Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
Here's my latest ramble on the state of the Blue Jays. Enjoy (or not, as suits you).




First off, the Jays deserve a lot of credit for surviving a very tough April schedule. The following chart shows the American League standings as I am writing this, followed by the number of games played against each opponent by the Yanks, Sox, and Jays.



vs Yanksvs Soxvs Jays
Boston14-110x6
New York13-10x05
Toronto12-1156x
Baltimore13-13333
Tampa Bay11-14363
Chicago16-7003
Detroit16-9000
Cleveland13-11030
Minnesota9-15303
Kansas City5-17300
LA Angels12-12300
Oakland12-12300
Texas12-12030
Seattle11-15040

As you can see, the Jays have played nearly half their games against their two main rivals, and have played 14 of their 23 games - over 60% - against teams that made it to the post-season last year. To have come out of that with a mark over .500, despite missing starts from their two best pitchers, is an impressive achievement. (By the way, the Jays' next game against the Yankees is a week after the All-Star break.) Now, we can all sit back and watch the Sox and Yanks pound each other into mulch. Yummy.

Lyle Overbay
He's playing good defense, and has a .370 on-base percentage. That's good enough for me. He was advertised as being a doubles monster, but has racked up precisely one (1) two-base hit this month. To the baseball gods, we are but sport.

Aaron Hill
He's obviously pressing a bit, but I've never seen anyone hit in such bad luck before. I haven't been keeping track of how many great plays have robbed him of base hits, but it seems like there's been a lot of them. You would think that some of them would start to drop in eventually, but then no one ever said that life was fair.

At second, he's been perfectly fine. He hasn't mastered the fine points of his position, but he makes up for that with excellent lateral range, especially to his right. He's a bit deliberate on the double-play pivot, but compensates for it with a strong arm.

Russ Adams
Same as last year: he does a little bit of everything, but not much of anything. He'll probably have to improve at something if the Jays are going to have a serious chance of contending.

John McDonald
He's fun to watch at short: he's so quick and fundamentally sound. He can't hit much, but we knew that already. It's good to have a Grade A glove on the bench for when you really need one.

Troy Glaus
Has the classic old-time power hitter stats: lots of extra-base hits, lots of walks, lots of strikeouts. It's a simple approach: wait for the pitch you like, then attempt to whale the tar out of it. Better defensively at third than advertised: he handles slow rollers well, and is good at stopping balls hit down the line.

Bengie Molina
Has been struggling a bit defensively: he's not throwing runners out, and he seems to be dropping balls a lot. Did you know that Molina only struck out three times this month? The slowest baseball player I have ever seen.

By the way: even if Molina turns out to be not as good as Zaun, his signing still isn't a waste of money. Most teams give 150 to 200 at-bats to a backup catcher who hits roughly as well as your Great-Aunt Dolly. The Jays don't have to do that.

Gregg Zaun
He watches. He waits. He plays hard whenever he gets the chance. And he watches. And he waits.

Reed Johnson
His stats are full of fascinating numbers. First off, he scored 17 runs while driving in only two; that's quite a ratio. He went the entire month without a single extra-base hit. And he had twice as many HBP (6) as strikeouts (3). And, best of all, his on-base percentage was .510. Five-ten! And he didn't even lead the team, as he finished behind...

Frank Catalanotto
...his platoon partner, who was at .550. Just think of it: Blue Jays left fielders reached base over half the time in April. Normally, nobody other than Barry Bonds does that. Cat also had nearly three times as many walks (12) as strikeouts (5), and whacked eight extra-base hits. Yowza.

Vernon Wells
It's ironic: once V-Dub realized that he didn't have to carry the entire offense on his shoulders, he started hitting well enough to do just that. There must be a Zen koan in there somewhere.

If he keeps this up, he won't see a fastball after the All-Star break. It'll be like what happened to Delgado: his walks will shoot up, and his power will drop. Then, he will need enough discipline to not swing at pitches off the plate.

Alex Rios
He's not completely out of the woods yet: he'll need to make adjustments once teams figure out that they can't get him out by trying to overmatch him with high heat. But let's not quibble: let's enjoy this ride while it lasts.

Two years ago, I wrote that Rios's upside was Dave Winfield, and Alex is looking a lot like Winfield out there right now. He's as much fun to watch in the field as at the plate: he has tremendous range and a world-class arm. And to think I practically gave up on him in the spring. I'm a really, really bad scout.

