ESPN has the Jays facing RHPs in (at least) their next 10 games. There should be lots of playing time for Lukes and Barger.
Plausible Best Possible Lineup, using this year's stats only:
* 1. LF Lukes 74pa, .313babip, 133wrc+, 2.6war/650
* 2. 1B Guerrero 177pa, .336babip, 126wrc+, 2.6war/650
* 3. DH Springer 143pa, .385babip, 163wrc+, 5.0war/650
* 4. SS Bichette 185pa, .326babip, 105wrc+, 1.8war/650
* 5. 3B Barger 59pa, .279babip, 104wrc+, 5.5war/650
* 6. C Alejandro 125pa, .314babip, 93wrc+, 4.2war/650
* 7. CF Varsho 36pa, .200babip, 97wrc+, 3.6war/650
* 8. RF Straw 73pa, .340babip, 97wrc+, 5.3war/650
* 9. 2B Clement 114pa, .315babip, 76wrc+, 2.9war/650
* B. UT Santander 160pa, .223babip, 76wrc+, -1.2war/650
* B. OF Roden 84pa, .214babip, 53wrc+, 0.8war/650
* B. IF Gimenez 143pa, .229babip, 68wrc+, 1.4war/650
* B. C Heineman 41pa, .438babip, 163wrc+, 12.7war/650
* X. UT Schneider 21pa, .143babip, 54wrc+, 0.0war/650
* X. OF Clase 16pa, .182babip, -15wrc+, -12.2war/650
* X. IF Wagner 68pa, .250babip, 52wrc+, -2.9war/650
* X. IF Stefanic 1pa, .000babip, -100wrc+, 0.0war/650
Using Past 1 Calendar Year Stats:
* 1. LF Lukes 165pa, .377obp, 132wrc+, 3.9war/650
* 2. 1B Guerrero 702pa, .400obp, 166wrc+, 5.3war/650
* 3. DH Santander 669pa, .302obp, 120wrc+, 2.4war/650
* 4. RF Springer 600pa, .333obp, 118wrc+, 2.6war/650
* 5. C Alejandro 426pa, .322obp, 98wrc+, 4.9war/650
* 6. CF Varsho 415pa, .280babip, 92wrc+, 3.6war/650
* 7. SS Bichette 370pa, .314obp, 94wrc+, 1.8war/650
* 8. 3B Barger 266pa, .275obp, 88wrc+, 1.5war/650
* 9. 2B Clement 493pa, .285obp, 89wrc+, 2.9war/650
* B. UT Jimenez 210pa, .329obp, 102wrc+, 1.5war/650
* B. OF Straw 77pa, .311obp, 94wrc+, 5.1war/650
* B. IF Gimenez 613pa, .290obp, 79wrc+, 2.5war/650
* B. C Heineman 55pa, .364obp, 130wrc+, 9.5war/650
* X. UT Schneider 372pa, .255obp, 57wrc+, -1.2war/650
* X. OF Loperfido 237pa, .254obp, 72wrc+, 0.0war/650
* X. IF Wagner 154pa, .314obp, 93wrc+, 1.3war/650
* X. C Bethancourt 96pa, .287obp, 110wrc+, 4.7war/650
* X. UT Roden 84pa, .262obp, 53wrc+, 0.8war/650
* X. OF Clase 54pa, .283obp, 76wrc+, -1.2war/650
* X. IF Stefanic 125pa, .298obp, 62wrc+, -2.1war/650
* X. C Sanchez 96pa, .211obp, 11wrc+, -1.4war/650
Using Fangraphs Combined Rest of Season Projections:
* 1. SS Bichette 485pa, .327obp, 116wrc+, 3.8war/650
* 2. 1B Guerrero 511pa, .370obp, 143wrc+, 3.9war/650
* 3. DH Santander 496pa, .313obp, 118wrc+, 2.2war/650
* 4. RF Springer 453pa, .330obp, 113wrc+, 2.4war/650
* 5. LF Lukes 158pa, .339obp, 112wrc+, 2.9war/650
* 6. C Alejandro 333pa, .342obp, 113wrc+, 5.9war/650
* 7. 3B Barger 264pa, .313obp, 106wrc+, 3.0war/650
* 8. CF Varsho 464pa, .297obp, 104wrc+, 3.1war/650
* 9. 2B Gimenez 432pa, .319obp, 103wrc+, 4.1war/650
* B. UT Wagner 142pa, .344obp, 111wrc+, 2.3war/650
* B. OF Roden 237pa, .334obp, 108wrc+, 2.2war/650
* B. IF Clement 258pa, .301obp, 96wrc+, 2.8war/650
* B. C Heineman 130pa, .312obp, 87wrc+, 3.5war/650
* X. UT Stefanic 21pa, .359obp, 112wrc+, 3.1war/650
* X. OF Schneider 69pa, .320obp, 106wrc+, 1.9war/650
* X. IF Jimenez 21pa, .333obp, 109wrc+, 3.1war/650
* X. C Bethancourt 24pa, .276obp, 91wrc+, 2.7war/650
