Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
On July 28, despite all their trials and tribulations, the Blue Jays had a 51-49 record. While there was a posse of contenders in their way, they were still 3.5 games out of a post-season berth.

Then came what can best be described as a Death Spiral.


The Jays would lose 11 of their next 13. They didn't fall out of the hunt - they plummeted, as Peter Cook once memorably described the efforts of sheep attempting to fly.

What happened? Easy. They stopped scoring runs. They allowed 64 runs in those 13 games. That's not great - it's 4.92 per game in a league where the average is 4.42. But even more appalling, they scored just 31 times in those 13 games. Eight times they scored just 1 or 2 runs, and they lost all eight of those games.

So let's look at how everybody did during the Death Spiral:

Player         G    PA    AB    R    H    2B   3B   HR  RBI   BB  IBB   SO  HBP  SH  SF  GDP   SB  CS   BAVG  OBP   SLG    OPS

Cooper    12    41    40    5    10    4    0    2    2    1    0    7    0   0   0    0    0   0   .250  .268  .500   .768
Davis    13    55    50   10    14    4    0    1    2    2    0   10    2   0   1    1    5   1   .280  .327  .420   .747
Rasmus    10    43    41    2    11    1    0    2    3    1    0   12    1   0   0    1    0   0   .268  .302  .439   .741
Johnson    12    51    48    3    10    3    0    2    4    2    0   17    1   0   0    0    0   1   .208  .255  .396   .651
Sierra    9    24    24    2     7    1    0    0    2    0    0    3    0   0   0    1    1   0   .292  .292  .333   .625
Encarnacion   13    57    48    3    10    1    0    1    5    8    2    5    0   0   1    1    4   0   .208  .316  .292   .607
Escobar    13    56    50    1    11    1    0    0    2    3    1    8    3   0   0    0    0   0   .220  .304  .240   .544
Gose    10    40    37    3     8    2    0    0    1    1    0   16    0   2   0    0    3   1   .216  .237  .270   .507
Snider    2     7     6    0     1    0    0    0    0    1    0    3    0   0   0    0    0   0   .167  .286  .167   .452
Lawrie     6    22    21    0     3    1    0    0    2    1    0    6    0   0   0    0    0   0   .143  .182  .190   .372
Vizquel    4    12    12    0     2    0    0    0    0    0    0    2    0   0  0    1    0   0   .167  .167  .167   .333
Mathis    11    39    37    2     4    0    0    1    5    0    0   11    0   1   1    0    0   0   .108  .105  .189   .294
Hechevarria    6    19    17    0     1    0    0    0    0    1    0    7    1   0   0    0    0   0   .059  .158  .059   .217
Gomes    7    20    19    0     1    0    0    0    0    1    0    8    0   0   0    0    0   0   .053  .100  .053   .153
                                                                                           
TOTAL        486   450   31    93   18    0    9   28   22    3  115    8   3   3    5   13   3   .207  .255  .307   .561
Hideous.

And as for the pitchers:

Player         G   GS    W    L   SV    IP     H    R   ER   BB   SO   HR  HBP    ERA

Oliver    3    0    0    0    1    2.7    2    0    0    0    1    0    0    0.00
Chavez    1    0    1    0    0    1.0    1    0    0    2    1    0    0    0.00
A.Carpenter    2    0    0    0    0    2.0    1    0    0    3    1    0    0    0.00
Crawford    1    0    0    0    0    0.3    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0.00
Lincoln    4    0    0    0    0    6.0    3    0    0    2    4    0    0    0.00
Jenkins    2    0    0    0    0    4.0    2    0    0    0    2    0    0    0.00
Lyon    5    0    0    0    0    6.0    4    1    1    1   12    0    0    1.50
Janssen    4    0    0    0    1    4.0    1    1    1    1    5    0    1    2.25
Loup    6    0    0    1    0    7.0    4    2    2    1    6    0    0    2.57
Romero    3    3    0    2    0   20.0   15    8    6    9   14    0    0    2.70
Carreno    1    0    0    0    0    2.0    1    1    1    0    1    0    0    4.50
Delabar    6    0    0    0    0    5.7    5    3    3    2    8    1    0    4.76
Villanueva    2    2    0    2    0   12.0   13    7    7    3   13    1    0    5.25
Cecil    2    2    0    1    0   11.7   13    7    7    5    8    3    0    5.40
Alvarez    2    2    0    2    0    9.7   16    9    7    8    3    1    0    6.52
Happ    2    1    0    1    0    6.3   10    5    5    3    9    0    0    7.11
Laffey    3    3    1    2    0   16.3   22   16   16    7    6    3    2    8.82
D.Carpenter    1    0    0    0   0    0.7    3    4    4    1    1    0    1   54.00

TOTAL    50    13    2    11    2    117.3    116  64   60   48   95    9    4    4.60

That's right - the Blue Jays used 18 different pitchers in a single 13 game span in mid-season. It wasn't their biggest problem - far from it - but I'm still having trouble wrapping my mind around it.

Anyway, Romero and the relievers were fine. The other starters were struggling but they were going to need to throw a shutout half the time anyway.


What Happened? | 139 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
adrianveidt - Sunday, August 12 2012 @ 05:20 PM EDT (#262057) #
The flying sheep sketch was by Monty Python. The line about the sheep plummeting was spoken by Graham Chapman.
Flying Sheep
Magpie - Sunday, August 12 2012 @ 05:44 PM EDT (#262059) #
Oh, I certainly remember Python doing it. But I always thought it was one of those sketches (like "Four Yorkshiremen") that they brought with them from one of the earlier shows they were involved in. I remember Peter Cook doing the part! But I could quite easily be confused. Maybe he just filled in later, during a Secret Policeman's show or something....
Richard S.S. - Sunday, August 12 2012 @ 07:12 PM EDT (#262062) #

Since July 28th:

Laffey has had one good start and two stinkers.  Villanueva can't win, and Alvarez hasn't won.  The bullpen has stunk up one game (the 10th).  Since 03 July, Cecil has two poorly pitched N.D. and three decently pitched losses.  

Travis Snider is traded (30 July), about the same time Adam Lind (July 26th) starts having back problems and Arencibia (July 25th) was Injured.  Oh yeah, doesn't Bautista officially go on the D.L., about this time,after being out since the 17th.

On the 20th we acquired Happ, Lyon and D.Carpenter.  On the 30th we acquire Lincoln and Delabar.

Sometimes your depth is just not good enough, and the depth's depth is just not good enough and the depth's depth's depth is just not ready.  One consolation in the 14 games since is the three wins, two losses by one run, one loss by two runs and 5 losses by three runs.  They are not getting badly beat every time.

Gomes and Mathis are the catchers, not offensive assets.  Gose and Hechavarria are bodies to fill spots not offensive assets.  No one called up replaces people left, so how they do will show what we need. 

Craig B - Sunday, August 12 2012 @ 07:17 PM EDT (#262063) #
Since Morrow's second shutout on May 19, the Jays are last in the AL in ERA. What happened isn't that they stopped scoring, what happened is that reality caught up. This team has no pitching.
Richard S.S. - Sunday, August 12 2012 @ 09:03 PM EDT (#262065) #

From April 5th to May 19th, Toronto is 23-18, and in contention.  They go to 24-24 (1-6) by 27 May, as 35 ER are given up by our Starters in 30.33 IP, and are still in contention.  From the 28th of May to the 28th of July, Toronto is 27- 25 (andlosing half the Team to injuries, and are still in contention.   Since then they go 3-11 and fall totally out of contention.  So when they are average or a little better, the Team is 50-43, and when they stink, the Team is 4-17.

This Team has better pitching than some people think, it just wasn`t good enough nor deep enough to take advantage.  If, instead of 4-17 they only go 11-10, this team is 61-53, just 6 games out of the Division lead, but only 1/2 game out of the Wild Card.

And someone thinks this Team has no pitching!

Ryan Day - Sunday, August 12 2012 @ 09:21 PM EDT (#262066) #
No, they've stopped scoring runs, too.

In April, they were 5th in the AL in runs scored.
In May, they were third.
In June, they scored more runs than any other AL team.
In July, they were 8th in the AL.
So far in August, they're 14th.
Paul D - Sunday, August 12 2012 @ 09:37 PM EDT (#262067) #
Yes Richard, if the results had been completely different, the team wouldn't look so bad.
Magpie - Sunday, August 12 2012 @ 09:52 PM EDT (#262069) #
someone thinks this Team has no pitching

Oh, anyone can say they have pitching. But it's blindingly obvious that the pitching they have just isn't good enough. They're 12th best in a 14 team league.
scottt - Sunday, August 12 2012 @ 10:37 PM EDT (#262071) #
The pitching hasn't been very good all year. The only thing that worry me about the offense is Bautista's wrist.

Mike Green - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 09:23 AM EDT (#262072) #
An offensive core of Lawrie, Rasmus, Snider and Encarnacion was good enough to help the club limp along with poor pitching and Bautista out, but by early in the slump, the club was a couple of bricks shy of a core.
John Northey - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 10:43 AM EDT (#262075) #
Well, the killer has been injuries and the kids not being ready just yet.

