So Springer-Lukes-Vlad-Kirk-Varsho-Clement-Barger-IKF-Gimenez is the lineup (if it ain't broke, don't fix it).
Most HR in a single season playoff - 10 by Randy Arozarena in 2020 (20 games). Vlad's 5 (in 8 games) is nice but a long way to go to catch the overall record. Stanton in 2020 had 7 in 7 games for most in sub 10 games. Another of note: Juan Gonzalez hit 5 in just 4 games in 1996 for Texas.
Vlad's next HR in the playoffs will tie him with Bautista and Carter for most Jays HR in the playoffs lifetime. Hard to believe given Vlad had 0 before this year in the playoffs.
It's been really incredible to see Vlad take off this post season. After his opening playoffs home run against the Yankees it just felt different. I remember even after he hit that home run he didn't over-celebrate it. He watched it then walked around the bases like a man on a bigger mission than getting a monkey off his back. Tremendous.
Nice play by Naylor (right as I tuned in here from Ireland, don’t ask how) but IKF’s instincts on the bases do make me scratch my head a little. Nobody out, line drive… it gets through the infield even if your first move on a liner is back to the base, you probably still get to third at least. Seemed like he froze for a split second of indecision and it doomed him, though he might not have been able to get back at all regardless.
Bases loaded nobody out… hitting a ball a total of six inches in fair territory… these are the moments you pull your hair out over.
Was gonna say Raleigh looks really clunky behind the plate catching certain pitches (he really does) but he was damn quick to recognize that double play on a platter. Keep it close, fight for another opportunity.
Obviously you don’t think of it in the moment, but Clement would’ve been better off just kicking or stepping on the ball as he went toward first. What a killer pair of at bats.
The M’s haven’t blown any glorious opportunities the way the Blue Jays have the last couple of innings, but they’ve had a runner on in each of the first, second and fourth innings and been unable to score those runners.
IKF having the kind of game that should make the manager want to take him out. Baserunning mistake. Fielding mistake. badly failed bunting situation. these are the things he's supposed to be good at.
Love the sequence from Gausman to Raleigh (sorry if I’m misspelling but it’s like 1am here and my bunk mate snores like a sawdust factory). Stuck with the low and away splitters, just off the plate where even a power behemoth like the Big Dumper couldn’t flick it out the other way. With a nice but too high fastball above the zone just to disrupt Raleigh’s timing on the split.
Buckle in, my baseball friends. Smoke or toke em if you got em.
Can we never ever see Little again in a tight situation? He doesn’t have it right now and even when he does, he attacks the strikezone as though he’s blindfolded. Enough with this guy.
Not funny? Yeah I didn’t think so either. Seriously though WTF bringing in Little nobody on the freaking planet thought that was a good idea except Mariners fans.
Just confounding and heartbreaking—so many chances not cashed in followed by a managerial and bullpen collapse. Maybe the bats have a miracle in them to wipe this bad taste away?
But seriously. An insane decision we all saw before the badness even happened. Infuriating. It’s 2am here and I can’t even scream… I’d wake up the jerk bunk mate who snores 15 hours a day and thus hasn’t allowed me a good night of sleep since I crossed over the ocean…
Michael - Friday, October 17 2025 @ 09:13 PM EDT
(#470774) #
It does seem crazy that up 1 facing the 2-3-4 danger part of the lineup in the bottom of the 8th you don't bring in your best pitcher. If our closer was our best pitcher, you bring him in. When our closer arguably isn't our best pitcher, bring in your best reliever. Now we still might have lost, but better to give your chance the biggest chance instead of the littlest. I mean I don't think Little is terrible, but he's not our best reliever.
I think all this cascades from the early hook. Just let these starters finish their innings. The relievers are not good with inherited runners anyway. Baffled as to why Little gets the top of that lineup
I hate to say this... but Little made sense to me in the moment. A one-run lead in the eighth with the power hitters coming up? The reliever who is least likely to allow a home run - and yes, that's Brendon Little - seems logical.
Least likely to allow a home run sure… but I tend to prefer guys who are even less likely to allow baserunners, which enables random wacky stuff to happen (or just plain bombs over the fence, both are equally brutal).