* X. OF Loperfido 21pa, .293obp, 91wrc+, 0.0war/650
* X. OF Clase 47pa, .294obp, 88wrc+, 1.4war/650
* X. UT Martinez 69pa, .278obp, 88wrc+, 0.9war/650
* X. OF Straw 63pa, .302obp, 78wrc+, 1.0war/650
That's a good thing for Springer in his 2nd last year of his deal, not so great for Santander in the first year of his spanking new contract.
A 118 OPS+ projection for Santander sounds about right based on his career stats, and is basically what he was paid to do.
Two comments from above . ... Another quote from a GM who will go nameless ... "We have to get faster" (2016 through 2025)
So; in 2022 with the 70th pick the Tampa Bay Rays selected from Georgia Tech the guy with Scouting Grades of 80 for speed and 60 for hitting. Some of his Scouting Bio quotes are ... "Simpson comes with an extreme offensive profile, with multiple evaluators joking that he has 90 speed" (although "10 for Power:) ... "he has displayed perhaps the best speed in the Draft and outstanding contact skills while leading NCAA Division I in batting at .433."... " He has tremendous feel for the barrel and rarely swings and misses" ..."He can get from the left side of the plate to first base in less than 3.8 seconds after taking a full swing and his quickness allows him to beat out routine grounders and run wild on the bases "
Meanwell, back at the ranch the Blue Jays selected with the 23rd pick LHP Brandon Barriera (21.1 innings pitched) and with the 60th pick SS Josh Kasevich with the 50 Run Grade ... Not really addressing the Running Speed Deficit ... but maybe this year !
The backup 1B is likely Clement simply because A) he has some experience and B) he's lower on the hierarchy totem pole to ask to play out of position.
Ernie has 15 innings of MLB 1B experience which came back with the Guardians in 2022. He has another 65 innings of AAA experience with Buffalo in 2023.
Tyler Heineman played two innings at 1B at AAA for Boston last year. He has 35 total minor league innings, but most are from 2019 & before.
Santander probably has the most MLB 1B experience from his time with the Orioles. But I doubt the Jays would ask him to play there between the shoulder injury and being in the 1st year of a new deal.
Santander played 72 innings at 1B in 2023 in the majors and a solitary inning there last year. He had another 79 innings in the minors, but a long time ago as a 21 y/o in 2016 in A ball.
Michael Stefanic has 61 innings at 1B in the minors, last being 18 innings in 2021 with Salt Lake City.
TL; DR - Anthony Santander has the most experience and is probably the best current backup at 1B, but I doubt they ask him simply for hierarchy reasons.
The job likely falls to Ernie Clement, with Stefanic taking over at 2B.
It’s mid-May and Santander has a 75 wRC+ and -0.3 fWAR / -0.4 bWAR. Not what you want from your entrenched #3 hitter just starting a five-year contract. Let’s hope he turns it around soon.
That was my first thought when Cash took Fairbanks out. No chance Schneider ever pulls a closer like that when he still has the lead. He'd wait for the lead to disappear first.
He really is a very unintuitive manager.
