Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine

Who is the most "untouchable" Jay when it comes to trades -- and why??

Roy Halladay 193 (90.61%)
Orlando Hudson 1 (0.47%)
Corey Koskie 2 (0.94%)
Vernon Wells 2 (0.94%)
Other (please specify) 1 (0.47%)
Nobody is untouchable 14 (6.57%)
Who is the most "untouchable" Jay when it comes to trades -- and why?? | 15 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Mick Doherty - Monday, December 05 2005 @ 12:04 AM EST (#134219) #
I'll be shocked if Doc doesn't get more than 90 percent in this poll ... you have a legitimate ace, you don't trade the ace unless you get two aces and a bat coiming back in return.
VBF - Monday, December 05 2005 @ 12:40 AM EST (#134223) #
Three years from now, the Cardinals offer you Pujols and Burnett for Halladay. Do you do it?

Assumption: All three players are playing at their current level and contract in 3 three years.
CaramonLS - Monday, December 05 2005 @ 12:45 AM EST (#134225) #
Unless we lock down Doc long term, we can consider offers for him.
Anders - Monday, December 05 2005 @ 04:38 AM EST (#134238) #
What are we going to trade Halladay for, at least strait up anyway? He's not making that much money now (well, for his talent), and he's under contract for two more years.

The list of players that you could trade Halladay for straight up, to me, would be Santana, Pujols, maybe Bay, maybe Teixara, Miguel Cabrera, and DWright. aka the best, young players in the Majors.
Twilight - Monday, December 05 2005 @ 05:21 AM EST (#134241) #
I understand the business of baseball, but I think that what makes him such a prize is that Toronto brought him up themselves, rather than just dishing out big bucks for him at FA signing. He's a symbol of a strong ball club from top to bottom. He's also a philanthropist and an active member of the community. I think a trade involving him would get some people shot. LOL
Twilight - Monday, December 05 2005 @ 05:22 AM EST (#134242) #
Oh and...Koskie? really? lol...
Smaj - Monday, December 05 2005 @ 08:28 AM EST (#134246) #
Doc is clearly the Jays MVP & when healthy the best pitcher in the AL. Anyone can be traded. Why trade Doc?

1) Only if you can acquire young proven talent with fixed costs in return i.e. Rich Harden & Jason Bay & Jeff Francis for the ACE (clearly hard for any team to do)

2) Doc has two years left on a deal that will consume roughly 16% of the 2006 payroll. If a reasonable contract extension is not feasible, put Doc's name into the ring & see what comes at you for opening offers...if there is a scenario where you can get Bay & Harden & Francis, you do it.

3) Doc has been injured for the past two seasons(parts of both), thus what if 2006 leads to yet another extended DL stay for Doc? Questions now arise concerning his durability & value in trades YET the Jays will stay have to pay him large $ to stay in TO

I beleive you do not trade an ACE unless you are blown away by an offer or you are rebuilding dramatically. The Jays would be foolish to trade Doc given all the variables concerning this club as of today.
Mike Green - Monday, December 05 2005 @ 09:50 AM EST (#134258) #
Nobody is untouchable; there are just degrees of reluctance.
I'd be very reluctant to trade Aaron Hill, because his future is so unknown.

I would not be reluctant in the least to trade Roy Halladay. He's a very valuable player, but his value is known. He's unlikely to be traded for the simple reason that it would be well nigh impossible to find a trading partner willing to offer value for value. Pujols for Halladay? I'd leap at that in a second, but the Cards aint offerin'.
Leigh - Monday, December 05 2005 @ 12:29 PM EST (#134280) #
If untouchable means "will not trade under any circumstances, including but not limited to the Pujols hypothetical", then the answer to the poll question is obviously "nobody is untouchable".

Under that definition of untouchable, to vote otherwise is patently absurd.

If we were to amend to poll question to read: "[w]ho is the most 'untouchable' Jay when it comes to reasonably foreseeable trades", or to remove the "nobody is untouchable" option altogether, then yeah, Doc's the answer.

Mike Green - Monday, December 05 2005 @ 01:43 PM EST (#134284) #
"A reasonably foreseeable chance of a trade that is not patently unreasonable"? Law, like love, is barely comprehensible. :)
CaramonLS - Monday, December 05 2005 @ 02:07 PM EST (#134289) #
Doc gets traded if the right package comes along.

Of course, what do you pay for one of the best 5 pitchers in baseball entering his prime? (That is my subjective opinion).

Fawaz - Monday, December 05 2005 @ 02:33 PM EST (#134297) #
I didn't realize Mrs. Koskie was a bauxite...

Perhaps I overrate Wells (though I didn't vote for him), but I think it's closer than I had first reckoned between him and Halladay, especially when you consider his beautiful, beautiful contract.
Ron - Monday, December 05 2005 @ 05:08 PM EST (#134338) #
There's no such thing as un untouchable player.

If I was the Jays GM and Terry Ryan gave me a phone call asking me if I would be interested in Santana for Doc, I would say yes right away.
Lefty - Tuesday, December 06 2005 @ 12:33 AM EST (#134506) #
Judging from the results of this poll, this is an emotional result rather than rational. Goodness Mick, you called it.
GregJP - Tuesday, December 06 2005 @ 04:01 AM EST (#134525) #
I echo some of the previous comments. NOBODY is untouchable.
Which starters would I take straight up for Halladay assuming money was not an issue?

Santana, King Felix, Prior.

Oswalt and Peavy I would at least have to think about.

As far as hitters, there are a dozen if not more that I would trade Halladay for sraight up.
Who is the most "untouchable" Jay when it comes to trades -- and why?? | 15 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.