Losing McGowan should've been expected, having Cecil completely collapse was a bit of a surprise (he should've been an endurable 90-95 ERA+ guy).  Litsch should've been a good backup plan in the 90-100 ERA+ range.  Morrow finally showed Ace material but has been gone awhile.  Romero should've been at least league average but instead is at 82.  Alvarez has been about all we should've expected for a 22 year old.  Hutchison was looking promising as he got his feet wet but then went kabloom. 

I doubt even the most pessimistic had the Jays at this point with just 2 guys over 96 for ERA+ with one on the DL (Morrow) and Villanueva as the second and just 2 guys with more than 13 starts (Romero & Alvarez).  That is tough for anyone to overcome.

Losing the closer, having the backup closer suck hard (not too shocking) didn't help either.

A team 96 ERA+ was not what we expected.  11 different starters with over a month to go also wasn't expected.

Still, compared to the last 'year from hell' aka 2004 it isn't too bad (67-94, 87 OPS+, 98 ERA+). 

2004 saw a kiddie core (sub 25) of Brandon League, Gustavo Chacin, Dave Bush pitching and Guillermo Quiroz, Russ Adams, Alex Rios, Gabe Gross hitting.
2012 has seen a kiddie core (sub 25) of Drew Hutchison, Henderson Alvarez, Sam Dyson, Chad Jenkins, Aaron Loup, Kyle Drabek pitching and Anthony Gose, Brett Lawrie, Adeiny Hechavarria, Moises Sierra, Travis Snider (traded), Yan Gomes hitting.

No question that AA has got the kids up and getting a shot vs the old days.  6 pitchers vs 3 and 6 hitters vs 4.  In 1982 (just before the Jays became good) there were 4 sub 25 hitters (Geno Petralli, Jesse Barfield, Lloyd Moseby, Alfredo Griffin) and 3 pitchers (Mark Eichhorn, Jim Gott, Dave Stieb).  Now _that_ was a good group (2 solid relievers and a star ace plus 2 AS outfielders a decent SS and a good backup catcher).  Sadly we need this group to produce even more in quantity of solid players, doubt anyone here now is a Stieb level (near HOF quality talent).
Ryan Day - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 10:57 AM EDT (#262076) #
Actually, it was Arencibia, not Rasmus, helping keep the team afloat in July. JPA was on one of his ridiculous hot streaks, hitting 321/345/736 in July, while Rasmus was floundering about at 191/284/372.
Richard S.S. - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 11:45 AM EDT (#262077) #

I found this http://www.sportsnet.ca/baseball/2012/08/12/alex_anthopoulos_toronto_blue_jays_off_season_needs/ item to be encouraging.

Morrow and Romero, plus two or three acquisitions, will form the Starting Rotation (4 or 5).  With Drabek and Hutchison missing all of 2013 (most likely scenario), our depth of field is lacking.   Henderson Alvarez is our 5th or 6th Starter; Brett Cecil becomes # 6; our # 7 Starter is someone named who.   Maybe Chad Jenkins becomes a viable # 7 Starter or a # 7 Reliever.   This lack indicates to me, that Three Starters will likely be acquired.

The Kids, as a group, have been struggling, while trying hard.  These Kids form the depth of this Team going forward.   Some are much closer, without naming the obvious names, to being ready than some others.  Morrow will return; Bautista will return; Lawrie will return; Frasor will return; Lind will return; Arencibia may not.   As to whom shall be called up in September?   Not Stroman, unless he's on the Team going forward.  The 40-man Roster will be the cast of characters chosen.   This is basically going to be a depth audtion for most, but for others, a decision gets made on who is to be removed from the 40-man this offseason.

John Northey - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 11:46 AM EDT (#262078) #
Consistent this team is not. sOPS+ by month...

JPA: 45-138-46-187-na - good he is hurt this month given the pattern
Rasmus: 97-104-137-79-164 - June & August woohoo, July uh oh
Davis: 76-146-96-88-106 - killer May
Escobar: 51-98-89-85-40 - 3 OK between 2 horrid
Johnson: 114-120-64-77-81 - 2 good to start, 3 bad after

But some have been good even in off months...
Encarnacion: 191-118-165-194-144 ('weak' May)

Interesting eh?
Paul D - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 11:53 AM EDT (#262079) #
Isn't Frasor a free agent after this season? I'd assume that he's not going to return.
John Northey - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 11:55 AM EDT (#262081) #
Wow Richard, that is the best sounding article in a long time.  AA is clearly talking of spending and spending big this winter. 
Potential Free Agents: http://www.baseballprospectus.com/compensation/cots/?page_id=177
Does any name jump out at anyone here?  Zack Greinke is an interesting one (issues in LAA, but solid K/9 and BB/9 and HR/9 figures plus had a 203 ERA+ a few years ago.


Richard S.S. - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 11:57 AM EDT (#262082) #
Sorry, the list of returnees was from the DL this year.
Paul D - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 12:00 PM EDT (#262083) #
Sorry, the list of returnees was from the DL this year. Ah. I think I'd be looking at Marcum if I were AA. He's not an ace, but he's solid, and he's familiar with the team and city and seemed to like it here.
Richard S.S. - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 12:07 PM EDT (#262084) #
Richard S.S. - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 12:10 PM EDT (#262085) #

John

It's bizzare, your link doesn't work?  My Copy and Paste does?

greenfrog - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 12:38 PM EDT (#262086) #
All I can say is, someone is going to pay Greinke a ton of money (over at least six years). He's clearly the prize among this year's FA starters (especially now that Cain and Hamels are off the market). I imagine the Jays will be making inquiries, but I have to think some other team is going to outbid Toronto.
Richard S.S. - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 12:44 PM EDT (#262087) #

My preference for Free Agent Pitchers are (in order): Zach Greinke (RHP), (28); Brandon McCarthy (RHP), (29); Edwin Jackson (RHP), (28); Shaun Marcum (RHP), (30) and that's it.  No one else looks better than Henderson Alvarez, unless someone is seeing something I'm not.

Now as for a Trade or two, assets are meant to be used.  Trading two Top Stud prospects et al (4 or 5 more) for a Star Pitcher should be a no brainer.  That shouldn't "strip" the system as some fear, because if we can't do that, our minor system sucks.

2013 must be the year.   Bautista will, at some time, start to decline - slowly or rapidly - it will happen.   While he's still very effective, we must take advantage of his abilities.   Either "go for it", or Trade Him while his value is still high.   It's simple, one or the other - pick one.

greenfrog - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 01:07 PM EDT (#262089) #
I would avoid Marcum. I've always liked him, but he probably carries too much injury risk going forward.

Jackson is a nice SP, but he's going to get paid a lot, assuming he continues his successful year with the first-place Nats. Last year he was relatively under the radar, but not anymore. Is he worth four or five years in a bidding war?

I don't know much about McCarthy, but looking at his stats I see two potential red flags: (1) health (he has never pitched more than 170.2 IP, and has amassed only 84 IP so far this year); and (2) home/road splits (his stats this year and last are a lot better in the spacious Coliseum than on the road).

I would rather see the Jays pass on the above names and go hard after Greinke, offering him Hamels and Cain money or more. But I expect the bidding to be fierce, with the winner offering ridiculous money that Rogers (perhaps prudently) won't match.

It's the usual problem when it comes to acquiring starting pitching, whether via the trade or FA market: supply and demand.
Gerry - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 02:22 PM EDT (#262090) #

I have to admit to being cynical about AA's weekend comments.  First, i would simplify his comments this way:

The offense was at the top of the league before guys got hurt so we think we are good there for next year.

The bullpen, with the new additions, is in a good place too and it is fine for next year.

The rotation is the one spot where the Jays need help, up to three new starters would be good.

 

OK, so how are we going to get these new starters?  The choice comes down to free agency or trade.  An AL East quality starter is not going to be ready internally next year.

I am not optimistic about free agency.  The pool is limited.  Free agents can name their preferred location and their price.  AA has never indicated he would be willing to go crazy with spending on free agents.  A free agent on a one or two year deal at a competitive contract?  Sure he would be all over that.  But why should we expect a reasonable free agency period for pitchers this fall?  There are a couple of teams with new owners and deep pockets which will also inflate contracts.  So before we get all excited about Zach Greinke get me excited about Rogers increasing payroll, or AA being willing to bid high, or AA being interested in long term free agent contracts for pitchers.  I don't see it for the big name guys.

This gets me to the second option, trades.  I suspect this will be the approach AA will take.  So who is tradeable?  I see the following: JP Arencibia; Yunel Escobar; Anthony Gose; Jake Marisnick; and a couple of the young pitchers.  Arencibia and Escobar can be traded because there are internal options, I am not saying they are equally valuable internal options, just from a body perspective.  Rasmus makes one of Gose or Marisnick expendable, and pitchers always have value although A ball pitchers have less value that those in AA.

If AA trades Arencibia and Escobar, then his argument that the 2012 offense was #1 and will be fine in 2013 is gone, unless you believe d'Arnaud and Hechavarria will provide equal value in 2013.

