Here we look at what the Blue Jays did in those 47 games decided by a single run. Seeing as how they lost 31 of these games, there are a lot of painful memories in here. Viewer Discretion Advised. But it's always a good day when I get to be the Dude's Advocate!
We'll have a quick recap of all 47 games, data tables of how the hitters and pitchers performed, and a few random observations.
Part One - A Game-by-Game Account
APRIL (13-12 overall, 3-4 in one-run games)
Game 1 (LOSS) - 8 April 2005
BOS (2-2) 111 001 200 6 9 0 TOR (2-2) 011 000 102 5 8 1Game Type: Rally That Fell Short.
Game 2 (WIN) - 10 April 2005
BOS (2-4) 010 000 002 3 10 0 TOR (4-2) 000 120 001 4 9 0Game Type: Big Hit in a Tie Game
Game 3 (WIN) - 14 April 2005
TOR (7-3) 100 000 100 2 5 1 TEX (4-6) 000 010 000 1 5 1Game Type: Pitcher's Duel
Game 4 (LOSS) - 17 April 2005
TOR (8-5) 000 103 100 5 10 0 TEX (6-7) 420 000 00x 6 12 1Game Type: Rally That Fell Short.
Game 5 (WIN) - 19 April 2005
TOR (9-6) 000 001 021 4 13 0 BOS (8-6) 100 000 200 3 6 0Game Type: Come From Behind Win
Game 6 (LOSS) - 21 April 2005
NYY (7-9) 000 220 000 4 9 1 TOR (9-8) 000 030 000 3 13 0Game Type: Rally That Fell Short
Game 7 (LOSS) - 30 April 2005
TOR (13-12) 000 020 010 3 8 0 NYY (10-14) 200 100 001 4 10 0Game Type: Bullpen Failure
MAY (Overall 15-12; 1-5 in one-run games)
Game 8 (WIN) - 3 May 2005
TOR (16-12) 000 000 010 1 5 1 BAL (17-9) 000 000 000 0 3 0Game Type: Pitcher's Duel
Game 9 (LOSS) - 8 May 2005
CHW (24-7) 120 200 000 5 10 2 TOR (16-16) 000 400 000 4 9 0Game Type: Rally That Fell Short
Game 10 (LOSS) - 14 May 2005
TOR (19-18) 020 000 000 2 7 0 CLE (16-19) 020 000 10x 3 5 0Game Type: Bullpen Failure
Game 11 (LOSS) - 18 May 2005
TOR (21-19) 001 100 000 2 7 0 MIN (22-16) 020 100 00x 3 7 0Game Type: Pitcher's Duel
Game 12 (LOSS) - 28 May 2005
MIN (29-19) 020 020 000 4 6 2 TOR (26-23) 001 000 002 3 9 1Game Type: Rally That Fell Short
Game 13 (LOSS) - 30 May 2005
TOR (27-24) 000 010 200 3 8 0 SEA (21-29) 000 310 00x 4 7 0Game Type: Rally That Fell Short
JUNE (Overall 12-15; 1-1 in one-run games)
Game 14 (WIN) - 22 June 2005
BAL (42-29) 001 100 000 2 7 0 TOR (36-36) 001 020 00x 3 7 1Game Type: Pitcher's Duel
Game 15 (LOSS) - 27 June 2005
TOR (38-39) 000 200 010 3 10 1 TAM (27-50) 003 100 00x 4 7 0Game Type: Rally That Fell Short?
JULY (Overall 13-12; 2-6 in one-run games)
Game 16 (LOSS) - 8 July 2005
TOR (44-42) 060 000 000 6 6 3 TEX (44-40) 111 200 002 7 14 0Game Type: Bullpen Failure
Game 17 (LOSS) - 10 July 2005
TOR (44-44) 000 130 013 8 13 1 TEX (46-40) 021 020 04x 9 12 2Game Type: Bullpen Failure / Rally That Fell Short
Game 18 (LOSS) - 16 July 2005
TAM (30-62) 031 200 000 6 12 1 TOR (45-46) 003 002 000 5 9 1Game Type: Rally That Fell Short
Game 19 (LOSS) - 17 July 2005
TAM (31-62) 000 100 031 5 12 2 TOR (45-47) 020 000 200 4 8 1Game Type: Bullpen Failure
Game 20. (LOSS) - 24 July 2005
TOR (49-49) 100 300 001 5 10 0 KAN (36-62) 000 420 00X 6 9 0Game Type: Blown Lead, Rally that Fell Short
Game 21. (WIN) - July 27 2005
LAA (59-42) 101 000 000 0 2 10 0 TOR (51-49) 010 010 000 1 3 10 1Game Type: Pitcher's Duel
Game 22. (WIN) - July 28 2005
LAA (59-43) 000 000 001 000 000 000 1 9 0 TOR (52-49) 000 000 001 000 000 001 2 9 0Game Type: Pitcher's duel.
