Lee vs Halladay

Monday, September 08 2008 @ 11:50 AM EDT

Contributed by: Magpie

Bauxite zeppelinkm has prepared a Data Table that examines this  year's work by Cliff Lee and Roy Halladay, with particular focus on the Quality of the Opposition. I'm just the middle-man!

Cliff Lee Starts                
Team    Opposition W Pct.    Average R/G OPP    Opponent Starter    ERA+ of Opp Starter
Oakland    .458 3.94    Blanton    86
Oakland    .458 3.94    Gaudin    107
Min    .545 5.07    Liriano    124
KC    .430 4.11    Bannister    81
Seattle    .394 4.18    Washburn    88
NYY    .531 4.85    Wang    105
TOR    .535 4.44    Marcum    125
Cin    .448    4.36    Volquez    144
Texas    .486    5.47    Feldman    85
KC    .430    4.11    Meche     113
Texas    .486    5.47    Ponson     84
Det    .483    5.04    Willis     42
SD    .385    3.87    Baek    74
LAD    .510    4.22    Kershaw     98
SF    .437    3.92    Cain    114
CWS    .563    5.06    Danks    132
Min    .545    5.07    Perkins    101
TB    .603    4.67    Shields    118
Seattle    .394    4.18    Silva    63
Min    .545    5.07    Hernandez    68
Det    .483    5.04    Robertson    69
TB    .603    4.67    Garza    118
TOR    .535    4.44    Richmond    84
LAA    .606    4.63    Weaver    98
KC    .430    4.11    Greinke    122
Det    .483    5.04    Lambert    65
CWS    .563    5.06    Richard    71
KC    .430    4.11    Greinke    122

Averages    .429    4.58        96.5

    11 starts against 500 teams           
    16 starts against sub 500           
And here's the Good Doctor:
Doc Starts                
Team    Opposition W Pct.    Average R/G OPP    Opponent Starter    ERA+ of Opp Starter
NYY    .531    4.85    Wang    105
Bos    .592    5.33    Beckett    108
Texas    .486    5.47    Mendoza    52
Texas    .486    5.47    Padilla    87
TB    .603    4.67    Hammel    92
Bos    .592    5.33    Lester    134
CWS    .563    5.06    Contreras     100
Cle    .489    4.85    Sabathia    158
Min    .545    5.07    Bonser    68
KC    .430    4.11    Greinke     122
Oak    .458    3.94    Harden    212
NYY    .531    4.85    Chamberlain     125
Bal    .447    5.04    Liz    56
CHC    .601    5.38    Marquis    103
Pit    .423    4.57    Duke    86
Cin    .448    4.36    Harang    86
Seattle    .394    4.18    Dickey    77
LAA    .606    4.63    Lackey     133
NYY    .531    4.85    Chamberlain     125
TB    .606    4.67    Garza    118
Bal    .447    5.04    Cabrera     84
TB    .603    4.67    Garza    118
Oak    .458    3.94    Gallagher     83
Cle    .489    4.85    Byrd     97
Bos    .592    5.33    Byrd    97
NYY    .531    4.85    Ponson    84
TB    .603    4.67    Shields    118
NYY    .531    4.85    Pettitte    95
TB    .603    4.67    Sonnanstine     93

Avverages   .586    4.81         104
    17 starts against 500 teams       
    12 starts against sub 500   
Pitchers who threw 120 innings or more Qualifty of Batters Faced (Baseball Prospectus)           
Halladay: 2nd    (Average OPS = .766)
Lee: 73rd   ( Average OPS = .732)

Run Support           
Lee 5.86           
Halladay 4.75           


***All statistics taken from mlb.com at approximately 11:00 pm (AST) on Sunday, Sept 7          

A couple of notes: zeppelinkm made a command decision to reduce Joba the Hutt's ERA+ from 160 to 125 to try to eliminate "reliever dominance," lest Joba's dominance as a reliever inflate the quality of Doc's opposition. This is a sensible precaution, but probably not all that necessary - almost three quarters of Chamberlain 88 IP of 160+ ERA came as a starting pitcher (Chamberlain has pitched 65.1 IP as a starter, 22.2 IP in relief.) If you look at his splits, you will see that Chamberlain really hasn't been much more dominant as a reliever at all. His ERA as a starter is 2.76 (2.42 as a reliever) - opposing hitters are hitting ..213/.302/.287 against him as a reliever, .245 /.319 /.322 against him as a starter. He's been almost as effective as a starter.

I've made one alteration to zeppelinkm's original work - he had a marker indicating whether the opposition was above or below .500 - I've inserted the opposing team's actual winning percentage, and averaged them.

Anyway, the overall impact is truly striking - Halladay has pitched against somewhat better offenses (his opponents have averaged 4.81 runs per game, Lee's have averaged 4.58 runs per game.) But Doc has pitched far more often against better teams, not just teams who score more runs, and he's generally been matched up against better starting pitchers. It's not particularly close, especially when it comes to being matched up against the very best teams in the game.

None of this is Cliff Lee's fault - his manager gives him the ball, he doesn't make the schedule, he doesn't decide who's pitching for the other guys. He's gone out against whoever he was sent out against and pitched about as well as you could ask a man to pitch. It's hard to ask him to have been better than he's been, and I personally won't quarrel if he gets the Cy Young. But there's simply no comparison between the overall Quality of Opposition the two pitchers have had to deal with.

There are only five teams in the majors on pace to win 90+ games: Boston, Tampa, the Angels, and the two Chicago teams. Halladay has made 11 of his 29 starts against those five teams, and they account for 5 of his 9 losses (he has 6 wins against them).

On the other hand, while Lee has made just 5 starts against those teams, he's been absolutely brilliant against them - he's 4-0, 1.15 in those five starts.

Hey - six of one, half a dozen of the other?

29 comments



https://www.battersbox.ca/article.php?story=20080908104435262