Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
Five runs? Break up the Jays!


1. Jays 5, White Sox 2. Good news all over. Jesse Litsch goes 7.1 efficient innings. The offense explodes for five runs. This is the second time since April 20 the bats have reached that lofty threshold. Marco Scutaro hits his first homer of the year. John Danks' record against the Jays in the post-Overbay incident era falls to 0-1. B.J. Ryan pitches a scoreless ninth for the Cheap Save, running his scoreless streak to 7.0 innings with 10 strikeouts, 3 walks and 6 hits. In that scoreless ninth, Alex Rios makes a pretty freakin' sensational catch to rob Jermaine Dye of a triple.

2. In Boston, the Red Sox are two-thirds of the way to avenging last weekend's sweep at the Trop and opening a three-game lead over everyone in the AL East. The Rays entered the series tied for first in the division, which is pretty impressive in light of the rash of injuries they've battled to this point. Tampa's 15-day DL has played host to Dioner Navarro, Matt Garza, Al Reyes, and, most cripplingly, Scott Kazmir. But they've fought through it to stay in second place.

Today, as they look to avoid the sweep, the Rays get Kazmir back.

This is a big deal. Scott Kazmir is a pretty good pitcher. Once his strained elbow is totally healed, he may even be - gasp! - the best pitcher in the American League.

Heresy? Maybe. Yeah, Kazmir may not eat innings like Roy Halladay does, so he's unlikely to be as valuable. But if you take efficiency out of the equation, the 2008 edition of Scott Kazmir may give Doc and the rest of the AL's aces a run for their money.

Here is how Scott Kazmir's ERA+ over the last three seasons has compared to some of the AL's best. The average is a three-year average weighted by innings pitched. 2007 counts double.


2005 2006 2007 Average
Kazmir 116 142 130 128.8
Sabathia 104 140 143 133.5
Halladay 184 143 120 137.4
Lackey 123 128 151 138.6
Johan
155 161 130 144.4
Beckett 118 95 145 125.8
Wang 124 121 138 130.7
Bedard 108 121 146 131.1

Consistent and respectable. Just going by the ERA - which, of course, depends heavily on external factors - Kazmir has not been out of his league here. And - big and! - those are his age 21, 22 and 23 seasons. Scott Kazmir is 24. His best days are likely ahead of him.

And there are a couple of mitigating factors which make Kazmir's 128.8 look even better and indicate that greater success may be on the horizon.

Mitigating factor #1 is Tampa Bay's defense. Over the past three years, it's been a joke. Due to various combinations of inexperience, instability and ineptitude, the Devil Rays finished 25th in defensive efficiency in 2005, 29th in 2006, and 30th with a bullet in 2007 with a stunning .662. This year? The Rays are 3rd in the majors with a .731. Huge improvement.

As you might expect, this has had a profound impact on the Rays' run prevention. They've allowed 4.07 runs a game, fourth-best in the AL. Without one inning from Kazmir. The improved D has affected all of their starting pitchers except James Shields:

Tampa Bay Starting Pitcher BABIPs, Pre- and Post-Desatanicization (Note: Only stats accumulated with Tampa Bay count; I left out Edwin Jackson's numbers with the Dodgers.)


Devil Rays (05-07) Rays (08) Differential BIP% Hits/100
James Shields .307 .330 .023 73.6 -1.7
Andy Sonnanstine .329 .267 -.062 77.8 4.8
Matt Garza (Twins)
(.348)
.276


Edwin Jackson .350 .291 -.059 71.3 4.2
Jason Hammel .347 .300 -.047 73.8 3.5
Average .333 .293 -.040 74.1 3.0
Scott Kazmir .328 ??? ??? 63.5 ???

The column on the right is how many hits per 100 batters faced the defensive improvement so far will save each pitcher, if they keep putting balls in play at their current rates. If Kazmir receives a 40-point downward bump in his BABIP, which is the average of the other starters' decreases, he figures to lose about 2.5 hits per 100 batters - or 20 hits over 800 batters.

When the pitcher receiving that 20-hit assist is a strikeout machine who happens to have posted 3.77, 3.24 and 3.48 ERAs in the past three seasons in the AL East, that's a pretty scary proposition for the rest of the league.