Game 23. (LOSS) - July 30 2005
TEX (53-50) 010 002 000 3 7 1 TOR (52-51) 200 000 000 2 6 1Game Type: Bullpen Failure, Missed Chances
AUGUST (Overall 13-15; 6-6 in one-run games)
Game 24. (WIN) - August 3 2005
TOR (55-51) 400 000 000 4 5 0 CHW (69-37) 100 020 000 3 9 0Game Type: Big Early Lead, Hung On
Game 25. (LOSS) - August 4 2005
TOR (55-52) 000 300 010 4 7 0 CHW (70-37) 400 000 01X 5 7 1Game Type: Bullpen Failure
Game 26. (LOSS) - August 8 2005
DET (53-58) 401 110 001 001 9 15 0 TOR (56-55) 110 202 020 000 8 20 1Game Type: Bullpen Failure
Game 27. (WIN) - August 10 2005
DET (53-60) 000 201 000 3 5 0 TOR (58-55) 010 002 001 4 9 1Game Type: Come-from-behind win.
Game 28. (WIN) - August 11 2005
DET (53-61) 000 000 010 1 2 1 TOR (59-55) 200 000 00X 2 4 0Game Type: Pitcher's Duel
Game 29. (LOSS) - August 13 2005
TOR (60-56) 000 000 000 0 5 0 BAL (57-59) 001 000 00X 1 4 0Game Type: Pitcher's duel (Dave Bush special!)
Game 30. (WIN) - August 14 2005
TOR (61-56) 110 011 030 7 14 1 BAL (57-60) 210 100 002 6 10 0Game Type: Barely Hung On
Game 31. (LOSS) - August 15 2005
TOR (61-57) 000 010 300 00 4 9 2 LAA (69-49) 010 011 010 01 5 13 1Game Type: Bullpen Failure
Game 32. (WIN) - August 16 2005
TOR (62-57) 010 001 002 4 7 0 LAA (69-50) 010 020 000 3 6 0Game Type: Come From Behind Win
Game 33. (LOSS) - August 20 2005
TOR (63-59) 100 010 000 000 0 2 5 0 DET (59-62) 100 010 000 000 1 3 11 1Game Type: Pitcher's Duel
Game 34. (LOSS) - August 23 2005
TOR (63-62) 000 200 011 4 10 2 NYY (69-55) 000 001 112 5 9 0Game Type: Bullpen Failure
. This was surely one of the most painful losses of the season. The Jays pushed across a run against the great Mariano Rivera himself to take a lead into the bottom of the ninth. But it was all in vain. This one featured not one, but two Blown Saves, by Speier in the 8th and Batista in the nightmarish 9th. Josh Towers, who went into Yankee Stadium and held the Bombers to two runs in seven innings, tried to take the blame for this debacle. And that's just one of the many reasons we all love Josh so much.
Game 35. (WIN) - August 27 2005
CLE (72-58) 001 000 000 1 5 0 TOR (65-64) 001 100 00X 2 6 2Game Type: Pitcher's duel.
SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER (Overall 14-16; 3-9 in one-run games)
Game 36. (WIN) - September 2 2005
TAM (55-81) 003 000 000 3 8 0 TOR (67-67) 001 010 02X 4 10 0Game Type: Come from behind win.
Game 37. (LOSS) - September 3 2005
TAM (56-81) 001 000 002 3 6 0 TOR (67-68) 000 002 000 2 2 1Game Type: Bullpen Failure
Game 38. (LOSS) - September 4 2005
TAM (57-81) 010 000 000 1 7 0 TOR (67-69) 000 000 000 0 4 0Game Type: Pitcher's Duel (Dave Bush Special!)
Game 39. (WIN) - September 10 2005
TOR (71-70) 010 000 002 3 9 0 TAM (59-84) 000 200 000 2 4 1Game Type: Come From Behind Win
Game 40. (LOSS) - September 11 2005
TOR (71-71) 010 000 220 00 5 8 1 TAM (60-84) 003 000 002 01 6 9 1Game Type:Bullpen Failure
Game 41. (LOSS) - September 12 2005
BOS (84-59) 000 102 200 01 6 12 1 TOR (71-72) 000 000 500 00 5 8 0Game Type: Bullpen Failure?
