Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
Richard Griffin checks in with a timely report from the GM meetings in Phoenix, where there was rain, but at least no sleet or wind. Here's his assessment of the new, post-ARod marketplace:

For the first time since the inglorious era of collusion, ownership appears to be firmly in control of the free-agent market. Supply exceeds demand. In a 15-day period following the conclusion of the World Series, more than 200 players filed for free agency. That's the equivalent of eight full major-league rosters. Astonishing! They will be joined in the next 37 days by over 100 additional artificially created free agents — arbitration-eligible players not tendered contracts by the Dec. 20 deadline.

Bingo. Owners may be slow, and they may be stupid too, but even they've finally gotten the message that Sandy Alderson and company have been banging into their heads for years: the only people you're bidding against are yourselves, and you're strangling your own marketplace by refusing to non-tender your marginal players. The Blue Jays got a one-year headstart on the competition with their foresight, but that's all. Though it may be wise to wait out the market and see who's still available come January, my sense is that JP normally targets the guys he wants and gets them early. How slow or fast he moves this off-season on names like Tom Gordon and Pat Hentgen will reveal whether his approach this year leans one way or another.
Captive Market | 48 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
_Spicol - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 09:28 AM EST (#14454) #
ESPN is reporting Schilling talked to his wife and is now open to being traded to the Yanks. Ugh.
_Jays1fan1 - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 09:28 AM EST (#14455) #
In other articles this morning I noticed the Jays lost two players from last season.
- Ken Huckaby is about to sign a deal with Texas
- Gord Ash in Milwuakee has scooped up another former Jay farm hand Brian Bowles. Ash how's Joey Lawrence?
Craig B - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 09:36 AM EST (#14456) #
Hee hee Joe Lawrence. By the way, for those who are interested in rubbing salt in that little wound, Jo-Jo The Non-Wonder Dog hit .204 for AAA Indianapolis this past year with a .299 slugging percentage.
Leigh - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 09:44 AM EST (#14457) #
Schilling talked to his wife and is now open to being traded to the Yanks. Ugh.

If it costs the Yanks Nick Johnson, and if it means that they will not resign Pettitte, it won't be that bad. Nick Johnson is awesome.
_Spicol - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 09:50 AM EST (#14458) #
If it costs the Yanks Nick Johnson, and if it means that they will not resign Pettitte, it won't be that bad. Nick Johnson is awesome.

You brighten my day. I wasn't looking long term.

The report is that 'Zona asked for Johnson AND Soriano for Schilling and Spivey. The Yankees balked.

Another trade idea, this one from Phil Rogers, is the Cubs dealing Alex Gonzalez, Carlos Zambrano, Kyle Farnsworth and a couple of good arms in Double A or below (not including the untouchable Angel Guzman) to the Rangers for ARod. Even considering the $$ savings, could the Rangers settle for Zambrano and such blah-ness?
Leigh - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 10:09 AM EST (#14459) #
The report is that 'Zona asked for Johnson AND Soriano for Schilling and Spivey.

As a Jays fan, I would be thrilled if that trade took place.

Cubs dealing Alex Gonzalez, Carlos Zambrano, Kyle Farnsworth and a couple of good arms in Double A or below (not including the untouchable Angel Guzman) to the Rangers for ARod. Even considering the $$ savings, could the Rangers settle for Zambrano and such blah-ness?

Farnsworth is pretty good, and Zambrano would be awesome in Arlington as (I am pretty sure) he has by far the lowest homerun allowance rate of any qualifying starting pitcher. Considering the $$$, I think Texas would fare well there. Maybe the Ballpark in Arlinton would turn AGon into a 25 homerun hitter. That said, AGon still sucks, and ARod is the second most valuable player in all of baseball.
Pistol - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 10:15 AM EST (#14460) #
Is there any reason for the staggering of dates? Why is the decision on whether to tender contracts or arbitration so much later than the beginning of the free agency period? Why are arbitration offers for free agents decided after the beginning of free agency?

It would seem to make sense to me that everything is done prior to free agency beginning.

The Jays feel they can find a closer from among the likes of LaTroy Hawkins, Tom Gordon, Ricardo Rincon, Jason Grimsley and Chad Fox. If not, they'll stick with Aquilino Lopez and non-tender Cliff Politte.

