Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
And so it begins...

The post-season fun begins today, with three games scheduled:

San Diego (Peavy 13-7, 2.88) at St. Louis (Carpenter 21-5, 2.83) 1:00 PM
Boston (Clement 13-6, 4.57) at Chicago (Contreras 15-7, 3.61) 4:00 PM
New York (Mussina (13-8, 4.41) at Los Angeles (Colon 21-8, 3.48)

So who do we cheer for?

For some Bauxites, this is easy. Mick, as is well known, shamelessly roots for the Yankees. He actually admits this, in public forums. Go figure. Chat regular PaulS, on the other hand, cheers lustily for the Bombers' ancient rivals, the defending champs from Boston.

These guys know where they stand when it comes to the upcoming playoffs. But what about the rest of us?

You may recall Craig B earlier this year (Pick a Team for Craig) actually looking for suggestions for an NL rooting interest, as his Expos had become la histoire. My shaky and often unreliable memory tells me he settled on.... was it the Pirates? Well, if it was, he needs someone to cheer for in the playoffs, too. Just like the rest of us.

How should we go forward? Well, we find a way. And so I present to you my rooting picks, in reverse order:

8. Boston Red Sox - It turns out that the Red Sox and their fans are just as irritating in victory as they are in defeat. (With the exception of PaulS, of course!) There are very few guys on this team that I can cheer for. There's John Olerud and Mike Timlin, of course, if only in honour of their contributions to Jays championships past. I have a lot of respect and admiration for Tim Wakefield, and I like Manny because I always like... eccentrics? Weirdos? Goofballs? But those guys already have rings, and I have very little use for any of the other guys on the team.

7. New York Yankees - It's been suggested that the prospect of a sleepy and contented Steinbrenner, less hungry, less driven, less motivated is itself sufficient reason to hope the Yankees do well. I don't buy it, not for a second. In the past, winning has usually made Steinbrenner even more determined to do it again. There are too many guys on this team who just give me the creeps: Mike Mussina, Jorge Posada, Kevin Brown, Tanyon Sturtze. Alex Rodriguez is the greatest player in the game, and he leaves me cold. And that bothers me about him. I don't share the Big Hate many Bauxites have for Derek Jeter and Al Leiter, but they both have multiple WS rings already. The only guys I actually like are Mariano Rivera and Hideki Matsui, and Matsui's the only guy who's never won the big prize.

6. Los Angeles Angels - OK, Vlad is completely irresistible. The rest of the team.. not so much. For one thing, they did win it all (without Vlad, of course) just three years ago, and they irritated the hell out of me while they were doing it. I'm tired of K-Rod. I have a lot of respect for Garret Anderson, but he's always bored me. For no remotely sensible reason. On the other hand, they have not one, but two Molinas...

5. Houston Astros - I can certainly understand if you want to see Craig Biggio and Jeff Bagwell finally play in a World Series. They've both been very great players for a very long time. And this is the only franchise, of the eight remaining, that has never gone to the Fall Classic. However, this would also require that you give your consent to seeing Roger Clemens there yet again. Been there, done that.

4. St. Louis Cardinals - I have no real powerful objection to the Cardinals. Tony LaRussa is a pest, but he's just the manager and I can ignore him if I have to. Every last one of their pitchers bothers me, for some strange reason. However, I can happily cheer for Albert Pujols all day long. For one thing, it's generally a deeply rewarding experience...

3. Chicago White Sox - Oh, what the hell. I give up! I surrender! The White Sox have gone longer without a title than the Red Sox ever did. Granted, they brought this evil fate upon themselves, but hey - the last of the Black Sox died more than thirty years ago. Furthermore, Ozzie might actually be nuts, and he might provide plenty of strange and unusual fun. I know I wouldn't want a miss a second of it. So I won't be too upset.

2. San Diego Padres - They have to be the ultimate underdog, and if they do go all the way, there will be no shortage of outraged commentary about an 82-80 team profaning baseball's whole process in determining a champion. That sort of crap is often richly entertaining. Brian Giles and Jake Peavy are wonderful players and a pleasure to watch, and Khalil Greene is just so cool.... The Padres are penalized because they employ Joe Randa. No particular reason, he just bugs me.