Game 42. (LOSS) - September 16 2005
NYY (84-62) 114 500 000 11 12 1 TOR (72-74) 300 013 300 10 14 0Game Type: Rally that fell short
Game 43. (LOSS) - September 17 2005
NYY (85-62) 010 000 000 1 10 0 TOR (72-75) 000 000 000 0 6 0Game Type: Pitcher's Duel
Game 44. (WIN) - September 18 2005
NYY (85-63) 002 000 111 5 8 1 TOR (73-75) 130 010 01X 6 10 1Game Type: Early Lead, Barely Hung On
Game 45. (LOSS) - September 21 2005
SEA (66-86) 000 300 000 3 5 0 TOR (74-77) 000 000 002 2 4 0Game Type: Pitcher's Duel, sort of.
Game 46. (LOSS) - September 29 2005
TOR (78-81) 011 020 000 4 10 1 BOS (93-66) 001 002 011 5 10 1Game Type: Bullpen Failure
Game 47. (LOSS) - October 1 2005
KAN (56-105) 102 002 020 7 12 6 TOR (79-82) 000 000 600 6 6 0Game Type: Bullpen failure
Part Two - The Hitters and the Pitchers
How did individual Blue Jays perform in these 47 games? I thought you'd never ask.
Hitters GP AB R H 2b 3b HR RBI BB SO SB CS SH SF HBP GDP BAVG SLG OBP RC RC/27 Eric Hinske 37 106 14 32 9 0 2 8 15 26 3 0 0 0 2 1 .302 .443 .398 19 6.93 Orlando Hudson 36 130 14 40 7 1 3 17 8 15 2 1 0 0 2 2 .308 .446 .357 20 5.95 Reed Johnson 42 108 13 30 10 0 1 12 7 24 4 2 1 0 4 4 .278 .398 .342 13 4.61 Vernon Wells 45 177 17 46 8 2 4 22 16 26 2 1 0 3 2 4 .260 .395 .323 22 4.46 Shea Hillenbrand 43 176 23 46 10 1 3 17 8 26 2 1 0 0 2 4 .261 .381 .301 19 3.88 John McDonald 7 17 2 5 0 0 0 2 0 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 .294 .294 .278 2 3.78 Alex Rios 43 144 14 38 6 0 1 13 10 27 5 3 0 2 0 6 .264 .326 .308 13 3.23 Frank Catalanotto 38 124 14 28 8 0 2 17 9 18 0 1 3 3 2 3 .226 .339 .277 11 3.16 Gabe Gross 12 28 5 5 2 1 0 2 4 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 .179 .321 .281 3 3.01 Aaron Hill 29 102 11 22 7 0 0 7 10 12 1 0 2 1 1 2 .216 .284 .284 8 2.81 Frank Menechino 19 37 6 6 1 0 1 3 7 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 .162 .270 .311 3 2.75 Gregg Zaun 40 131 10 25 6 0 1 12 20 28 1 0 0 0 0 2 .191 .260 .298 10 2.51 Corey Koskie 36 130 10 24 2 0 3 9 19 35 1 0 0 0 0 4 .185 .269 .289 9 2.38 Russ Adams 46 162 17 31 4 2 1 12 20 25 3 1 1 2 0 3 .191 .259 .276 11 2.37 Ken Huckaby 9 20 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 .250 .250 .250 1 2.25 Guillermo Quiroz 5 15 1 3 1 0 0 3 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 .200 .267 .200 1 1.80 Greg Myers 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 .000 .000 .167 0 0.23 A Dominique 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 0 0.00 John-Ford Griffin 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 .000 .000 .000 0 0.00Sometimes, being the Dude's Advocate has its rewards. (You will notice that the Jays only played two one-run games in June, which neatly eliminates Eric's Month From Hell.) Hinske, Hudson, Johnson, and Wells were the only hitters who performed at a level better than league average. Remember, these games take place in a different offensive context. One-run games on the whole are lower scoring games than the overall average - teams score at the rate of about 4.00 runs per game.
The second thing that leaps out at me is that while some of the veterans, especially Zaun and Koskie, struggled in these games, all of the young players - Adams, Hill, Rios - performed quite poorly indeed. Rios was the best of the bunch, but all he did was produce about as empty a .264 BAVG as you could hope to see.