Is this just a poorly phrased paragraph?

From the way I read it if the Jays sign one of the above they won't non-tender Politte, but if they don't sign one of the above they will non-tender Politte? That doesn't make sense to me. It would seem the decision on Politte is independent of everything else.
Craig B - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 10:33 AM EST (#14461) #
I have nothing to base this on, but I think the Jays will do everything in their power to sign Politte before the non-tender deadline.
Leigh - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 10:42 AM EST (#14462) #
I hope that they bring Politte back. He was dynamite in 2002 (granted, I do remember, during the Canada Day weekend series at Olympic Stadium, cursing the day that he was born).

If Politte played for any other team, we would all be clamouring for the Jays to pounce on him now, while his value is low.
_Jonny German - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 10:48 AM EST (#14463) #
Here's an interesting name: Danys Baez. There's a good chance that Cleveland will non-tender him, having made over $5M this year. He turned 26 this September. What's he worth on the open market, and is he a starter or a closer?
						
Year G GS IP ERA WHIP BAA K/BB K/9 BB/9 HR/9
 2001 43 0 50.1 2.50 1.07 .191 2.60 9.34 3.59 0.90
 2002 39 26 165.1 4.41 1.46 .256 1.59 7.09 4.47 0.76
 2003 73 0 75.2 3.81 1.16 .229 2.87 7.90 2.75 1.08
 Career 155 26 291.1 3.92 1.32 .238 1.98 7.67 3.86 0.87

Only 11.1 of his 2002 innings were in relief. Anybody know why he was moved backed to the bullpen for 2003? If I'm a GM and I'm confident he can be a starter, I target him right behind Escobar & Batista.

Pistol, I agree that paragraph sounds odd, both for the reasons you mentioned and for the fact that Rincon, Grimsley, and Fox are not likely to be better as closers than Aquilino. I do think the decision on Politte is dependent on other signings, however - the market in the next month will dictate whether or not he's worth tendering, given that he'd likely get close to $1M in arbitration. I think the key is whether or not he's completely healthy.
_S.K. - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 10:50 AM EST (#14464) #
Politte was injured last year, I don't see a reason to non-tender him. Just keep him out of the closer's spot and he should be fine (which works out well - if he regains his effectiveness, he'd be a perfect fit for the super-setup role...)
Leigh - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 10:51 AM EST (#14465) #
Baez... I like.
_S.K. - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 10:52 AM EST (#14466) #
I second JG's interest in Baez! I assumed he'd be too expensive for the Jays to take a flyer on him though... he's one of those 'failed prospects' who people seem to forget is still young.
_Chris - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 10:53 AM EST (#14467) #
I thought the Cubbies were planning on letting Gonzo go. Glad JP got rid of that contract. What was Ash thinking when he signed him to it. Sure, he is good with the leather but sure whiffs a lot in the box.
_Bigjaysfan - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 10:55 AM EST (#14468) #
I think the problem with Politte is that he would make too much money in arbitration this year to justify keeping him around if the Jays didn't come to a deal with him first. Who cares if he was injured last year, still doesn't mean that the Jays should pay him bloated arbitration dollars to have him play for them. Non tender him and then if it is possible in the CBA, cause I don't know if it is, sign him for cheaper. He would make way more in arbitration then he would on the open market.
Leigh - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 10:58 AM EST (#14469) #
Baez' numbers as a starter are significantly worse (thanks for the stats, Jonny); the k/bb, k/9 and bb/9 were are gross deviation from 2001 and 2003. Put into the context of those other two years, he was lucky to escape 2002 with a respectable ERA.
_Mick - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 11:17 AM EST (#14470) #
Baez is 26 like Orlando Hernandez is 34, people. That said, even a 28-31-year-old Baez would be a good pickup.

If the Cubs make that trade with the Rangers and agree to take all of A-Rod's salary, the Rangers can't sign the papers fast enough. Hey, if they're seriously considering A-Rod for David Eckstein and Jarrod Washburn, the Cubs offer beats the hell out of that.

