Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
I can't give it up
I dose my mind
I can't get enough
I'm in no shape
I gotta turn it off
Just let it play...


Actually, I didn't see this game. With Francisco Rosario making his major-league starting debut after posting very good stats in Syracuse, I was fairly certain I'd regret missing it.

Nope.

Javier Vazquez dominated. Rosario hit the 70-pitch mark in the third. Dustin McGowan was slapped around and then started pitching around people, finishing with four hits, walks and runs in 2.2 innings. The Sox coasted to a 7-1 win.

Boxscore:
Right size, wrong shape.

Star of the Game:
Hands up, everyone who had Javier Vazquez striking 13 Jays out and leaving after eight with a two-hitter. Thirteen! Wow!

For the Jays:
Troy Glaus keeps on trying. He homered in the fifth.

Unsung Hero: Scott Downs worked 3.1 no-hit innings with four strikeouts and a walk.

Elsewhere:
The A's beat Seattle 5-2 behind Dan Haren. Oakland has now beaten the Mariners 11 times in a row, and they've won six of seven and eight of ten. Joe Blanton goes today. Yup, it's that time of the year again...

Today: A.J. Burnett tries to end this wretched streak against Jose Contreras at 1:07.

Why have Burnett's results been so surprisingly mediocre? Here is a noteworthy A.J. Burnett split:

             NO RUNNERS     
        
ab   k  bb  hr   ba  obp  slg
2003-05 775 184  72  15 .221 .292 .320
2006    140  27   4   4 .293 .322 .414

             RUNNERS ON
         ab   k  bb  hr   ba  obp  slg
2003-05 525 148  63   8 .253 .330 .370
2006    140  26   7   5 .271 .327 .521

Check out that slugging percentage with runners on this year. That's... that's not good.

Burnett's last two starts have given his legion of detractors in the Toronto media plenty of ammunition. He's had trouble getting out of jams in those games, and he's taken two big losses. However, his track record suggests that he doesn't really struggle much more than every other pitcher when forced to pitch from the stretch, and particularly not in the slugging department. I think it is wholly unreasonable to expect his struggles with runners on to continue, and it is unfair to question Burnett's mental makeup simply because he has been prone to big innings at times this year.

In fact, let's play Spot the Outlier! with some of Burnett's peripheral stats. The following stats are for 2002, 2004, 2005 and 2006. (2003 doesn't count, as Burnett was injured and made four starts.)

K/9: 8.94, 8.48, 8.53, 8.27. Remarkably consistent.
BB/9: 3.96, 2.85, 3.40, 1.72. Hum. Maybe a bit too aggressive this year?
GB%: 42.8, 50.2, 58.4, 50.8. Consistent.
LD%: 19.7, 16.7, 19.3, 21.3. The jump is predictable since A.J. isn't facing pitchers twice a game anymore.
HR/9: 0.53, 0.68, 0.52, 1.40. Welcome to the AL East?
HR/Fly%:
6.1, 8.4, 9.4, 17.6. Outlier city. I think we found it. Burnett's stuff is conducive to keeping the ball in the park; most pitchers will settle in around 11 or 12% in the long run regardless of stuff and pitching style anyway, with very few exceptions. This is a figure that is almost certain to decline as Burnett's season goes on, and he doesn't give up many flyballs to begin with. As this figure goes down, so will Burnett's ERA.

A.J. Burnett has struggled in clutch situations in a very small sample, and he's been homer-unlucky. I think that's all there is to it, unless there is actually a hitch in his delivery from the stretch that makes him more hittable or causes him to make mistakes. He's giving up a few more liners than usual, but he's also cut his walk rate in half, and that's a tradeoff he should be very happy with.

Injury will always be a concern with Burnett, but I see very little to worry about in his actual performance this year. Ideally it would translate into a few more wins. Today would be a nice time to start.
TDIB Sunday: I Close My Eyes | 35 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Mike D - Sunday, August 06 2006 @ 10:24 AM EDT (#152497) #

I attended AJ's last start in the Bronx, and it amazed me how tightly wound he became with runners on base.  His pace slowed down and his body language was poor.  It appears that he's been putting a lot of pressure on himself on the mound.

Anyway, all this has to end today.  I implore all authors of Batter's Box to post as many photos as possible from the NFH collection in this thread.  I know it's Sunday, but POTD mojo -- as in, a lot of POTD mojo -- is clearly called for.  It's the least we can do.

Mike Green - Sunday, August 06 2006 @ 12:28 PM EDT (#152508) #
Unfortunately, Burnett's difficulties with runners on base are not restricted to this year.  He is vulnerable to the stolen base, and it seems likely that worry about baserunners contributes to his diminished effectiveness with runners on. There may also be mechanical issues arising from his delivery from the stretch.
Mick Doherty - Sunday, August 06 2006 @ 01:45 PM EDT (#152513) #

Lyrics from Sloan, eh?

i admit, on first seeing the headline, I wondered how you were going to work in "Dust in the Wind.'