And finally - where did the power go? The Jays' team-wide inability to hit home runs probably cost them dear in these games. Vernon Wells led the way, with 4 dingers - but this was in 47 games, almost a third of a season. That's a 14 HR pace for a full season.
How about the pitchers?
Pitchers G ST W L SV H BS IP H R ER BB K HR ERA Shaun Marcum 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.0 2 0 0 1 3 0 0.00 Justin Speier 16 0 1 1 0 4 1 14.2 10 3 3 8 17 3 1.84 Vinnie Chulk 18 0 0 1 0 4 1 23.0 20 5 5 10 9 1 1.96 Scott Downs 7 5 2 0 0 0 0 37.0 24 10 9 10 33 2 2.19 Scott Schoeneweis 23 0 1 2 0 8 1 17.2 9 5 5 8 12 0 2.55 Jason Frasor 26 0 1 2 0 6 1 30.1 23 9 9 12 27 4 2.67 Roy Halladay 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 19.2 15 7 6 3 16 4 2.75 Pete Walker 15 3 2 4 0 3 0 37.0 38 15 15 11 19 6 3.65 Gustavo Chacin 8 8 0 3 0 0 0 48.2 46 23 22 17 31 6 4.07 Brandon League 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 11.0 11 6 5 9 3 1 4.09 Dave Bush 13 13 2 7 0 0 0 76.2 75 40 38 15 34 14 4.46 Josh Towers 7 7 1 2 0 0 0 41.2 47 23 21 3 15 5 4.54 Miguel Batista 28 0 2 6 11 0 7 29.2 34 17 15 15 21 2 4.55 Ted Lilly 5 5 1 1 0 0 0 25.2 27 15 14 6 21 5 4.91 Dustin McGowan 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 15.1 13 9 9 10 10 1 5.28 Chad Gaudin 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1.2 4 2 2 2 0 0 10.80It is bizarre that 13 of Dave Bush's 24 starts were decided by a single run. In one of them, Bush was pounded early, but the bats came back to make it a one-run game - that would be the 11-10 affair with the Yankees. Otherwise, there's two 1-0 losses, two 3-2 losses (and another loss when he left trailing 3-2 and the final score was 6-5), and a 4-3 loss.
These close games do not apear to have been Miguel Batista's finest hour. It's not the six losses and the seven blown saves that bothers me - I mean, I'm not wild about them, but by definition, this data set would be expected to include most of those games. You can't really complain when they show up. But, clearly, he doesn't seem to have pitched very well. And it troubles me somewhat that Pete Walker ended up with 6 decisions. Somehow, Walker's not the first guy I'd want out there when the game was on the line. But in fairness to Gibbons, I know that on at least one occasion, Walker was the seventh pitcher he sent into the game. So sometimes, no doubt, he was the only option.
Part Three - Random Observations
In the 31 losses, the Jays fell behind to stay ten times in the early innings, six times in the middle innings, ten times in the late innings, and five times in extra innings.
In the 16 wins, the Jays went ahead to stay three times in the early innings, twice in the middle innings, nine times in the late innings, and twice in extra innings.
That strikes me as interesting enough to turn into a Data Table! (I know, I don't need a lot of excuses.)
Took Lead to Stay 1-3 4-6 7-9 Extra Other Guys 10 6 10 5 Blue Jays 3 2 9 2Notice that the Jays are 5-16 in one-run games where the lead was settled in the first six innings. The Jays starters had almost half of the decisions - they went 9-13 , the relievers went 7-18. (Pete Walker was 1-0 as a starter, 1-4 as a reliever.) I'm not sure what I expected here: anyway, roughly half of the games were settled after the seventh inning. Which suggests, to me anyway, that the other guys' bullpens did a better job in these games than Toronto's.
In previous discussions of this subject, which have occurred more or less willy-nilly over the last few months, it's been suggested that the Jays were in the habit of falling behind and then scoring not enough runs to win, but enough runs to create a one-run loss. It happened a few times, of course, so let's get some sense of how often it was a factor.
The largest deficit at any time in the 31 losses was 8 runs (Game 42, 11-10 loss to New York.) They trailed by 6 runs once (Game 4, 6-5 loss to Texas.) Both of these games represent scoring enough runs to make it close, but not enough to win. The Blue Jays have, in their long and sometimes glorious history, overcome an 8 run deficit to win a game exactly once. And actually, it was a ten-run deficit on that occasion - who could forget Sunday, the 4th of June 1989 .
