Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
You can not sweep the series when you lose the first game, and you can not win the first game if you do not hit. And when you do not hit, there will be Frustration. And Irritation.


I had the radio on, and round about the seventh inning Warren Sawkiw was waxing ecstatic about John Gibbons' decision to start John McDonald at shortstop. And while McDonald is a very fine defender, and made a very memorable play last night, there's a reason he's never been a regular in the major leagues. He is pretty much overmatched by major league pitching in general, and right-handed pitching in particular. On a night when the Jays could push but a single run across the plate, innings two and four ended with McDonald striking out with runners on base.

Irritation and Frustration.

Star of the Game - The Jays managed naught but eight scattered singles last night. Gregg Zaun had two of them, and threw out out two Devil Rays trying to steal, one of them Carl Crawford himself; he also coaxed a somewhat shaky Casey Janssen through seven semi-decent innings.

Unsung Hero - Well, Janssen did soak up seven innings...

Defensive Play of the Game - John McDonald hustled out into left field and alertly caught Jonny Gomes fly ball when it escaped the overhanging catwalk and finally plummetted to earth.

Defensive Misplay of the Game - Nothing too egregious, but Rios threw to the wrong base on Lugo's double, which pretty much eliminated any chance of catching Gathright at home. Aaron Hill threw home anyway, which allowed Lugo to take third, from where he scored on Janssen's wild pitch.

Boxscore - You want to see this? OK.

Elsewhere - Carlos Delgado got reacquanited with Dave Bush last night. Carlos walloped a solo homer to put the Mets up 2-0 in the top of the first, and singled his next time out. But Bush worked six innings and got the win. Jose Lima was starting for the Mets, so the final result couldn't be too surprising...

Barry Zito and Chien-Ming Wang hooked up in the night's best pitcher's duel. Barry Zito's Run Support ranks 102nd out of 107 eligible pitchers, so what ensued was probably easy to foresee. Oakland last night managed a measly four singles, while grounding into five double plays. How often does a team hit into more double plays than hit into... hits?

I guess it's not April anymore. In his last four starts, Johan Santana is 4-0, 2.17 and has struck out 40 batters in 29 IP.

Cole Hamels made his much-anticipated debut for the Phillies and shut out the Reds for five innings. He struck out seven and allowed just one hit, although he did walk five. Ryan Madson instantly gave up a pair of solo homers to cough up the lead Hamels had turned over to him, but the Phillies won anyway. The Phils have won 11 of 12 - hey, didn't someone around here pick them to go to the post-season?

This only means that the Phillies are almost as hot as the Padres, who have won 12 of 13, and caught up with the Rockies at the top of the NL West. Just so you know - San Diego is going to blow this division apart, not that anybody cares..

Back when people were making their predictions for NL rookie of the year, did the name Josh Willingham ever come up? Not that I remember. He tore up the PCL last year, hitting .324 with 19 HR in just 66 games - but it was the PCL, he was 26 years old, and he didn't have a position - he had bounced between catcher, first base, third base and left field as a minor leaguer. The Marlins have settled on left field for him and in the majors this year, he's hitting .305 with 7 HR and 28 RBI. I of course have a reason to root for him - Willingham turned 27 this past February, on the very same day that I turned... well, older than 27. Me and Michael Jordan and Jim Brown. And Mike Green's mom, of course. All of us older than 27, so I would be grateful indeed if you would restrain yourself from carping that Willingham is an "old" rookie. Spare me. Please. Pretty please?

In fact, ... I would be grateful if you would say this with me, and keep saying it all weekend long:

Go Josh!

We can all agree on that, surely.


