Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
The second-place Orioles are the Jays' last opponent before interleague play. Baltimore will throw their top two pitchers and an Adam Loewen replacement at the Jays this series, plus one shellshocked closer too.


Erik Bedard: Is second in the AL in strikeouts. He throws a heavy fastball from around 90 to 94 which induces lots of ground balls. The O's broadcasters like to talk up how Ramon Hernandez hates catching Bedard's heater because it moves so much in the strike zone. When Bedard gets ahead in the count, he looks for strikeouts with his deadly combination of breaking pitches: a sweeping slider around 84 and a biting curveball in the 70s. When defensive hitters zero in on the wrong breaking ball, Bedard induces some ugly swings. In Bedard's last start, he struck out 10 Rays over 7 shutout innings. No Jays have particularly noteworthy numbers against Bedard. Alex Rios is 8-24 with two walks and two homers. If he sits, it's definitely not because of the matchup...

Daniel Cabrera: Still the same guy - 5th in walks, 10th in strikeouts... I'm pretty sure that's him, right? - but he's inching ever closer to the Great Revelation. He's sitting on a career-high K/BB of 2 and a career-high 50% groundball rate. He seems more comfortable relying on his fastballs to get hitters out all by themselves than he has been in the past. Cabrera tends to throw first-pitch fastballs when there's nobody on base, so a hitter who's really struggling against him (see: Wells, Vernon) might do well to go up hacking if there's nobody on. Of course that just increases the risk of a one-pitch out, which is the absolute positive last thing you want to happen when Cabrera's pitching. The Rays roughed Cabrera up in his last start, only striking out twice in six innings while hitting two homers and barely seeing 3 pitches per PA, so the hacking method may have some merit. Cabrera surrendered six runs but still picked up the win to move to 3-3.

Brian Burres: Waiver claim from the Giants' organization who pitched in AAA for the O's last year. Burres is keeping Adam Loewen's spot in the rotation warm while the stress fracture in Loewen's elbow heals. Burres is a typical lefty who throws in the high 80s and relies on deception and keeping hitters off balance. He throws lots of late-breaking sliders, a looping 12-6 curve, a diving changeup and lots of balls. His strikeout rate is very high, but he only gets 1.4 strikeouts per walk. Burres' style is really conducive to giving up crooked numbers against a patient team.

Scott Williamson: The veteran reliever is finally active at the major-league level again after years of elbow and triceps aches and pains. He replaces Jon Leicester.

Chris Ray: Mulligan. Ray's season WPA total was positive on Saturday. Now it sits at -0.81.

Notable lines in the chart:
- Tomo Ohka's numbers are becoming scary;
- It's not hard to see why Jesse Litsch has been very effective, though he certainly doesn't look overpowering;
- A.J. Burnett is doing an admirable Cabrera impression so far this year, except with far more homers allowed;
- Chad Bradford and Todd Williams are both legitimate groundball pitchers with career groundball rates in the 60s - their stats are not a fluke;
- John Parrish seems more determined than ever to miss bats as he ascends the leverage ladder. His walk rate has increased dramatically since the last O's-Jays series.
- This is a very impatient lineup, especially when Kevin Millar sits. I'd love to see Dustin McGowan face them. He should get a shot at Camden Yards next week.

The Credit Section: Batted-ball and Leverage Index are available at Fangraphs. K% and BB% are strikeouts and walks as a percentage of plate appearances. Jesse Litsch's stats are from Minor League Splits. Everything else, most notably the AL average statistics, is available at The Hardball Times.


Advance Scout: Orioles, May 14-16 | 23 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
mathesond - Monday, May 14 2007 @ 03:43 PM EDT (#168077) #

Last year I had free tickets to see what turned out to be Casey Janssen's first ML start. This year I have free tickets to see Jesse Litsch's first ML start. What is with clients and vendors setting me up to see the O's face a guy making his debut anyway? 

Hopefully the defense plays better for Jesse than they did for Casey last year. Between the fly ball that landed between three guys and Hillenbrand's wild throw home (from first), poor Casey never had a chance. And even though he only went about 4 innings, he wasn't getting hit hard. Mind you, he did hit a couple of batters...

 

Magpie - Monday, May 14 2007 @ 04:25 PM EDT (#168079) #
first ML start....

Two in two years? Not bad. It prompted me to rummage through my unreliable memory (and the more reliable sources at baseball-reference.com and retrosheet) to see what I could offer. After all, I've been getting into games free for a long time (and paying for the privilege since the early days of the franchise).

And while I can remember the first ML starts, from such worthies as Gott, Cerutti, Duane Ward, all the way up to Carpenter and Halladay  - the only times I've actually been in the house were for Giovanni Carrara (1997), Brandon Lyon (2001), Dustin McGowan (2005), and Francisco Rosario (2006.)

Not, so far, a very inspiring bunch. Oh wait  - I may or not have been on hard for Marty Janzen in 1998 - I was there for either his first game (in relief) or his first start.