 

So my cynical view if that the Jays will not sign a "top" pitching free agent.  They might sign a marginal guy, they will try for trades but you have to give up value to get value and giving up value will have a cost.

AA is talking a page out of Beeston's book, the future is bright, don't look at the present.  Remember there are years of playoffs coming.

Mike Green - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 02:42 PM EDT (#262092) #
Perhaps the club will be in on the free agent left-fielder pool, which might be deeper and more inviting than the starting pitcher pool.  I still think that the club had a significantly better outlook going into 2012 than it does now. 
grjas - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 03:11 PM EDT (#262093) #
" I still think that the club had a significantly better outlook going into 2012 than it does now. "

No question. A year ago, I was neutral on 2012 but upbeat on 2013. Now feeling neutral or worse on 2013. Depends on what rabbits AA can pull from the SP hat, one way or the other. But also there are a lot of injuries to "return" from in the lineup, bullpen and rotation, and it will be interesting to see how many players are fully recovered..
greenfrog - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 03:40 PM EDT (#262094) #
Gerry, I basically agree. I don't really buy AA's comments to the effect that "whereas last season we were trying to fill multiple holes, this season we can focus exclusively on starting pitching." I'm quite confident that AA is capable of discussing multiple areas at the same time. The team had many weeks to participate in the Latos or Gonzalez or Jackson negotiations if it so chose (and was reportedly one of the finalists for Latos).

I'm also not sure that the offense is currently as great as he's suggesting (eg, Lind DH, Arencibia C, Davis LF, Escobar SS, and no promising option at 2B).

My guess is that the main challenge last off-season wasn't simultaneously conducting trade discussions with several teams to address multiple areas of need; rather, it was the same as it will be this off-season: the high cost of adding talented SPs.
Richard S.S. - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 03:55 PM EDT (#262095) #

It should be accepted by everyone that the chances of Syndergaard, Nicolino or Sanchez being a 200 inning-ready MLB Starter in 2015 is remote, if ever.  As good as they are, they have a long, long way to go.   There is no reason not to make any one of them available in a Trade.

Trading d'Arnaud makes better sense than trading the established Arencibia when you are "going for it".   Rasmus blocks Gose.   Gose's abilities are wasted in LF, Sierra can do that job well.   Does Hechavarria have more trade value than Escobar?  Maybe not.

Offering Syndergaard (most asked for), d'Arnaud (injury-prone?) and Gose as the main items of your (5-7 player) package should get your Stud Pitcher, especially from a Team not ready to contend.   Minnesota, Seattle, Kansas City, Miami, Chicago, Houston, San Diego and Colorado might be open for dealing.   The other Teams are harder to read.   I can see a big Trade happening.

As for Free Agents, I can see A.A. being able to got up to $20.0MM per season as well as up to 6 years with one or two option years, if he really means what he says.  Other than Greinke, I won`t give anyone that kind of money.

Ryan Day - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 04:20 PM EDT (#262098) #
Rasmus blocks Gose.

At this point, Gose's bat blocks Gose, and will likely continue to do so for at least another year.
greenfrog - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 04:48 PM EDT (#262101) #
It's not clear to me that apart from the few farmhands at the top of the heap (d'Arnaud, Sanchez, Syndergaard) that it will be easy to trade prospects for top-tier talent. Will teams be willing to part with the equivalent of Mat Latos and Gio Gonzalez for players like Gose, Marisnick, Nicolino, Hechavarria, Sierra? I have my doubts. And most of the Jays' best talent is in the lower levels of the minors, so it's hard for teams (including the Jays) to assess their value.

Personally, I think the Jays are somewhat betwixt and between. Good farm system, but most of the best talent is a long ways off. Decent major-league team, but still several pieces short of being a really good ballclub, while the competition is fierce and the budget is limited. Perhaps there is a way to bolster the team's competitiveness without sacrificing the rebuilding process that a year or two ago pretty much everyone agreed was necessary. I don't really know.
Kasi - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 04:59 PM EDT (#262103) #
Most of those teams don't even have a stud pitcher Richard. Certainly the Twins, Royals, Astros, Padres and Rockies don't. Cubs maybe do with Samardjia or Garza. Mariners certainly do with Fernandez, although I doubt they'd trade him. Miami maybe with Johnson, but given his health I'd be wary.

If we're going to trade a bunch of our future, we better get a strong SP back who is young, proven and controllable. Otherwise one or two bad trades and we screw our minor league depth for no gain.
Moe - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 05:04 PM EDT (#262104) #
As for Free Agents, I can see A.A. being able to got up to $20.0MM per season as well as up to 6 years with one or two option years, if he really means what he says.  Other than Greinke, I won`t give anyone that kind of money.

I don't think there is a single FA available I would give 6/20 for. Maybe Greinke and that won't get it done.

I see nothing in AA comments that suggest to me that the Jays would break the "max 5 years" rule. And if I had to guess, the Jays will avoid giving anyone a bigger deal than Bautista's deal. So, I predict Anibal Sanchez.

However, I got the sense that AA is willing to swing a deal using prospects. But even there I wouldn't expect Felix Hernandez but rather Shields (getting expensive for the Rays).


Richard S.S. - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 06:07 PM EDT (#262107) #

Two points to remember:

1) 9/11.  The border used to be like crossing the street.  Now it`s very intrusive.   As the Guys at Baseball Central At Noon said, all thing being equal ...then said Toronto has to buy those problems away (spend the money).   Anthopoulos must understand just how much more he must pay to get Top Free Agents to come here now.  He needs to offer $3.0MM - $5.0MM more per year; and 2-3 more years with option years.

2) Jose Bautista saying, ``trade me``.   If I`m Bautista, after this injury, I want a Trade if the Rotation is not much, much better.   If that happens, I don`t see how A.A. stays as GM.

greenfrog - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 06:27 PM EDT (#262108) #
For bullpen aficionados, have a look at Aroldis Chapman's stats this year (at age 24). Simply amazing:

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/c/chapmar01.shtml

I don't know which is more impressive: the K rate or the drastic decrease in his BB rate. In any case, it's really too bad the Jays weren't more aggressive when he was available on the IFA market (no question he was a pretty big gamble, though).
China fan - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 06:28 PM EDT (#262109) #
"....9/11. The border used to be like crossing the street. Now it`s very intrusive..."

That's perhaps true if you're driving across the border, but MLB teams do not drive across the border. They fly. And the changes aren't very evident if you're flying -- except that you have to carry a passport now, whereas in the past you could sometimes get away with carrying just a driver's license. Is there really a large cohort of MLB players who strongly object to carrying a passport? I would assume that virtually all MLB players (including all the non-Americans) already have a passport. The only conceivable exception would be a few parochial American players who refuse to travel abroad. How many free agents would refuse to sign with Toronto because it would require them to obtain a passport? Is this really a huge burden? Don't they have agents who can take care of their passport application?

I just don't think that MLB players find it so onerous to deal with a occasional passport queue on their Toronto trips. And don't MLB teams already arrange the VIP service at the airport, so their players can skip the regular queue?
scottt - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 06:52 PM EDT (#262110) #
LF and DH might be ok, but the Jays have no one at second.

What I would do is offer an extra year and a buy out option, but not a no-trade clause. Whenever the prospects are ready, unload to a contending team and move along.
greenfrog - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 06:56 PM EDT (#262111) #
He needs to offer $3.0MM - $5.0MM more per year; and 2-3 more years with option years.

Ah, memories of AJ Burnett and BJ Ryan...
Richard S.S. - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 08:28 PM EDT (#262116) #
Paying Tax on earnings in Canada, those pesky 81 Home games, is mandatory.   Paying for Universal Health, over and above whatever thay have, is mandatory or at least was.   Custom`s not always a wave through even with passports, and it`s an extra burden for Wives and Children, sometimes onerous.  There`s buying homes (expensive in Toronto) and arranging schools.   Those are not problems, just hassles, which will never happen if they don`t sign here.  All things being equal - money - years - playing time - no one comes here.
CeeBee - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 08:55 PM EDT (#262117) #
Off topic:
Johnny Pesky died today at the ripe old age of 92. I'm not sure but he might be the only player to have a foul pole named after him. R.I.P. Johnny.
Richard S.S. - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 09:04 PM EDT (#262118) #
Thanks CeeBee.
Paul D - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 09:40 PM EDT (#262120) #
I really think that the 'you can't sign guys in Canada" is seriously over rated.  The problem is losing, not Canada.
greenfrog - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 09:43 PM EDT (#262121) #
Delabar just struck out four batters in one inning. Impressive.
Spifficus - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 10:00 PM EDT (#262124) #
Those two innings were insanely impressive. Plenty of swings and misses on the fastball, and no one stood a chance on that splitter. Heck, he even threw a good slider to Rios to boot, but was just off the corner.
Ryan Day - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 10:13 PM EDT (#262125) #
Steve Delabar is my new favourite Blue Jay.

I was sure that Juan Guzman once struck out four in an inning, but apparently I imagined that.
Ryan Day - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 10:21 PM EDT (#262126) #
According to MLB, Delabar is the first pitcher to ever strike out four batters in an extra inning.