You might also expect the effect to trickle down to Kazmir's middling walk rate and pitches per PA, helping him to go deeper into games than the 6 innings he averages now. Kazmir has had every reason to shy away from contact in the first 3+ seasons of his career. This year might be a bit different.

Mitigating factor #2: Age. Did I mention he's 24? It's worth repeating. He's probably going to get nastier and smarter himself, as the defense around him improves.

Kazmir is returning from an elbow strain, so there's always the possibility that the injury lingers and dents his effectiveness. If he does return to full strength quickly, though, watch out. Halladay and Chien-Ming "6-0" Wang are the early frontrunners for this year's AL Cy, but a healthy Scott Kazmir is a very intriguing dark horse.

3. Doc and Contreras, 1:07 at the RC. Jays go for four in a row, Doc goes for his fifth straight complete game. Like Rakim says, light 'em up, blow 'em out like candles.
4 May 2008: Offense Explosion! | 34 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Mike Green - Sunday, May 04 2008 @ 12:29 PM EDT (#184295) #
The Rays have also lost Cliff Floyd, and replaced him with old friend Gabe Gross who hit his first homer of the year last night.
Rob - Sunday, May 04 2008 @ 01:24 PM EDT (#184300) #
Fascinating stuff on the Rays' D, Alex. I'm just not sure if we're seeing a real change or mere April shenanigans. Bartlett's presumably an improvement over Lugo and the rest, but Iwamura was pretty bad last year and he's moved the wrong way on the spectrum. Which defensive players have caused this improvement, and is it likely to continue?
Maldoff - Sunday, May 04 2008 @ 01:33 PM EDT (#184301) #
5 runs was nice, but 3 for 13 (2.31) with RISP is still quite ugly. Need this to start improving before we get too excited about the offense.
China fan - Sunday, May 04 2008 @ 03:55 PM EDT (#184306) #
   Geez, what happened to all the people who were tearing out their hair and gnashing their teeth over a few losses by the Jays last month?  Those who chose to boycott the team are missing some good baseball now!
   And, conversely, props to those who predicted astutely that the bad luck wouldn't last forever. 
robertdudek - Sunday, May 04 2008 @ 04:04 PM EDT (#184307) #
So, now that the Jays have won 4 in a row, who's ready to jump back on the bandwagon?

Not me. But I'll be watching as always.

Mike Green - Sunday, May 04 2008 @ 04:38 PM EDT (#184308) #
Rob, the improvement in the Rays' D was predicted before the season by most analysts.  Bartlett instead of Brendan Harris is huge, Longoria is good, Iwamura over Cantu/Upton is large, Upton over Dukes/Young in center is significant.  Basically, the Rays have gone from being absolutely vile at the four most important defensive positions to being above average.  The significance of the absence of Jorge Cantu in the middle of the diamond cannot be overstated.
AWeb - Sunday, May 04 2008 @ 05:07 PM EDT (#184309) #
I'm glad to see the Jays go on a win streak, and yeah, I'm glad to be back on the bandwagon for now. Let's go sweep tomorrow, to match the longest win streak in 3 years.

Looking at the stats, the Jays now lead the majors in run prevention after 32 games (Arizona and Oakland have better ERAs, but have allowed a lot more unearned runs). I was one of the skeptics pre-season that didn't think the pitching could be any better than last year - I am glad to be wrong so far. The odd thing is I haven't really noticed stellar defense, as compared to last year. The Jays are striking out a lot of batters, including all four lefties out of the pen this year (Tallet, Downs, CArlson, Ryan) at or above 9K/game. Strangely, it's Burnett who isn't striking out anyone so far.

I also note that the fans in Toronto seem to have started cheering a lot more for pitching - the starting ovations for Litsch, Marcum, and Halladay the last three days have been great. Glad the fans are adapting - it'll be a while before we get to cheer for a juggernaut offensive team.
peiscooter - Sunday, May 04 2008 @ 05:26 PM EDT (#184310) #

Great to see a few wins strung together. 

I'm concerned, however, with the use of Scott Downs.  Wasn't it just a little over a week ago that he was unavailable for a couple of games while nursing a tender shoulder.  Now, he's pitched on 3 consecutive days and 4 of the last 5.  Mind you, his total pitch count in those 4 games was only 44, but with bullpen warmups, etc., I'm concerned about overuse.