That's not helping much, is it?
Magpie - Monday, May 14 2007 @ 04:40 PM EDT (#168080) #
So I dug out this year's Jays media guide, where on p.196 they list every Blue Jays pitcher who made his ML debut as a starter. Litsch will be the 24th. You saw Janssen, I saw Carrara, Lyon, and McGowan. Which leaves 19 other games, of course.

Did anyone else out there happen to catch any of these games? Quite a few of them were played on the road, of course, which greatly reduces the chances I suppose. But here's the list:

Jerry Garvin, 10 April 1977, Chicago at Toronto
Jeff Byrd, 20 June 1977, Cleveland at Toronto
Jim Clancy, 26 July 1977, Texas at Toronto
Mike Darr, 6 September 1977, Toronto at Boston

Dave Stieb, 29 June 1979, Toronto at Baltimore
Butch Edge, 13 August 1979, Oakland at Toronto

Luis Leal, 25 May 1980, New York at Toronto

Alex Sanchez, 23 May 1989, Minnesota at Toronto
Mauro Gozzo, 8 August 1989, Texas at Toronto

Juan Guzman, 7 June 1991, Toronto at Baltimore

Scott Brow, 28 April 1993, Kansas City at Toronto

Giovanni Carrara,  29 July 1995, Oakland at Toronto (Magpie!)
Jeff Ware,  2 September 1995, Chicago at Toronto

Chris Carpenter, 12 May 1997, Minnesota at Toronto

Roy Halladay, 20 September 1998, Toronto at Tampa Bay

Pascual Coco, 17 July 2000, New York at Toronto

Brandon Lyon, 4 August 2001, Baltimore at Toronto (Magpie!)

Mike Smith, 26 April 2002, Toronto at Anaheim

Dave Bush, 2 July 2004, Toronto at Montreal in Puerto Rico
Gustavo Chacin, 20 September 2004, Toronto at New York

Dustin McGowan, 30 July 2005, Texas at Toronto (Magpie!)

Casey Janssen, 27 April 2006, Baltimore at Toronto (mathesond!)
Ty Taubenheim, 20 May 2006, Toronto at Colorado

Jesse Litsch, 15 May 2007, Baltimore at Toronto (mathesond!)

I'm not too optimistic about the Dave Bush game, and you'd need to be almost as old as me to even think about Garvin or Clancy, or even Leal. But how about Carpenter? Coco? The immortal Jeff Ware, who didn't make it in hockey, either?

BigTimeRoyalsFan - Monday, May 14 2007 @ 05:08 PM EDT (#168081) #
guess whos back. back again. troy is back. tell a friend
3RunHomer - Monday, May 14 2007 @ 05:08 PM EDT (#168082) #
See if you agree -- this season Cabrera looks to me like he's trying very hard to stay in control on every pitch. It gives him a mechanical motion. I assume that the much anticipated revelation will come when Daniel can let fly with some fluid grace ... and still keep it in the strike-zone.
the shadow - Monday, May 14 2007 @ 07:15 PM EDT (#168087) #
Magpie, I was at  Clancy's 1st game for the Jays and if I remember rightly it was a very good beginning, as far as being as old as you I only wish, I'm now 88 and still an avid Jay's and BBox supporter
Magpie - Monday, May 14 2007 @ 07:47 PM EDT (#168088) #
Wow - Jim Clancy's debut was about the last I was expecting to hear about...

The Jays will be making a roster move after this game to make room for Litsch. They could option someone to AAA - Roberts, Vermilyea, Tallet...they could designate someone for assignment - Towers, McDonald, Clayton, Ohka...

Call me crazy, but I think Tallet is a goner.

Squiggy - Monday, May 14 2007 @ 08:04 PM EDT (#168089) #
My vote goes to Ohka being gone. In any event, I doubt he sees the All-Star break as a Jay.
Magpie - Monday, May 14 2007 @ 08:59 PM EDT (#168091) #
Smart hitters and dumb hitters.

With Wells on second, Glaus drives a pitch the other way to score the tying run.

With two men in scoring position, Clayton takes three huge cuts from his heels and gets nothing.
GregJP - Monday, May 14 2007 @ 09:26 PM EDT (#168092) #
The fact that Royce Clayton and Tomo Ohka continue to play significant roles on this team deeply mystifies me.
CaramonLS - Monday, May 14 2007 @ 10:14 PM EDT (#168093) #
The fact that Royce Clayton and Tomo Ohka continue to play significant roles on this team deeply mystifies me.

Who do you put in their place?  Jmac isn't a better hitter and the jury is in on Smith having a fat hole in his swing. 

Call up Santos?  Don't think so.  I'd sure like Wilson Betemit to be on the next flight over to TO, but I don't see that happening.
ChicagoJaysFan - Monday, May 14 2007 @ 10:19 PM EDT (#168094) #

Who do you put in their place?  Jmac isn't a better hitter and the jury is in on Smith having a fat hole in his swing.