However, that wasn't what always happened in the games where they fell far behind. Three times they trailed by as many as 5 runs: in Game 9, they had cut the gap to one run by the fourth inning, but never did tie it up; in Game 41, they actually erased the five run deficit, only to lose in extra innings; in Game 47, they actually rallied to take the lead, only to lose in the eighth inning.
Six times the Jays trailed by as many as four runs at some point during the game. Twice it was a ninth-inning rally that fell short to make it one-run game (Game 1 and Game 17). Twice the Jays drew to within a single run with plenty of subsequent opportunities to tie it up (in Game 6, they had closed to 4-3 by the fifth, and in Game 18 they had closed to 4-3 by the third.) Twice the Jays erased the deficit, only to lose later on. In Game 25, after falling behind 4-0 in the first inning, they tied the game in the eighth inning; in Game 26, after trailing 4-0 and 6-2, they actually took an 8-7 lead into the ninth inning.
The other teams, of course, posted rallies against Toronto that fell short. To some extent, the one-run games created by rallies that fell short are cancelled out by the one-run games created by the other team's rallies.
In the 31 losses, the Blue Jays never had a lead at any time during the game 16 times. Which means that 15 times, they held a lead and gave it up. In nine of those fifteen games, they fell behind to stay in the final three innings (three times in the seventh, four times in the eighth, twice in the ninth.)
This looks like a bullpen failure, and I suppose it is. The two largest leads they surrendered both came in games when they lost their starting pitcher to injury. The biggest was a five run lead in the Kevin Mench game (Game 16) - Doc had a 6-1 lead when he took the hill in the second inning. The other occasion was the 4-0 lead Ted Lilly held against the Royals when his shoulder started hurting (Game 20).
In the Jays' 16 one-run victories, they trailed at some point in 11 games, six times in the seventh inning or later. The biggest deficit they overcame in any of these games was a 3-0 Tampa Bay lead early in Game 36.
In the 31 losses, five times the Jays scored in their final at-bat to close to within a single run, only to fall short. (They scored three runs once, two runs three times, and one run once.) Seven times, the other team scored at home in their last at bat to win by a single run. That leaves 19 games when the Blue Jays went into their last at bat trailing by a single run, and were unable to score.
In the Blue Jays 16 wins, twice they allowed a single run in the opposition's final at-bat to make it a one-run victory; four times they scored at home in their final at bat to win by a single run, for a walk-off victory of their own. Once that run scored on a wild pitch (thank you, Mr Donnelly) - on all three other occasions, Orlando Hudson delivered the game-winning hit - a double, a single, and a home run. All hail the O-Dog, the Blue Jays Mr Walk-Off!
As for John Gibbons... I'm not going to complain. I review these games and on occasion I see things that make me wonder. First man out of the bullpen in a tie game... Chad Gaudin? Game on the line, and here comes Pete Walker? John McDonald, pinch-hitting? These are not moves I'm entirely comfortable with.
But there is still something to be said for them. First of all, I think the fact that Gibbons was willing to use anyone on his roster at pretty well any time is very much a good thing. After all, if you're not willing to use all the resources at your disposal, you're literally not playing with a full deck. Sometimes it has educational value - a young player gets the experience of coping with a difficult situation, and the manager maybe learns something about the young player. And sometimes, there really isn't a better option. In no sane universe should John McDonald ever be a pinch-hitter. But early in the season, Gibbons was spotting Russ Adams against LH pitchers. In a key situation, with a LH on the mound, he would naturally prefer to pinch-hit for Adams. This is where the modern tendency to carry a dozen pitchers handcuffs the manager and severly reduces his in-game options. His bench consisted of a backup catcher, a backup outfielder, and two backup infielders. If he used anyone besides McDonald to bat for Adams, he'd generally find himself having blown through fully half his bench on a single at bat, possibly with several innings left to play. Bring back the 10 man pitching staff!
Who was the opposition, anyway?
Tampa Bay 2-6
New York 1-5
Boston 2-3
Texas 1-4
Baltimore 3-1
LA Angels 3-1
Detroit 2-2
Chicago WS 1-2
Cleveland 1-1
Minnesota 0-2
Seattle 0-2
Kansas City 0-2
So - a combined 2-10 mark against three lousy clubs, Tampa, Seattle, and Kansas City. Each of whom lost more than 90 games. That was... very unfortunate.
https://www.battersbox.ca/article.php?story=20051119091549680