Meanwhile, Brian Tallet has now had 10 days off and seems, with the addition of Jesse Carlson, to have become the forgotten man. 

 

uglyone - Sunday, May 04 2008 @ 06:18 PM EDT (#184312) #

very encouraging to see this team able to build a decent winning streak, even though they STILL aren't hitting at all.

 

and really, just how long is Gibbons going to continue with the stubbornity of keeping Eckstein at the top of the order?

brent - Sunday, May 04 2008 @ 06:27 PM EDT (#184313) #
game 32- WPA heroes Halladay (4), Stairs (4), Accardo (2)          WPA let downs Rolen (2), Eckstein (11), Lind (4)
Magpie - Sunday, May 04 2008 @ 06:59 PM EDT (#184314) #
just how long is Gibbons going to continue with the stubbornity of keeping Eckstein at the top of the order?

You're not seriously advising him to Mess With a Winning Streak?
CeeBee - Sunday, May 04 2008 @ 07:25 PM EDT (#184318) #

" The odd thing is I haven't really noticed stellar defense, as compared to last year."

Eckstein at or near the top of the order does nothing to impress me and Eckstein on defense scares the bejeesus out of me. Maybe Sir John has spoiled me but I could almost live with his bat just to gain his defense.

katman - Sunday, May 04 2008 @ 07:38 PM EDT (#184319) #
Baseball is superstitious, and so no, let's leave the dumb decision to bat Eckstein second and keep on-base machine Overbay near the bottom of the order in place until that streak ends. When it does, however, competent management will make the change.

As for Eckstein in the late innings, once again we're clinging to a 1-run lead, and once again our best defense isn't out there. We have a Gold Glove defender at a key position, and we're completely wasting him.

Every day these things continues puts me one step closer to wanting Gibbons fired, irrespective of whether we are winning (as we are now) or losing recent ball games. There's just no excuse for this kind of boneheadednes. Especially when the team needs every advantage it can imagine in order to get back in this and make any kind of serious playoff run.

timpinder - Sunday, May 04 2008 @ 08:37 PM EDT (#184320) #

It is frustrating to see Eckstein batting 2nd every game.  With runners on 2nd and 3rd, nobody out and the infield in, I just knew he wouldn't get the ball in the air.  Sure enough, he grounded out to short and it should have been a double play as Rios ran into Cabrera's glove, but the Jays got a break.  Then there was the throwing error.  Eckstein has become my least favourite player.  I'm sure he's a decent person, but on the field, I just can't stand him.  Gibbons won't move Eckstein while the Jays are winning though. 

I thought Lind looked good in his first few games.  He hit the ball hard but didn't get any hits.  However, today he looked terrible chasing after those "forkballs", or as everyone not named Rance calls them, "splitters".  I really hope the Jays let Lind battle out of this slump.  It seems like he's started pressing and I'd hate to see him sent down or benched.  If they keep throwing him out there everyday eventually he'll start hitting.  I fear, however, that Gibbons won't be nearly as patient with Lind as he is with Eckstein.

ChicagoJaysFan - Sunday, May 04 2008 @ 09:39 PM EDT (#184322) #
However, today he looked terrible chasing after those "forkballs", or as everyone not named Rance calls them, "splitters".

I don't think you can really criticize Rance for being accurate - Contreras throws a forkball and is rather well-known for it.  While a forkball is similar to a splitter, the forkball has a wider grip and a slightly different spin.
Mylegacy - Sunday, May 04 2008 @ 10:05 PM EDT (#184323) #

Halladay - what more can be said.

Eckstein - when he throws from SS to 1st he sets himself and puts everything into the throw. JMac gets the ball to 1st from his bum. 'Nuff said. I was in favour of Eckstein batting 2nd (rather than 1st) because if Rios is on base at least he'd be a competent bunter. However, clearly Overbay would be the better guy batting 2nd. Eck's best position is still batting 10th!

Wells - I'm seeing a REAL change in the way he's approaching each at bat. When he used to swing at some ball that had bounced three times before it got ot him he acted like he didn't care. Now, I see a genuine response - he's actually upset with himself when he takes a dunderhead swing. I think Rolen is starting to rub off on him.

