Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
Researcher extraordinaire Dick Thompson posted two very interesting articles on the SABR-L mailing list yesterday, and I thought I'd mention them as they are of considerable interest.

Incidentally, SABR-L is one of the 1,000 good reasons to join SABR, as I am quickly finding out. Did you know that SABR has a massive lending library of books and other baseball research materials that you can borrow? I didn't, but now that I'm a member I plan to take advantage of it. The mailing list is a treasure trove of research findings and discussion.

Anyway, Dick posted two articles that were extremely interesting, both from 1939, on June 6 and June 7.

Here's the June 6 article:

"The new meter, which gives an immediate reading which engineers said
compared with standard laboratory meter accuracy, is built in a trailer. You
throw into a hole two feet square. Just inside is a set of photo-electric
tubes, and five feet back is another set. The device measures the ball's
speed between the two points and flashes it on a scale facing the pitcher."

"Sponsors recall that back in 1917, in Bridgeport (Conn.) arms laboratory,
Walter Johnson recorded 134 feet per second, Christy Mathewson 127 and 'Smoky
Joe' Wood 124. They used a gravity drop interval recorder."

And the June 7 article:

"Three Boston Red Sox threw a baseball 122 feet a second into a new
photo-electric pitching meter yesterday. Three Cleveland Indians could only
do 119 feet.
"Pitchers were not included in yesterday's test but 'unofficially,' Bob
Feller of Cleveland threw three balls into the meter from a distance of 20
feet. The best mark he recorded was 119 feet. His less-touted teammate,
pitcher Johnny Humphreys, recorded 127 feet. There will be a contest for
pitchers later.
"Jimmy Foxx, Jim Tabor and Roger Cramer made it a clean sweep with a
first-place tie in yesterday's fielder's contest.
"The best the Indians could do was a tie at 119 feet by Ben Chapman,
Julius Solters and Jim Shilling.
"Cleveland men who developed the speed meter said the only comparable
scientific marks were made in 1917. Walter Johnson threw the ball 134 feet a
second, Christy Mathewson 127 and 'Smoky Joe' Wood 124. Their speeds were
shown by a gravity drop interval recorder."

Anyway, thanks to Dick for this.

What do these equate to in MPH?

134 feet per second = 91mph
127 feet per second = 87mph
124 feet per second = 85mph
122 feet per second = 83mph
119 feet per second = 81mph

OK, I know you're all saying, yeah right, Bob Feller only threw 81 miles per hour, pull the other one. I guess first we should discount these later tests somewhat, but the 1917 speeds are very interesting, and extremely plausible.

First, remember that modern radar guns as used in baseball are massively inflated. Apparently - I don't remember where I heard this - the "gun speed" you see most on TV or at the ballpark is actually about 5mph faster than the actual speed, as it would be measured by devices such as we are talking about here. The JUGS gun, the most popular kid, consistently gives readings several mph higher than other devices. And radar guns aren't very well calibrated; when you sit with a group of scouts, having readings be 4-6mph apart isn't uncommon.

If we bump the speeds above up by five miles per hour, especially the early ones, they start to make a lot of sense. Walter throwing 96? I can believe that. Matty 92? Sure. Joe Wood 90? I'd be surprised if it wasn't a bit higher, but it seems reasonable.

Anyway, the fact that Walter could throw about 4mph faster than Big Six is interesting in itself. And the thing is, the speeds that regular players were clocking in the later test definitely have a ring of truth about them... if you took a player out of the field and put him on the mound, an 80mph fastball would be about right.
Old-Time Radar Guns | 11 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Gitz - Wednesday, February 05 2003 @ 01:39 AM EST (#35190) #
Very fun stuff, Craig.

Everyone remembers Dave Winfield, I presume, and I further presume everyone knows of his mound mastery while he was at the University of Minnesota. “Mr. May” had a cannon in RF: I wonder what he was clocked at in college? Low 90s?

In high school one of our pitchers was clocked at 86 MPH. I remember facing him, knocking line drives, and an occasional long one, all over the place and thinking, “This is 86 MPH?” I’m gonna make it after all!” Obviously, there’s no way it was 86. Probably high 70s. Of course speed isn’t as important as movement, and I’m sure we all have seen those Bob Gibson highlights where the ball dances more than Dick Cheney avoiding questions about his corporate dealings.