Baseball: Who the heck knows what's gonna happen?
greenfrog - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 10:51 PM EDT (#262127) #
I've been thinking about AA's comment that the offense is basically set for 2013. My best guess for next year's starting lineup (barring further additions) would be something like:

1. Lawrie 3B
2. Rasmus CF
3. Bautista RF
4. EE 1B/DH
5. Lind/Cooper/??? DH/1B
6. Escobar SS
7. ???/Davis/Sierra LF
8. Arencibia/d'Arnaud C
9. ???/Hechavarria 2B

I don't know - the offense still seems to have a lot of question marks once you get past the presumptive first four batters in the lineup. It also doesn't look all that great to me, at least on paper - again, apart from 1-4, which looks pretty good (it would be a fantastic quartet if Lawrie and Rasmus had a higher OBP).
Ryan Day - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 11:17 PM EDT (#262128) #
If you believe Escobar can bounce back to something around his career norms, then he takes Rasmus' place at the top of the lineup, and Rasmus can take his power behind Bautista & Edwin.

Lawrie's hitting 291/339/469 out of the leadoff spot this year, and I think he can improve on that; at least for a few years, I see him as a very good 1 or 2 hitter. Someone just needs to either a) teach him how to steal, or b) tell him to stop trying to steal.
greenfrog - Monday, August 13 2012 @ 11:29 PM EDT (#262129) #
Even if you believe in Escobar (I respect his defence, but am a skeptic about his bat), who is going to play LF, DH, 2B? That's a third of your offense up in the air - hardly a situation in which you want your GM to say, "We're set! Let's go get some starting pitching." Do you really want to see the Jays field a lineup that features Escobar, Davis, Lind and Hechavarria among its starting nine?
Spifficus - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 12:22 AM EDT (#262132) #

Baseball: Who the heck knows what's gonna happen?

It's truly wonderful that way, isn't it? I mean, you can see Humber throw a perfect game, Davis turn a good read into a catch of the year contender, Kevin Frandsen hitting a homer off of Strasburg, or countless other improbable events on any given night.

Landomar - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 01:11 AM EDT (#262133) #

Yeah, the offense does seem to have some holes for 2013.  2B, LF, and 1B/DH will need attention.

If we just re-sign Johnson, and acquire an OF to compete with Davis for playing time, then we'd look alright.  Johnson is inconsistent, but he's capable of hitting very well, and we'd just have to hope we'd get one of his better years next season.  A proven, consistent hitter at 2B is not going to be easy to acquire, and Johnson is likely going to be the best option for us.  A legit big bat 1B or DH instead of Cooper or Lind would be nice, but improving our rotation should be the priority.

Escobar, Johnson, Bautista, Encarnacion, Rasmus, Lawrie, Cooper, Arencibia, Davis/someguy

That's respectable enough, and if we fix our rotation, that group has enough talent to succeed if things go well.  The d'Arnaud, Hechevarria, Gose, Sierra group at AAA is also interesting depth to have for potential pleasant surprises during the season (Gose and Hech clearly aren't ready now, but perhaps they will be during 2013 at some point).

Oceanbound - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 03:36 AM EDT (#262135) #
When does Villanueva become a legit option for next year's rotation? Is he one already?
TamRa - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 05:11 AM EDT (#262136) #
has been for a while, in my view. I'd rather resign him as throw our money at rotation filler from elsewhere. Plus you might very well get a much better cost/benefit ratio from him than from say a Saunders or a Marcum or a Floyd just on the percieved value of being "established"
Paul D - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 08:14 AM EDT (#262138) #
Could Sierra play LF next year?  He looks like he could be a decent option.
greenfrog - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 08:32 AM EDT (#262140) #
Keith Law recently described Sierra as a fourth outfielder in the majors.

I too have thought for a while that it makes sense to keep Villanueva. But at this point I think it's too late to prevent him from testing the free agent waters. Virtually all teams need quality starting and relief pitching. The season ends in less than two months, so the Jays no longer have much leverage. Villanueva will have multiple suitors (presumably including the Jays) in the off-season - why not (a) get the most lucrative contract he can (at age 28, he's in his prime), and (b) try to secure a berth in some team's rotation?
Moe - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 09:46 AM EDT (#262142) #
Villanueva will have multiple suitors (presumably including the Jays) in the off-season - why not (a) get the most lucrative contract he can (at age 28, he's in his prime), and (b) try to secure a berth in some team's rotation?

The interesting question would be whether the Jays would consider offering him arbitration (or whatever it's called now). He would be guaranteed a 1 year 12.5m contract which is a bit much for one year but he should be in line for multiple years at maybe 8m if he keeps pitching like this.


hypobole - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 10:00 AM EDT (#262143) #
It's called a qualifying offer and will be in the $13.2-13.3 million range. Ain't gonna happen. If Villanueva returns to the Jays, it will be a multi-year deal.

Three quality starting pitchers (Anibal Sanchez, Ryan Dempster , Zack Grienke) changed teams before the trade deadline, going from the NL to AL. Their combined lines in the AL:
56.2 IP, 82 H, 50 R, 46 ER, 22 BB, 44 K, 7.31 ERA.
Grienke has been "best" with a 5.63 ERA, Sanchez at 7.97, and Dempster at 8.31. Ugh.
greenfrog - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 10:10 AM EDT (#262144) #
At least the Jays re-upped Encarnacion. Can you imagine if he was headed for free agency this off-season? He might even be more valuable than Bautista at this point.
jerjapan - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 10:28 AM EDT (#262145) #
According to Cot's, Villanueva is making roughly 2.3 million this year.  I'm no salary guru, but why would he command a qualifying offer north of 10 million?  he's topped out at 13 starts in the bigs (last year) and was basically given to us by Milwaukee.  he's had a nice run, and I'd try to re-sign him, but he's far from a proven starter.
Mike Green - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 10:31 AM EDT (#262146) #
Theoretical question.  What does Gose have to hit to make him a viable centerfielder, with Rasmus moving to left? ZIPS has him at .230/.295/.365, and I think that would do it, with his defensive and baserunning contributions. 
John Northey - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 10:40 AM EDT (#262148) #
Villanueva is getting interesting.  Fangraphs puts him at $4.3 for this year so far, $5.1 last year (when he started often), $17.6 lifetime for value.  His FIP for last year was 4.10 and is 3.99 this year.  His xFIP is 4.48 last year and 3.84 this year. 

If you expand to a full season of starting he could be as much as a 2.5 win player.  That would be worth about $10 mil.  He is going into his age 29 season, so a 3 year deal covers 29/30/31 which are still prime years.  I'd look at offering a 3 year $15 mil deal right now and see if he bites (career earnings of just shy of $6 mil so far) as even in the pen he'd not be crazy overpaid and if he keeps starting he might be well worth it.  Anyone who'd offer $30 over 3 or more is nuts though.  I'd put his market at the $24 for 3 range if he keeps it up all year. 

jerjapan - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 10:56 AM EDT (#262149) #
Three years at 15 million seems like a good deal for the Jays and Carlos.  If he keeps it up we have a solid bottom of the rotation starter, and having a legit swingman is an appealing plan B.

Another reliever on a 5 million per contract is Lyon, who has 20K vs. 6 baserunners in his 10 innings with the Jays.  I'm thinking he's a valuable waiver-wire trade chip, especially if we can resign Carlos, but given AA's recent comments I'm not sure we are going to be trading major league players.  Given that our pitching has solidified recently and will be dramatically better with Morrow back in a couple of weeks, I'd trade him. 

Ryan Day - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 11:03 AM EDT (#262151) #
Would Lyon even make it through waivers? He's affordable, there's no long-term commitment, and just about everyone could use another reliever.
hypobole - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 11:04 AM EDT (#262152) #
3 yrs/$15 million is a much better deal for the Jays than Carlos.
MatO - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 11:25 AM EDT (#262154) #

Last year Villanueva developed a "tired arm" and had to be pulled from the rotation.  If this happens again in the next 7 weeks then his dream of a big payday likely goes up in smoke. There is some incentive for him to sign earlier rather than wait for FA.

Mike Green - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 11:26 AM EDT (#262155) #
I had a closer look at Villanueva's career splits.  One of the perils of being a swingman is that a pitcher is off regular rest more often than starters in the rotation.  Villanueva has had less than half his career starts on 4 days rest, but when he does get this amount of rest, he pitches at exactly his career ERA+ of 104. 

This makes me less concerned about how he is likely to do in the rotation over 10-15 consecutive starts in the rotation.  The major question to my mind is how his arm will stand up to 160-200 innings.  He is an interesting gamble. 

greenfrog - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 11:29 AM EDT (#262156) #
I think part of the problem for the Jays is that they don't know how Villanueva will hold up over 30+ starts/year for multiple seasons. He's a proven swingman and has looked solid in his recent run of starts, but the track record is limited. He might turn into a dependable full-time SP, or he might be better suited as an RP/swingman. He might be worth the gamble up to a certain price point (especially given his age), but at some point it gets risky. The Jays probably can't afford to pay a long reliever/spot starter $6-10M a year.
Chuck - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 11:29 AM EDT (#262157) #
If Villaneuva cares more about the money than any feelings he specifically has about pitching for Toronto -- a position he is surely entitled to -- he'd do best to forego any talks of extensions and instead test free agency and luxuriate in the ensuing overbidding.

