Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
The Twitter rumour mill is reporting that the Jays will announce on Friday that Vancouver will be the new home of their short season A team, replacing Auburn.

The report comes via John Lott who is retweeting a report from one Kelsey Brade who is a Vancouver based sports anchor and producer.  Some of our west coast bauxites can comment on how much we should believe Mr. Brade.

This move has been quietly rumoured for a while now, ever since word broke that the Jays were leaving Auburn.  Recently the Jays Charlie Wilson said the Jays would have exciting news in the off-season about the minor league affiliations.  From the Jays perspective, a team in Vancouver will extend the "brand" and continue to try and make the Jays, Canada's team.

So west coasters, are you happy?  Are you more likely to see the Canadians now?

Jays Invade Vancouver | 81 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
slitheringslider - Thursday, September 16 2010 @ 08:33 PM EDT (#222590) #
Being from Vancouver, this is awesome news for me. I never understand how the baseball development hotbed of Canada only has a short-season A-ball team. I feel like Vancouver can definitely support a higher level franchise and hopefully a big league team sometime down the line. I'm not necessarily the baseball purist some others are on BB, I don't have much interest attending a random minor league game with players I don't know and don't care about, but for a team I have vested interest in I will most certainly go watch the jays of tomorrow develop.
TamRa - Thursday, September 16 2010 @ 08:46 PM EDT (#222591) #
how is it a city that size doesn't have a AAA team? Can we not buy the 51's and move them at some point?

One can only assume it's a problem with the stadium situation?


ayjackson - Thursday, September 16 2010 @ 09:12 PM EDT (#222595) #
This is good news for the Vancouver base for sure.  I look forward to your reports, SS, and hopefully the odd scotch-soaked one from our friend in Victoria.
Original Ryan - Thursday, September 16 2010 @ 09:13 PM EDT (#222596) #
The ballpark in Vancouver, while it was a PCL facility until 1999, only holds 6,500.  10,000 seats is the general rule of thumb for AAA these days.  They'd likely need to build a new ballpark to land a AAA team.
ayjackson - Thursday, September 16 2010 @ 09:14 PM EDT (#222597) #

Speaking of scotch, here's a tweet from Elliot...

Jays tell RHP Zach Stewart, one of top arms in system along with Henderson Alvarez: "Be prepared to start or pitch in relief next spring."

 

jgadfly - Thursday, September 16 2010 @ 09:18 PM EDT (#222599) #

Since the Triple AAA Portland Beavers are closing up shop ,  couldn't  the Padres go into Las Vegas and the Jays go into Vancouver ?

Mike Green - Thursday, September 16 2010 @ 09:20 PM EDT (#222600) #
Very interesting rumours all the way around.  The club is playing poorly, but September 2010 feels nothing like September 2009.  That is a good thing.
Original Ryan - Thursday, September 16 2010 @ 09:48 PM EDT (#222603) #
Since the Triple AAA Portland Beavers are closing up shop ,  couldn't  the Padres go into Las Vegas and the Jays go into Vancouver ?

The Padres are reportedly trying to buy the Beavers and relocate them temporarily to Lake Elsinore until they can find a permanent home somewhere in Southern California.  The Beavers are merely being relocated, not folded.

Right now the only AAA options for the Jays are Las Vegas or Oklahoma City (barring something really unexpected with Sacramento and Pawtucket).  The Astros really want OKC and it would make a lot of sense for them geographically, but it depends on if the RedHawks want the Astros.
ayjackson - Thursday, September 16 2010 @ 09:51 PM EDT (#222604) #
The Padres bought Portland to move them to SoCal. The Jays could buy Vegas and move them. I'd guess they're making a play for Oklahoma City, but will be unsuccessful and left again with the ugliest girl at the dance.
kinguy - Thursday, September 16 2010 @ 10:13 PM EDT (#222605) #
Anyone know why the Jays soured on Auburn as an affiliate?  The Canadian connection notwithstanding, the NYP makes more sense from a geographical perspective with all teams except Las Vegas in the Eastern timezone.
Original Ryan - Thursday, September 16 2010 @ 10:43 PM EDT (#222607) #
Anyone know why the Jays soured on Auburn as an affiliate?  The Canadian connection notwithstanding, the NYP makes more sense from a geographical perspective with all teams except Las Vegas in the Eastern timezone.

