Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine

The BBFL has four proposed rule changes. Returning BBFL team owners may now vote on these propositions. The fourth pro, which has three options, will be voted on via the Borda Count Method. In voting for such propositions, owners must rank their answers from most favored to least favored.

To vote, send an email to bbfl at scottlucas dot com. Please put your team name in the message so I can keep track of who has voted. Use this forum to discuss your vote, the upcoming season, or whatever.

Voting ends at 1159pm PST, Monday, February 27. I will immediately begin placing owners with teams depending on the voting results, and when that process ends, I'll open the trading window.



Propositions:

2006-1: Change the handling of trade protests. Currently, all trade protests are handled by a single seven-member committee. This proposal will create a five-member Trade Committee for each division. Each Committee will vote on trade protests within its respective league. A simple majority will approve or disallow a protested trade.

The Commissioner will appoint members for each division based on owners’ activity and availability. An owner is not required to serve on a Committee if asked. At any time, the Commissioner may remove a member for not fulfilling his duties and appoint a replacement.

A Committee member may not vote on a trade involving his own team. If a protested trade involves one Committee member, the Commissioner will serve as a fifth member. If a protested trade involves two Committee members, the other three members will rule. The Commissioner may also serve if another member is unavailable so that the total number of voters is odd.

(Yes) Change the system as described above.
(No) Keep current system


2006-2: Change the assignment of ownership for promoted, relegated, and orphaned teams. The current system is described in the BBFL Constitution under
”VIII. Promotion and Relegation” and “XI. Ownership.” In brief, promoted and relegated owners switch rosters, and orphaned teams are then assigned to the highest-ranking unpromoted teams in the next lower division. Rank is by regular-season finish.

The new system would work as follows:

Upon determination of all promoted, relegated, and orphaned teams in the league, the Commissioner will contact all owners switching leagues. These owners will be allowed to choose among the ownerless teams in the order described below. Promoted and relegated owners MUST move. Other owners given the opportunity to accept an orphaned team are not required to accept, and they can keep their present teams.

Prompt and efficient handling of ownership changes is essential to the functioning of the league. The Commissioner reserves the right to bypass owners who do not respond as soon as possible.

Regarding the Alomar Division, choice of teams will follow this order (in terms of regular-season finish except as noted):
-- 1st-place finisher in Barfield
-- 2nd-place finisher in Barfield
-- Championship Playoff winner in Barfield (or 3rd-place finisher if the 1st or 2nd-place team won the Playoff)
-- Next highest-ranking team(s) from Barfield, if any are needed

Regarding the Barfield Division, choice of teams will follow this order (in terms of regular-season finish except as noted):
-- 18th-place finisher in Alomar
-- 19th-place finisher in Alomar
-- 20th-place finisher in Alomar
-- 1st-place finisher in Carter
-- 2nd-place finisher in Carter
-- Championship Playoff winner in Carter (or 3rd-place finisher if the 1st or 2nd-place team wins the Playoff)
-- Next highest-ranking team(s) from Carter, if any are needed

Regarding the Carter Division, choice of teams will follow this order (in terms of regular-season finish):
-- 18th-place finisher in Barfield
-- 19th-place finisher in Barfield
-- 20th-place finisher in Barfield
-- New additions to Carter, if any are needed will be assigned teams by the Commissioner.

(Yes) Change the system as described above.
(No) Keep current system


2006-3: Create a Center Fielder roster position. All position designations are made by Yahoo.
(Yes) Change one of the four OF slots to a CF slot.
(No) Keep current system.


2006-4: Increase the number of Disabled List slots on a roster. The current number is two.
(a) 2 slots (current system)
(b) 3 slots
(c) 5 slots
Note: Rank the three choices from favorite to least favorite.

2006 BBFL Rules Ballot | 3 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
MulRedux - Thursday, February 23 2006 @ 10:25 PM EST (#141463) #
Would just like to say that I strongly oppose increasing DL slots. The joy of this league is the challenge and more than 2 DL spots takes away from that challenge substantially in my opinion. For that same reason I am voting for the addition of a centerfield position on the roster.
Skills - Friday, February 24 2006 @ 08:03 AM EST (#141475) #
Just curious, why is there no choice for having 4 DL spots?
Lucas - Friday, February 24 2006 @ 08:33 AM EST (#141476) #
Nobody suggested it. Just three and five.
2006 BBFL Rules Ballot | 3 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.