From my perspective, one wonders just how many innings he could offer a team. He figures to log around 130 this year, if he stays healthy, and that would be his career high. Would that be enough to give a team confidence that he could become a 180 IP starter and warrant a 3/24 offer?

AA will have a difficult decision to make. Clearly, he is pressed to acquire starting pitching. But signing Villaneuva with ideas of 30 starts and 180 IP would be a huge roll of the dice. And endurance questions aside, what is Villaneuva's "true" level of ability? Surely he can't be expected to replicate his recent run of good starts. But what level of performance can be reasonably expected of him?
Chuck - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 11:31 AM EDT (#262158) #
Three posts all saying the same thing at the same time. That was spooky.
Oceanbound - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 11:38 AM EDT (#262161) #
Among pitchers in the majors with over 70 IP this season, Villanueva has the 4th lowest contact rate (74%. By contrast, Alvarez has the second highest, at 90.1%). He has always owned a well above average ability to generate whiffs, except for 2011. This year his O-Contact% is 53% (league average 63%). If AA really does value this sort of pitcher then I imagine he'll try very hard to keep V around.
Mike Green - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 12:02 PM EDT (#262162) #
Alvarez has some of the same issues.  What you could do is have each start for half a season and relieve for half a season.  I would guess that you might be able to get 125-130 good innings out of each of them.  I know, I know. This would be way too radical.  Anyways, 125-130 innings of 105 ERA+ pitching is probably worth significantly more than $5 million, but you do have to account for the usual pitcher variability.  Villanueva isn't a starter, but he also isn't the prototypical swingman- as many swings as typical, but many more misses.  Personally, I would probably take the gamble if Villanueva was interested.
uglyone - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 12:34 PM EDT (#262165) #
Career as SP:

C.Villanueva (28): 48gs, 270.1ip, 6.4k/9, 2.8bb/9, 1.38whip, 4.59era, 4.70fip, 4.41xfip

could do worse.

with upside for more if his ability to transfer his always-awesome bullpen K-rate to the rotation this year for the first time is anywhere near legit.

Moe - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 12:36 PM EDT (#262166) #
It's called a qualifying offer and will be in the $13.2-13.3 million range. Ain't gonna happen. If Villanueva returns to the Jays, it will be a multi-year deal.

I agree that IF he keeps pitching like that over another 8 starts, he is in line for a multi-year deal. But I don't think 15m over 3 years is enough in that case. There isn't much pitching available, so I would guess he could get something like 3 yrs and 24m from someone desperate. I'm not saying that's a good idea but looking at the SP available, he is closer to the top than the bottom. He pitched well last year until he got tired and if he can avoid that this year, he looks like someone who can give you 150 innings of average pitching. That's pretty valuable, more than most realize.

In that case, the Jays could risk making a qualifying offer. He might take it because it's more per year than he will get on the open market. But if he feels he could get double that over 3 years, he might prefer the security. It still seems unlikely but if he keeps this up (big if), he will be one of the more interesting off-season stories. For sure, of all the players on the roster, he has the most to loose over the next 6 weeks.


According to Cot's, Villanueva is making roughly 2.3 million this year.  I'm no salary guru, but why would he command a qualifying offer north of 10 million?

In order to get a compensation draft pick, the team has to offer a one year deal at the average salary (~13m). It's to avoid collecting compensation picks for easily replaceable players, especially RP.


greenfrog - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 12:44 PM EDT (#262167) #
It's a nice idea, but you would have to think Villanueva accepts a QO (which wouldn't be the worst thing if the Jays' budget was a lot bigger). It might be different if he had posted his 140 ERA+ after starting all season, which would increase the drool factor among bidders significantly.

However you slice it, the Jays are going to have to find ways to field a deeper, stronger rotation next year. If V isn't the answer, someone else is going to have to be.
uglyone - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 12:47 PM EDT (#262168) #
Villanueva as SP year by year:

2006 (22): 6gs, 36.2p, 6.4k/9, 2.2bb/9, 1.15whip, 3.93era, 4.84fip, 4.32xfip
2007 (23): 6gs, 35.0ip, 6.4k/9, 4.4bb/9, 1.31whip, 2.06era, 4.75fip, 4.85xfip
2008 (24): 9gs, 49.0ip, 5.7k/9, 2.9bb/9, 1.63whip, 6.43era, 6.09fip, 4.82xfip
2009 (25): 6gs, 29.0ip, 5.3k/9, 3.7bb/9, 1.69whip, 6.52era, 5.86fip, 4.71xfip
2010 (26): ---
2011 (27): 13gs, 73.1ip, 5.2k/9, 2.0bb/9, 1.38whip, 5.15era, 4.12fip, 4.48xfip
2012 (28): 8gs, 47.1ip, 9.5k/9, 2.7bb/9, 1.14whip, 3.04era, 3.31fip, 3.43xfip


I've always thought his K-splits from SP to RP were inexplicably extreme, a guy who consistently K'd over 9/ip as a long reliever but sat in the 5-6/ip range as an SP in most years never really made sense to me.....so him bringing that 9+ Krate to the rotation this year isn't a massive shock to me, and would be reason for a legit bump in expectations as an SP....though on the other hand, there's plenty of warning signs that he can't keep that up as an SP going forward.
Moe - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 12:57 PM EDT (#262169) #
I just looked over Villanueva's starts from this year and I noticed (a) he didn't start against one team twice and (b) he faced some of the less offenses around and avoided NYY and TEX. Odds are, he won't keep pitching like this for another 8 starts.



Hodgie - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 01:06 PM EDT (#262170) #
Mike, with regards to Gose I believe you are pretty close with your numbers. Consider one Peter Bourjos. In 2010 and 2012, his wOBA was/is .273 and .271 respectively yet his fWAR would prorate to 5+ wins over a full season each time. Even if you take the defensive valuations with a rather large grain of salt, ZIPS projections would likely translate in a 3-4 fWAR season for Gose if his defence is as good as his reputation suggests.
92-93 - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 01:11 PM EDT (#262171) #

Theoretical question.  What does Gose have to hit to make him a viable centerfielder, with Rasmus moving to left? ZIPS has him at .230/.295/.365, and I think that would do it, with his defensive and baserunning contributions.  

It's taken you 4.5 months, but I see you've come around MG. ZIPS' projection of Gose before 2012 was .230/.300/.374. When I suggested that the team was better on the field with Rasmus/Gose/Bautista rather than Thames/Rasmus/Bautista I was scoffed at because Gose wasn't ready for the major leagues. When Gose gets called up and I point out the folly in rushing up a prospect who clearly isn't ready when the team has no chance to compete, there of course becomes a whole new set of reasons why it makes sense to have an undeveloped prospect up in the major leagues. So it goes around here.  

uglyone - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 01:45 PM EDT (#262172) #
IMO people still don't consider Gose's age enough. I mean, marisnick is struggling in AA almost as much as Gose is in MLB at the same age, and nobody is condemning him to the "never will hit" garbage bin.

In the Bourjos comparison, at age 21 he was in A+ posting simiar numbers as Gose has posted in AAA this year:

Age 21

Bourjos (A+): 545pa, 3.5bb%, 17.6k%, 50sb, .345babip, .295/.326/.444/.770, .352woba, 108wRC+
A.Gose (AAA): 433pa, 10.9bb%, 21.5k%, 29sb, .375babip, .292/.375/.432/.807, .364woba, 113wRC+
Chuck - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 02:17 PM EDT (#262173) #

and nobody is condemning him to the "never will hit" garbage bin.

I haven't been in these parts for a while, but does such a sentiment truly exist about Gose? I would have thought that the prevailing opinion would be that he's not ready yet, but that given his advanced level for his age that it was just a matter of time, maybe another year.

IMO people still don't consider Gose's age enough.

If this is indeed true, then it is unfortunate. Age is a huge determinant of future success.

Ryan Day - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 02:27 PM EDT (#262174) #
I don't think many people have suggested Gose will never hit. Many people have pointed out that he cannot hit right now. As meagre as that ZIPS projection is, it is a dream season compared to what he's actually doing right now.

If you think he has significant offensive potential, why waste years of control and affordability now? Let him spend another year or two in the minors, teach him how to hit a baseball with a bat, and take advantage of the All-Star player he might be in his late 20s instead of the fourth outfielder he is now.

On top of that - Colby Rasmus is a very good centre fielder. Why push him to a corner now, particularly when his bat isn't great for a corner spot?
Chuck - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 02:28 PM EDT (#262175) #

What does Gose have to hit to make him a viable centerfielder, with Rasmus moving to left? ZIPS has him at .230/.295/.365, and I think that would do it, with his defensive and baserunning contributions.

That Rajai Davis would be squeezed out of a starting job in this scenario is, of course, irrelevant. So I will dismiss that as an impediment to this plan.

And while Ramus is, subjectively, a good center fielder, though perhaps not a great one, he would lose value playing in left field. But that said, any outfield with Gose in it must have Gose in center field.