Speaking of shiftiness, one of my friends—he wasn’t shifty, mind you—on the USC baseball team got to face pre-surgery Orel Hershiser, during the annual USC-Dodger day at Dodger stadium. Orel was “only” throwing in the mid 80s, but Mike (my friend) could not believe the movement on the ball and the general heaviness of it. Mike took about 10 hacks and couldn’t get the ball out of the infield. And this was a Division I college baseball player, at one of the best baseball schools in the U.S.A.—and it was just BP! Dang. I’d like to think I could stand in there against any major leaguer, and maybe stroke a few line drives, but I don’t think it could happen. One curve ball, I’d be eating dirt. And Randy Johnson would simply scare the beejeezus out of me. Baseball players are, um, good.
Craig B - Wednesday, February 05 2003 @ 09:53 AM EST (#35191) #
By the way, I've been thinking about Mathewson's nickname. If Matty was "Big Six", should we maybe think about calling Antonio Alfonseca (in deference to his ever-expanding bulk) "Really Big Six"?
Coach - Wednesday, February 05 2003 @ 09:53 AM EST (#35192) #
I often sat behind the plate at Fort Lauderdale Yankees (FSL) games, and Craig's right -- different guns of the same model produce different readings. If it's an inexact science now, imagine how precise the earliest attempts were to measure pitch speed. It got me thinking about the physics of baseball, so I searched for Professor Bob Adair, and found this -- Alan Nathan's comprehensive list of Web sites on the topic. It includes a link to Batspeed, which may not be as scientific, but is a great summary of the mechanics I teach and Barry Bonds exemplifies. (I prefer this torque/rotation approach until there are two strikes, then recommend advanced hitters switch to Charlie Lau/Walt Hriniak style.)

Also linked from Nathan's page is this graphic, illustrating some of Adair's work and confirming Gizzi's experience -- for mere mortals, hitting is impossible!
Coach - Wednesday, February 05 2003 @ 09:57 AM EST (#35193) #
Quit picking on Alfonseca, Craig. According to my detailed statistical analysis, he is twice as good as Three-Finger Brown.
Craig B - Wednesday, February 05 2003 @ 11:12 AM EST (#35194) #
If it's an inexact science now, imagine how precise the earliest attempts were to measure pitch speed.

Interestingly enough, because of the design of the machines mentioned, they were likely giving accurate readings (also because scientists are going to be much more careful about the accuracy of their equipment than scouts are).

Coach, before the next time we meet up you will have to remind me to bring you Dr. Chris Yeager's video on hitting. Very interesting indeed, something you would find quite useful.
_Ralph Hinckley - Wednesday, February 05 2003 @ 04:09 PM EST (#35195) #
http://www.tvtome.com/tvtome/servlet/GuidePageServlet/showid-586/epid-78701/
Hey, I could throw 200 miles per hour! I could fly, too, just not very well....
_robert - Friday, April 18 2003 @ 12:48 AM EDT (#35196) #
Don't know much about baseball, but target speed would seem to depend upon the point at which the target was aquired. If aquired at release it would be faster than it would be if aquired 20 feet from release point. Seems to be very subjective, for any object that is decreasing in velocity after leaving it's propulsion source.
_jerry logan - Tuesday, July 22 2003 @ 11:40 PM EDT (#35197) #
i am looking for a radar gun that will register the speed of a karate kick.can you help me?

sincerely,jerry logn
_jerry logan - Tuesday, July 22 2003 @ 11:40 PM EDT (#35198) #
i am looking for a radar gun that will register the speed of a karate kick.can you help me?

sincerely,jerry logn
_Doug - Wednesday, July 30 2003 @ 07:39 PM EDT (#35199) #
As far as your comments on early radar gun readings is concerned: I believe that the measurements for today's jugs gun isn't off by 5 mph, it simply measures the velocity of the pitch right out of the pitcher's hand. Whereas, the other type of today's gun measures the velocity of the pitch about half way to home plate (at least that's what I've read). Also, from what I've read there is a difference of about 3-4 mph between the two.
If Bob Feller and the others were standing about 20 feet from the old meter, there speeds would be underestimated by a couple of miles per hour relative to the modern jugs gun.
While Bob Feller's fastball was almost certainly up around 100 mph, I believe that the above readings taken as a whole indicate that it's probable that the typical pitcher in those days simply didn't throw as hard as today's pitchers. A 90-93 mph fastball was a big deal back then.
Of course, it would be interesting if someone really found out how the old meter compared to todays radar guns.

Doug
_Jeff - Thursday, September 16 2004 @ 10:33 AM EDT (#35200) #
A modern Jugs or, better yet, a Stalker gives a PEAK reading. True, the best ones acquire the ball almost immediately after it is thrown.
Reading will depend on: 1) gun's quality; 2) calibration accuracy 3)sampling rate; 4) gun range; 5) interference from other guns and even moisture in air.

Those early methods produced an AVERAGE speed which was of course about 4 MPH less than peak. Also the earliest method of measuring how far a ball goes in one second produces an average for about double the normal 60' 6".

Those early speeds were truly amazing!

---
As for HS pitchers, 95% have no idea how fast they can throw. I've only known two who own good guns.

--
"In high school one of our pitchers was clocked at 86 MPH."

My son can hit 80 mph (for real) but some days he can barely muster 74. He is fastest out of season when well rested.
Old-Time Radar Guns | 11 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.