On the potential Yankees trade, here is what Lee Sinins is reporting today:

According to the Newark Star Ledger, Curt Schilling has told the Diamondbacks he's changed his mind and would approve a trade to the Yankees. There is a 3 team rumor that would send Schilling to the Yankees, Nick Johnson to the Brewers and [the paragraph in Sinins' report was truncated at this point, but I will assume Ben Sheets and/or Richie Sexson to the Diamondbacks - MD].

According to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, if the Yankees decide they are interested in Jim Edmonds, there is already a 3 team rumor that would send Edmonds and Schilling to the Yankees, Nick Johnson and Danny Bautista to the Cardinals and Alfonso Soriano and Jeff Weaver to the Diamondbacks.
Pistol - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 11:18 AM EST (#14471) #
I think the problem with Politte is that he would make too much money in arbitration this year to justify keeping him around if the Jays didn't come to a deal with him first.

Maybe I'm missing something, but if you don't have a good year, or a high initial contract I don't see how the arbitration amount will be anything significant.

He made $845,000 last year with a 5.66 ERA in 50 innings. Who is his comparable where there's a possibility that he gets even $1 million?
_Scott Lucas - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 11:36 AM EST (#14472) #
Baez was put back into the bullpen in August 2002 when Bob Wickman was hurt. Baez had a 4.44 ERA as a starter.

Another trade idea, this one from Phil Rogers, is the Cubs dealing Alex Gonzalez, Carlos Zambrano, Kyle Farnsworth and a couple of good arms in Double A or below (not including the untouchable Angel Guzman) to the Rangers for ARod. Even considering the $$ savings, could the Rangers settle for Zambrano and such blah-ness?

Ideas are fun!

Contrary to the opinions of several bored sportswriters and talk-show hosts, the Rangers will not go bankrupt if they don't trade Rodriguez by next Tuesday. They are fully capable of carrying his contract to term. Hence, they have no reason to accept anything less than full value in a trade (which, by the way, A-Rod can veto). Teams would have to offer their so-called untouchables to elicit real interest from Texas.

Fueling this fire are some in the Dallas media (like the execrable Gerry Fraley) who are playing the Ever Popular Stupidity Game: blaming the best player on the team for its poor performance.
_mathesond - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 11:48 AM EST (#14473) #
Another thing about A-Rod's contract - doesn't he have the option to void the final 3 years (when he's 32)? I would assume that any team trading for him would want to ensure he does opt out at that point. After all, isn't Scott Boras is on record as saying that A-Rod would get an even bigger deal than his current one if he was a free agent today? - C'mon Scott, put your money where your mouth is!
Craig B - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 11:53 AM EST (#14474) #
Presumably, A-Rod could be presuaded to negotiate a commitment or rider that states he will exercise his opt-out right. But that's certainly not cost-free! It potentially represents $75 million of value to A-Rod, and if you want him to just negotiate it away you better pony up. I'm sure he'd happily commit to that right now... if you offered him $30 million in cash on the table.
_Scott Lucas - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 11:56 AM EST (#14475) #
doesn't he have the option to void the final 3 years (when he's 32)?

Yes. Purely a player option; no team could make him do it. Here's his full contract (about halfway down the page).

Scott Boras is on record as saying that A-Rod would get an even bigger deal than his current one if he was a free agent today?

Scott Boras says things to benefit himself and his clients. Any resemblance to the truth or what he actually believes is just an unfortunate coincidence.
_S.K. - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 12:08 PM EST (#14476) #
Scott: while I agree with what you say, I think it's pretty obvious that the Rangers are at least shopping A-Rod around if not actively trying to deal him. Whether they HAVE to unload him for financial reasons is not as important as whether THEY believe that they have to.
_R Billie - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 12:12 PM EST (#14477) #
I really don't understand the thinking behind non-tendering Politte either. What will that accomplish? Saving two or three hundred grand in the hopes of getting a pitcher with similar ability with the same chances of success? Agree with him before the arbitration date to pay him approximately the same salary and hope he bounces back from his injury and trauma as a closer. This is still a guy as far as I know who throws hard and generally knows where the ball is going. That might be something the Jays want to have in their bullpen next year.