Back when the Jays had affiliates in St. Catharines and Medicine Hat, I vaguely remember there being some sort of advantage to having minor league teams in Canada due to the visa rules. The Jays were able to carry more players from Latin America on those teams as a result.  If that advantage still exists (I have no idea), it would make sense for the Jays to affiliate with Vancouver given the team's increased focus on scouting in Latin America.
Mylegacy - Thursday, September 16 2010 @ 11:19 PM EDT (#222608) #
Hot damn!

I'm on vacation - just roaming around BC for a couple of weeks, presently in Quesnel - reading DaBox every day but not commenting - until now! Hot Damn!

Living in Nanaimo (not Victoria) - I can just walk on the ferry and take the bus downtown to the game. When the Jays had a team in Medicine Hat I used to actually go at least once a year when I lived in Terrace BC - that's a 22 hour drive one way!

With a Jay's team in the province, a new cruise ship terminal just 200 yards from my 14th floor balcony over looking the harbour (the terminal will be able to take bigger ships than can get into Vancouver under the Lions Gate bridge - up to 1400 feet long!), and a few bottles of 18 year old "good stuff" stored for just such an ocassion - not sure I'll even bother to go outdoors this winter - unless, of course, I run out of scotch - single malt natch!

Hot damn!

Ron - Thursday, September 16 2010 @ 11:32 PM EDT (#222609) #
I'm a Vancouverite and I have never heard of Kelsey Brade before.

Despite the fact the Canadians had Michael Choice on the team this season, I didn't go to a single game. If the Jays were to move their short season A ball team here, I would be more likely to attend a game or 2. But the bottom line is that Vancouver deserves at least a AA team. The Canadians had bigger crowds during certain games this season than the 51's in Vegas.
TamRa - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 02:40 AM EDT (#222614) #
Since the Triple AAA Portland Beavers are closing up shop ,  couldn't  the Padres go into Las Vegas and the Jays go into Vancouver ?

Again - BUY the team (the Beavers) and move them to BC if you can get any sort of agreement lined up regarding the stadium issue.


TamRa - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 02:43 AM EDT (#222615) #
ok so i didn't read the thread so....like I was saying, buy the 51's!!


rtcaino - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 08:25 AM EDT (#222617) #

Jays tell RHP Zach Stewart, one of top arms in system along with Henderson Alvarez: "Be prepared to start or pitch in relief next spring."

So it appears the Jays will not convert either individual from pitching. Interesting.

BalzacChieftain - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 08:45 AM EDT (#222619) #
I posted this late on an older thread, but do you think this might mean we see one of the two as the big-league closer in a few years?
Parker - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 08:47 AM EDT (#222620) #
As a resident of Calgary (at least on days off) this is very exciting for me.  Due partly to my insane work schedule (but mostly to my hatred of air travel) I'm able see only a couple Jays games a year.  The Cannons are alright, but the prospect of a weekend road trip to see some baby Jays in action is a lot more enticing.

TJ Caino, that was hilarious!  Nicely done.
Moe - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 09:20 AM EDT (#222622) #
Why would they go to all the trouble converting Stewart into a starter and now converting him back. Especially since the results look good so far. Yes, the Jays have a lot of young arms but they also tend to break.

Original Ryan - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 09:29 AM EDT (#222623) #
From John Lott in the National Post:

Meanwhile, the Jays will likely reveal their Triple-A plans “in the next day or so,” general manager Alex Anthopoulos said yesterday. Their player development contract with Las Vegas expired when the minor-league season ended.

From Brian McTaggart at MLB.com on the Astros' situation:

"Our hope would be that we would end up on Oklahoma City," Astros general manager Ed Wade said. "Of all the landing slots, that certainly is where we'd like to be. We've had some discussions with the people there, and it's basically up to them to make what they feel is the appropriate decision. We think there's great synergy between there and here, and we think from our standpoint it would be a terrific fit."