A legitimate question is -- and I don't presume to know the answer -- would Gose's development continue at the same pace in the majors as it would were he to spend the next year in AAA instead? And I am thinking about more than just issues related to confidence. While I suppose it seems self-evident that the best way to learn to hit major league pitching is to face major league pitching (a position that many argued during Snider's many demotions), is it not perhaps in Gose's best interest to learn to cream AAA pitching first before then seguing into facing major league pitching fulltime. Again, I don't pretend to know what the right answer is here.

Beyonder - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 02:38 PM EDT (#262176) #
It's possible that part of the reason for the sentiment, if it exists, is that through four+ years, Gose has never hit for a high average anywhere he has played. Marisnick, on the other hand, has (in one of three seasons). Some of the less savvy crowd (myself included) may be wondering whether the reason for Gose's poor hitting may have less to do with his age, and more to do with the fact that he's not a very good hitter. At this stage my guess is that both theories are equally likely.
Mike Green - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 02:50 PM EDT (#262177) #
From a development perspective, it's a two-edged sword.  Gose's offensive development would be, I am quite sure, helped by having him held back next year (I argued at the start of the year that I would have preferred him to be creaming double A pitching than playing in Las Vegas).  On the other hand, as a speedy centerfielder, development time offensively comes at a cost defensively. 

Willie Wilson struggled in triple A at age 21, then struggled mightily (offensively) in the majors at age 22 but was ready to go after that.  It can work. 
 

Mike Green - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 02:54 PM EDT (#262178) #
With the amount that he strikes out, Gose will have to hit for medium range pop to be effective.  He can do that. 
uglyone - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 03:04 PM EDT (#262179) #
quick note about Gose's previous developement curves:

Monthly splits, first to last:


AA (20): .595ops/88pa, .889ops/132pa, .658ops/94pa, .821ops/133pa, .780ops/139pa
AAA (21): .582ops/.115pa, .985ops/138pa, .789ops/133pa, .895ops/.47pa
MLB (21): .491ops/71pa
jerjapan - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 03:45 PM EDT (#262181) #
In order to get a compensation draft pick, the team has to offer a one year deal at the average salary (~13m). It's to avoid collecting compensation picks for easily replaceable players, especially RP.

It's a nice idea, but you would have to think Villanueva accepts a QO (which wouldn't be the worst thing if the Jays' budget was a lot bigger).

You don't have to offer a QO of 13 million ... only if you want the draft pick.  Villanueva would definitely accept a QO of 13 million plus ... I agree with whoever suggested three years at 20 million plus will be necessary if he remains unsigned, pitching well in the rotation, at the end of the year. 

BTW, should the new compensation draft pick rule be called the AA rule?
Gerry - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 04:17 PM EDT (#262183) #
The Jays are apparently close to acquiring Yorvit Torrealba for what I assume amounts to a bucket of balls.  I think AA has always liked Torrealba and it gives the Jays a 45 day look in case they want to sign him as a backup for next season.
dan gordon - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 04:21 PM EDT (#262184) #

I would rather give Gose another year in AAA, keep Rasmus in CF, and go get a LF who can legitimately hit in the 5 or 6 spot and play half-decent defense - even just a 1-year guy who's a free agent after 2013.  Whether they can get such a player or not, I don't know.  Given Gose's age, I think it is highly likely that he develops into a good mlb hitter.

Surprised to hear AA say he thinks the offense is set for next year.  After Lawrie, Rasmus, Bautista and EE, I'm not all that impressed with the rest.  When you're that top-heavy, you're very vulnerable to injury, as just a couple of your big bats being hurt leaves you in a difficult situation.  I think there is a good chance that D'Arnaud gives them another good bat.  Sierra is hitting well in a small sample size here, but looking at his AAA numbers this year and his AA numbers last year, I doubt he's ready to hit well enough to be a mlb outfielder next year.

I'd like to see them sign Villanueva - I think he's got a reasonable chance to be a quality starter for a modest dollar figure.  I don't get the talk about offering him the $13 million or whatever it would take to guarantee a draft pick - he'd take that in a heartbeat, and he's not worth nearly that much.  I've always liked Marcum, but he's not exactly the healthiest guy around.  Any chance Janssen could be a starter?  They seem to have a lot of depth in the bullpen now, assuming Santos is healthy next year, and especially if they sign Lyon.  Janssen seems to finally be 100% after the shoulder surgery, and he has the repertoire of a starter.

Moe - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 04:59 PM EDT (#262185) #
Villanueva would definitely accept a QO of 13 million plus ... I agree with whoever suggested three years at 20 million plus will be necessary if he remains unsigned, pitching well in the rotation, at the end of the year.

I think this is a contradiction. If he feels certain that he can get 25m on a 3 year deal he would probably turn down the QF and go with the security even if it's less per year.

However, as I said above, I don't expect him to have another 8 solid starts which is what he would need to get viewed as a true SP. Nevertheless, it would make for an interesting off-season decision problem.


 
dan gordon - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 06:01 PM EDT (#262187) #

Zaunie just mentioned the idea of Janssen moving back into the rotation next year in a Fan 590 interview.  He likes the idea and I agree.  If they resign Lyon, they still have a strong bullpen of Santos, Lyon, Lincoln, Oliver, Delabar, Frasor(?), Perez or Loup, and maybe a guy like Happ if he's not starting.  You could have Janssen, Morrow, Romero, Villanueva and a free agent signing like Marcum in the rotation.  Happ is your depth guy in case of injury to a starter and Alvarez gets some development time in AAA until he is needed in the big leagues at some point. 

Alternatively, maybe you can package Happ and a prospect or 2 for a left fielder.  It would be nice to get a guy who can be a legit leadoff hitter, and by that I mean a guy with a high on base percentage, and play some good defense in left.  Then you can move either Rasmus or Lawrie down to the 5 hole.  More people on base means more RBI's for Bautista and EE.  When you've got 2 big power guys like that, you want to maximize their value by getting lots of baserunners in front of them.

Magpie - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 06:36 PM EDT (#262188) #
Last year Villanueva developed a "tired arm" and had to be pulled from the rotation. If this happens again in the next 7 weeks then his dream of a big payday likely goes up in smoke. There is some incentive for him to sign earlier rather than wait for FA.

It's very unlikely that Villanueva sees it that way. For one thing, that's just not how athletes think. In the specific case of Villanueva, he's said that he wasn't physically prepared to become a starter in 2011. This off-season he got himself ready for it. He had to wait his turn, but he was going to be ready when it happened. He won't be worried about fading down the stretch.
92-93 - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 06:40 PM EDT (#262189) #
Villanueva would have to accept a qualifying offer if he got one, which is why he won't get one. Even if he pitches tremendously down the stretch is a team really going to forfeit one of their first round draft picks to get him on a 2 or 3 year deal? Only the top 10 picks are protected so I find it highly unlikely.
sam - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 06:40 PM EDT (#262190) #
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2012/08/blue-jays-sign-jeff-mathis-to-extension.html

Jeff Mathis gets a two year contract extension with an option. Two years at $1.5 with an additional $1.5 option...Jack Cust must really like his chances of getting a four year offer.
greenfrog - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 07:21 PM EDT (#262191) #
Having McCoy bunt with Davis on first and none out in the 1st inning of a 0-0 game...there are times when I think that Farrell isn't the brightest of managers. Are the Jays really this sabermetrically obtuse as an organization?

I also wonder why a player with a career 542 OPS in the majors is batting second in the order.
uglyone - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 08:14 PM EDT (#262192) #
Seems that AA doesn't envision either of TDA or JPA as bench guys going forward...and I can't say i disagree:


Shi Davidi @ShiDavidi
15m
Torrealba reporting to NH on Thursday, plays four games, will join #Jays in Detroit next week.

John Lott @LottOnBaseball
15m
AA: Still room for d'Arneau next year as DH; can see JPA/Mathis/d'Arnaud all with MLB club.

John Lott @LottOnBaseball
15m
AA: Still room for d'Arneau next year as DH; can see JPA/Mathis/d'Arnaud all with MLB club.

Shi Davidi @ShiDavidi
15m
Torrealba will move to third-string once/if JP Arencibia able to return from broken hand.

John Lott @LottOnBaseball
15m
Torrealba strictly short-term. Will play 4G in NH, report to Jays in Det on Tuesday. AA says no decision yet on who will be sent down.

Shi Davidi @ShiDavidi
15m
Mos intriguing comment by AA? Potential room for d'Arnaud with team as DH next year. Can be on roster with JPA/Mathis. Key is bat in lineup

John Lott @LottOnBaseball
14m
AA says EE is 1B, JPA regular C, but "Travis, at the end of the day, can certainly force his way up here."

John Lott @LottOnBaseball
13m
In short, AA says d'Arnaud is a good defender but a better hitter and has a good shot at playing every day for Jays next year.
Mike Forbes - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 08:27 PM EDT (#262193) #
D'Arnaud must be terrible defensively if he can't start behind the plate over JPA. Like an absolute trainwreck.
uglyone - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 08:57 PM EDT (#262195) #
IMO JPA has been a competent, average fielding C this year.
Gerry - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 09:12 PM EDT (#262196) #
Don't believe everything you hear from AA. He is keeping everyone happy, JP is the starter, Mathis the backup, d'Arnaud can play his way onto the team. Everyone loves everyone and all is sweet and nice in shangri-la.