His disastrous year was all concentrated in 9.2 innings in June (after which he came down with shoulder trouble) and 4.2 innings in September. Yes his ERA was 5.66 because he gave up 11 homers in 49.1 innings. The three years prior he posted ERAs of 3.66, 2.42, and 3.67 with similarly good ratios as his 40/17 k/bb mark from this season. A year ago it was 72/28 in 73.2 innings. His homerun rates from prior years are all good to reasonable. He may not be a closer and he's certainly not a dominant reliever; but for the Blue Jays to non-tender a reliever who has a good chance of posting a sub-3.80 ERA in 2004 would seem odd to me in the extreme.
_Jordan - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 01:24 PM EST (#14478) #
According to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, if the Yankees decide they are interested in Jim Edmonds, there is already a 3 team rumor that would send Edmonds and Schilling to the Yankees, Nick Johnson and Danny Bautista to the Cardinals and Alfonso Soriano and Jeff Weaver to the Diamondbacks.

Regardless of whether this would be good or bad for the Jays, the Yankees or the AL East, I hope it happens: this trade of this magnitude would be an absolute blast. Big trades are fun, end of story. That said, I can't see the Yanks doing it, not even for Schilling and Edmonds: they're giving up too much of their future, and the added payroll (bloated further by the need to sign someone like Todd Walker for 2B) would push their payroll to, what, somewhere in the $180 million range? And that's before the payroll tax.
_R Billie - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 01:46 PM EST (#14479) #
That said, I can't see the Yanks doing it, not even for Schilling and Edmonds: they're giving up too much of their future, and the added payroll (bloated further by the need to sign someone like Todd Walker for 2B) would push their payroll to, what, somewhere in the $180 million range? And that's before the payroll tax.

Giving up Johnson and Soriano would border on insane for most teams but if the Yanks can spend $150 million and not care then what's $180 million? And as long as they can spend two or three times as much as the average team then it doesn't matter much how much future they give up really.

Of course, if I were running the Yanks I would never trade Johnson. I might trade Soriano in the right deal just because his hype has always seemed to be a couple of steps ahead of his actual value (even after breaking out). And if he has to move off of second he loses a lot of value unless he can play centerfield well.
Pepper Moffatt - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 01:59 PM EST (#14480) #
http://economics.about.com
Hijack:

Check out the Baseball Prospectus PTP on The Expos, Giants, and Jays.

Mike
Mike Green - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 02:08 PM EST (#14481) #
Hijack2: Canada's Eric Gagne won the NL Cy Young award.
_Jordan - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 06:31 PM EST (#14482) #
Just to update the likely free-agent list, the odds of Paul Quantrill being a Blue Jay next season seem slim. From Mike Rutsey at the Toronto Sun:

"At this point in my career, I'm looking to play for a contending team, I'm looking for a shot at a ring," Quantrill said yesterday as he prepared to go on a bow hunting expedition out west. "I'm also looking for a multi-year contract." Given the two demands, it's hard to see where the Jays would be a fit.

Still, Quantrill is interested in talking with the Jays. "Obviously I like Toronto, I have good memories of being there and I don't think they're that far away from being a contending team," he said. "You never know what's going to happen."


That last part sounds to me like he's just being polite, in a very Canadian way. I fully expect to see Quantrill in Yankee pinstripes next season.
Mike Green - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 07:58 PM EST (#14483) #
Just a couple of other thoughts about Politte. He has a 4 year record of performing much better after the All-Star break (an ERA 2 runs per game lower post-All-Star than pre-). He also had a couple of successful starts with the Phillies. Assuming the Jays don't non-tender him, I'd like to see him get a couple of starts in spring training, to see how he does and if nothing else, to get some innings on his arm before the regular season starts. I'm also hoping that he starts the season in long relief, so he can get some work in low leverage situations.
_Dr B - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 08:35 PM EST (#14484) #
Apart from the fact that Carlos Tosca has been messing with Pollite's mind he is a pretty cheap option for a flamethrower (though he lost some velocity last year, no?). He's also quite short (5-11) for a pitcher who throws so hard, and these guys have always been considered an injury risk. Maybe the Jays used him too heavily in 2002? Anyway, I like the idea of seeing if he can start, but I think you have to baby his arm a bit, whatever you do.
_R Billie - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 08:48 PM EST (#14485) #
I think Politte is an ideal 3rd or 4th arm out of the pen.

