manny Lee is a distant second on the franchise list and well behind both Cabrera and Brooks. Advantage: Blue Jays. (Jays up, 3-2).

LF:
We love George Bell and have a respectful nod for Shannon Stewart, but Tim Raines ... c'mon, he was Tim Raines! Advantage: Expos. (Tied 3-3).

CF:
The young Vernon Wells was good, Devon White could pick it with anyone, and Lloyd Moseby deserves accolades, but here we'll go with Andre Dawson. Advantage: Expos. (Expos up, 4-3).

RF:
Hate to call a position a "draw," but who are YOU going to choose between the pairing of Vladimir Guerrero and Larry Walker and that of Jesse Barfield and Joe Carter (or even Shawn Green)? Advantage: Draw (Expos up, 4-3-1).

DH:
Hard to make a call here since the Expos never actually played with a DH, but one of the great early DH's was an Expo first in Rusty Staub. Still, with another nod to the he-wasn't-here-very-long Dave Winfield, we'll go here with Paul Molitor. Advantage: Blue Jays. (Tie, 4-4-1).

Rotation:
The Expos all-time five-man rotation is probably Steve Rogers, Dennis Martinez, Pedro Martinez, Bill Gullickson and Bryn Smith. The Blue Jays all-time five-man rotation is probably Dave Steib, Roy Halladay, Jim Clancy, Jimmy Key and Pat Hentgen. These are surprisingly even head-to-head, with just a slight nod to the Jays.  (Jays up, 5-4-1).

Bullpen:
The Expos' all-time bullpen, let's see ... Jeff Reardon, Ugueth Urbina, Mel Rojas, Mike Marshall and we need a lefy, so apologies to John Wetteland, but Dale Murray over Woodie Fryman. The jays' all-time bullpen, again, let's see ... Tom Henke, Duane Ward, B.J. Ryan is the lefty, Mike Timlin and Paul Quantrill. Again, you can't go wrong with either group, but give me the Expos' group by the slightest of margins. (Tie, 5-5-1).

That's right, given the historical Expos against the historical Jays of roughly the same time frame, the two franchises are pretty much exactly even from a talent perspective. So Griffin might have been overstating to say the Montre-all-stars were "better" but the idea is far from "laughable."

Over to you Bauxites -- who's missing? What'd I get wrong?

Jays vs. Expos? | 16 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Callum - Sunday, April 04 2010 @ 06:18 PM EDT (#213069) #
I thought for a second - Time Wallach over Kelly Gruber? Then I had a look. He quietly hit over 2000 hits in his career. Stud!  He also had one 123RBI season.
slitheringslider - Sunday, April 04 2010 @ 06:46 PM EDT (#213070) #
For RF, I would much rather have Vladimir Guerrero or Larry Walker and it is not even close. Sure Joe Carter has some great moments but he is perennially overrated as a hitter and you can't really call him an OF. Let's look at their career OPS+ respectively

Vladimir Guerrero: 145
Larry Walker: 140

There is a big drop off after this

Jesse Barfield: 117
Joe Carter: 105

Sure, the best seasons in Walker's careers were in a Rockie's uniform, but Vlad put up some godly numbers as an Expo that none of the other candidates can match. There is no reason for this to be anything but a landslide victory for the Expos.

slitheringslider - Sunday, April 04 2010 @ 06:52 PM EDT (#213071) #
Also, I don't think B.J. Ryan ever played for the Jays when the 2 teams' existence overlapped. Perhaps Billy Koch, or Mark Eichhorn as replacement?
ayjackson - Sunday, April 04 2010 @ 07:04 PM EDT (#213073) #
Difficult to give a nod to the Blue Jays for having better DH's.  Agree about RF too.  I'd rather have Guerrero, Walker or Alou than any Jay.  And my all time favourite Jay is Barfield.
martinthegreat - Sunday, April 04 2010 @ 07:10 PM EDT (#213074) #
Oh the Expos, maybe someday they'll be back. As for the comparison, its pretty pointless. It'd be better to look at the best teams of individual seasons. Say, compare the 92 or 93 Jays to the 81 or 94 (arg) Expos. Someone else should do this, I'm too busy with school right now.
John Northey - Sunday, April 04 2010 @ 07:35 PM EDT (#213076) #
For the pen I'd take Henke/Ward over virtually any combo - they were amazing - and mix in Eichhorn and a few others and it is killer.

For the rotation the Jays should win by more with Roger Clemens* who won two triple crowns of pitching (and two Cy Young awards) while here for two years - you just don't get better than that.

RF I'd say the Jays lose big time - OPS+ as a Jay or Expo...
Walker 128, Vlad 148
Carter 104, Barfield 118, Green 116

While Barfield might have had the best arm in baseball history it just can't compensate for that big a spread.
Mike Green - Sunday, April 04 2010 @ 08:27 PM EDT (#213081) #
Well, if you're looking at performance with the Jays and with the Expos, there is an argument for Barfield over either Guerrero or Walker.  CHONE has their peak seasons as Barfield 7.3, 6.6 WAR, Vladdy 7.1, 6.5 and Walker nowhere close.  Vladdy had more seasons closer to his peak with the Expos and I personally would take him, but it is close.  People forget what a beast Jesse was at his best. 
Magpie - Sunday, April 04 2010 @ 09:43 PM EDT (#213084) #
Like many of the others chiming in, I see RF as an edge for the Expos: Barfield at his best, while clearly significantly better in the field to those Gold Glovers from Montreal, was simply not quite as good with the bat as Walker or Vlad - and there's two of those guys and only one Jesse.