The makeup of the team will be addressed in the off-season and AA is not going to get ahead of himself at this stage of the season.
MatO - Tuesday, August 14 2012 @ 11:58 PM EDT (#262207) #

I did hedge by saying that Villanueva had "some" incentive to sign early not that he would.

This off-season he got himself ready for it.

How do you prepare to pitch 200 innings when the most you've pitched is 114 in your mlb career and could he please reveal his secret to Blue Jays management.  We should have those Lansing pitchers on the program.

Craig B - Wednesday, August 15 2012 @ 12:01 AM EDT (#262208) #
Just to clarify something John Northey said. AA is not talking of spending or spending big. The implication from the article is that up to three rotation spots need to be addressed. I read that as 0-3.

If it were up to AA, of course he would spend big. Sadly, it's not.
bpoz - Wednesday, August 15 2012 @ 10:17 AM EDT (#262215) #
I am agreeing with Gerry a lot on how to interpret AA's comments. This is the 2nd time.
First time Gerry suggested that some players may sulk if asked to change position. His comment was in regard to a past suggestion Escobar to 2B. I remember G Bell being miffed.

There is some history here... Did Mosby retire rather than become a part time player? Any stories on who demanded a trade and what happened.
John Northey - Wednesday, August 15 2012 @ 01:09 PM EDT (#262235) #
JPA/Mathis/d'Arnaud all in the majors plus Gomes would result in some interesting potential for the manager.  You'd have 4 catchers, one who can be a fill in pitcher for blowouts, one who can play 3B/1B/LF, one who should hit well and one who has shown power but no patience.  Of course, to do that you'd need to have a bullpen that was no bigger than 7, open up the DH slot (bye bye Lind) and go with Davis & a middle infielder for the rest of the bench.
Mike Green - Wednesday, August 15 2012 @ 03:03 PM EDT (#262242) #
One of the free agent leftfielders had a performance spike this year.  Enhancement?  Hell ya. 
greenfrog - Wednesday, August 15 2012 @ 03:33 PM EDT (#262246) #
Those must have been some good drugs.

Cabrera's OPS the last three years: 671, 809, 906 (All-Star).
Mike Green - Wednesday, August 15 2012 @ 03:52 PM EDT (#262249) #
I love the bit at the end of the article which explains how Cabrera could still end up as the "batting champion".  I imagine that is a rule which MLB will get around to changing after the year is over. 

Kids, performance enhancing drugs are really, really bad for you and for baseball.  It is wrong to cheat. It hurts when you become very aggressive with others and you develop heart problems when you are very young.  But, if you manage not to get caught until late in the season, you can still be a batting champion. 
Parker - Wednesday, August 15 2012 @ 04:54 PM EDT (#262253) #
Or a home run champion.
JB21 - Wednesday, August 15 2012 @ 06:11 PM EDT (#262258) #
King Felix, perfect. The game was free on MLB.tv today, Felix was untouchable.
mathesond - Wednesday, August 15 2012 @ 08:06 PM EDT (#262266) #
" I imagine that is a rule which MLB will get around to changing after the year is over. "

I seem to recall - Willie McGee? - winning the NL batting title on year despite having been traded to Oakland at the end of August. He had a bunch of 0-fers tacked on until he reached the requisite number of plate appearances
BlueJayWay - Wednesday, August 15 2012 @ 08:16 PM EDT (#262267) #
Better question is what happened to Ricky Romero.
Hodgie - Wednesday, August 15 2012 @ 08:25 PM EDT (#262268) #
Simple, Rickey tried earlier in the season to ensure the Jays record conformed to Pythagoras' expectations and tonight he is doing his best to show that he does not believe in CERA. That or is was worried that Arencibia and Wise did not want to be friends of his anymore and is out to make each feel better about themselves.
greenfrog - Wednesday, August 15 2012 @ 09:27 PM EDT (#262270) #
This might sound pathological, and I know this puts me in the minority among fans, but I'm actually hoping the Jays lose a lot of games this year and end up with a top five or ten draft pick (and a healthy draft budget as a result) in 2013. I still enjoy watching the team and root for strong individual performances, especially from the prospects and core players going forward. But I really don't care about trying to finish .500 or "finish strong," etc. Give me the draft advantage under the new CBA and a clean slate in 2013 any day.
Mike Green - Thursday, August 16 2012 @ 09:59 AM EDT (#262275) #
Romero actually didn't pitch that badly last night despite the 6 ERs in 6 innings.  He passed the 60% mark in strikes thrown, and only one ball left the yard off him.  More ink was spilled about last night's fair outing than the Oakland disaster. 
Moe - Thursday, August 16 2012 @ 10:42 AM EDT (#262278) #
I'm actually hoping the Jays lose a lot of games this year and end up with a top five or ten draft pick (and a healthy draft budget as a result) in 2013.

Going from 15 to 6 only adds 1m to the slot value. The big amounts where you can hope for some substantial savings to use later (like HOU this year) are really only the top 3 picks. And the Jays aren't getting that high.


Parker - Thursday, August 16 2012 @ 10:50 AM EDT (#262279) #
Draft position is definitely a consideration, but I'm hoping the team finishes badly enough so that Farrell is looking for another job in October. From my subjective observation, it seems like he's actually going backwards in his development as a manager.

All the injuries this year will probably earn him a free pass, though.
John Northey - Thursday, August 16 2012 @ 11:06 AM EDT (#262281) #
I'd prefer the Jays just do well and if a good choice with high demands drops to them that they punt their 3rd to 10th pick to make it happen if needed. 
Ryan Day - Thursday, August 16 2012 @ 11:14 AM EDT (#262282) #
At what point does a better draft pick balance out the potential hit to attendance & TV ratings, or the perception of the team by free agents?

I suppose it's one thing if you're angling for the 1st overall pick so you can get the next Strasburg... but the Jays won't be worst overall and there's no next Strasburg.
Chuck - Thursday, August 16 2012 @ 11:17 AM EDT (#262283) #
so that Farrell is looking for another job in October

AA likes continuity, so I don't see that happening. And firing Farrell won't be necessary from a PR perspective since the rash of injuries is the perfect excuse for the 2012 season.

I thing it is legitimate to argue that the team was going to be in for a rough second hand even without the injuries. The second half schedule figured to be much more difficult. It is not clear to me that a healthy Drabek and Hutchison would have been any more effective than their replacements (Villaneuva and Laffey). Lind did post a solid couple of weeks upon his return, but there was no reason to believe he truly was a phoenix rising from the ashes. It is true that the absence of Morrow, Bautista and Lawrie hurts. There is no denying that. But this team, while ostensibly in the wild card picture prior to the injury wave, seemed destined for a slide (though not necessarily as dramatic as the one we are witnessing) even if healthy. But the injuries can now fortuitously be used to gloss over the entire season.

As for Farrell, he strikes me as one of the many middling, interchangable managers in the league: not terrible, not great, basically harmless.
Parker - Thursday, August 16 2012 @ 01:20 PM EDT (#262312) #
As for Farrell, he strikes me as one of the many middling, interchangable managers in the league: not terrible, not great, basically harmless.

It's the process that bothers me more than the results. Would you still call Farrell harmless if EE had hurt himself playing LF last night when he could've been played at 3rd? That would've prevented Farrell from starting the worst hitter on the roster, though.

Worse yet, what if Mathis had hurt himself pitching? With the #1 and #3 catchers in the organization injured, this struck me as an almost incomprehensibly stupid move.
Magpie - Thursday, August 16 2012 @ 02:45 PM EDT (#262325) #
As for Farrell, he strikes me as one of the many middling, interchangable managers in the league: not terrible, not great, basically harmless.

More or less what I'm thinking. The team's troubles aren't his fault, and he's been in a position where he's simply been reacting to one damn thing after another. I don't know that he does a whole lot to actually help, and he's quite possibly the worst in-game manager we've had around here since... Bobby Mattick? Which is irritating, but I don't think it's enormously important, especially if you bring other attributes to the job. (I always remember Bob Brenly managed a team to a WS title, and he was the worst game manager I ever saw.)
Original Ryan - Thursday, August 16 2012 @ 03:00 PM EDT (#262326) #
I thought Tim Johnson was an awful manager, but that 1998 team still has the best record of any Blue Jays squad since the World Series years.
Mike Green - Thursday, August 16 2012 @ 03:40 PM EDT (#262330) #
I'd put Farrell in the bottom 1/2 of the middling range, at this point.  One of the major jobs of a manager is to manage the pitching staff, in conjunction with the pitching coach.  You'd have to say that he hasn't done well at that, on a season level as well as a game level.  You would anticipate that that might be a strength for a former pitching coach. 

It wouldn't surprise me at all if Farrell is gone after this year.  It has to be classified as a disappointment, and rightly or wrongly, somebody will get fixed with the blame for it. 
Chuck - Thursday, August 16 2012 @ 03:50 PM EDT (#262332) #

It wouldn't surprise me at all if Farrell is gone after this year. 

