Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine

What will B.J. Ryan's ERA be in 2006?

2.30 39 (22.94%)
2.60 59 (34.71%)
2.90 47 (27.65%)
3.20 13 (7.65%)
3.50 6 (3.53%)
3.80 6 (3.53%)
What will B.J. Ryan's ERA be in 2006? | 12 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Mike Green - Thursday, January 05 2006 @ 11:35 AM EST (#138721) #
I voted 2.3. I would have gone for 2.0 or even 1.8 had it been offered. Ryan is the kind of pitcher who should grow by sharpening his control at the expense of a little power- if he loses 1 strikeout and allows half a walk less per 9 innings, he will gain effectiveness.
Mick Doherty - Thursday, January 05 2006 @ 11:47 AM EST (#138726) #
I went with 2.60, but to be fair, a closer can have pretty good year and an ERA around 6.00 -- sayin 2-something means "No, zero, nada truly awful outings" of the 2/3 IP, seven earned runs variety. And that can happen to the best of relievers.

Ryan's career ERA is 3.54, incidentally, so I think the voting here is wildly optimistic -- tho again, I selected 2.60.
Nick - Thursday, January 05 2006 @ 12:15 PM EST (#138728) #
Given his peripherals and ERA the last two seasons, I would say the choices given are way too conservative. 2.30 is the absolute zenith of reasonable expectations? Hogwash.
Nick - Thursday, January 05 2006 @ 12:19 PM EST (#138730) #
In the history of baseball, has there ever been a closer who had an ERA of 6.00 that also had what could be considered a good season?

I am of the belief that "ERA of 6.00" and "good season" are mutually exclusive events barring major changes in the game in the future which result in a league ERA of 7.00 or something.
Phil - Thursday, January 05 2006 @ 12:19 PM EST (#138731) #
3.50 is my bet; surprised there aren't more votes in the upper range. 3.50 could be a good result for a closer, depending on where those ERs fall.
Mike Green - Thursday, January 05 2006 @ 12:29 PM EST (#138734) #
Ryan's career has followed a confidence-inducing arc. He started off walking about 6/9IP lowered it to 4.5/9IP and the last 2 years has got it down to 3.5/9IP. Once a pitcher finds the strike zone, it is fairly uncommon to lose it. This is exactly the pattern you like to see from a power pitcher.
Jonny German - Thursday, January 05 2006 @ 12:47 PM EST (#138737) #
I voted 2.3. I would have gone for 2.0 or even 1.8 had it been offered.

I guess the options reflect my general view of reliever ERA - extremely volatile. Which is to say I agree with Mick's general premise about a closer's ERA not necessarily being in line with how good of a year he had. I gotta disagree at this point, though:

Ryan's career ERA is 3.54, incidentally, so I think the voting here is wildly optimistic

Eric Gagne's career ERA following the 2003 season was 3.49. Would you have said it was wildly optimistic to predict a 2.50 ERA for him in 2004? Sometimes ya gotta take the early career numbers and throw them right out the window.

Back to Mike Green, and Nick, and anybody else who disagrees with the ranges offered in these polls - Please continue to speak up! I'm coming up with the ranges on my own judgement, so if I'm out to lunch I need to hear it. If necessary, I'll re-post polls with updated options. The shape of the voting on Ryan's ERA tells me I should have had 2.00 instead of 3.80, but that's not a big enough error to bother with a change.

Nick - Thursday, January 05 2006 @ 01:01 PM EST (#138739) #
Didn't mean to sound snide though. I will speak up more politely in the future.
Mike Green - Thursday, January 05 2006 @ 09:16 PM EST (#138786) #
B.J. Ryan is a bit of a special case. You're doing a great job, Jonny.
Lefty - Thursday, January 05 2006 @ 09:45 PM EST (#138788) #
The question I might have polled here, is how many K's.
Jonny German - Thursday, January 05 2006 @ 10:59 PM EST (#138792) #
Thanks, Mike.

I actually thought it would be fun to poll Ryan's strikeouts too, Lefty. Decided not to because I don't like the way multiple polls push the hot topics down the left side of the page. We'll file this idea under K and pull it out in February.
Twilight - Friday, January 06 2006 @ 12:36 AM EST (#138800) #
I voted 2.60. I don't think ERA is as important with relievers, because one really bad outing can absolutely ruin your ERA and you need to have several excellent ones to bring it back down.

Generally if you're a reliever pitching 1-2 innings, you come in and give up 3 runs and only retire one batter, your ERA is likely to go up quite a bit. Even if in the previous 5 games, you were stellar and in 8 innings, gave up 2 hits and 0 runs.
What will B.J. Ryan's ERA be in 2006? | 12 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.