Overall… this is a rough kick to the gut but I agree, being down 3-2 at this point after those first two games… we would’ve taken it earlier this week. The season is still alive, we have something to gnaw our pointy teeth about and an easy target or two to do so. Both games are at home… time to break the Seattle-owning-us-at-the-SkyDome, right?
Sigh. I need a dozen pillows to stuff out that godawful snoring.
I think Little was a defensible choice as Magpie alludes. But I give Eephus credit for complaining about the choice before the results came in. For me those are the only reliever complaints that are legit.
It’s the top of the order. You have to go to either the closer or Varland/relief ace. I didn’t think that was little an hour ago and I don’t think it is now.
The solo home run I can live with. The two walks, which are definitely part of Little’s m.o., are the things you can’t live with in the bottom eighth on the road. Completely inexplicable decision from Schneider.
Well, there was also the fact that Gausman comes out in the 6th instead of trying to get through 7.
Schneider has done this the entire time he’s managed so it’s not like it’s a shock. I just am never going to like pulling a starter that’s been on all night. This isn’t the Dodgers or another elite pen we have here.
Hindsight is 20-20 and Schneider has done a lot with what he’s been handed this year. On Reddit people are acting like this is the worst decision in Jays history which is too hyperbolic.
Did they announce Yesavage for Sunday? What about using Bassit as an opener? Schneider says he used little to make the top face arms they haven’t seen.
I’m not exactly thrilled about being proven right before the bad thing happened (it’s like betting correctly on where the meteor is gonna hit the Earth. Hooray?)
While I disagree with Magpie’s Mitch Williams 1993 comp (didn’t Williams actually have a few helpful moments for the Phillies in that run?) I do think that once he’d given up the dinger, if not for the three batter rule he’d have been out of the game quicker than a… a… I dunno it’s 3am here insert your own joke. Help me out, please!
If Schneider had been able to yank him right away, instead of helplessly watch as he walked the next two batters with nobody out… well I’m not really sure what would’ve happened or what we would think. Bottom 8th on the road, inheriting two runners with nobody out in a tie game… that’s where I really blame Little because that’s just an unreasonable situation to escape from. Not impossible, but definitely unreasonable to expect.
Bringing in Little still remains an awful decision and a crucially bad one should the Jays not win the next two games. I’m sorry but that’s just how I see it.
I suppose I was thinking rather like Schneider - Cal Raleigh was coming up and I was worried about the solo homer that would tie the game. I didn't consider the big inning that would lose it.
If HR were only issue, then I'd get Little but he's been bad for a long time. His Whip in the second half was 1.54. We've watched him pitch and it's been brutal for months. What makes it even crazier is that Raleigh and Polanco are both significantly better against lefties. It feels like the whole thing was about Naylor.
I said it an hour ago and it's like Schneider saw Little versus Naylor as a huge advantage that outweighed all other considerations.
It's as if it overrode Little's poor form recently, the fact that he'd be facing two right-handed batters with the numbers Gerry posted. It overrode that if Dominguez got two batters, he could pitch around Naylor. It overrode that Raleigh is one of the best hitters in baseball and you, presumably, want your best reliever to face him, not the one who has been very mediocre recently.
In Little's last 21 innings, he has given up 19 hits, 16 BB, and 13 ER. Over the last 7 weeks, righties are hitting.500 against him. There are dozens of these stats. FIP over a handful of innings is pretty useless. He's been objectively awful for quite some time.
I think the scariest part in all of this is that if the Jays are leading by 1 in the 8th inning in Game 6, and Schneider feels like he wants a lefty in the game, then Little is going to get the ball again. There's no doubt in my mind. I hope the Jays bats stream roll the Mariners pitching in game 6 and hopefully 7 because 1 run games are not going to be advantageous to them. Schneider, as bad as he is with managing a bullpen, doesn't have the horses to play the bullpen game with the Mariners.
Hoffman was used with a 6-run lead because Schneider was managing scared, as he has been wont to do all season. It’s pretty obvious that Hoffman was coming into a one-run game in the 9th tonight.
I don’t understand why they announced Yesavage as the Game 6 starter before tonight’s game. I would have left him available as a super-high leverage option in Game 5, but they didn’t because they had full confidence in their bullpen.
As frustrating and nerve wracking as tonight was, I just want to point out how thoroughly entertaining the ballgame was.