Rolen - Like Stairs a professional hitter. I LOVE the way he goes about his business.

Other pitchers - BJ, Carlson, Downs, Accardo and Camp are all very good right now. How many bullpens in the game can say they have five guys at their level?

Hitting - it still s-u-c-k-s. We can't force our pitchers to be nearly perfect to expect any chance at a win. I really feel Wells is trying to turn it on. IF - Wells, Rios, Rolen and Stairs get even a bit hot and this team will be able to put together a 10+ game winning streak.

Ryan Day - Sunday, May 04 2008 @ 10:19 PM EDT (#184324) #
Meanwhile, Brian Tallet has now had 10 days off and seems, with the addition of Jesse Carlson, to have become the forgotten man.

I was just noticing that myself. Granted, the starters have been going deep into games lately, but how often do you see a guy with a 2.25 ERA, a K per inning, and BAA of .222 sitting at the back of the bullpen?

Though, geez, the Jays bullpen has nothing to fear from lefty hitters:

Carlson: 120/120/240
Tallet:  190/261/190
BJ: 100/250/100
Downs: 304/360/391


scottt - Sunday, May 04 2008 @ 10:47 PM EDT (#184325) #
Now, if Lind starts to contribute, things could get a lot easier for the pitchers.



timpinder - Sunday, May 04 2008 @ 11:33 PM EDT (#184326) #

CJF,

I guess you learn something new everyday.  I thought that a splitter and a forkball were the exact same thing, and that Mullinicks was trying to be different.

But seriously, is it just me or is Rance Mulliniks very hard to listen to?  Campbell's fine and I like that he's enthusiastic, Fletcher's fun to listen to and Ashby and Howarth are great on the radio, but there's something about Mulliniks.

Lefty - Sunday, May 04 2008 @ 11:55 PM EDT (#184327) #

Thats a great sidebar poll question.

Who is the best broadcast commentator / colour guy.

My vote goes to Mulinicks hands down.

And I'd say he knows a thing or two about the old forkball, as I recall that was the bread and butter pitch of his teammate Terminator Tom Henke.

 

timpinder - Monday, May 05 2008 @ 12:07 AM EDT (#184328) #
Lefty, I can't read body language off of a computer screen, so I don't know if you're being sarcastic or not.  Do really like Mulliniks!?  It must just be me then.  I'd rather watch the game on MUTE.  Mulliniks really bugs me.
ANationalAcrobat - Monday, May 05 2008 @ 12:27 AM EDT (#184330) #
Rance really bothers me too. He's extremely dry and Jamie often has to suck information out of him. He's also far too casual about a lot of things and his voice is gritty. He frequently does provide interesting analysis on the topic of pitch selection, however those are nullified in my mind by his old school praise for sacrifice hits and "clutch" players.

Jays TV personalities leave a lot to be desired, but I could listen to Howarth and Ashby forever.
James W - Monday, May 05 2008 @ 12:28 AM EDT (#184331) #
It's not just you.  Everyone that I watch games with can't stand Mulliniks's work.  (I'm indifferent; just happy to be watching baseball).  They think he talks way too much.
Magpie - Monday, May 05 2008 @ 12:33 AM EDT (#184332) #
The forkball's been around much longer, and ball is generally jammed deeper between the two fingers, making it more of an off-speed pitch. It was the main weapon of Elroy Face, one of the first great career relievers. The splitter (split-finger fastball) is generally thrown quite a bit harder, and was first brought to prominence by Bruce Sutter in the late 1970s. It became all the rage in the 1980s, as Roger Craig taught it everywhere he went (San Diego, Detroit, and San Francisco) and it was what Mike Scott credited for his rather sudden transformation from a journeyman into a dominating ace (although Scott may have been doing other things to the ball that didn't involve his grip!)
robertdudek - Monday, May 05 2008 @ 04:04 AM EDT (#184337) #
The Neyer/James Guide to Pitchers is absolutely essential reading for every baseball fan.
Frank Markotich - Monday, May 05 2008 @ 08:47 AM EDT (#184345) #

Mulliniks is easily the best colour man on the Jays' crew. He was one of the most intelligent players of his time, and I always learn something from listening to his thoughts on various situations.