And finally, the team that has my total and unconditional support. Until they get knocked out in the first round, as they so often do. But until then:

1. Atlanta Braves - Why? I have no shortage of reasons. Because they're Liam's NL team. Because Bobby Cox is a genuine legend actually walking amongst us. (We're not still bitter that he left the Blue Jays after the 1985 LCS to go home to Georgia, are we?) Because they went into this season with Danny Kolb as their closer and Raul Mondesi and Brian Jordan as their corner outfielders, and it still couldn't stop them - here they are, anyway. Because if you don't like Marcus Giles, you don't like baseball. Because Leo Mazzone did it again, turning Jorge Sosa into a wonderfully effective pitcher. Jorge Sosa? The guy who pitches BP for Carlos Delgado? Yes, Jorge Sosa. Because the saga of Jeff Francoeur, Kelly Johnson, Brian McCann, Kyle Davies and all the other kids is an amazing story - truly one of the most remarkable things to happen in the game this year.

But mostly because Julio Franco must - must - win a World Series ring. If we are ever to see peace in our time. There is absolutely nothing anyone can say to persuade me otherwise. This is my post-season cry:

"JULIO NEEDS A RING!"

Come on, say it with me. You'll feel a better person for it. I promise.

This Day in Baseball, Playoff Edition: October 4 | 13 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
VBF - Tuesday, October 04 2005 @ 10:29 AM EDT (#129586) #
On the topic of Jorge Sosa, is there any way of finding out if he ever faced Delgado this year and what occured? As I recall, there was still an existing streak...
Rob - Tuesday, October 04 2005 @ 11:29 AM EDT (#129591) #
Delgado vs Sosa, 2005:
April 5: double
June 23: groundout, flyout, single
Sep 25: flyout, double, GIDP
James W - Tuesday, October 04 2005 @ 11:36 AM EDT (#129593) #
Just by checking his game log and play-by-plays of ATL vs. FLA games:

April 5, Sosa relieved Smoltz in the bottom of the 2nd. Faced Delgado in the 4th and gave up a double.

April 7, Sosa came on after Hudson was lifted for a pinch hitter. He did not face Delgado.

May 3, Sosa pitched the 8th inning, and did not face Delgado.

June 28, Sosa started. Delgado struck out in the 1st, homered to lead off the 4th and lined out to right in the 6th.

Sept. 25, Sosa started again. Delgado flied out to center in the 1st, hit an RBI double in the 3rd and later scored and grounded into a 5-6-3 double play in the 5th.

Oct. 1, Sosa started but faced only one batter, Juan Pierre.

So totalling it up, Delgado went 3-for-6 vs. Sosa with 2 doubles and a home run.
James W - Tuesday, October 04 2005 @ 11:39 AM EDT (#129594) #
We both had incomplete information...

But yes, on June 23, Delgado grounded out to second in the 1st, flied out to left in the 4th and singled to right in the 6th.

So make the final total 4-for-9 with 2 doubles and a home run.
Mick Doherty - Tuesday, October 04 2005 @ 11:55 AM EDT (#129597) #
Padres (Jake Peavy, 2.88) at Cardinals (Chris Carpenter, 2.83), 1:00
Red Sox (Matt Clement, 4.57) at White Sox (Jose Contreras, 3.61), 4:00
Yankees (Mike Mussina, 4.41) at Angels (Bartolo Colon, 3.48), 8:00

Just for today, to stay with the theme the rest of the day's starters (Carpenter, Clement, Contreras and Colon) present, we will go with Mike Cussina and Jake Ceavy.
Mylegacy - Tuesday, October 04 2005 @ 11:57 AM EDT (#129598) #
So who do we cheer for?

It's exquisitely simple for me... sometime in the next few weeks the Evil Empire or the Evil Idiot Empire is going to LOSE and there is nothing they can do about it! If there is a God BOTH will lose. The cosmic plan will unfold and mankind will be safe from the darkness.