TDIB Saturday: Be-Devilled | 33 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Rob - Saturday, May 13 2006 @ 09:29 AM EDT (#146837) #
Speaking of Josh Willingham, he was one of only three players not involved in a strange double play last night in the Pirates-Marlins game. Jeromy Burnitz singled home two, Craig Wilson was thrown out trying to go first to third and then Burnitz somehow decided it would be a good idea to go to second. Follow that link to see a videoclip of one of the weirdest double plays I've ever seen. Call it 9-3-5-6-4-3-8; the putouts were made by the SS and CF.

js_magloire - Saturday, May 13 2006 @ 10:25 AM EDT (#146842) #
A special mention has to go to a couple of other Marlin rookies that are dong just as well. Hanley Ramirez: 331. ave., 8 SB, 2 hr, and 15 rbis. Dan uggla (2b), 4 hr, 17 rbi, 3 SB, and 300 ave., and well Jeremy Hermida too, who was expected to win the Rookie of the year, but he's been on the DL. Mike Jacobs has been slightly cooler than his 10 hr in 90 AB that last year indicated.

I remember last year we had trouble with Tamba Bay pitching too. The pitching! How cruel is the irony of the basball gods. At least let us lose slugfests. Hideki Nomo beat us last year, and Casey Fossum held us down (hopefully not this series again, I'm hoping because we hit lefties so well), and I'm sure a couple of other times too.

CokeYouNut - Saturday, May 13 2006 @ 12:46 PM EDT (#146847) #
Why is it that we have so much trouble with the Devil Rays? You would think a Major League team would play every team with the intensity that they play the first place teams.

It's a mystery to me.
Pepper Moffatt - Saturday, May 13 2006 @ 12:56 PM EDT (#146848) #
"Why is it that we have so much trouble with the Devil Rays? You would think a Major League team would play every team with the intensity that they play the first place teams."

The funny thing is that Red Sox fans say the same thing about their team playing the Blue Jays.
zeppelinkm - Saturday, May 13 2006 @ 12:59 PM EDT (#146849) #
I think that displays some serious arrogance on the part of Red Sox fans.



Pepper Moffatt - Saturday, May 13 2006 @ 01:49 PM EDT (#146852) #
'I think that displays some serious arrogance on the part of Red Sox fans."

I don't really see why.  Over the last 4 years, the Red Sox have been an average of 17.5 games better than the Jays.  Over the same span, the Jays have only been an average of 13.9 games better than the Rays.  The Jays have been a lot closer to being Tampa than Boston.

Of course, this is largely caused by the disaster which was the 2004 season.  If you just consider '02,'03 and '05, the figures are 13.2 and 19.5, respectively.
Rob - Saturday, May 13 2006 @ 03:11 PM EDT (#146856) #
Wait. I'm confused. How is it a "good catch" when the Jays are hitting righties better than they did last year? A .272/.340/.467 line doesn't scream "making the pitchers look good." They're just making them look like Paul Byrd. Last year, it was Mark Mulder.

AWeb - Saturday, May 13 2006 @ 03:16 PM EDT (#146857) #
A thought I've had more than once this year is that the Jays are not a good lineup to take advantage of pitchers who generally give up a lot of walks. While they are set up to pound the other pitchers into submission, they don't have many batters who really work at bats, let alone take walks. Glaus and Catalanotto (maybe Zaun, Overbay?) will work a pitcher into a walk, but the rest of lineup is content, generally, to try and hit the first good pitch they see. This will often work very well, as it has most the year, but sometimes, against pitchers like McClung, Beckett, and Escobar, who hold batters to around a hit an inning, not getting those 3 or 4 walks kills you. Another like this is Kazmir, against whom the Jays have often annoyed me. It seems like the Jays are unable to let him walk himself out of the game, or at least take enough pitches to get to the bullpen early enough. This as opposed to someone like Hendrickson,  who keeps walks down, but otherwise gets hit hard, hopefully like tonight.

Evidence: Jays average 3.73 pitches per at bat as a team, with Cat leading at a very high 4.38
Orioles :3.59
Boston: 3.95
New York : 3.93
Tampa Bay : 3.80

Also, more basically, Toronto is 8th in the league in walks, but lead in OPS (that's not easy to do). When the slugging doesn't happen, they don't have a fall back strategy. I'm liking the offense anyway, although they're not likely to OPS .850 as a team for the year. But the team ERA should drop below 5.00 soon too, right?


Maldoff - Saturday, May 13 2006 @ 04:00 PM EDT (#146858) #

My comment wasn't that they are "bad" vs righties, but just not as effective.