Eric Hinske
His baseball career has turned into The Glass Menagerie: he's spending more and more time enduring the baseball equivalent of sitting forlornly at home, holding a wilting corsage, and waiting for a gentleman caller.

His approach to the plate is the polar opposite of what it was last year. Then, he was trying to hit everything hard: his walks dropped, and his strikeouts went up. This year, he hasn't had an extra-base hit yet, but he's walking enough and hitting enough singles to bring his on-base percentage up over .400. This is perfectly okay: anything that isn't an out is a successful plate appearance, as the goal is to keep the line moving.

Shea Hillenbrand
See? He still hits well in April. (Unrelated aside: I don't recall a more benevolent April, weather-wise, in Toronto history. Usually, April breaks your heart. Global warming is real, people - we're going to have to get used to it.)

Roy Halladay
I am beginning to believe that Doc narrowly avoided disaster this spring. In his first two starts, his stuff was absolutely filthy - everything was darting this way and that. I think he was trying too hard: applying that much torque to every pitch must have been putting undue strain on his arm. Since his return, he's looked a bit rusty, and much more ordinary, but he's still been pitching well enough to help the team. He doesn't need to win the Cy - all he needs to do is give up fewer runs than the other guy. I think he's gonna do that.

A.J. Burnett
I totally sympathize with his situation. Burnett is experiencing arm pain he's never felt before, and is being paid millions of dollars to perform at his peak for the next five years. Is it any wonder that he is reluctant to go out there before all the tweaks are gone? Recall that pitching is an unnatural motion to begin with. I'd say walk a mile in his shoes, and let the man heal.

Having said that, I can understand why some people associated with the Jays are frustrated. Pain is a normal part of a pitcher's existence, and the Jays are currently experiencing a bad case of the pitching shorts. Even at 70 or 80%, Burnett would likely be able to help the team. I hope that A.J. doesn't get tagged with the "malingerer" label: that can be the kiss of death, as Kelly Gruber can tell you.

By the way: did you know that A.J. is actually older than Roy Halladay? Burnett was born in January, 1977, and Doc came into the world in May. They were both drafted in 1995. No wonder they've become best buds.

Ted Lilly
Watching Lilly pitch is like watching somebody attempt to cross Niagara Falls by unicycle over a tightrope while simultaneously juggling flaming knives and playing "I Wish I Could Shimmy Like My Sister Kate" on the kazoo. He's obviously got considerable ability, but he always seems this close to total disaster. Still, he's kept his ERA under 4, and he's kept the team in the game in most of his starts. If it's too painful to watch, change the channel.

Gustavo Chacin
He hasn't been pitching that well, but he's gotten a lot of run support, and he's maintained his composure throughout. I'm not worried about him. Much.

Josh Towers
One stat says it all: he's third on the team in walks allowed. All he had going for him was his pinpoint control: if he doesn't get that back, he's toast.

Casey Janssen
In his first start, he worked his way out of a couple of jams, and looked like a competitor out there. I don't know whether he will help the team, but it's a good sign when a rookie doesn't appear to be intimidated.

B.J. Ryan
Someday, he might actually allow a run. But, then again, he might not: he throws serious high heat, plus a slider that causes lefthanded hitters to have to clean themselves up afterwards. Note to the Rogers Centre scoreboard people: filling all available screen space with flames when he comes into the game is a wee bit tacky.

The Endless Rotating Cavalcade of Relief Pitchers [tm]
John Gibbons and the Blue Jays are taking advantage of a loophole in the rules. During the course of a year, if a player has an option remaining, a team can send out and recall that player as many times as he likes. The Jays are using this to, effectively, add one or two pitchers to their roster. When their existing bullpen arms got tired, they called up Marcum and McGowan. Once Marcum was used up, the Jays sent him down, and brought up Tallet to pitch bulk innings if needed. Once he's no longer needed, they'll probably send him back down and bring Frasor back up. If necessary, they can repeat the whole cycle again.

Eventually, major league baseball will put a stop to this, if only to cut down on the frequent flyer miles and give fans of AAA teams a chance to learn who-all is on their rosters. The best way to close this loophole is to expand the major league roster to 27 players, as the original 25-man roster was created back when teams only used 9 or 10 pitchers. But that'll never happen, as more major-league contracts means more leverage for players. Owners would rather cut off an appendage or two than allow that. (Besides, it would increase the number of mid-inning pitching changes, which is the single most boring part of any baseball game.)