I'd rather Olmedo than Clayton.  At least Olmedo is young enough that he might improve for the future.  From what I've heard, his defense is amazing and at least in the minors he's had a few seasons where his OBP has been above .340.  He's definitely not amazing (or even average) offensively right now, but has the potential to at least help out more than Clayton has for the last 8 years or so.
Sherrystar - Monday, May 14 2007 @ 10:23 PM EDT (#168096) #

Finally...

Wilner just confirmed that Jason Smith has been designated for assignment...

 

Matthew E - Monday, May 14 2007 @ 10:30 PM EDT (#168097) #
Everyone looking forward to the debut of Jesse "Acererak the Demi-"Litsch tomorrow?
SNB - Monday, May 14 2007 @ 10:42 PM EDT (#168098) #
Oh, Glaus.

When he was an Angel, I always saw him as a big-time power guy, but a guy who wasn't too difficult to pitch to. I figured he chased way too many pitches out of the strike zone, hit into too many double plays, and was generally a mistake hitter. Over the last two years I've realized that this approach is a conscious choice - I think, if he so chose, he could hit about 30 points higher but lose about a dozen home runs in the process.

Case and point: Bottom of the sixth against Bedard. One-run game, home run would have given us the lead, but playing at home all we really need to play for is the single and the tie. So he shortens up a bit and lines a single into right-center.

He's a player. Unfortunately, he needs to be a DH, and we already have one of those.

oodler - Monday, May 14 2007 @ 11:34 PM EDT (#168104) #
With Smith D for A - doesn't he go back to whoever the Jays Rule 5'ed him from? (assuming they want him back!)
tstaddon - Tuesday, May 15 2007 @ 12:50 AM EDT (#168108) #
Interesting that they're electing to designate Smith rather than demote Roberts and remove him or someone else from the 40-man roster (Zambrano, Houston).

If Glaus can manage to stay healthy through the week, I wonder if JP will call up Olmedo in place of Roberts. McDonald could surely handle 3rd base in a pinch and Olmedo's playing well enough at AAA to warrant 100 ABs as a starting SS. Of course, his recall would warrant another 40-man spot. But there are plenty of candidates to pick from. Even if Olmedo can't rake (stats certainly suggest that) , after watching Smith drop one down Saturday I realized it'd be nice to have someone around who can bunt for a hit in Reed's absence. He also played parts of 3 games at 3B last year in Cincinnati. So it's not completely foreign territory. Let's see what he's got!
tstaddon - Tuesday, May 15 2007 @ 12:52 AM EDT (#168109) #
Also: has anyone noticed that McDonald is batting .500 vs LHP (7/18) while Clayton is .276 vs. RHP (16/58)? If you're not going to settle on one, at least platoon them properly, Gibby.
Ryan Day - Tuesday, May 15 2007 @ 12:59 AM EDT (#168110) #
There's really no point in having Clayton, McDonald, and Olmedo on the roster together - they're practically the same player, though Olmedo might be the best of them. (Not a huge endorsement, I realize.)

Ryan Roberts at least gives the Jays something slightly different: A bit of pop and some decent patience at the plate. I'm not sure I'd want him as a regular, but he's got a role if you already have one starting shortstop (Olmedo) and  one slick-fielding backup (McDonald).
Seamus - Tuesday, May 15 2007 @ 03:53 AM EDT (#168111) #
Nice game tonight.  It's almost strange to see the Jays come from behind and actually hold the lead.  It's a little more like how I imagined the team to be from the start.

it's nice to see Accardo looking so sharp.  Remember in Spring Training when a lot of people were questioning the Jays choice of him over Rosario? 

Also, how good is Accardo?  Is this a blip, or do you think he will be a high quality relief pitcher?  17.2 scoreless innings to start a season is pretty impressive.



budgell - Tuesday, May 15 2007 @ 08:52 AM EDT (#168112) #

Ryan Roberts at least gives the Jays something slightly different: A bit of pop and some decent patience at the plate. I'm not sure I'd want him as a regular, but he's got a role if you already have one starting shortstop (Olmedo) and  one slick-fielding backup (McDonald).

I like Roberts a lot, seems like a gamer, uniforms dirty by the top of the second type of player.  Something we've missed since Sparky went down.

ayjackson - Tuesday, May 15 2007 @ 11:47 AM EDT (#168129) #

Remember in Spring Training when a lot of people were questioning the Jays choice of him over Rosario? 

And rightly so.  It wasn't and either/or choice.  Accardo had an option, and for the use he got out of the pen in April, he might as well have been in Syracuse.  There's certainly room for both of them in the pen right now!

Ryan Day - Tuesday, May 15 2007 @ 12:06 PM EDT (#168130) #

On a pure talent basis, taking Accardo over Rosario makes enough sense. Particularly in hindsight.

But taking Accardo and then sticking him at the bottom of the bullpen doesn't make a lot of sense. But even that looks like a brilliant move next to keeping Zambrano, using him for all of five innings in April, and then expecting him to start. That's a month where Zambrano could have been starting in AAA and Rosario could have been showing his stuff.

Still, it looks like everything has worked out in the end. I wonder how long the Phillies will stick with Rosario if he continues to struggle.

Advance Scout: Orioles, May 14-16 | 23 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.