Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
I know, I know. Chemistry doesn't exist in dugouts or clubhouses. It's irrelevant, a figment of old coaches' imaginations, with no influence on the outcome of ball games. Why, it's as meaningless as... let's see... confidence? Just kidding; I don't want to annoy the ZLC.

ESPN's Jim Caple imagines an "All-Snarl" team in his latest. Caple also lists five potential blowups we should watch for in the real world. Master chemists Raul Mondesi and Jeremy Giambi are overlooked in both pieces, and Jim spelled Bizarro wrong, but I enjoyed this. Thanks to Sean.
Chemistry 101 | 1 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
_Chuck Van Den C - Saturday, March 29 2003 @ 01:17 PM EST (#92138) #
Chemistry doesn't exist in dugouts or clubhouses.

Coach, of course we recognize your remark as being sarcastic.

I don't think anyone would deny that chemistry exists. What skeptics amongst us might suggest is that it's not entirely clear that a causal relationship can be proven to exist between clubhouse chemistry and on-field play. The cause-effect certainly seems plausible, but where's the proof?

And even if you could measure the effect, how could you measure the cause?

Further, some have argued that the perception of the cause-effect is actually bass ackwards. A team's success breeds clubhouse harmony which is then later treated as a contributing cause of that success.
Chemistry 101 | 1 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.