But even so, the manager should have pulled his closer before he allowed TB to take the lead. There was ample evidence by that point that Hoffman didn’t have it tonight.
plausible best possible lineup using this year's stats only:
* 1. LF Lukes 76pa, .373obp, 126wrc+, 1.7war/650
* 2. DH Springer 148pa, .404obp, 160wrc+, 4.8war/650
* 3. 1B Guerrero 182pa, .379obp, 127wrc+, 2.9war/650
* 4. SS Bichette 190pa, .337obp, 114wrc+, 2.4war/650
* 5. CF Varsho 41pa, .268obp, 143wrc+, 7.9war/650
* 6. RF Straw 75pa, .319obp, 103wrc+, 5.2war/650
* 7. C Kirk 125pa, .312obp, 93wrc+, 4.2war/650
* 8. 3B Barger 63pa, .286obp, 90wrc+, 4.1war/650
* 9. 2B Clement 118pa, .302obp, 89wrc+, 3.9war/650
* B. UT Santander 165pa, .273obp, 73wrc+, -1.6war/650
* B. OF Roden 84pa, .262obp, 53wrc+, 0.8war/650
* B. IF Gimenez 143pa, .273obp, 68wrc+, 1.4war/650
* B. C Heineman 45pa, .400obp, 172wrc+, 13.0war/650
At least Roki Sasaki has been similarly bad (and he’s now on the IL).
Really, I have no idea how anyone thinks Hoffman could've been pulled in time there. Just too quick with 2 guys having 1 pitch AB's after the walk. No way you have someone else ready as the inning starts unless it is the 1983/84 Jays who never saw a lead they couldn't blow it felt. Jordan Romano we might start wanting back, if he didn't have a 8.79 ERA (3 saves, 2 blown). Ugh.
This year's team really knows how to kill any good vibes from emerging.
Pooks, Hoffman is on pace for 75 appearances this season — roughly half of the team’s games. If you think that’s a sustainable level of usage for a pitcher who failed two physicals in the off-season — or any hard-throwing reliever who has had TJ surgery — then sure, Schneider is doing a great job of managing his closer. Hoffman’s recent downturn in stuff and command is probably just a coincidence.
Hopefully they can figure it out. I'm sure they can; his stuff is electric, he was dominant prior to the past week or so. It's just rough timing for the back of the bullpen to be on a downswing.
It's no coincidence that we've seen both Hoffman and Garcia crumble...
Even if one were to blame Schneider for his reliever management and alleged abuse/overuse six weeks in, this is still predicated on the notion that he has full autonomy on which relievers are available to him on a given day.
I'm sure he gets a list daily from the front office's High Performance Analytics department on who in the pen is allowed to pitch that game (and likely very heavy suggestions on the order and situation they should be deployed).
Sounds like our manager.
"I love how it's John Schneider's fault whenever one of Ross Atkins' key offseason acquisitions melts down in a save situation."
I've changed my perspective from this negative view point ("everything is John Schneider's fault," to asking myself... "Could a better manager have acted differently?" I am finding that the answer is "no it's not John Schneider's fault, but if we had a better manager the outcome had a better chance to be changed or avoided." In this way it's possible for these outcomes not to be John Schneider's fault but at the same time entirely on John Schneider as the weakest link.
"Pooks, Hoffman is on pace for 75 appearances this season — roughly half of the team’s games. If you think that’s a sustainable level of usage for a pitcher who failed two physicals in the off-season — or any hard-throwing reliever who has had TJ surgery — then sure, Schneider is doing a great job of managing his closer. Hoffman’s recent downturn in stuff and command is probably just a coincidence."
Damn, that's how you illustrate a point...
"Kevin Cash is someone who could manage a team like the Jays with a paper thin margin for error and extract as many wins as possible. Schneider is not that manager."
This this this. I want a manager that can manager in the mess and pressure creatively and instinctively not someone that the players like who follows a pre-cut guide of how to make decisions. John Schneider is the equivalent of a bad robo ump that can't make adjustments to the game of inches.
If you were at the game, you noticed that two pitches before the grand slam, a ball was thrown on to the field. Nobody noticed it for the first pitch, but right before the grand slam Varsho noticed it and pointed it out to Straw. Why the game was not paused, which might have helped Hoffman regroup a bit at that exact moment, is beyond me.