Overall
The Jays aren't a complete team: their starting pitching has been very leaky at times, the middle infielders aren't quite there yet, and I'm convinced that the bats will die once the Rogers Centre roof is open. But they're good enough to compete with the big boys: heck, they are one of the big boys. Over the next few weeks, I'm convinced that the American League will discover that for themselves. The hard way. Play ball, gentlemen.
May Day Rambling | 22 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Mike D - Monday, May 01 2006 @ 01:49 PM EDT (#146123) #

Here's a thought:  Make Gregg Zaun the "personal catcher" for Towers.  Let's see if re-creating last season's game-day preparation and style of game-calling will help Towers get comfortable and pitch more confidently. 

Josh has only pitched to Zaun once this year, and although Ortiz took him deep, he definitely pitched respectably that day.  With Lenny DiNardo scheduled to start on Thursday, you can DH Molina and play Shea at first, and put Overbay in for either once the Jays chase the southpaw.  But I would suggest putting Zaun behind the plate to see if it works.

Jordan - Monday, May 01 2006 @ 03:42 PM EDT (#146133) #

The Jays are pretty much where I thought they'd be after April: slightly over .500 following a brutal opening schedule. I expected the middle infielders would struggle and that the bullpen would be helping out the starters big-time. I didn't count on Alex Rios exploding, but I also counted on AJ Burnett to be in the rotation, so that's more or less a saw-off. They've let a couple of winnable games get away from them, but so have most teams. All things considered, they're not in bad shape.

Oddly enough, the key to the team right now might be Josh Towers. He doesn't need to be unhittable, but his five starts have accounted for nearly half the team's losses. I wonder if he needs to get used to having a guaranteed contract -- here's a guy who's made a career out of pitching for next year's salary. He walked 29 batters last season; this year, he's on pace to walk 90. He's never come close to doing that, so I think he'll come around and pitch closer to his league-average ability. This team can score 5-6 runs in any given game, so an average Josh Towers is all they need.

May won't be a walk in the park, either: 7 games against the Angels, 5 with Boston, 3 each with Oakland and the ChiSox. But as Dave says, the Jays can play with these guys, so if they can be within 2 to 4 games above .500 by June 1, they'll be in a good position going forward. And I can't wait to see Wells, Rios and Glaus in Colorado May 19-21.

JustinD - Monday, May 01 2006 @ 04:31 PM EDT (#146140) #
With all the shuffling that has gone on between our Triple A and Major league bullpen, when do you think we will seen Brandon League? It appears he has figured some stuff out this year as he has a 1.53 ERA with 12Ks, 4BB, and 15 hits allowed in 17 2/3 innings. He hasn't allowed one long ball either.

I'm always comfortable when Ryan, Speier, and to a lesser degree SS Loogy come into a game. But if this team is to contend, we need some more middle relief and to figure out what's going on with the rotation. If one or two of McGowan, League, Marcum, Frasor and Chulk can get it together, the bullpen could be pretty good.

Another interesting thing, if Janssen pitches well in his brief audition and Towers continues to struggle, would you keep him in the rotation when AJ comes back, send him back down to AAA, or if the bullpen is still scuffling, put him in there? A lot of interesting questions that need to be answered.

As Billy Bean says, first two months are figuring out what you have, the next two months are trying to fill the holes, and the final two months is where everything should come together.

Chuck - Monday, May 01 2006 @ 04:36 PM EDT (#146141) #
Towers needs pinpoint control and luck to perform well in these situations.

And would benefit, in theory, from facing less patient teams like the Orioles and Angels, rather than the Red Sox and Yankees.  Of course this just opens the door to have someone show me that Towers actually fared better against patient teams than non-patient teams in 2005!
Fawaz - Monday, May 01 2006 @ 11:44 PM EDT (#146157) #
Aaron Hill's been unlucky, but the hits that have been prevented haven't exactly been liners in the gap; It seems like his power just got sapped from him at some point in July last season. I haven't seen another player consistently swing so hard, get the good part of the bat on the ball, and still barely get the ball out of the infield. To my untrained eye, he spent last season waiting on his back foot, this year he's lunging over the plate and twisting himself into a pretzel. He's been nice at second though, and this team can probably afford one weak spot in the line-up until Hill sorts himself out (what do you mean, "What about Russ Adams"?).
TamRa - Tuesday, May 02 2006 @ 01:23 AM EDT (#146158) #

I'm glad I was not the only one who saw a Winfield/Rios correlation.