Funny, my guess would be the exact opposite (not that I care one way or another if Farrell stays or go).

Firing Farrell would make him a sympathetic figure what with all the injuries he's had to deal with. That would make AA, and by extension Rogers, the villain in this piece. And why invite bad PR when the team's misfortunes can already be laid in the lap of Providence?

Mike Green - Thursday, August 16 2012 @ 04:01 PM EDT (#262333) #
That is the other scenario.  I guess my feeling is that after so many years without success, including the Season From Hell (2004), blaming 2012's disappointments on bad luck/injuries will seem less appealing than blood on the floor. 

I suspect that Anthopoulos' honeymoon is nearing its end, and that too will play a role.  Again, I wish to reiterate that I believe he has done a good (but not great) job. 
Parker - Thursday, August 16 2012 @ 05:19 PM EDT (#262337) #
I thought Anthopoulos was doing a great job until he traded for Santos. And yes, at the time I thought Santos would be effective and that Nestor Molina had a chance to be something special. That likely isn't true going forward (in either case) but that trade just struck a sour note for me (selling high on a non-elite prospect = good, but buying high on a reliever with a limited track record, and traded by an organization that a) had long-term control over him, b) wasn't in a posisiton of strength to make the trade, and c) is run by an individual who has screwed the Jays in the past = very sketchy) and it seems like the team has been in panic mode ever since.

I guess the honeymoon's over, Alex. Sorry dude.
Parker - Thursday, August 16 2012 @ 05:44 PM EDT (#262338) #
Now it looks like Encarnacion IS hurt. Maybe Farrell will start Mathis in left tonight.
Original Ryan - Thursday, August 16 2012 @ 06:59 PM EDT (#262342) #
I also think Farrell is safe, at least for another year. That said, it wouldn't surprise me if the coaching staff was shaken up a bit. Bruce Walton might wind up being the one who takes the fall for the pitching staff's woes. Replacing Torey Lovullo with a real outfield coach is another possibility.

While a large part of a manager's work takes place before and after games, from what I have seen from Farrell, I think Mike Green's ranking is a fair one. I realize I probably started sounding like a broken record a long time ago on Farrell's bullpen management, but it's something that continues to frustrate me. With a few rare exceptions, his in-game management of the bullpen has been conventional and formulaic. It would've been nice to see him try something different, especially with the group of relievers he's had to work with.

The frequency of the 8-man bullpen has been discussed at length. Unless the bullpen is almost completely gassed, I see absolutely no reason for carrying that many relievers. Even though the stars had to align somewhat for Aaron Loup to bat during the game in Oakland, it was an embarrassing and avoidable situation.

Farrell hasn't done anything to distinguish himself when running the offence. The "uncomfortable offence" never really materialized. New managers often talk about using the running game more, but soon back away from it when guys start getting thrown out at inopportune times.

Defensively, I suppose Farrell deserves credit for his willingness to use relatively unconventional infield shifts. Even if Brian Butterfield is the one responsible for the positioning of the infielders, I believe the Blue Jays are the only team who regularly stick their third baseman in right field. I just wish Farrell was willing to define his bullpen roles in a similarly unconventional manner.
Hodgie - Thursday, August 16 2012 @ 09:28 PM EDT (#262346) #
Can't wait to read how the Alex Rios home run was Farrell's fault as well, surely that was inevitable and there must have been someone better suited to pitch that inning.

Hell, it was probably also Anthopoulos' fault for allowing Ricciardi to let Rios walk on waivers in the first place - a desperation move that came back to bite them in the eighth.
smcs - Thursday, August 16 2012 @ 09:38 PM EDT (#262347) #
Can't wait to read how the Alex Rios home run was Farrell's fault as well, surely that was inevitable and there must have been someone better suited to pitch that inning.

Judge the process, not the results. Farrell made the right move going to Oliver, Oliver just wasn't good. Last night, Oliver should have come in to face Dunn instead of Lincoln. I'd feel the same even if Lincoln struck out Dunn on 3 pitches.

I've been critical of Farrell's bullpen usage in the past because I feel that he holds his best relievers for theoretical higher leverage situations instead of using them to get through high leverage situations earlier in the game. Last night, I guarantee Farrell's plan was to let Lincoln get through the 7th and then start Oliver fresh in the 8th with a tie game or a lead. I would have preferred the opposite happen.
Hodgie - Thursday, August 16 2012 @ 10:10 PM EDT (#262349) #
Well, that is the funny thing about process. Individuals are certainly free to question it and delve further into the rationale. However, without possessing all of the facts any definitive conclusions drawn about said process are ill-advised at best and irresponsible at worst.
hypobole - Friday, August 17 2012 @ 02:10 AM EDT (#262355) #
Except Farrell pretty well admitted it was his mistake to bring Lincoln in to face Dunn, just as last year he admitted he screwed up using Dotel against lefty hitters.
Farrell seems to be the anti-Valentine, a players manager to a fault. Players seem to like playing for him and he shows a lot of faith in his players, although most everyone on the outside looking in knows in certain situations that faith is misplaced.
Hodgie - Friday, August 17 2012 @ 10:32 AM EDT (#262362) #
That is one way to interpret his comments, the other would be that he is choosing to take blame for the result shifting focus from that of his player. Lincoln owns a healthy 27.3 K% as a reliever this season and has even shown a slight platoon reversal, one that is actually better than Oliver's splits against LHB. He was acquired by the Jays to be a high leverage arm in the bullpen and bringing him in to face Dunn and his 33.7 K% isn't what I would call a situation where everyone looking in should know his faith is misplaced.
ayjackson - Friday, August 17 2012 @ 12:44 PM EDT (#262368) #

Farrell seems to have his fair share of bad luck.  He chose Lincoln to face Dunn-Rios one night and Dunn homers; he chose Oliver to face Dunn-Rios the next night and Rios homers.  I think both pitchers are effective enough to not follow strict platoons.

Same with the EE injury.  EE saw plenty of time in ST in LF; try it in a game?  Yep, injured.  99% of the time a manager gets away with that.  Christ I remember Troy Glaus playing SS.

mathesond - Friday, August 17 2012 @ 01:09 PM EDT (#262369) #
"Christ I remember Troy Glaus playing SS"

It made plenty of fantasy-leaguers happy, I'm sure
Mike D - Friday, August 17 2012 @ 01:32 PM EDT (#262371) #

At what point does a better draft pick balance out the potential hit to attendance & TV ratings, or the perception of the team by free agents?

I take the point, but I think the primary reason the Jays have a perception problem with the vast majority of free agents is that the Jays have no interest in offering them a major league contract.

Mike D - Friday, August 17 2012 @ 03:23 PM EDT (#262373) #

Quick thought about the Jays' injuries.  I know that it seems that Lawrie, Morrow and Bautista will likely return in the near or nearish future, but they're not back yet.

Has anybody, at any time in 2012, returned from the disabled list to appear in a game for the Jays?  I mean, it's bad luck to have the staggering number of DL'd players the Jays have had.  But it would seem to be truly awful luck to have each and every DL stint to be, heretofore, permanent.

Original Ryan - Friday, August 17 2012 @ 03:34 PM EDT (#262374) #
Has anybody, at any time in 2012, returned from the disabled list to appear in a game for the Jays?

If we exclude guys who were on the minor league disabled list, I believe Ben Francisco is the only one.

Mike Green - Friday, August 17 2012 @ 03:37 PM EDT (#262375) #
The club could beneficially have put Kelly Johnson on the DL with the hamstring, but chose not to. There were a couple of other instances where it was a bit of a marginal call with injuries of 4-5 days.  It seemed that the club was, in particular, reluctant to call up Hechavarria for reasons that in hindsight are not altogether clear to me.
John Northey - Friday, August 17 2012 @ 04:11 PM EDT (#262379) #
I think they thought Hechavarria would hit about what he has - namely a minus 2 OPS+ - thus best to let him learn in AAA.

As for ex-Jays...
Francisco: 88 OPS+ over 59 PA (54 as a Jay at 79 before that)
Cordero: 22 ERA+ over 5 IP with Houston, 0-3 in 6 appearances (ouch)
Snider: 134 OPS+ over 46 PA (40 PA here with a 122 OPS+)
Thames: 57 OPS+ over 46 PA (160 PA here with a 73 OPS+)
Igarashi: 39 ERA+ over 3 IP for the Yankees
Luis Valbuena: 71 OPS+ over 168 PA for the Cubs
Darin Mastroianni: 113 OPS+ for the Twins over 128 PA

Huh. Guess Mastroianni would've been good to keep.
Thomas - Friday, August 17 2012 @ 08:53 PM EDT (#262383) #
Huh. Guess Mastroianni would've been good to keep.

Several posters on the Box expressed that opinion last year, when we saw Dewayne Wise get meaningless September at-bats and when he was taken off the 40-man. I don't think he's that good a hitter, of course, but, as was noted on here several times, Mastro's got several traits that could make him an effective 4th or 5th outfielder. He didn't have a future in Toronto because of the team's infatuation with relievers, but he could carve out a few years in the majors.

What Happened? | 139 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.