Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
Well, Alex Bregman is no longer an option, he is a Cub.

Bregman wasn't a good fit for the Jays at this point, with Kazuma Okamoto signed for 4 years for $15 mil per.  Bregman got 5 at $35 per.  Yikes.  Bo must be very, very happy right now as the next best IF is Eugenio Suárez, a pure power 3B who was shy of 4 fWAR despite 49 HR, then Luis Arraez who is mostly a 1B now, then Willi Castro who is a 95 wRC+ lifetime guy who is entering his age 29 season hoping for a contract I suspect.

The OF situation is still Kyle Tucker and Cody Bellinger with Harrison Bader the next in line (122 wRC+ last year after 3 straight years of sub 100 performance - anyone making a big offer to him is likely to be disappointed).  Yep picking are slim after the big guys sign.

So who should the Jays chase?  I seem to flip flop a lot on this so lets see the assorted forecasts that I have access to for Bo, Tucker, and Bellinger - the only guys worth thinking about imo for the Jays.  ZiPS is not available for the Jays or Cubs yet so no Bo or Tucker from that.  PECOTA won't be available for a bit unless one pays for Super-Premium and no, I'm not doing that.
  • Tucker age 29: FGDC: 4.4 WAR, Steamer 3.7, The Bat 4.8, The Bat X 4.5, OOPSY 4.5 = average 4.38
  • Bo age 28: FGDC: 4.0, Steamer 3.6, The Bat 4.4, The Bat X 4.2, OOPSY 4.0 = average 4.04
  • Bellinger age 30: FGDC: 3.0, Steamer 2.7, The Bat 2.8, The Bat X 2.3, OOPSY 2.1, ZiPS 3.3 = average 2.7 (non-ZiPS is 2.58)
Bo & Tucker are a lot closer than I expected there.  Bellinger a LOT further behind than I expected.  If the Yankees really are offering him $30 mil a year for 5 he should take it imo as he is good, just isn't that good.

Given if Bo is signed Clement is benched (avg for him is 1.46 while playing full time), if Tucker is then either Barger (1.62) or Santander (1.12) is benched/traded (Santander projected for about 130 games, Barger around 100).  There are also 1001 trade possibilities and other choices internally (Lukes 0.68, Schneider 0.98 - both projected for under 50% playing time so double to get a full season worth).  This is all to give a 1000 mile view on what is here, what is possible/likely for 2026 performance.  Cost wise as is by far is the cheapest.  Bo & Tucker will almost certainly both be looking at Bregman's deal as a starting point.  If Tucker doesn't get $400 mil at this point (pre-deferrals) I'd be surprised.  Bo I'm figuring is looking at $200 mil as a bottom, $250 as a real possibility while he pushes for $300 mil.  Yes, all these figures are insane and make the Okamoto deal look damn good if he is any good (over 2 WAR, ideally 3+).

The Phillies are listed as a strong Bo chaser (meeting Monday so no news on Bo until then at the earliest I'd think).  Blue JaysMets, Dodgers, Yankees, Giants, and even the Angels are all after Tucker to some degree.  Who will get him?  Jays are seen as the favorites but we all know the other teams have deep pockets too and a desire to make headlines.  I'd advise the Jays to find a way to sign him before Bellinger signs if possible, as once Bellinger does the Yankees/Mets (whichever loses out) will go nuts for Tucker I suspect.  Of course, his agent will feel the same so this is the time to pull out the '2 outs from winning it all, or 2 inches depending how you look at it' and 'great clubhouse, great atmosphere for a family' as he got married in 2024 and has a baby on the way.  Just read that Myles Straw was at his wedding so there could be a connection there that helps (Straw offered to babysit if they come to the Jays).  Easy to see that team atmosphere will be critical if the dollars are close.  I suspect the fact the Jays have Vlad signed for 14 years would also help as it would mean he knows 1 player who will be here for his entire career if he comes - a rare bit of stability in the unstable world of baseball.

