Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
The POTD captures three players who briefly passed through Baseball North in 2010.

Jeremy Reed prepares for his first at-bat in a Jays uniform against the Chicago White Sox April 14 at the Dome.




Reed shown on JaysVision.  He entered the game earlier as a pinch-runner.   The former Seattle Mariner would lift a pop fly to short in the ninth as the Jays lost 11-1 to the Pale Hose.

Reed inspects his bat before stepping into the batter's box against the White Sox April 15.  He got the start in right field and would contribute a hit, a walk and a stolen base in the Jays 7-3 win over the White Sox. 

The only other time Reed saw game action at the Dome was June 6 against the Yankees.  His last game came in San Diego 10 days later.  After hitting .271/.356/.355 in 41 games with Triple-A Las Vegas, the 6-foot, 185 pound Reed hooked up with the White Sox in July but never did see major league action for the rest of the season.  The left-handed hitting Reed had just three hits and two walks in 23 plate appearances in a Toronto uniform.  His best stretch came against the Angels in Anaheim when he homered off Ervin Santana May 25 and knocked in two runs against the Halos the next day.  The 29 year-old from San Dimas, California will try to get back in the bigs with the Milwaukee Brewers after signing a minor league deal January 21.

Merkin Valdez takes to the hill against the White Sox April 14.

Valdez relieved a shaky Brandon Morrow after he failed to record an out in the fifth inning.

Valdez recorded three ground ball outs and issued just a walk in the fifth.  However, the 29 year-old native of San Cristobal in the Dominican Republic gave up another walk and two hits in the sixth without recording an out and all three runs would come in to score. 

This was Valdez's first and only appearance at the Dome.  His only other appearance was in Tampa Bay April 26 when he gave up a walk in one-third of an inning.  The 6-foot-5, 230 pound righthander did not have much success in Triple-A Las Vegas as he went 3-5 with a 7.91 ERA.  Valdez remains a free agent.

Nick Green, second from left, high-fives John McDonald after the Jays blanked the St. Louis Cardinals 5-0 June 24 at the Dome.
The 32 year-old Green began 2010 with the Los Angeles Dodgers but he was released June 16.  Two days later, the Jays signed the Pensacola, Florida native as a free agent and saw his first action on Father's Day, June 20, when he flied out in a pinch-hitting appearance against the San Francisco Giants at the Dome.  Green's only other appearance in Toronto came July 6 in Minnesota when he went 0-for-3.  The 6-foot, 180 pound Green had just two hits and a walk in 14 plate appearances but scored a pair of runs and drove one in.   He earned a hit, a walk and an RBI June 30 in Cleveland.  The righthanded hitting Green signed a minor league deal with the Baltimore Orioles June 28.  He has spent time with Atlanta, Tampa Bay, the New York Yankees, Boston and Seattle since beginning his big league career in 2004.  If he makes it to Baltimore, that will mean Green has been with every team in the American League East.

In the photo of Green, you'll also notice Jarrett Hoffpauir (first from right), who is now in the San Diego Padres organization.  You can see more photos of him right here.
7 Photos - Green 7-47 Edition | 35 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
85bluejay - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 09:25 AM EST (#229894) #

offtopic - heard manager  John Farrell on the fan yesterday - couple of points of interest - old school approach to BP ala Cito, wants defined roles for relievers & apparently will breakin JP slowly into #1 spot - molina will apparently be more than once a week catcher to start season.

 

 

China fan - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 11:45 AM EST (#229895) #
Molina starting more than once a week?  JPA breaking in slowly?  Well, it must be yet another example of John Farrell's longstanding bias in favor of veterans and his prejudice against rookies....  He must be trying to help Molina get a nice free-agent contract in 2012.....
bpoz - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 12:34 PM EST (#229897) #
This is not a response to CF or 85BJ.

JPA is a rookie catcher, also his ML start was full of controversy.
I can accept people saying that inexperienced catchers can be a liability to the pitching staff, because that position is very key. But IMO he is having a terrible welcome to our team.
Sometimes the NYY are lighting up the pitcher.
Glevin - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 12:46 PM EST (#229898) #
I don't mind if Molina plays a little more often in April, but I'll be bothered if it turns into anything like a time share. I hate "easing him in" type of stuff in general, especially when the player has nothing left to prove in the minors. Being a catcher is a little different as catchers don't play every day anyway, but J.P. needs to get the bulk of playing time. (Especially since Molina is just such a terrible offensive player-last year's .681 OPS was his career high,he's 36 and Rogers Centre is unlikely to be the HR haven for righties it was last year. An OPS of  .550-.575 or so seems likely). .
christaylor - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 01:05 PM EST (#229899) #
I have no problem with this -- like the "best shape of my life" trope and others there's the "breaking in the rookie slowly" (pre-) spring training one. In a long, fine, tradition of pre-season scuttlebutt. If JPA wins the job with a quick start, he almost certinly plays, if he doesn't he's got the safety net of "we're breaking him in slowly".