Astros affiliates were 360-468 in 2010, while Blue Jays affiliates went 376-386 with their A+ and AA affiliates both making the playoffs.  It'll be interesting to see what team the RedHawks choose to affiliate with.
BalzacChieftain - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 10:06 AM EDT (#222624) #
Moe, I agree with you on Stewart.  I wonder if this means there will be some trade bait action going on with one of our current top 4 starters if they are going to give Stewart some starts in Spring Training.  I'm doubtful, but if one of those guys can headline a package that would bring us back a young, controllable, serviceable major league bat, I'm all over that bandwagon.
John Northey - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 10:06 AM EDT (#222626) #
From the sounds of it the Jays are basically looking at the team and seeing what I see - tons of starters and space in the pen.

Top 5: Romero/Marcum/Cecil/Morrow/Drabek
Next 5: Litsch/Rzep/Mills/Hill/Stewart
Also ready: Richmond/Ray/...

I mean, that is getting nuts and I probably missed a few. I figure Stewart wouldn't get a shot until we are at least 2 or 3 deep into the replacement starters (Drabek/Litsch/Rzep are ahead of him for certain). The Jays started the year figuring a few kids would flop, as that is what happens normally. However, most stepped up or at least didn't collapse thus causing a major logjam. The pen, meanwhile, is losing at least 2 key guys. Thus telling the kids to be ready for either is smart. If they do well and we are short in the pen they go there, if they do great and starters get hurt/are ineffective they can go there. If they do mediocre and no slots are ready for them they start in AAA and are ready for wherever a hole occurs.
whiterasta80 - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 11:04 AM EDT (#222629) #

What's going on with Portland? I was there this summer: the stadium is quite nice, the crowd was fairly large and knowledgable.  Sure the team sucks, but that doesn't mean that market can't support a team.

Nigel - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 11:05 AM EDT (#222630) #

As a Vancouverite this would be great news but I have never heard of the sports reporter.  I go to 3-4 Canadians games a year now.  I used to go to about double that when the AAA team was here.  Vancouver has mostly been a marginal AAA location.  It had a few years when local interest was better when Molsons was making noise about a major league franchise and California had a good minor league system.   As noted above, the stadium is now too small for a AAA franchise.  Baseball interest is also pretty variable here but the biggest problem is that the weather in Vancouver from the beginning of the season to the end of June is generally very wet.  The number of rainouts in the old AAA days was scary in some years.  One of the great attractions to the short season league is its scheduling.  The good news for the Jays is that the team came under new ownership two or three years ago and they are now a pretty well run franchise.  This would be a good location to send new professional players now - two or three years ago I would not have said that.  One final note, Vancouver and its park makes us sort of the anti High Desert.

Original Ryan - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 11:13 AM EDT (#222631) #
What's going on with Portland? I was there this summer: the stadium is quite nice, the crowd was fairly large and knowledgable.  Sure the team sucks, but that doesn't mean that market can't support a team.

PGE Park is being converted for use by a new MLS franchise, and the renovations will make it impossible to play baseball there.  I've only casually followed the story, but Portland was unable to get a new minor league ballpark built.
Original Ryan - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 11:42 AM EDT (#222633) #
The Rogers news radio station in Vancouver is reporting that the Jays and Canadians have reached an agreement.
John Northey - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 12:09 PM EDT (#222634) #
This is good news. Short season A teams normally don't have tons of promotions/demotions due to length of season and the level it is (vs AAA which has tons) so location for this team isn't as big a deal as it is with AAA Vegas. It allows the Jays to see two teams when they fly out west (although Vegas and Vancouver aren't exactly close, but same time zone).