Casual fans prefer more of a song and dance man, which is understandable.

Geoff - Monday, May 05 2008 @ 09:14 AM EDT (#184348) #
Casual fans prefer more of a song and dance man, which is understandable.

ZING!

Yes, Bring Back Warren Sawkiw!

But seriously, Rance is a competent colour man with good insight. He doesn't have a single song or dance in his repertoire and would bore you to tears if you weren't interested in what he's saying. But his insight is genuine, thoughtful and useful. Nobody's perfect but Rance easily passes muster. Really.

Now Joe Carter, that man could dance and sing.
Thomas - Monday, May 05 2008 @ 10:52 AM EDT (#184358) #
But seriously, Rance is a competent colour man with good insight. He doesn't have a single song or dance in his repertoire and would bore you to tears if you weren't interested in what he's saying. But his insight is genuine, thoughtful and useful. Nobody's perfect but Rance easily passes muster. Really,

I agree. I enjoy Rance the most of the three regular colour men who take their turn with Campbell. No colour man is perfect, but Rance is thoughtful and explains himself well. I also think Campbell does a fairly good job of drawing insight out of him by asking him questions in particular situations.
Magpie - Monday, May 05 2008 @ 11:11 AM EDT (#184362) #
No colour man is perfect

It also takes a fair bit of time to learn a new trade from scratch. Buck Martinez is good now and has been quite good for more than ten years. But he wasn't good at all when he got started about twenty years ago. John Cerutti was just getting good at it when he died, after more than five years of being far too tense and uptight on the air.
Dewey - Monday, May 05 2008 @ 11:29 AM EDT (#184364) #
"...I could listen to Howarth and Ashby forever."

Jerry and Alan are a big improvement on Jerry and Warren; but I still have to turn Jerry off several times in a game.  The man simply cannot allow *any* dead air!  Yesterday he "explained" the Rios play at second base about five times throughout the broadcast.  It's as if whenever he runs out of things to say he repeats himself.   I don't know how he imagines his audience following the game.  Did you know that Jerry hails from San Francisco, and used to watch the Giants?!!  I'm thoroughly weary of some of Jerry's "reminiscences and anecdotes", told and re-told, and then re-told again.  Did Ernie Harwell or Vin Scully fall back on that stuff?  At least he does seem to have cut back, a bit anyway, on all the Readers' Digesty feel-good family-values homilies he so dearly loves.

 Ashby is so much better than Sawkiw it won't fit on a graph.
Mike Green - Monday, May 05 2008 @ 11:38 AM EDT (#184365) #
he does seem to have cut back, a bit anyway, on all the Readers' Digesty feel-good family-values homilies

What are the odds that "cutback", "Readers Digest", "feel-good", and "family values" would appear in the same sentence months before the Republican convention? 

How much a play-by-play man fills the air is a matter of taste, like that in wine or decorating.  Myself I prefer dry wine and modern clean lines in design, and announcers who know when to say nothing.  It is particularly important for TV play-by-play men; sometimes the image tells more than words can.
Dewey - Monday, May 05 2008 @ 12:10 PM EDT (#184367) #
Not sure what your point is about the Republican convention, Mike.  (For the record, I despise what the Republicans have done to a once-great country.)

I agree with you that play-by-play manner is a matter of taste, and I apparently share your own in that regard.  On Jerry's radio broadcasts at least, what is annoying is that so much of the chatter/filler/commentary is not about what's going on on the field.  It's Jerry in his pulpit.

ANationalAcrobat - Monday, May 05 2008 @ 12:23 PM EDT (#184371) #
That's a good point, Dewey. Jerry did repeat his explanation of the Rios play far too many times. It's worth considering though that people listening to the radio generally aren't just sitting in front of it for the entire game; if they were in a position to do that, they would probably watch the TV broadcast. If you're listening to the radio in the first place, it's probably because you're doing something else at the same time - driving, cleaning, working, etc. If that's the case, you probably also end up missing a few plays and it's thus helpful to have important plays explained at various intervals.
Mike Green - Monday, May 05 2008 @ 12:33 PM EDT (#184373) #
It was a joke, Dewey.  I guess that it need a smiley.
4 May 2008: Offense Explosion! | 34 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.