Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
Two years ago, we looked at Robin Ventura, Chipper Jones, and Scott Rolen. We're moving Alex Rodriguez from the shortstops to the third basemen this time around. This time, I thought that I'd take a closer look at the offensive contributions of the very good and great third basemen in major league baseball since 1900 at age 30, 32 and 34, and see where Ventura, Jones, Rolen and Rodriguez slide in at each age offensively, before we get to defence.


From top to bottom among the retired players, we have Mike Schmidt, George Brett, Eddie Mathews, Frank Baker, Ron Santo, Ken Boyer, Harlond Clift, Stan Hack, Sal Bando, George Kell, Graig Nettles, Darrell Evans and Brooks Robinson. Let's see how everyone fares at age 30 first:

Player AB HR W K SB CS AVG. OBP SLUG. OPS+
Schmidt 4261 283 778 1077 129 59 .259 .375 .525 144
Brett 5307 150 474 358 131 69 .316 .370 .503 141
Mathews 6062 399 1031 976 59 28 .282 .386 .543 152
Baker 3796 58 302 98 187 unknown .316 .372 .467 150
Santo 6213 279 860 1004 29 33 .280 .366 .478 130
Boyer 3943 170 359 507 79 50 .299 .356 .491 121
Clift 5311 170 991 652 67 42 .277 .394 .452 117
Hack 4063 36 541 257 120 unknown .302 .387 .406 114
Bando 4595 165 716 728 40 32 .257 .361 .417 127
Kell 5212 47 479 183 46 32 .311 .372 .417 113
Nettles 3707 148 447 489 15 13 .247 .329 .409 108
Evans 3338 147 633 544 46 20 .248 .368 .428 117
Robinson 5846 157 434 574 19 19 .280 .330 .424 110


Here's where A-Rod, Chipper Jones, Scott Rolen and Ventura were at age 30:


Player AB HR W K SB CS AVG. OBP SLUG OPS+
Rodriguez 6767 464 820 1404 241 60 .305 .386 .573 145
Jones 4589 253 759 698 114 38 .309 .404 .544 144
Rolen 4585 231 625 972 92 35 .284 .375 .515 130
Ventura 4542 171 668 659 15 29 .274 .365 .440 117

Alex Rodriguez just finished his age 30 season. Among the third basemen, he is closest to Eddie Mathews. Mathews was a somewhat better hitter in his 20s, but A-Rod came up a year earlier and of course, had more defensive value during his years as a shortstop. As a hitter, Chipper Jones was in the Brett/Schmidt zone at age 30, but was substantially inferior as a fielder. Scott Rolen was in the Boyer/Bando/Santo zone at age 30, and Ventura was somewhere between Darrell Evans and Harlond Clift.

Taking things forward 2 years, here's how the third base greats were doing at age 32:

Player AB HR W K SB CS AVG. OBP SLUG OPS+
Schmidt 5129 349 958 1279 155 70 .262 .385 .532 150
Brett 6234 193 615 444 140 72 .316 .375 .507 143
Mathews 7051 445 1240 1195 64 34 .277 .384 .526 149
Baker 4853 70 388 138 213 unknown .311 .367 .449 144
Santo 7232 317 1008 1174 34 37 .280 .367 .474 128
Boyer 5171 218 504 701 92 57 .296 .358 .484 120
Clift 5730 178 1070 713 69 43 .272 .390 .441 116
Hack 5202 49 734 337 140 unknown .304 .390 .408 120
Bando 5145 192 792 702 60 38 .255 .359 .418 127
Kell 5967 60 563 234 49 35 .310 .371 .415 112
Nettles 4879 217 577 662 28 24 .249 .330 .427 113
Evans 4447 184 829 688 56 32 .248 .365 .420 116
Robinson 7052 196 534 684 22 21 .274 .325 .421 109

Now, let's see how Chipper Jones, Scott Rolen and Robin Ventura fare at 32:

Player AB HR W K SB CS AVG OBP SLUG OPS+
Jones 5616 310 937 877 118 40 .304 .401 .537 141
Rolen 5106 253 681 1041 99 39 .285 .375 .515 129
Ventura 5599 227 817 859 19 32 .273 .364 .450 117

Chipper Jones remained roughly comparable to George Brett as a hitter at age 32, but couldn't keep up with Schmidt's blistering pace of his early 30s. Scott Rolen who finished his age 32 season in 2006 remains at the top end of the Bando/Boyer/Santo zone. Robin Ventura continued to track Harlond Clift's career very well. Clift's career ended at 32, while Ventura kept on for 3 more seasons.