As to buying and moving a team, if the Jays did buy a AAA team it would move to Ottawa or Montreal long before it would go to Vancouver as they are the same time zone and have shown the ability to support AAA baseball in the past just like Vancouver/Edmonton/Calgary have. Heck, I'd think Winnipeg would be higher on the list of potential relocations than Vancouver.
raptorsaddict - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 12:48 PM EDT (#222638) #
Great news to hear, and a few of the remarks have me thinking: why don't they have all their minor leaguers in Canada? Van city makes sense for short season, and as others have said, there are lots of other potential cities. From a "branding" perspective, it would seem like a no-brainer to me.
TamRa - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 12:52 PM EDT (#222639) #
re: Stewart

if this is a clue to anything, for me, it's thatthe jays might be inclined to decline the option on Gregg and are thus hedging their bets on potential major league closers.

They might well sing a replacement...but if they didn't, the leading candidates are probably roenicke and Purcey and neither have answered enough of the questions that you can feel great confidence.

I think the general opinion is that Stewart could close in the majors now, if he was needed...so MAYBE (just guesswork of course) they are thinking let Gregg go and if another good signing doesn't come along, then have Stewart as their hole card if no one else steps up and grabs the closer job.

I HAVE to think they'd take at least one more season before they decided there wasn't going to be a rotation opening and conceded him to relief work.


#2JBrumfield - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 01:20 PM EDT (#222641) #
Team 1040 Sports Radio out of Vancouver says the Jays and Canadians have signed a four-year Player Development Contract.  I'm thrilled the Jays have a Canadian minor league affiliate again but I'm sorry it comes at the expense of Auburn.  Doubleday Field is not a bad place to watch a game.  I wonder if the A's wind up going there.  Even though Michael Choice was there this year, I think the fact Vancouver really didn't get any of the A's top draft picks was also a deciding factor in the C's switch to Toronto.
ayjackson - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 01:27 PM EDT (#222642) #
I think they'll get Sanchez and Syndergaard in the rotation to start the year, which will be nice for the locals.  Not sure what other top prospects would go there - especially with fewer signing close to the draft.
Original Ryan - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 01:30 PM EDT (#222643) #
Great news to hear, and a few of the remarks have me thinking: why don't they have all their minor leaguers in Canada? Van city makes sense for short season, and as others have said, there are lots of other potential cities. From a "branding" perspective, it would seem like a no-brainer to me.

It's not something the Blue Jays have a lot of control over since they don't own most of their minor league affiliates.  The only ones they own are the Dunedin Blue Jays, the Gulf Coast League Blue Jays, and possibly the Bluefield Blue Jays (I'm unsure on this one).  None of those teams can be relocated to Canada for obvious geographical reasons.

There also aren't many cities in Canada that would work geographically for the current affiliated minor leagues.  Besides Vancouver, the only other cities that might fit are in Southern Ontario and Southern Quebec.  Winnipeg has a great ballpark and it could probably support a team, but sadly there aren't any affiliated leagues nearby.  It would be hard to put a team in Manitoba/Saskatchewan/Alberta unless several others were added at the same time, and I don't see that happening in the foreseeable future.
ayjackson - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 01:32 PM EDT (#222644) #
If the Jays were to let Gregg walk, I think they would bring somebody in to bolster the pen and perhaps close - like Benoit in Tampa or Uehara in Baltimore.  Or even Bobby Jenks.  I don't think Roenicke and Purcey are options at this point.  I'm also not sure the Jays will let Gregg walk (unless they feel they got lucky and aren't interested in pressing their luck).
ayjackson - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 01:36 PM EDT (#222645) #

Winnipeg has a great ballpark and it could probably support a team, but sadly there aren't any affiliated leagues nearby.

The league the Goldeyes play is as close to Winnipeg as a few affiliated leagues.  Most of the Teams are around Lake Michigan.  I don't see this as an issue.  The biggest issue for relocating a team to Winnipeg is you'd have to buy the Goldeyes and contract them, in addition to buying the team you want to move there.  And the Goldeyes are probably worth more than most affiliated teams.

cascando - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 02:00 PM EDT (#222646) #
Just connecting a few stray dots here, but I wonder if Erik Bedard would be an option as a late-inning reliever.  He certainly had the stuff and after missing all of 2010 and only throwing 80 some innings in both 2009 and 2008, the prospects of him returning as a SP are not strong. 
cybercavalier - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 02:07 PM EDT (#222649) #
The biggest issue for relocating a team to Winnipeg is you'd have to buy the Goldeyes and contract them, in addition to buying the team you want to move there.  And the Goldeyes are probably worth more than most affiliated teams.