JPA is going to be at the center of attention all year, this comment simultaneously takes the pressure of and could serve as motivation... plus... would we really want to hear Farrell say the opposite, "JPA is our starting C for 120 games no matter how poorly he plays or how tired he is..."?

Nothing to see here, move along.
MatO - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 01:18 PM EST (#229900) #
Molina starting more than once a week?  JPA breaking in slowly?  Well, it must be yet another example of John Farrell's longstanding bias in favor of veterans and his prejudice against rookies....  He must be trying to help Molina get a nice free-agent contract in 2012.....   Wow.  2 hours and 20 min between 85bluejay's post and your reply.  What took you so long.  I was waiting and waiting....
smcs - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 01:21 PM EST (#229901) #
Re: Molina starting more than once a week

Meh.  The list of catchers who start 3/4ths of their teams games is low.  I'd expect the year-end split to be somewhere near 110/50.  Molina started 51 games behind the plate last year, and did not start in back to back games until August.  He is probably going to start out by catching Morrow a few times through the rotation, so that is 1/5th of the games, plus most day games after night games, which happens 7 times in the first month, and 34 times through the whole season, plus a few more times of 7:05-4:05-1:05 start times on weekend series.

MatO - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 01:21 PM EST (#229902) #
Per story in the Globe it looks like Pettitte's retiring.
Mike Green - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 01:40 PM EST (#229903) #
Hmm.  The Yankees have had a funny off-season, while the Rays have done pretty well in a difficult situation.  Going in, you would have thought that the Yankees would be a pretty solid bet for a playoff spot in 2011.  It looks quite a bit iffier now. 
Flex - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 01:44 PM EST (#229904) #
Here's a list of the 25 worst high-HR seasons of all time (in other words, more than 30HR, but otherwise terrible offensive seasons). I may be wrong, but it looks to me at least three of them are Blue Jays.

http://sbn.to/gNWWGX
Mick Doherty - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 01:53 PM EST (#229905) #

Reed is from San Dimas???

Ooh, ooh ... insert appropriate Bill & Ted joke <<here>>!!!

TamRa - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 03:52 PM EST (#229909) #
Molina starting more than once a week?  JPA breaking in slowly?  Well, it must be yet another example of John Farrell's longstanding bias in favor of veterans and his prejudice against rookies....  He must be trying to help Molina get a nice free-agent contract in 2012.....

The drama queen act is REALLY getting tired at this point...

Magpie - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 04:04 PM EST (#229910) #
It would be surprising to me if Farrell didn't, at least in the beginning, operate as a fairly conventional manager. It's his first job, I wouldn't expect him to take it upon himself to rewrite the book.

So in Blue Jay terms, I assume we should expect a middle of the road guy, like his predecessor, and like Jim Fregosi. His lineups won't be as rigid and as carved in stone as those of Bobby Cox. He won't be as flighty, juggling for the sake of juggling, forever riding the hot hand of the moment, as Jimy Williams. He won't be as committed to his last breath with old players who can't play defense anymore as Tim Johnson.

It will be especially interesting to me to see how much his work resembles Terry Francona's, who is obviously the manager you'd expect to have had the biggest influence on him. Francona's a fairly conventional game manager himself, of course.
Magpie - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 04:11 PM EST (#229911) #
I'll be bothered if it turns into anything like a time share.