Now, age 34 for the greats:

Player AB HR W K SB CS AVG OBP SLUG OPS+
Schmidt 6191 425 1178 1543 167 85 .265 .384 .535 151
Brett 7102 231 767 536 147 77 .312 .377 .505 142
Mathews 8049 493 1376 1387 66 35 .273 .379 .517 145
Baker 5420 80 432 156 220 unknown .309 .365 .443 140
Santo 8143 342 1108 1343 35 41 .277 .362 .464 125
Boyer 6334 255 631 859 97 69 .293 .356 .475 119
Hack 6118 55 869 385 150 unknown .301 .390 .401 119
Bando 6265 226 939 843 67 42 .257 .358 .417 124
Kell 6702 78 621 287 51 36 .306 .367 .414 111
Nettles 5987 264 695 784 30 27 .252 .331 .428 113
Evans 5360 216 966 786 75 40 .251 .364 .419 117
Robinson 8249 234 650 787 23 22 .274 .327 .421 110

Santo's career ended at age 34. Right now, Rolen at age 32 is roughly 6 seasons behind him in playing time. Chipper Jones has now hit 357 homers at age 34, with an OPS+ of 142 in 6,385 at-bats. Robin Ventura continued to plug away with an OPS+ of 117 at age 34 in 6,520 at-bats.

Deeee-fence

Measuring the scale of a third-baseman's defensive contributions is not easy. It is generally considered that third-base lies between the premium defensive positions (C, SS, 2B and CF) and the less-important defensive positions (RF, 1B, LF). How many runs does a good or outstanding third baseman save above an average or replacement one in a season, compared with a similar centerfielder or rightfielder? Shall we look at some metrics for current great defenders and historic ones?

We will start with the current players. For these, we have a choice of a number of metrics. We will start with Chris Dial's rating of the best defensive AL infielders over the last 20 years, the best AL outfielders over the same period and the NL best. Dial uses a modified zone rating over players' career to set the standard. According to Dial, Scott Rolen has been the best defensive third baseman of the last 20 years, saving 15 runs per 150 games with his glove (with admittedly the decline phase of his career to come). Robin Ventura and Matt Williams (Robin Williams and Ace Ventura, shall we call them?) are next at 11 runs per 150 games. Ozzie Smith saved 17 runs per 150 games during the decline phase of his career after 1986. Jose Oquendo and Pokey Reese led the second basemen with 19-22 runs save per 150 games of their careers, while Devon White led the centerfielders with 11 runs saved per 150 games over his career. Centerfielders do appear to suffer a more steep defensive decline than infielders, which may explain this phenomenon to some degree.

Let's tackle this another way. How about we look at the peak performance of the very best at the position. As the players predate our ability to perform zone rating calculations, the metrics are less reliable. The middle infield is Ozzie Smith and Bill Mazeroski. Brooks Robinson is at third base. We will use Baseball Prospectus' Fielding Runs as our metric over the players 3 year peak. Smith and Mazeroski are at 25-27 runs saved above average and 60-65 runs saved above replacement. Brooks Robinson is at 26 runs saved above average and 46 runs saved above replacement. For the centerfielder, it does not matter whether one chooses Willie Mays, Garry Maddox, Devon White or Richie Ashburn. I have not been able to find a player with more than 18 runs saved above average and 45 runs saved above replacement (Ashburn). Among third basemen, Mike Schmidt and Ron Santo are in a similar zone to Robinson at his peak but just a little behind.

The metrics might suggest that third base is as important, or perhaps even more important, defensively as centerfield. And when you think about it, how many routine plays does a third baseman actually have? Depending on the batter's speed, it can range from quite a few to hardly any. The centerfielder, on the other hand, will consistently have routine plays. It is true that a great play by a centerfielder is more spectacular and potentially may save an extra-base hit, but on balance these plays seem to me to arise less frequently than the more mundane difficult play for a third baseman. Regardless whether one buys full into the nature of the spectrum hinted at by the metrics, it does seem to me that it is indeed likely that the defence of a third baseman is at minimum close in importance to the defence of a centerfielder. On a particular team, this will depend on the ground ball/fly ball tendencies of the staff.

To end the defence discussion for now, let's summarize the career runs above average per 150 games using the Dial and FRAA methods for Rolen, Ventura and Jones:

Player Dial FRAA
Rolen 15 15
Ventura 11 12
Jones
-15

Chris Dial had Chipper Jones at -6 for 2006. David Pinto had him at 3 outs fewer than expected (or roughly 2 runs).

Time to sum up.