Additionally, if you’re expecting the pen to have someone ready as backup, then you can’t complain people are being overused. Getting people hot counts as wear and tear too. In the last thread people were complain Schneider is too short term focussed and if using the main guys too frequently. Then in the next thread the complaint is he should be using them more.
At the end of the day, Hoffman struggled to locate his fastball so tried using his other pitches and got burned. It happens. It sucks too
Shouldn’t we be criticizing Vladdy for dropping that ball and allowing a run to score? Or Hoffman for tripling up a few times on sliders?
As mentioned, Schneider has zero ability to improvise based on the situation, either because he can’t, he’s not good enough, or more likely some combination of both.
I wish Toronto aimed higher with their managers. I wish they had difference makers (if you believe such a thing exists). I have no doubt in my mind that Kevin Cash, Terry Francona and other managers would make a difference of at least a few wins more each year not to mention improvement in the play of some players. I wouldn't put any of those manager's in a 1 game sample size and say "they would fix the issue John Schneider was faced with tonight," but I would certainly assume that over a 162 game span they would better direct all decisions to avoid being in situations that John Schneider consistently finds himself in. Example, having a burned bullpen - Maybe they run the starter longer on occasion. Maybe they use an opener more often. Cash basically ran an opener for 2-3 innings every other game to bridge the gap between his starters and bullpen in past years and he rode his top starters as long as he could.
Cito Gaston, I only watched some of his tenure with the Blue Jays but he certainly seemed to bring out the best in some of his players who went out of their way to praise the way he increased their productivity especially on the hitting side. The only positive I've heard about our manager now is that he is a great communicator and the players like him. Pretty low bar if you ask me.
It also needs to be repeated that nobody knows how much control John Schneider actually has with this FO. As the game has changed with more analytics the role of manager has seemed to change to focus on two main roles: 1) clubhouse management and 2) bullpen usage. It's the second area where Schneider sucks. That balance between winning every game and burning the usage of your pitchers...he's way on the one end and I see it blowing up in his face if it hasn't already.
And largely it seems to have worked imo - i'm not going to lay any blame on the manager for Santander and Gimenez deciding to suck or the SP not being able to do their job or his best relievers blowing save situations in epic fashion.
I'll add to the request... anybody want to tabulate how many blown leads the Rays/Jays have allowed in the past 3 years from the 7th inning on? That would be an interesting analysis.
And Matt Svanson made the majors for the Cardinals about a month ago - we sent him over for Paul DeJong, so the Jays had already lost that trade. He got into a few games in relief, was okay, got sent back down, and just got recalled today. I expect he'll be up and down for the Cardinals quite a bit if he isn't totally overmatched.
Hoffman & Garcia's underlying numbers are still very good btw.
* CL Hoffman 19gms, 1.0ip/gm, 155era-, 78fip-, -0.3war/65
* RSU Garcia 17gms, 0.9ip/gm, 101era-, 71fip-, 0.4war/65
* LSU Little 20gms, 0.9ip/gm, 51era-, 57fip-, 1.5war/65
* LMR Fluharty 16gms, 1.0ip/gm, 55era-, 74fip-, 1.4war/65
* RMR Sandlin 10gms, 0.8ip/gm, 58era-, 69fip-, 0.0war/65
* RMR Green 19gms, 1.0ip/gm, 86era-, 153fip-, -0.3war/65
* RLR Rodriguez:16gms, 1.2ip/gm, 109era-, 129fip-, -0.4war/65
Even the depth guys have been passable enough for depth guys (Lauer, Schultz, Fisher, Walker, Tate, Barnes, Lawrence, Lovelady):
* Depth: 24gms, 1.7ip/gm, 156era-, 91fip-, 106xfip-, -0.7war/65
We could be looking at a bullpen of Hoffman, Garcia, Green, Little, Fluharty, Yariel, Swanson, and Burr (presuming Fisher is optioned and Urena is DFA'd in this scenario).
After him I would blame the front office. Even though they are in the top echelon for spending they could have added another piece.