Agreed, absolutely - but twice a week is the normal, conventional workload for the number two catcher. It's practically the minimum, in fact. If Molina were to start only once a week (you'd end up with Arencibia catching 130-135 games and Molina 27-32) - that's what would be unusual.
Mike Green - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 04:23 PM EST (#229912) #
Farrell was, I thought, supposed to be potential GM material.  And there are a couple of very different "managerial books". One can hope that he might follow the Herzogian novel rather than the "Thou shalt not bring in your closer before the ninth inning" scripture. 
China fan - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 04:27 PM EST (#229913) #

Leaving aside the irony of TamRa lecturing anyone about verbosity and drama, there is actually a serious issue here:  do the Jays attract more free-agents if they fulfill their promises to those players that they sign?  The issue was interesting enough that Gregor Chisholm devoted an entire article to exactly this question on MLB.com yesterday, complete with long quotes from Anthopolous. Here's a brief excerpt:

Anthopoulos said while he understands the criticism the organization received [for playing Buck over JPA], the move was made because of the promise that was given to Buck. "When we give our word to someone ... that's part of our brand," Anthopoulos said. "When I'm negotiating with an agent or I'm trying to recruit a player, and we have to tell them something, whether it's good or bad news, they know that we're going to honour our word and we're going to be straight shooters.  People in the game are starting to realize that the way the Toronto Blue Jays operate, they're men of their word and they keep to their commitment."

Other Jays blogs have had interesting debates on this question in the past couple of days, with many different viewpoints being expressed and no simple consensus about who is right or wrong.  Despite the flip dismissive comments of MatO and TamRa, the majority of Bauxites have always been interested in empirical facts and honest debate, and I'm confident that they wouldn't want issues to be censored or silenced by a small minority of people who disagree with it.  If TamRa feels that I'm a "drama queen" for debating something that MLB's official website is discussing at great length, I hope he is sending his angry messages to Gregor Chisholm as well.  Here is the link to Gregor's article:

http://toronto.bluejays.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20110202&content_id=16555818&vkey=news_tor&c_id=tor

MatO - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 04:51 PM EST (#229914) #

My problem with you China Fan is that you use every single opportunity to question whether the Jays think JPA will be the  catcher this year even though AA himself has stated that he has nothing left to learn in AAA and needs to play.

 

CeeBee - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 04:58 PM EST (#229915) #
This is sort of like fishing..... bait the hook and sure enough......
China fan - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 05:09 PM EST (#229917) #

MatO, you're misinterpreting my position.  Of course JPA must play in the majors this year.  Everyone agrees on that.  The only question is whether it's something on the order of 4 games a week at catcher (with a game or two at DH or 1B) or whether it's 5 or 6 games a week at catcher.  Not a huge difference, and that's not what I'm debating at this point.  (But even JPA's playing time was my focus -- is it an invalid subject for debate?  It's not an attack on JPA to debate his appropriate useage.)   If you look at my last post, you'll notice that it was actually on a much different subject:  Anthopolous and his promises to free agents.  I think it's an interesting question, and so did Gregor of MLB.com.   And to respond to the other point:  it's not baiting or provocation, it's simply an interesting issue.  For example: should AA have the right to promise a full year of playing time to a free agent, regardless of changing circumstances over the course of the season?  Is it a reasonable promise to make to a player?  Is it enforceable?  Should the promise be ditched if rookies arrive on the scene?  Does it help the Jays in the long-term future if AA is known to be a straight-shooter with the free agents that he signs?   These are all valid subjects for discussion, surely?  

If there is a deafening silence on those questions, then I guess it's a boring subject, not worthy of discussion.  But I'm tossing it out there for discussion if anyone wishes.

92-93 - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 05:57 PM EST (#229919) #

100-110g with 450 PA would be a nice total for Arencibia. A 50/50 timeshare with Molina wouldn't be the end of the world if the team is competitive and Farrell believes JPA is holding the team back from winning while he holds the pitchers back from developing. He seemed to indicate that JPA's ability to call a game would directly correlate how often he plays. If his reduced playing time is for reasons other than rest and an inability to catch at the MLB level, then we have a problem on our hands.

should AA have the right to promise a full year of playing time to a free agent, regardless of changing circumstances over the course of the season?

Of course.

Is it a reasonable promise to make to a player?

No.

Is it enforceable?

No.

Should the promise be ditched if rookies arrive on the scene?

No. It shouldn't be made, certainly not to acquire veterans scrambling for a job like John Buck. (And let me be clear, I am still not willing to agree that this promise was even made - it was just the easiest solution to explaining September 2010.)

Does it help the Jays in the long-term future if AA is known to be a straight-shooter with the free agents that he signs?

Yes, but marginally. Money will always talk. Honesty about your playing time situation would go a long way for the players at the bottom of the ladder though, who probably want to find jobs where they know where they stand from the start.

TamRa - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 06:04 PM EST (#229920) #
Leaving aside the irony of TamRa lecturing anyone about verbosity..

Feel free to quote me to refresh our memories.
Magpie - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 06:07 PM EST (#229921) #
One can hope that he might follow the Herzogian novel rather than the "Thou shalt not bring in your closer before the ninth inning" scripture.