Scott Rolen

Two years ago, I said:

"It is really too early to say too much about Rolen. If he ages normally (better than Santo, but not as well as Schmidt), he should end up with career statistics very similar to Santo. Santo is not in the Hall of Fame, but clearly should be, and the Veterans Committee might very well remedy this omission in the next balloting."

Santo remains the best comparison. Rolen is now 32, and he's 3 seasons worth of at-bats behind Santo. Santo had one so-so season and one poor one and finished his career with the statistics you see above at age 34. There is a good chance that Rolen ends up with a somewhat longer and roughly comparable quality career to Santo. At this point, he is clearly on a Hall of Fame path at least on merit.

Chipper Jones

He was on a Hall of Fame path 2 years ago, and is now, by reason of his bat. Then, Craig Burley took me to task for suggesting that the metrics suggested that Chipper Jones was an average defender. Craig was right. Jones is, and was, below average with the glove.

Alex Rodriguez

Two years ago, I said:

"Rodriguez is on pace to become the second best shortstop of all time behind Wagner (or if he continues as a third baseman for many years, to be competitive with Mike Schmidt for the title of greatest third baseman). Curiously, Wagner converted from third base to short in mid-career, while Schmidt converted from short to third very early in his career. Rodriguez was the first shortstop since Wagner to be one of the top 3 hitters in the league for an extended period. While he was not one of the best hitters in the league last year, there is good reason to believe that he may be one again for another run of years.

Let's try for Alex Rodriguez final career statistics. For the Green projection method, we'll try an orange-tomato soup to steel us for the cold. Saute onions, add cumin and garlic, then canned diced tomatoes, stock and juice and grated rind of one orange. Cook 30 minutes, inhale and pronounce:

2200 runs, 750 homers, 2350 RBIs, .295/.378/.569."

Since then Rodriguez has put in one excellent year with the bat, and garnered another MVP award, and one ordinary (for him) one. Last year, his troubles with the glove caused some to wonder whether he would be moved off third base, but I doubt that he will be. At this point in his career, he is 2500 at-bats ahead of Schmidt, with modestly less impressive rate numbers. Schmidt has a hell of a finishing kick, and A-Rod has his work cut out for him if he wants to win the title of greatest third baseman ever.

We will review the outfielders in December, and then start in on the closers in the New Year.
Hall Watch 2006 Update-The Third Basemen | 3 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Elijah - Friday, December 01 2006 @ 01:22 PM EST (#159612) #
Good work as always, Mike.

I wanted to put in a few words about one of the players I really enjoyed watching (and got repeatedly annoyed at): Wade Boggs.  He's arguably one of the top five and certainly one of the top ten third basemen of all time.  He aged quite well - even though he wasn't the hits and walks machine into his late 30s, he was still relatively productive compared to other third basemen into their late 30s.

Didn't hit for much power but man, he was an artist with the bat much like Tony Gwynn.  He was Gwynn with the walks.
Mike Green - Friday, December 01 2006 @ 01:32 PM EST (#159613) #
Wade Boggs omitted from my list?  It looks like I'll have to start eating more chicken.




John Northey - Friday, December 01 2006 @ 05:43 PM EST (#159639) #
Very fun to read through these.

OF note for Boggs though - had to look up his stats and was shocked to see he hit 259/358/397 in his last season in Boston.  This is a guy who to that point had only 1 season with a sub 325 average and that was 302.  His 2nd and 3rd year in NY were similar to his core Boston years (324+ average, over 400 OBP, in the 400's for Slg) but still had 4 seasons in total that were sub 100 for OPS+ with a peak of 173 in 1987.

For comparison, George Brett had a negative OPS in his first season (41 PA hit 125 at the age of 20), 90 in year two then was above 100 until his last season of 96.  Peak of 202 the year he hit 390 and also had a 178 in 1985, the year he stopped the Jays from getting to the World Series.  Mike Schmidt was the same as Brett, two low scores to start (although not negative) and a low score to end, the year he retired mid-season as he felt he wasn't helping anymore (OPS+ of 91 203/297/372 - league OPS was 699).

It was fun in the 80's watching those 3.  And to think we almost had Boggs here in Toronto - the Red Sox left him unprotected in 1980 (I think) and Gillick said years later that he almost took Boggs in the Rule 5 draft but decided not to at the last moment - then was going to take him the next season but Boston protected him at the last second (literally #40 on the 40 man).  Sigh.  Good ol' what if's just like how Ron Guidry almost was here in '77 but it was the one trade of Gillicks that was revoked by upper management.  After Guidry went 25-3 in '78 Gillick had a lot more power.
Hall Watch 2006 Update-The Third Basemen | 3 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.