We'd all love to have Bo back but with his leg issues and that crazy Bregman deal I gotta think the Jays won't go where Bo will want to be except maybe on a short term 3 year/opt out after each year deal which IMO would be a bad idea.
One Off List | 7 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Michael - Sunday, January 11 2026 @ 07:23 AM EST (#474406) #
That is a very high contract for Bregman. If you do the $ value his last 5 years were worth you get (fangraphs numbers):

2021 $17.1M (2.1 WAR, age 27)
2022 $43.2M (5.4 WAR, age 28)
2023 $35.1M (4.4 WAR, age 29)
2024 $33.2M (4.2 WAR, age 30)
2025 $28.2M (3.5 WAR, age 31)

So that is $156.8M of value (19.6 WAR). 5/35 is paying him $175M for the next 5 years, I.e., expecting his 32-36 years will be *MORE* valuable than his 27-31 years were. It is true that his peak value is very good as 2018-2019 (7.9 and 8.3 WAR respectively for $63.1 and $66.6 M value) so a couple of years like his age 24-25 would make it worth it most likely, but again, do you really figure ages 32-37 to match the very best of his career?

BTW Bo over the last 5 years from fangraphs is:

2021 $38.9M (4.9 WAR, age 23)
2022 $38.6M (4.8 WAR, age 24)
2023 $31.0M (3.9 WAR, age 25)
2024 $2.3M (0.3 WAR, age 26)
2025 $30.6M (3.8 WAR, age 27)

So that is $141.4M of value (17.7 WAR). So Bregman's been slightly better than Bo in value over the past 5 years - basically due to the one down Bo year. But Bo is 4 years younger than Bregman and you'd be paying for years 28+ so an 8 year deal for Bo would cover 4 of the years that are in Bregman's past (age wise) and still end one year before the 5 year deal Bregman signed.

If Bregman is worth 5/35, I think Bo should be worth at least least 7/35 (and 10 year 300M deal wouldn't be out of the question). Of course, I don't think Bregman really ought to be worth 5/35, but we'll see.
dalimon5 - Sunday, January 11 2026 @ 08:51 AM EST (#474408) #
If Bo gets 10/30 then Tucker's getting 400 million in some format of years, bonuses and deferrals.

Bregman has skewed the market.
Glevin - Sunday, January 11 2026 @ 09:13 AM EST (#474409) #
The good thing about the Jays off-sesson is that the Jays are as of right now probably the best team in the AL. Signing Bo or Tucker would be great but after signing Okamoto, they don't need to and if the Bregman contract is a guide, those contracts might get silly.
greenfrog - Sunday, January 11 2026 @ 09:18 AM EST (#474410) #
One thing to remember is that inflation is eroding the value of a baseball dollar by around 5% a year. Something to keep in mind when comparing the size of contracts from a few years ago with the size of contracts now.
greenfrog - Sunday, January 11 2026 @ 09:30 AM EST (#474411) #
Today Law had some positive things to say about the Cubs adding Bregman. As for Boston, he thinks they should add Bo:

“The obvious answer for Boston would be to sign Bo Bichette, who needs to move off shortstop anyway and might be a 5-win player if he slides to third or second and is at least a 55 defender at either spot (which I’m saying is a realistic expectation). I’d rather have Bichette than Bregman anyway, and he’s at least capable of backing up Trevor Story at short.”
Glevin - Sunday, January 11 2026 @ 11:15 AM EST (#474412) #
Oh, I think signing Bregman is good for the Cubs because nobody in the central spends any money so spending some makes you automatic favourites. Two divisions where almost nobody even tries. Like. If the Tigers spent an extra $20M on a player, they'd be easy favourites but they won't and might win anyway. There's a lot of deferred money in the deal so in the end, it will be similar to Alonso, Schwarber deals which feels a lot more realistic than the way the deal looked without deferrals.
uglyone - Sunday, January 11 2026 @ 11:32 AM EST (#474413) #
Of note there's significant deferrals for Bregman bringing the AAV down to about $30m.
One Off List | 7 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.