You liked how Herzog ran his bullpen? (I liked many, many things about the White Rat, but this always gave me pause.)
TamRa - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 06:09 PM EST (#229922) #
If you look at my last post, you'll notice that it was actually on a much different subject:  Anthopolous and his promises to free agents.

Oh? Look at your last post? and ignore THIS one:

Molina starting more than once a week?  JPA breaking in slowly?  Well, it must be yet another example of John Farrell's longstanding bias in favor of veterans and his prejudice against rookies....  He must be trying to help Molina get a nice free-agent contract in 2012.....

Obviously you were introducing nice, high-minded discussion of"Anthopolous and his promises to free agents. "

How silly of me not to see it.

Way to race for the high ground there sport.
Magpie - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 06:13 PM EST (#229923) #
Without getting into why Anthopoulos would double down on his position, I'll say this with respect to honesty - if you're going to actually lie to a player, it's much, much better if the GM does the lying. Once the players believe that the field manager is lying to them, it's all over. Never mind Tim Johnson - it's a major reason Billy Martin couldn't stay anywhere longer than two years. (Billy could no more tell the truth than he could stay out of a bar...)

Thomas - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 06:54 PM EST (#229926) #
No. It shouldn't be made, certainly not to acquire veterans scrambling for a job like John Buck. (And let me be clear, I am still not willing to agree that this promise was even made - it was just the easiest solution to explaining September 2010.)

Well, the "easiest" solution could well have been to say it was the manager's decision. He's no longer with the club and Anthopolous has been clear that, while he's in constant communication with the manager, he leaves decisions on the lineup and strategy to the field boss.

However, leaving that aside, what, if anything, will convince you such a promise was made? I can understand your hesitancy to accept the commentsv at face value, but Anthopolous has been very candid, when he chooses to speak, throughout his time as GM. Short of an audio recording of the conversation itself, is there anything that would cause you to accept that this promise was made to Buck?

92-93 - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 07:09 PM EST (#229927) #

Well, the "easiest" solution could well have been to say it was the manager's decision.

If everyone is so worried about the FO's reputation when it comes to prospective players & agents, why does this consideration go out the window when it comes to coaches & managers? I've said this numerous times - did you want AA to defecate on Clarence's reputation as he walked out the door? The easiest way to handle the situation was to put the blame on the FO and make the player & manager, who have no reason to deny the allegations, look better.

However, leaving that aside, what, if anything, will convince you such a promise was made? I can understand your hesitancy to accept the commentsv at face value, but Anthopolous has been very candid, when he chooses to speak, throughout his time as GM. Short of an audio recording of the conversation itself, is there anything that would cause you to accept that this promise was made to Buck?

No. First of all, at this point I want to give AA the benefit of the doubt that with Arencibia already in the PCL he wasn't stupid enough to guarantee a one-year stop gap solution C everyday playing time in September. Secondly, my problem is with the timing - tons of ink was spilled on the Arencibia/Buck situation in September that would have been easily cleared up at the time if the FO just let everyone know what was going on. That they didn't spoke to me of an internal strife that AA wasn't yet sure how to confront, and decided wasn't his worthwhile to start picking a bone with a manager on his way out.

but Anthopolous has been very candid, when he chooses to speak, throughout his time as GM

Except when it involved this mystery 5m that the team refuses to admit to in the Wells trade.

Magpie - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 07:24 PM EST (#229928) #
with Arencibia already in the PCL he wasn't stupid enough to guarantee a one-year stop gap solution C

You sure? When they were actually negotiating with Buck, Arencibia had just finished hitting .236. In the Pacific Coast League. In view of that, I might have made Buck a promise or two myself.

Obviously, if Anthopoulos had wanted to put the responsibility on the manager he could have easily done so. Easily - without creating a scapegoat, without second-guessing, without throwing him under the bus. He could have made a virtue of it - emphasizing, with the new manager by his side, that the manager is and always shall be, the final authority when it comes to making out the lineup. That's how it was for Gaston, that's how it shall be for Farrell. And as for this particular issue, he did ask Gaston why, Gaston explained his thinking, and so on and so forth. It would not be a remotely difficult thing to do. Hey, if I can think of a good reason to play Buck instead of Arencibia, I'm sure Anthopoulos could come up with something, especially with months to prepare.