Is there a workaround on this issue of using the Canadian pool of baseball players, given the developing strength of Blue Jays scouts? Instead of a PDC, the Jays can designate a scouting team to the teams in Canadian priaries (which seems to be the strongest among non MLB-affiliated Canadian teams). Does such a scounting management go along with MLB rules?

Just connecting a few stray dots here, but I wonder if Erik Bedard would be an option as a late-inning reliever.  He certainly had the stuff and after missing all of 2010 and only throwing 80 some innings in both 2009 and 2008, the prospects of him returning as a SP are not strong.

On paper, it would be nice to get another MLB experienced Canadian arm, amidst Scott Richmond, Shawn Hill etc. Nice and interesting suggestion.
92-93 - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 02:12 PM EDT (#222650) #
It worries me that so many people think bringing Gregg back on that option and effectively giving away a mid-to-late 30s draft pick is a possible scenario. It shouldn't be. I'm strongly against paying relievers so much (4.5m + the value of a compensation pick) if the team isn't making a push to contend and spending strongly elsewhere on the FA market. The team would be so much better off letting Gregg walk and targeting someone like Rauch, Putz, Fuentes, Qualls, Affeldt, etc. if the addition of a veteran bullpen arm is imperative.
BalzacChieftain - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 02:20 PM EDT (#222651) #
I'm with 92-93 on this one.  I am puzzled whenever I read articles/blog postings saying that Gregg's options are affordable.  I would much rather see 9 million over the next 2 years go somewhere else.  I think Gregg's done a fine job, as much as I hold my breath every time he comes into the game. It's not the 30+ pick I care about losing, it's the problem of spending almost 9 million over 2 years on a guy who, I personally think, can be replaced for half the price externally, and who knows, maybe even from within.
Original Ryan - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 02:23 PM EDT (#222652) #
The league the Goldeyes play is as close to Winnipeg as a few affiliated leagues.  Most of the Teams are around Lake Michigan.  I don't see this as an issue.

It's a huge issue.  The affiliated minor leagues have rules governing team travel.  Any bus trip in excess of 500 miles requires an off-day, and off-days are relatively rare.  Looking at the various league maps, the nearest affiliated team in any league is the Iowa Cubs in the PCL, 640 miles away according to Google.  A team in Winnipeg would have to fly on just about every road trip, which would be rather expensive and impractical for a minor league club.  Winnipeg would easily be the most isolated team in affiliated minor league baseball, and I doubt any league would allow a team to be put there.

The rules for travel in the Northern League are probably less strict, so Winnipeg can probably get away with some long bus trips.  Plus they do have one other team nearby in Fargo in that league.
ayjackson - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 02:33 PM EDT (#222653) #

I've felt for a while that part of building a strong minor league system is continually turning over free agents and playing the compensation game effectively to maximize your top 75 picks in each draft.  I'm not sure though how the organization will treat Gregg in this regard. 

 

cybercavalier - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 02:35 PM EDT (#222654) #
it's the problem of spending almost 9 million over 2 years on a guy who, I personally think, can be replaced for half the price externally, and who knows, maybe even from within.

I think both BalzacChieftain and 92-93 agree on this point of view. As much as I am leaning to this point, I ask myself instead, "can the Jays get or afford the caliber of pitching above the Gregg's, given the pools of free agent relief pitching (or converted starters like the Bedard mentioned few posts ago) ?"

And I obviously meant the Canadian Prairies.

Original Ryan - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 02:39 PM EDT (#222655) #
Is there a workaround on this issue of using the Canadian pool of baseball players, given the developing strength of Blue Jays scouts? Instead of a PDC, the Jays can designate a scouting team to the teams in Canadian priaries (which seems to be the strongest among non MLB-affiliated Canadian teams). Does such a scounting management go along with MLB rules?