I was expecting Quantrill to have that kind of viewpoint. I don't think he left $3.1 million on the table to sign a one year deal for a hometown discount. If the Jays are going to offer a multi-year deal they're probably better off offering it to a guy like Hawkins.
_Tassle - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 09:39 PM EST (#14486) #
O's declined their option on Kerry Ligtenberg, making him a free agent.
I gotta say, he looks better than most of what we've got already, but his left/right splits are just ugly, lefties just dominate him. Maybe he'd be better off in the National league, but him and Trever Miller might make a pretty good combo if Ligtenberg is cheap.
_R Billie - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 09:54 PM EST (#14487) #
His splits are fairly extreme this year but are much more reasonable in this prior years. That could come from his being more familiar with National League hitters or simply from having better stuff back then. He usually held batters to an average in the low .200s but it was up over .260 this year.

Still I think he could be as useful as Politte and he does have a number of saves earlier in his career. I did think he was a good guy to go after last year and I still think he can help and he probably won't cost much.
Leigh - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 10:05 PM EST (#14488) #
Ligtenberg is a good idea... love those sideburns.
_Dr B - Thursday, November 13 2003 @ 10:23 PM EST (#14489) #
Ligtenberg is a good idea... love those sideburns.

Yes, but they looked better from the left than the right in 2003 (the difference wasn't so extreme in 2002). Perhaps if Miller grew his sideburns a bit we could get a cheap platoon...
Pistol - Friday, November 14 2003 @ 08:14 AM EST (#14490) #
FWIW

Boston Herald: "Besides their pursuit of free agent closer Keith Foulke, the Red Sox have also turned their attention to the starter's market by expressing early and significant interest in Toronto right-hander Kelvim Escobar."
Pistol - Friday, November 14 2003 @ 08:16 AM EST (#14491) #
http://redsox.bostonherald.com/redSox/redSox.bg?articleid=330
Greenberg said seven teams have contacted Escobar. The others are the White Sox, Mets, Angels, Devil Rays, Phillies and Blue Jays, who have already made a two-year offer.

``They have made it very clear that they want Kelvim back but with all due respect to them, Kelvim wants to see what else is out there as well,'' said Greenberg. Escobar is looking for a multiyear deal beginning at three years, although a two-year guarantee at better money with an option for a third year is feasible.


The whole article is linked to my name
Mike Green - Friday, November 14 2003 @ 10:31 AM EST (#14492) #
Early indications of salary contraction are not so clear cut. According to MLB.com, Tom Martin yesterday signed a 3.2 mil, 2 year contract with the Dodgers. He's a 32 year old LOOGY. His stats in Dodger Stadium with that defence behind him were OK, but nothing special, 80 games, 51 innings, 3.52 ERA. Here are the details: http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/splits?statsId=5752.

If Martin can get 1.6 per year, maybe Quantrill and Alvarez can get more than 3 million per year, and Escobar can get 7 million per year. It certainly has happened before in the recent past that owners have preached financial restraint, and then not practised it. Who can forget Reinsdorf's signing of Albert Belle after the 94 labour dispute?

This is, however, just one signing, so we'll have to see if other teams follow the Dodgers' lead.
_Jonny German - Friday, November 14 2003 @ 11:55 AM EST (#14493) #
Lee Sinins reports the Tom Martin signing as well as Mike Timlin re-signing with Boston for 1 year, $2.5M. I agree with Mike Green, these signings do not appear to fit with a downward salary trend.
_Craig - Friday, November 14 2003 @ 12:05 PM EST (#14494) #
Early indications of salary contraction are not so clear cut. According to MLB.com, Tom Martin yesterday signed a 3.2 mil, 2 year contract with the Dodgers.

True, but all that shows is that Dan Evans doesn't understand the value of a dollar. That's hardly new; it's been going on for a long time. They key to the market is where the main body of GMs end up; rumors are that there will be a record number of non-tenders which would mean they are listing to the cheap side. But there's not nearly enough evidence yet one way or the other, as we all seem to agree.

There is a pretty good-sized group of GMs out there who would consider Timlin worth $2.5 million on a one-year deal. A good signing by Theo Epstein for two reasons... one, it locks in an important piece of the Sox bullpen; two, it might make other GMs nervous enough about the market to jump at signing guys like Tom Martin to similar deals.
_Jordan - Friday, November 14 2003 @ 12:14 PM EST (#14495) #
Tom Martin for two years ... Evans should be worried about Billy Beane taking his job.