Meh. Maybe he was lying, maybe he wasn't. Nobody knows anything. Where's Gordon Liddy and Howard Hunt when you need 'em?
Mike Green - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 09:09 PM EST (#229932) #
Where's Gordon Liddy and Howard Hunt when you need 'em?

Cito might be John "When the going gets tough, the tough get going" Mitchell in this whole thing.  Haldeman, Ehrlichman, John Dean...Watergate was such a great sordid story.

As for my fondness for the White Rat, it wasn't so much his bullpen usage but rather his willingness to depart from the conventions of the time- the five man rotation, for one. 
Magpie - Thursday, February 03 2011 @ 10:34 PM EST (#229935) #
Herzog had some very interesting rotations, especially in St Louis, where he'd be running Andujar out there on three days rest and spotting four or five other starters around him.

Whitey was absolutely fearless. If you were on his roster, he was willing to put you in the game. He was just as willing to use his fifth best relief pitcher in the ninth inning as his best reliever.

Which blew up in his face, rather spectacularly, a few times.
MatO - Friday, February 04 2011 @ 10:49 AM EST (#229946) #
I don't know how to link this but the Sportsnet site has video of of McCown interviewing Keith Law exclusively about Jays prospects.  The video is listed on the homepage as Jays Prospects in the main window if that helps.
cybercavalier - Friday, February 04 2011 @ 12:46 PM EST (#229947) #
Nice update, #2JBrumfield.

Update: The Dodgers has signed Merkin to a minor league contract.

Gerry - Saturday, February 05 2011 @ 10:23 AM EST (#229981) #

The Yankees signed Eric Chavez.  Given that Chavez took a deal to back up A-Rod, I assume the Jays interest was not strong.  If the Jays were seriously interested you would think Chavez would have chosen a spot to play, Toronto, rather than a backup spot in New York.

With Pedro Feliz now off the market too it seems certain that the Jays will go with Jose Bautista at third base this season.

Jeremy Sandler in the National Post has a follow-up story on James Paxton and Jake Eliopoulos.  Both are still waiting to start their professional careers.

cybercavalier - Saturday, February 05 2011 @ 12:26 PM EST (#229983) #
The Yankees signed Eric Chavez.  Given that Chavez took a deal to back up A-Rod, I assume the Jays interest was not strong.  If the Jays were seriously interested you would think Chavez would have chosen a spot to play, Toronto, rather than a backup spot in New York.

I don' know but methinks the Jays needs to be more aggressive in minor league signing. For example, Marlins and Braves signed respectively Chris Lubanski and Shawn Bowman to MLC with ST invitations; you would think Bowman can fill Vegas 3B and Lubanski could be an option besides Corey Patterson. One could argue that the AAA should fit their roster to the needs of the MLB parent roster and the farm system promotions, say Jeroloman, Adam Calderone and possibly Lawrie but would it be more beneficial to everyone if some crucial pieces of last year AAA roster other than internal player transactions (promotion, demotion) could have been resigned?  So far only Sean Henn was kept. IMO, Lubanski and Bowman would have been kept. Dopirak would still go to another club with the imminent Lind's test at 1B.

Vegas' non pitcher roster if Lubanski and Bowman were kept:

C
Jeroloman, Budde, (a third left handed AAAA catcher who could also play IF? I recall a poster here recommended fellow Canadian John Suomi)

IF
Jason Lane 1B/RF, Scott Campbell (with question marks on his performance?), Shawn Bowman, Callix Crabbe

OF
Chris Lubanski, Corey Patterson, Danny Perales, (resigning Aaron Matthews?), Adam Calderone or Ricardo Nanita
Gerry - Saturday, February 05 2011 @ 12:32 PM EST (#229984) #
Starting Monday Da Box will preview potential minor league rosters but you are forgetting Brett Lawrie, David Cooper, Manny Mayorson, Jesus Merchan, Mike McCoy, Darin Mastroianni, Eric Thames and Adam Loewen.
cybercavalier - Saturday, February 05 2011 @ 10:14 PM EST (#229991) #
Thanks Gerry. My point was to put more attention in minor league rosters while taking AAA as an example. For the few names mentioned, they might spend 2011 season in minor leagues other than AAA. Loewen might start 2011 in AA. But their whereabouts would be off my original topic. By the way, when did major league teams fill up their high level (AAA, AA) minor league rosters? The Marlins AAA seems to be filling up pretty fast with their frequent signing this offseason, even before spring training when the makeup on minor league rosters are usually decided.
7 Photos - Green 7-47 Edition | 35 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.