I've also noticed that trend that was mentioned about walks.  This team seems very reliant on the 3-run bomb, similar to the Phillies and Cubs of last year.  This is not a good thing, because it is not sustainable, and will cause some long periods of time with low scores.  This team doesn't set up the small-ball type inning.  I think it all comes back to not really having a true leadoff hitter.

Chuck - Saturday, May 13 2006 @ 04:26 PM EDT (#146860) #
I think it all comes back to not really having a true leadoff hitter.

The team has been batting the likes of Johnson, Catalanotto and Rios at the top of the order. Their OBP's have been .500, .459,  and .385. I'm having a difficult time seeing how that type of leadoff hitting is hurting the team.
JayFan0912 - Saturday, May 13 2006 @ 06:13 PM EDT (#146864) #
I think the jays caught a hot pitcher - his last two start were pretty good. The pitching by jansen in this game was good enough to win, especially against the devil rays who have a bunch of rejects and rookies on their staff, besides kazmir.

Losing to the devil rays is just a case of bad luck ... their wins in toronto were flukes (bullpen blown 6 run lead, halladay surrendering late lead and going on DL next day), and I doubt McClung (or whatever his name is) can keep this up over a full season.  Also, some of the runs the rays scored were on boneheaded plays - a balk, throwing to the wrong base, etc... maybe the speed of the devil rays forces a bad defensive lineup to make plays.  I don't think they manage to score these runs in midseason.

I also don't think the red sox comment applies. The jays are built to do well against that team, being stacked with RH hitters, and of course, lilly was always good against them.

Mike Green - Sunday, May 14 2006 @ 08:50 AM EDT (#146873) #
I don't know that the start of Pujols' hitting career has been as impressive as Ted Williams', but if someone wanted to do a pinch-hit Hall Watch on Pujols' standing among the great first baseman (so far), I would be happy to work on it.  The start of Pujols' career vs. Gehrig's is an interesting comparison.
Magpie - Sunday, May 14 2006 @ 10:17 AM EDT (#146879) #
I don't know that the start of Pujols' hitting career has been as impressive as Ted Williams

You might also want to look at the early years of Frank Thomas' career, which are none too shabby..
js_magloire - Sunday, May 14 2006 @ 11:02 AM EDT (#146881) #
You might also want to look at the early years of Frank Thomas' career, which are none too shabby..

I'm not saying that you're implying this, but for arguments sake, I can take your point as saying that its only the beginning of his career, and though Pujols may be good, but he may not be THAT good (best player of all time-ish, as I said before), and even if he is, there is no guarantee he stays healthy.

With Frank Thomas, he had monster power because he weighed 275 pounds and was 6'5, which I think makes him more prone to age faster (decline began at 30 years old). Pujols weighs in at 225. I don't really have any other proof that Pujols won't regress as much as Thomas other than that I think he's an amazing athlete, an anomaly, who's extremely quick in his reflexes (and psychologically too). Some players, usually ones with combination of speed and strength, age better than others, like Moises Alou (in 40's, but still hitting strong). Frank Thomas was surely marred by injuries, especially because of his big frame. The same things were being said of Ken Griffey Jr. too, that he would break Hank Aaron's homerun record when he was young, but injuries proved to get the better of him too. There is no telling what freak thing could happen, but Pujols strikes me as a guy who is physically strong and healthy - he's already playing through back pain this year, and in his career year in 2003, he was dealing with hamstring spasms I believe.
Mike Green - Sunday, May 14 2006 @ 12:17 PM EDT (#146888) #
Playing through back pain at age 26 is a sign of good character perhaps, but it is not an indicator supporting consistent excellent performance in one's 30s.  It takes its toll.
Cristian - Sunday, May 14 2006 @ 12:30 PM EDT (#146891) #
While we're on the topic of trade rumours, ESPN Insider also mentioned a day ago that there is talk about a Shea Hillenbrand for Livan Hernandez deal, for what it's worth.

It can't be worth much.  Where would Shea play in Washington?  The Nats have Zimmerman at third, N.Johnson at first, and no DH.
TDIB Saturday: Be-Devilled | 33 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.