Tom Martin, 33
51 IP, 36 H, 24 BB, 51 K, 3.53 ERA, 1.18 WHIP

Jason Kershner, 27
54 IP, 43 H, 15 BB, 32 K, 3.17 ERA, 1.07 WHIP
Mike Green - Friday, November 14 2003 @ 12:20 PM EST (#14496) #
Jordan,
I agree. I actually like Kershner quite a bit. He can get righties out, and he did start in the PCL successfully. I'd much rather have Kershner for 04 and 05 than Martin.
Pistol - Friday, November 14 2003 @ 01:56 PM EST (#14497) #
In the take it for what it's worth department, I heard Gammons on the radio this morning. He said one team surveyed (Toronto?) all the other teams on what their budgets would be for 2004, and found on average teams are going to end up $4.5 million below where they were in 2003.

If I'm a free agent (I suppose technically I am....) I'd be taking the first reasonable offer I can find. Those who aren't assessing the market correctly are going to cost themselves some money.
Craig B - Friday, November 14 2003 @ 02:03 PM EST (#14498) #
on average teams are going to end up $4.5 million below where they were in 2003.

Hmph. Teams usually wind up overshooting budgets (for the same reason you usually find yourself bidding higher than your "limit" in an auction or a poker game) a little bit, but this indicates an acros-the-board 7% cut. Considering that well over half of salaries are frozen from year-to-year *with increases built into the contracts*, and you get a not-so-pleasant picture... the average player who is a 2004 free agent is looking at a sizable pay cut, maybe as much as 20%.
Mike Green - Friday, November 14 2003 @ 03:08 PM EST (#14499) #
I'd love to know what Gammons says the Yankee budget is for 2004. George could overshoot any figure you name by $30 or $40 million on his own. Speaking of which, Jayson Stark points out that the Yankees have already got $75 million committed through 2006 (!) with contracts for Jeter, Williams, Posada, Giambi and Mussina. Hmmm.

There seem to be at least 4 big spenders: the Os, the Yankees, the Dodgers and the Phillies. If that is all, the market for free agents will indeed be tight. If there are more, bidding wars might erupt again.
_R Billie - Friday, November 14 2003 @ 04:36 PM EST (#14500) #
I think what's important to look at is not just overall payroll level but spendable dollars. That's going to vary per team and some teams may actually see their budgets increase but their spendable dollars decrease because of rising player contracts.

It's also not going to affect much the players at the very top end of the scale as those teams with the most spendable dollars (presumably the Yankees, Orioles, Phillies, Padres, Angels, Dodgers, etc) won't afraid to bid closer to what the best players are asking for.

The Jays would probably be considered just about middle class in spending power which isn't a bad place to be; it just means little chance at the best free agents and sadly that might include Escobar.

Certainly the lesser lights would be insane for passing up reasonable contract offers from their former clubs. The Jays should be able to find a fair amount of capable help for low to middling dollars if they wait out the bigger spenders.

Along those lines, Cleveland declined the option for Baez making him a free agent. Although I have no idea whether players whose options are declined are still worth draft pick compensation as free agents. In any case, I doubt Baez would be offered arbitration on his $5 million 2003 salary.
_Geoff - Saturday, November 15 2003 @ 11:11 AM EST (#14501) #
I could see the Yankees doing the following

Signing Mike Cameron
Signing Vladdy
Trading Soriano to Florida for Lowell
Signing Colon
Trading Johnson for Vazquez
Signing Quantrill
Signing Rincon
Signing Hawkins
Re-Signing Jeff Nelson

Giving them an outfield of Matsui-Cameron-Vladdy, an infield of Lowell-Jeter-Boone-Giambi with Posada catching and Bernie DHing, a rotation of Mussina-Colon-Vazquez-Contreras-Lieber and a bullpen of Weaver-Hammond-Nelson-Rincon-Quantrill-Hawkins-Rivera...that is a sick team that would cost about 160 million, with 40 million of that taxed at 30%

Yikes
Captive Market | 48 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.