I'm not entirely sure what you're asking, but the teams in those independent leagues out west (namely the Winnipeg Goldeyes, Edmonton Capitals and Calgary Vipers) consist of mostly American players who either went undrafted or were released by a major league club.  Any major league team can sign those players, and while a good player does occasionally come out of those leagues (i.e. Scott Richmond), most of those guys aren't worth signing.

If you're asking whether a team like the Blue Jays could loan its minor league players to teams in those leagues, I'd have to read through the rules on that, but I'm doubtful.  Besides, the current affiliated minor leagues are better for player development anyway.
cybercavalier - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 02:42 PM EDT (#222656) #
The affiliated minor leagues have rules governing team travel. 

I wonder what rule(s) govern team travel in PCL, just based on my curiosity, although I would like to see the Jays have a AAA team in Oklahoma City, while the Astros go to Vegas.
ayjackson - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 02:46 PM EDT (#222657) #

AAA teams don't bus everywhere.  Vegas plays one night in New Orleans and the next night at home - a distance of 1738mi according to Google Maps.  I'm sure they're flying some if not most of their games in the PCL.  Calgary and Edmonton had PCL franchises not so long ago.  It's about $12,000 round trip to fly a ball club to Winnipeg for a series, maybe about $250k a year in air travel - or two home games of ticket sales.

You may be right, I don't have any insight into the business of AAA baseball.  But I remain skeptical.

 

John Northey - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 02:46 PM EDT (#222658) #
Good point about the draft pick plus money for Gregg. The question on his option also could be what can you trade him for with the option already cashed in? Would a team trade something worth as much as a 40th overall pick? What is that pick worth?

Checking 40th round picks all time I get...
WAR over 20: Kevin Tapani 143-125 4.35 ERA 26.6 WAR
WAR over 10: Larry Gura 126-97 3.76 ERA 18.9 WAR; Milton Bradley 808 OPS 18.2 WAR over 1014 games
WAR over 1: Huston Street 148 saves 2.98 ERA 8.9 WAR
WAR over 0: 2 guys
Made majors: 9 more
Never made it: 31 players out of a total of 46 - 32% made it to the majors with 4 actually being useful, or 8.7%

So, is Gregg in 2011 worth risking an 8.7% shot at a guy who has some value in the future?

39th had Barry Bonds plus 2 more over 10, 4 more over 1 = 7 out of 46 who were useful.

41st had Fred Lynn & Dan Plesec plus 5 more over 1 = 7 out of 46 again

42nd had 4 over 1 including Dennis Leonard & Mookie Wilson

38th had 7 over 1 including David Wright, Larry Hisle, and Butch Wynegar.

So for 38-42 we have a total of 29 useful players of whom 1 is an all-time great and 9 were star level (20+) out of 230 picks. A 12.6% shot at a useful player and 4.3% shot at a star. Is Gregg worth that (plus $4.5 million)? That is the question. I know Frasor isn't, Downs gets a 2nd pick as well thus it could be more than double those odds for him. Gregg though is harder to say - I'd lean towards keeping him as he might be a B next year as well (or even an A).
92-93 - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 02:56 PM EDT (#222659) #
I mentioned 5 relievers (with very little research) as good or better historically than Gregg, and with their minuscule 2011 payroll of course they can get and afford whomever they want. I'm just petrified of picking up his option and watching him have a terrible year, slipping out of Type B status in the process.

And how often compensation picks "hit" aren't really a concern to me - that's factored into the "value" I spoke of that you are giving up when you pick up Gregg's option. If 95% of compensation picks made the majors Victor Wang's evaluation of supplemental draft picks would probably equal a heck of a lot more than 2.6m. The figure is only so low because of the inherent crapshoot of the draft, but for me the flexibility a team has with its draft is when it has as many picks as possible in the top 3 rounds is hard to put a price on. When the Blue Jays are pining for Travis D'Arnaud and settle for Brett Cecil at #38 I see a lot of potential in that range while being cognizant of all the failures.
BalzacChieftain - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 03:04 PM EDT (#222660) #

Is Gregg worth that (plus $4.5 million)? That is the question. I know Frasor isn't, Downs gets a 2nd pick as well thus it could be more than double those odds for him. Gregg though is harder to say - I'd lean towards keeping him as he might be a B next year as well (or even an A).