So sayeth the scribe.
Craig B - Tuesday, October 04 2005 @ 12:24 PM EDT (#129602) #
If anyone in downtown Toronto wants to get together for an hour for lunch and part of San Diego - St. Louis, around 1:15 or so, post here (don't e-mail me).
Jonny German - Tuesday, October 04 2005 @ 12:35 PM EDT (#129604) #
Can't Stand 'em:

8. Yankees

8 reasons why the Fancy Ladies are #8:
1) Slappy Rodriguez. Greatest current player, yadda yadda yadda... Is there a single off-field thing to like about this guy?
2) Derek Jeter and his legion of media fanboys.
3) Derek Jeter and L'Affair Huckaby.
4) Derek Jeter and that smarmy look on his face.
5) Mike Mussina. See (1), minus a lot of talent.
6) 205 million dollars
7) 205 million fans, approximately 3 dozen of them actually baseball fans.
8) Giambi. Being clean doesn't score points, he's still just another mercenary.

7. White Sox

For Hawk Harrelson and Joe Cowley. For smart ball and Ozzie ball. For not collapsing like I expected them to.

6. Red Sox

I don't dislike these guys as much as I should, they're mostly here because they're in the AL East.

5. Houston

It's all Roger's fault. Nothing else particularly wrong with these guys.

Don't Need 'em

4. LA of A

Whatevah.

3. St. Louis

If Larry gets a ring, is he more likely to retire?

2. Atlanta

Magpie's reasons are good, but they're largely cancelled out by The Chop and 15 consecutive postseasons.

Cheerin' For 'em:

1. San Diego

They're officially my NL team, though I really don't follow them very closely at all. Obviously they're the biggest underdog in the tourney, but I think they're a fair bit better than their 82 wins. What they really need is someone to step up behind Peavy... they've got the dominant bullpen to back up any decent starts, and they're really not a bad offensive team despite what the park does to their numbers. One measure: They were 2nd in the NL in runs scored on the road.

Curios, Magpie, what's your NL team?

DepecheJay - Tuesday, October 04 2005 @ 07:01 PM EDT (#129620) #
Interesting how many teams have an "AL team" and an "NL team." I keep it simple in all sports and am a diehard of 1 team only. What happens if your AL team plays your NL team in the World Series? That certainly would be interesting!
Lefty - Tuesday, October 04 2005 @ 07:02 PM EDT (#129621) #
Lots of MLB news today.

Texas GM John Hart resigned today, but will remain on as a consultant. He'll be replaced by 28 yr old assistant GM Jon Daniels.

Jim Leyland has signed on to manage the Tigers.

Mark Shapiro says he will attempt to resign - my favorite FA this season - Kevin Millwood. He is expected to command at least 24 million over three years.

My AL only 12 team, ten catagory, rototeam won the championship. Its going to be a good Christmas for my kids.

And back on topic, I'll be pulling for the California Angels to win the WS. Not the strongest team on paper, but they have a pretty nice balance throughout the staff and positional players. Lots of options for the manager.

They will need a good performance from Jaun Rivera to accomplish this.

A note to the Roster, you guys should consider starting round-up threads again for the offseason.
Lefty - Tuesday, October 04 2005 @ 07:04 PM EDT (#129622) #
I keep it simple too, but in a different way. No matter who makes it to the World Series, I always, always cheer for the AL team.
VBF - Tuesday, October 04 2005 @ 07:11 PM EDT (#129623) #
I think people have one team, but since the NL is seperate, it allows us to pick an additional one to root for, just because we can. We're not in utter heartbreak if this team losses and we don't go nuts if we win. It's more or less a team picked independantly (compared to some of us, who were born into our respective primary fandom) based on things we like or a model of what we want our main team to be.
Pistol - Tuesday, October 04 2005 @ 08:22 PM EDT (#129628) #
Jon Daniels is the new GM of the Rangers. He's 28 and was two years behind me in college and we actually had the same major. Where'd I go wrong?

Wait, don't answer that.

http://mlb.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/article.jsp?ymd=20051004&content_id=1237613&vkey=news_mlb&fext=.jsp&c_id=mlb
This Day in Baseball, Playoff Edition: October 4 | 13 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.