Although that'd be a great nickname for McGowan -- Dustin "The Wind" McGowan. Heh.

 

ken_warren - Sunday, August 06 2006 @ 04:03 PM EDT (#152519) #
Sometimes the best deals are the ones you don't make.  Unfortunately they made  this one.

O'Dog is now 281/345/455 and climbing fast.  Can play a little defense too!!

Mick Doherty - Sunday, August 06 2006 @ 04:17 PM EDT (#152521) #

Sometimes the best deals are the ones you don't make.  Unortunately they made  this one.

Typo there -- you mean "Fortunately." Glaus has 31 homers and 85 RBI. And it's August 6.

Mike Green - Sunday, August 06 2006 @ 05:02 PM EDT (#152528) #
I was pleased that John Gibbons pulled Burnett after 6 innings and 98 pitches.  The fact that Podsednik, Iguchi and Thome were coming up made that decision easier, but it would have been the right one even if gaining the platoon advantage wasn't a factor.
SK in NJ - Sunday, August 06 2006 @ 09:11 PM EDT (#152543) #
One thing to keep in mind with Burnett's home run rates: he gave up four in his first two starts (10 innings) before going on the DL for two months. Since then, he's given up five home runs in 54 innings (0.83 per 9). Burnett gets a lot of flack from Blue Jays fans, and some of it is deserved, but I'm not terribly upset about the way he's pitched since coming off the DL. The biggest concern is whether he can stay healthy.

I think people have to look past his salary at this point. Yes, he's overpaid. Yes, I would of rather re-signed Escobar when we had the chance than wait two years and destroy the market for starting pitchers to sign AJ. However, at this rate, we should look at performance, and since it's a five year deal, we should look at projectable performance. Burnett is not showing any signs of being a worse pitcher than he was in Florida, other than the increased home run rate (his former Florida partner is having a much worse time with it in Boston). If Burnett can maintain his K/9, BB/9, and improve on his HR rate a bit (which he has since coming back), then I don't have a reason to worry about him performance-wise. I think he can get better. Injury is a much more delicate issue with him.

As far as Orlando Hudson goes, as much as I would of loved to keep him at 2B with Hill at short, you'd have to be crazy to want him over Glaus right now. Let's not pin the Koskie deal with this. That was a blunder unrelated to the Glaus deal (Ricciardi could of kept Koskie at DH and traded Shea.....JP forced himself to move Koskie that way, not Glaus). Aaron Hill is hitting over .300 with an OBP near .360 in his first full season (after a horrid start), and Troy Glaus is on pace for Carlos Delgado type numbers. Anyone who looks at this move with any sort of regret (at least this year) is really looking for things to complain about.

As for Dave Bush, other than his innings pitched (which would of been very valuable in Toronto), he's been subpar. A 4.74 ERA and .751 opponent's OPS (and a 1.20 HR/9 rate) in the NL would translate into god knows what if he was in the American League facing the Yankees, Red Sox, White Sox, etc, and pitching at Rogers Centre. Value-wise, I think Bush/Overbay was fair. The bad part was Ricciardi overvaluing inferior pieces ahead of Bush (Towers and arguably Chacin...though I think Gus can be just as good or better than Bush long-term, if healthy).
Dave Till - Sunday, August 06 2006 @ 09:37 PM EDT (#152544) #
Typo there -- you mean "Fortunately." Glaus has 31 homers and 85 RBI. And it's August 6.

And Aaron Hill's best defensive position turns out to be second base. And he's not too shabby with the glove there either. Mark me down as happy with this deal.
Mike Green - Monday, August 07 2006 @ 11:27 AM EDT (#152562) #
Even using 20-20 hindsight, it's hard to see what moves could have been made in the 2005-06 off-season which might have improved on the pitching significantly in 2006.  Dave Bush has had an off-year for him.  Kevin Millwood ended up getting 5 years/$60 million, and has not been very good.  One can construct a scenario where the team would have had better starting pitching this year, but it is not easy to do.

The one assessment that seems to have been foreseeably inaccurate was the one that pegged Russ Adams as ready to be the starting shortstop on an everyday basis.  The Red Sox were faced with a similar dilemma, having traded Renteria and with the readiness of Pedroia very much in question, and signed Alex Gonzalez to a $3 million 1 year contract.  That has worked out swimmingly for them.  The other move that might have helped a bit, at least for 2006, in hindsight would have been non-tendering Hillenbrand and signing Frank Thomas, with Thomas being the primary DH and Hinske filling in from time to time.  One definite benefit of that move would have been the elimination of the "Hillenbrand at third, Glaus at short" games which were not helping a struggling pitching staff. 

The most serous criticism of the off-season moves is not really that better ones for 2006 could have been made but that the management is hamstrung by financial pressures resulting from the moves  for 2007 and following.  We will see what the 2007 budget is.

TDIB Sunday: I Close My Eyes | 35 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.