The manager is the weakest link. If I could have only one of a) new players/core, 2) new FO with less payroll (all I've known before Shapiro took over) or 3) a new manager - I would pick the third option.
There have been surprises (Springer, straw, heinemena, lukes) and dissappointments (vlad, wagner, roden, schneider) amongst the other bats but having two fulltime additions hit like bad bench bats has been a bigger blow that's more outside expectations imo.
I sure hope Santander isn't hust done trying after the big payday, because his narrow skillset can't survive a significant lack of focus, and i sure hope Gimenez isn't completely toast, because i don't know that this FO will have the willingness to sit them, even if the multitude of younger borderline bats may start deserving chances ahead of them.
Vladdy
Springer
Kirk
Would that be a better top of the order for the time being?
Going to be a tough challenge for the team against Detroit this weekend.
Last 15 days: Jays 7th in HR in majors, 6th in runs scored, 4th in OPS, 5th in BABIP, 6th in AB/HR. Nice! But just 19th in ERA, 3rd in saves, but 4 blown vs 6 made. 6th in K's, 9th lowest walks, 20th for giving up HR. So clearly issues pitching wise.
Season to date OPS: C #8, 1B #10, 2B #21, 3B #26, SS #14, LF #29 (tied for last), CF #1 (!), RF #13. LF mostly Roden/Clase/Schneider which explains a lot, CF Varsho/Lukes/Straw.
Detroit will be a challenge but at least their ace won't be there as Skubal pitched today.
- SP: #28 1.2; RP: #11 1.4
- C: #2 2.1; DH: #15 0.1
- 1B: #9 0.8; 2B: #14 0.6; 3B: #18 0.3; SS: #18 0.6
- LF: #25 -0.4; CF: #2 1.6; RF: #15 0.5
- All hitters: #11 6.1; All pitchers: #21 2.6; Fielding #2 12.8 Def runs.
For starters, by fWAR Bassitt leads at 1.1, Gausman 0.9, big drop to Berrios 0.2, all others negative, worst being Francis at -0.4. Strangely for the pen Little is #1 at 0.5, Green dead last at -0.4 (due to his giving up HR a lot - 6 in 18 2/3 IP).
Top 10's in C/1B not a shock, but I bet many are surprised to see CF at #2 in the majors despite Varsho being out for so long - amazing how Straw has a 125 wRC+ while in CF, Springer over 200, Lukes 153. Dang, is it nice to have depth somewhere eh?
Bottom 10 in LF sucks, but Clase has sucked there (-0.3 already), as has Santander and Lukes (76 wRC+ in LF - weird vs his CF stats). Straw, Springer, and Schneider were all 0 WAR in LF, Roden +0.1 despite his 58 wRC+. Basically everyone getting a shot in LF forgets how to hit it seems. I'd probably just give Lukes a lot of time there for now, mixing in Straw vs LH pitching. Clase hasn't shown anything deserving of a shot yet so I have no idea why he is up right now.
They've had continuing good luck with health (other than Scherzer). The holdovers Berrios, Gausman & Bassitt have been pretty comparable to other years.
They've had some decent coverage from their depth starters: Easton Lucas before he became a pumpkin, Jose Urena, Eric Lauer, etc.
Bowden Francis has been a disappointment but not unplayable.
I wonder if Toronto's ranking in fWAR has to do with the fact that it is based on FIP instead of RA-9, meaning the team is doing exceptionally poorly in HR/9, BB/9 or K/9 skewing the data.
The Jays (SP & RP) are 25th for HR/9 but Top 10 for both BB/9 & K/9.
So it would seem if there is a statistical outlier, it would be HR/9 killing their FIP/fWAR with guys like Francis and to a lesser degree recent Chris Bassitt killing them.
Gausman has been good.
Berrios has been ok - tho his 4.33 ERA and 4.27 xFIP are solid it's his 4.97 FIP alone that looks bad.
Francis has been bad - but again his 5.40 ERA and 4.61 xFIP have been just pretty bad while his 6.34 FIP alone has been horrendous.