A nice point, in that if we exercise his option and he puts up 2 more seasons of 30+ saves with a sub-3.50 ERA, we might have a Type A on our hands.  Despite that, I'd just as easily sign an RH set-up man with a decent K/9 (don't have a list of potential FAs in front of me) for 2 years at 5 or 6 million and just hand him the closer's job.  Saves you 3 extra million you can do what you want with.  Gives a little room for signing Bautista and/or another FA bench player.  That being said, I don't know how much the money matters in the grand scheme of things - I just think it would be worth saving that money rather than spending it on Gregg.

Thomas - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 03:05 PM EDT (#222661) #
The team would be so much better off letting Gregg walk and targeting someone like Rauch, Putz, Fuentes, Qualls, Affeldt, etc. if the addition of a veteran bullpen arm is imperative.

I think a high-leverage bullpen arm is something the Jays should have on their team. Aside from the importance of the innings he pitches, I think such an arm instills confidence in the rotation and the rest of the bullpen, even if the high-leverage isn't of the calibre of Rivera or Bell. It is also useful to have another arm there, as that pushes Camp, Purcey and potentially Roenicke into setup roles and so on down the chain. If we are going to lose Gregg, Downs and Frasor, I don't think all of them can be replaced effectively internally.

The team doesn't have to spend $10 million a season on Rafael Soriano, either. As pointed above, there are plenty of other options on the free agent market, such as the players list above (Rauch is someone who could possibly be signed on a reasonable 2-yr deal) or Grant Balfour.

Original Ryan - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 03:17 PM EDT (#222662) #
AAA teams don't bus everywhere.  Vegas plays one night in New Orleans and the next night at home - a distance of 1738mi according to Google Maps.  I'm sure they're flying some if not most of their games in the PCL.  Calgary and Edmonton had PCL franchises not so long ago.

There are several teams within 500 miles of Las Vegas.  I'm sure they have to fly a fair amount, but they wouldn't on nearly every road trip.  You'll notice on Las Vegas's schedule that they played New Orleans for just one series the entire season.  New Orleans didn't visit Las Vegas at all.

Back when Vancouver, Calgary and Edmonton all had teams, travel wasn't all that bad.  I've read (I can't recall where) that one of the big impediments to Edmonton or Calgary getting a AAA team again is the fact that there aren't any other teams close by.

Here is the current map of the PCL.  Winnipeg just wouldn't make any sense, especially with the minor league club on the hook for most travel expenses.  And that assumes Winnipeg is suited to be a AAA affiliate (right now the facility is closer in capacity to AA).  A team in Winnipeg at a lower level like the Texas League or Midwest League would be a complete non-starter geographically.
Original Ryan - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 03:24 PM EDT (#222663) #
I wonder what rule(s) govern team travel in PCL, just based on my curiosity, although I would like to see the Jays have a AAA team in Oklahoma City, while the Astros go to Vegas.

The same rules apply to all affiliated minor leagues.  The Major League Rules can be read here, with Rules 51 to 59 dealing with the minor leagues.  Some interesting stuff in there, particularly for those interested in the affiliation process, as well as the acquisition and relocation of minor league franchises.
ayjackson - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 03:30 PM EDT (#222664) #

A team in Winnipeg at a lower level like the Texas League or Midwest League would be a complete non-starter geographically.

Fair enough.  My main point, which you are leading me away from, is that Goldeye ownership is likely the key obstacle to any affiliated team in Winnipeg.  And I'm not sure travel is a deal breaker (i think the Goldeyes currently subsidize the Northern League for travel costs), though that would obviously depend on the league.  The revenue model is excellent in Winnipeg too, with 7k fans per night, 30 luxury boxes, radio and tv coverage, and excellent corporate support.  You could cheaply add bleachers to get up to 10k seats if you wanted to.