Here's another one:

Based on similar physical structure, and incidentals (position played and what not) I becamse a bit fascinated with the similarity between a couple of other players - so I'd like to submit the proposition for discussion here...

Resolved-

(In like manner to the proposition Alexis Rios' upside is Dave Winfield)

Aaron Hill's upside is Paul Molitor.

Yay or nay?

 

Thomas - Tuesday, May 02 2006 @ 02:54 AM EDT (#146159) #
Mike Barnett has just been named the new hitting coach of the Kansas City Royals as Andre David was reassigned within the organization. The former Blue Jays hitting coach had been K.C.'s roving minor league instructor.
Chuck - Tuesday, May 02 2006 @ 08:40 AM EDT (#146164) #
Aaron Hill's upside is Paul Molitor.

If the Winfield/Rios and Molitor/Hill comparisons are restricted to physiques, positions, etc., then that is one argument.

But it's a whole separate argument to draw parallels between them as players (and I don't want to put words into anyone's mouth and suggest that this is what they are doing). Winfield and Molitor were already very good players at age 22, giving them many years of development prior to their theoretical peaks at age 27/28 (ignoring that Molitor actually peaked in his 30's). Rios is now 25 and hitting for the first time ever. Hill is 24 and obviously not hitting at all. Unless they prove to be exceptions to the rule, their windows of development time will be much smaller than Winfield's and Molitor's.
R Billie - Tuesday, May 02 2006 @ 02:38 PM EDT (#146191) #

I think Hill's lack of power is a bit confounding.  He's always been projected to have average power at least (double digit homeruns, gap hitter) so it's kind of puzzling to see him struggle to squeak grounders and bloopers into empty spots on the field.  As has been mentioned even most of his squared balls seem to be dribblers or soft liners.

So now I'm thinking unless a relentless virus has sapped all of his strength that there must be something mechanical going on either in the way he triggers his swing or the swing path of his bat.  Rios has made remarkable gains this year by becoming quieter and using more hands and less leg/body movement to prepare his swing.  There's got to be a similar thing that Hill can work on.

The only other thing I've noticed is that he strikes out relatively little but he's also not walking at all.  He's drawn a couple of BB recently but he generally has not been as selective as he could be even when getting ahead in the count.  He gets a lot of 2-0, 3-1 counts, and ends up not drawing the walk or even hitting the ball hard.  To his credit he still looks confident at the plate but he's also shown frustration at times.

TamRa - Tuesday, May 02 2006 @ 04:06 PM EDT (#146201) #

Chuck,

I agree that the age difference does stand out as a major point of division. It is possible that this meansthat their "peak" would be lower, or it might mean that they would be expected to spend less time AT the peak in terms of sustaining performance.

That said, as you noted, Molitor was slow developing - and we know now drugs played a factor early in his career, along with injury. That would seem to be a favor that mitigates in favor of Hill peaking around the same age Molitor did.

 

Still, one would be foolhardy to assume the similarities produced similar results, and I'm not going to be quite so optimistic. That doesn't mean I am not intrugied that the similarities exist, however.

 

Chuck - Tuesday, May 02 2006 @ 04:59 PM EDT (#146206) #
That said, as you noted, Molitor was slow developing - and we know now drugs played a factor early in his career, along with injury. That would seem to be a favor that mitigates in favor of Hill peaking around the same age Molitor did.

Molitor was a much better hitter in his 30's than his 20's. While such rare animals exist, they are anomalies and no one could be expected to follow that kind of career path. Or even hoped to follow that path.

Unlike Hill, Molitor hit well at a young age, posting an OPS+ of 120 or more three times between the ages of 22 and 25. So whatever factors conspired to suppress his performance during his theoretical peak years, he at least had a reasonably high pre-peak level to return to once his theoretical peak ended, portending a career of some duration (though not 20 years, of course).

Following the traditional growth model, Hill has 3 or 4 years to get to his peak before his deterioriation commences (which will be hastened if he remains at second base). Scouts suggest that he has the tools to become very good and I am in no position to refute that. But holding up Molitor as Hill's ceiling may be a big dose of wishcasting.
May Day Rambling | 22 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.