So for these two we should definitely not ignore that their FIP is that bad, but at the same time there's reason to think that the FIP is not the most important number and a bit of an outlier.
The 5th SPs (scherzer/Urena/Lucas) have been awful with a 6.49era and 7.10fip in 3.8ip per starts. This gets even worse if you count Yariel's opener performane as a 'start', but looks better if you count Schultz's 4.1ip followup to that opener as a 'start'. And of course when you toggle to an "As SP" split on the sites, they're forced to include that yariel opener as a start (1.0ip, 18.00era, 21.00fip) and not that Schultz followed (4.1ip, 0.00era, -0.59fip).
I'd be comfortable labelling our SP so far as:
* 1. Very Good
* 2. Good
* 3. OK
* 4. Bad
* 5. Very Bad
maybe it's
* 1. Good
* 2. OK
* 3. Bad
* 4. Very Bad
* 5. Awful
and then realizing there's 2 more guys with far higher OPS than him on the bench, too.
Santander's quest for the rest of the day is to see if he can keep his wrc+ (currently 69 after 2pa today) above Gimenez' 67 by the end of the game.
Of the 10 jays hitters hitting much better than both of them, the next worst is Clement's 89wrc+.
I don't know that it's anyone's best interest to keep Santander in the 3-hole any longer.
First 38 games of the season (prior to today's game):
2025: 72 wRC+, -0.4 WAR
2024: 114 wRC+, 0.5 WAR
2023: 119 wRC+, 0.7 WAR
2022: 113 wRC+, 0.3 WAR
Nothing on his Statcast page is encouraging either. I'm sure there will be a hot streak some time this summer and hopefully we can put April/May aside when that happens, but at the very least they need to consider moving him down in the order. He only does one thing well as a hitter, and when he's not doing that, then he's practically unplayable. Not sure what else they can do. Luckily the AAV on his contract due to the deferrals is manageable, but 5 years for a player like this was always a terrifying scenario. If he's not hitting home runs, then he's a negative WAR player.
Plausible best possible lineup this year's stats only:
wRC+
* 1. SS Bichette 115
* 2. DH Springer 151
* 3. 1B Guerrero 138
* 4. CF Varsho 133
* 5. C Kirk 95
* 6. LF Lukes 135
* 7. RF Straw 102
* 8. 3B Barger 98
* 9. 2B Clement 82
* B. UT Santander 67
* B. OF Roden 52
* B. IF Gimenez 67
* B. C Heineman 171
Big 4 Money Adds (Santander, Gimenez, Scherzer, Hoffman) over first 1/4 of season: -0.4war
Brandon Wile@Brandon_N_Wile · 1h
The Blue Jays have already played a pretty tough schedule, and now they're about to play 28 of their next 31 games against teams above .500
DET - SD - @ TB - @ TEX - ATH - PHI - @ MIN - @ STL - @ PHI - ARI
In 22, his worst month was .704.
In 21, he had an OPS of .551 in April and .561 in July.
He goes through streaks. He's had months of hitting below .200 and slugging below .350 and months of hitting over .300 and slugging over .500.
Overall, he usually ends up with a middling average and a good HR total, but he does hit for average when he heats up.
It's like rolling dice. Just because you roll 3 and 5 doesn't mean your odds of rolling a high number have increased.
The odds are still good that he'll have a good month eventually. Even Springer had one good month last year.
The other 2 things are being on a new team and being a DH.
He's never hit as a DH.
- Apr: 645, May: 803, June: 771, July: 861, Aug: 852, Sept: 663
- DH: 674, RF: 787, CF: 781, LF: 781, 1B: 1081 (9 games), PH: 600, DH/RF/LF have 100+ PA
- 1st: 0, 2nd: 742, 3rd: 722, 4th: 871, 5th: 817, 6th: 1024, 7th: 757, 8th: 613, 9th: 410, only 2nd-5th have 100+ PA.
The good news on Santander is that there isn't really anything in his profile that shows an underlying problem - his whiff rate, chase rate, exit velocity and launch angle are all within career norms. He's just not making good contact right now, which sounds to me like a garden-variety slump, rather than anything more concerning.