I can think John Schneider is a good manager (in considering all of the job duties of a manager) who made a terrible decision at the most crucial time.
Caleb Joseph put it nicely, who can you live with losing this game? If it's Dominguez who gave it up all by himself, that sucks, but he's clearly part of the core set of relievers you trust. I would have been disappointed, but because they lost the game.
Instead, it feels like the Jays just handed this game to Seattle by losing with their lesser weapons.
Little should never have been used in such a high leverage situation but Schneider was always going to go there. It is what it is.
If Springer can go then I actually feel pretty good about winning the series. But for the pen implosion, I think the Jays pretty handily outplayed the Mariners the last three games. Even today.
I agree with Nigel. If Springer is good to go, then I actually like the Jays chances of winning this series, but if the games are close, then that's where some of my skepticism creeps in.
In that "close" game vs the yankees, 7 relievers were used while the game was within 3 runs, and hoffman was the 8th and only reliever to pitch with a 4 run lead, and promptly gave up 2 hits a walk and a run.
Schneider doesn't use Hoffman like a relief ace. If that's what you are arguing, we agree.
The closest thing they have had to a save is the ninth inning of a home game they were down by two, and he pitched that. I'm not sure how you can conclude he doesn't trust him.
If there's a save opportunity on Sunday, I feel very confident he'll get it.
Ugly - Hoffman has been CONSIDERABLY better than Little for a ~month now. He has given up just 2 runs in his last ~14 outings. Yes, some of those outings had walks surrendered - but even those are nowhere near Little's issue with walks and losing the strike-zone.
There is zero excuse for this. The red dumbo went with the sketchiest reliever in the entire bullpen. A guy who hasn't thrown a strike in ~2 months. Hitters have clearly figured out that you just sit middle-middle and don't swing otherwise, because he WILL walk you.
Agree if Springer is healthy, Jays are still in a good spot. Need the dominant Yesavage to show up. Schneider has managed this way all year. He acts as if his relievers are way better than they are. It's so odd because I loved seeing Hoffman facing heart of lineup yeatrday even if it was the 8th. Thats the way to do it and Schneider hasn't really done that all year. Just so crazy he did it in a 7-2 game and not a 2-1 game.
Why is the debate between Little or Hoffman? Hoffman has looked better in the playoffs, but the three guys who have been bad the last couple of months are Little, Hoffman and Rodriguez. Based on merit, Fisher or Dominguez were the choice but Schneider was always going to go with Little and Hoffman in the 9th. So you have to just live with it. Schneider has had an absolute mountain of head scratching (and in many cases hard to justify) decisions work out this year. You can’t expect every single one to go your way.
Because Hoffman is probably their best reliever when he's throwing his good stuff. Dominguez, like most Jays relievers has been hidden from opponents that would give them trouble (in his example, lefties). The same way Little throws a lot of 0.1 and 0.2 innings. Hoffman is not treated like that.
Michael - Saturday, October 18 2025 @ 12:23 AM EDT
(#470819) #
As much as I think Little was a mistake to bring in, the real reason they lost this very winnable game wasn't the pitching, it was the failure to convert on the offensive chances.
For the first 7.5 innings of this game Toronto looked like a much, much better team with better PA, betting hitting, and better pitching (and some help from the Umpire on Balls/Strikes for Gausman). But a lot of the luck seemed to go Seattle's way and the line drive double play was bad, and the bases loaded 0 outs end up with 0 runs was really bad. Also, Seattle feeling fine waling Vlad and mostly not punished showed how much we miss Bo being in the lineup.
Still if someone said we'd win 2/3 in Seattle this series, I think we'd all feel pretty good about our chances, and we still have good chances to win the series.
If all games are 50/50 the Jays would have 25% chance, but they are at home and that should count for something. Also, the broadcast noted that in 7 game series that were tied 2-2 the team that won game 5 have won 69% of the series, which suggests less than the 50/50 odds would suggest (which is surprising because historically you might expect the team that wins game 5 to be the "better" team, but also maybe the home team wins game 5 more, and the team at home for game 6 and 7 has that advantage and also might be the better team). So the Jays are probably somewhere between 1/3 and 1/4 chance of winning the series, which is better than it was after game 2.
It is also a little like the end of the regular season when the Jays just needed to win out at home to keep the division ahead of the Yankees. We can certainly succeed again with that.