But I'll definitely take the Jays bullpen. Tom Henke was the True Terminator and one of the most under-rated pitchers in history. And besides - the Mighty Q! All-seeing, all-knowing, a perfect continuum of wonderfulness...
Mick Doherty - Monday, April 05 2010 @ 12:25 AM EDT (#213091) #

I knew as I was writing that RF blurb that it would draw comments. Here's my thinking ... first, when you're talking about an all-time team, you mean one man at a position, not overall depth. So it was Barfield vs. either Walker or Guerrero. Honestly, and this may be the non-Canadian in me, when I first think of Walker, I think Colorado, and when I first think of Guerrero, I think LA/Anaheim. Barfield, to me, is clearly a Jay, even though I loved the (eventually failed) idea of him in Yankee pinstripes.

Given a choice between Vlad and Walker for the 'spos, I apologetically choose Vlad (Walker always struck me as a HOF talent, though he won't end up getting there). So, Barfield the Jay or Guerrero the Expo? I absolutely cannot choose between the two. Gun to my head, I probably go Barfield based on his freaking unbelieveable 1985-86. But then maybe I'd go with Vlad and his near 40/40 season in 2002 (39/40) ... but he was even better two years later with the Angels, as AL MVP. So I think ... a tie!

By the way, interesting footnote -- Vlad's most similar player for his career, per BaseballReference.com? Larry Walker!

robertdudek - Monday, April 05 2010 @ 05:15 AM EDT (#213093) #
Right field is a clear win for Expos - by roughly the same margin as shortstop is for the Jays.
robertdudek - Monday, April 05 2010 @ 05:16 AM EDT (#213094) #
Also Javier Vazquez instead of Bryn Smith.
robertdudek - Monday, April 05 2010 @ 05:21 AM EDT (#213095) #
My personal view is you have to assess both the season with the team and away from the team, perhaps with a minimum number of required years to weed out the rent-a-players.

I don't think Barfield was as good as either Walker or Vlad for as long. And of course Barfield tailed off pretty quickly after age 30.

Also, I favour comparing a full 25-man team.

electric carrot - Monday, April 05 2010 @ 08:15 AM EDT (#213098) #
I'm with the Guerrero/Walker over Barfield camp too.  But really not sure I'd choose Kelly Gruber for the Jays at 3rd base.  Is it wrong to choose Rolen?  And if not then I choose him over Wallach or Larry Parish.


Mick Doherty - Monday, April 05 2010 @ 11:20 AM EDT (#213107) #

Rolen does not qualify per the admittedly extremely arbitrary guideline noted above: "For our position-by-position comparisons, eligibility-wise, those named have played with the team long enough to appear in at least one of the franchise's "counting stats" Top 10 lists as published by BaseballReference.org."

Same reason Clemens, who wasn't in TO very long but was not a rent-a-player per se, doesn't make the rotation ...

John Northey - Monday, April 05 2010 @ 01:11 PM EDT (#213111) #
Always fun to think about, makes one wonder about single season guys though.
Checking http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/TOR/leaders_bat_50.shtml for OPS+ single season

Jays...
CA: Greg Myers '03 125 OPS+
1B: Olerud '93 186 OPS+
2B: Alomar '93 141 OPS+
3B: Gruber '90/Mulliniks '87/Roy Howell '77 127 OPS+
SS: Fernandez '87 112 (120+ at 3B years later, Scut was 111)
LF: Otto Velez '79 148 OPS+ Bell '87 146 OPS+
CF: Moseby '83 134 OPS+
RF: Green '99 143 OPS+
DH: Delgado '00 181 OPS+ (Lind '09 144 is best for a primary DH)

Rotation... (ERA+ - http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/TOR/leaders_pitch.shtml)
Roger Clemens '97 222 (plus a 174 the next year)
Roy Halladay '05 185
Dave Stieb '85 173
Juan Guzman '96 171
Jimmy Key '87 164

Bullpen...
Tom Henke '89 191 ERA+ over 89 IP 20 saves (different era)
BJ Ryan '06 335 ERA+ over 72 IP 38 saves
Mark Eichhorn '87 249 ERA+ over 157 IP (!) 14 saves
Duane Ward '92 211 ERA+ over 101 IP (204 in '93 then bye bye arm)12 saves
Many other options after that.

Someone else can do the Expos (too depressing to see 'Washington' at the top)
http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/WAS/leaders_bat_50.shtml
http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/WAS/leaders_pitch_50.shtml
Cynicalguy - Monday, April 05 2010 @ 10:42 PM EDT (#213152) #
Perhaps "laughable" wasn't the best word to use to describe Griffin's bias.  But knownig Griffin from his writing, he probably made up the score before analysing it position by position.  But that WAMCO lineup from '93 with the top 3 hitters in the league, the Expos can't compare with that...but the '94 Expos were a good team though.
Jays vs. Expos? | 16 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.