R Romero Vaughan - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 03:38 PM EDT (#222665) #

For a system that I assume was designed to try and compensate small market clubs for losing free agents to large market ones, you really have to question the system they have managed to put in place.

Rewarding movement (e.g. letting Gregg walk and replacing him with a different type B) is a very poor outcome vs intent of the system.

Signing a class A should mean you lose your 1st rounder and any 1st/ supplementary round picks you acquire to try and counteract the temptation to go on periodic FA splurges as you lose less valuable picks by bunching them in one year while you gain picks from FA departures.

But if that's the system, you have to play it.

Out of interest does anyone know how much a AAA team would cost to buy? Would be interesting to know the cost of e.g. Syracuse or Buffalo.

I would have thought owning Buffalo (or similar) would have quite real ancillary benefits to the Jays.

 

 

 

 

cybercavalier - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 04:02 PM EDT (#222667) #
Re: Original Ryan,

I though there are some undiscovered Canadian players in those leagues, given the success of Richmond and the developing prowess of Jays scounts. Thanks for the update.

Re: ayjackson,

In the end, Winnipeg is just not suitable to bring a AAA team, under the geographical reason or the ownership and financial model.




cybercavalier - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 04:19 PM EDT (#222668) #
ayjackson - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 04:29 PM EDT (#222669) #

cybercavalier,

why are you linking my profile? 

cybercavalier - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 04:34 PM EDT (#222670) #
Well, I just copy and paste your profile name from your post when I was replying to it.
ayjackson - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 04:39 PM EDT (#222671) #

That'll do it every time!

Looking at those maps, the Midwest League has the most similar geographical profile to the Northern league that the Goldeyes where currently play.  The Texas League looks like a non-starter.

John Northey - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 04:43 PM EDT (#222672) #
All league maps are here

I wonder if Windsor could support a team - right on the US border with Detroit there are a lot of people living there who grew up baseball fans who might enjoy a team that doesn't require a passport to go see, while Detroit purists might like going to minor league games at a much lower price.

216k, 323k metro area (non-US portion). Should be plenty for a AA team. The Eastern League would work nicely and iirc used to have a team in London but that is where New Hampshire is and that relationship is going well I think. An full-season A level team in the Midwest League could work too but that is where Lansing is and that was just re-upped for a few years.

I see short season as the hope for minor league teams in Canada generally, with a AAA team in Ottawa or Montreal the only higher level with a shot as I think the Jays have to be affiliated for it to work in Canada long term, or it has to be an indy league one ala Winnipeg.
Spifficus - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 05:00 PM EDT (#222673) #

Why would they go to all the trouble converting Stewart into a starter and now converting him back. Especially since the results look good so far. Yes, the Jays have a lot of young arms but they also tend to break.

Having Stewart work as a starter in the minors even if they were looking at him as a late inning reliever in the majors helps accelerate his development. It gets him reps for his delivery, it allows him to build arm strength, and forces him to work on his command and secondary stuff. Given the way people have been talking about the development of his change and his ability to hold velocity, I'm not sure they only see him as a reliever, but even if so, when feasible it's the right move.

As for Gregg, the obvious risk is that he accepts arbitration. Given his history of shakeyness, it's hard to say how big the market will be for him. An arbitration win would probably end up costing a couple million more than the option would, given his shiny save total. I'm not sure what I'd do, but I don't know if it's automatic. If I felt he won't accept arb, then it does move into the obvious realm.

92-93 - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 05:11 PM EDT (#222674) #
If the shiny 2010 stats would earn him a handsome arbitration award shouldn't it earn him a decent contract too? Jose Valverde made 8m in 2009 and declined arbitration, and Billy Wagner did the same after making 10.5m. I bet people in Atlanta were also worried about the award Mike Gonzalez would make in arbitration before he promptly declined as well.
Spifficus - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 05:12 PM EDT (#222675) #

Rewarding movement (e.g. letting Gregg walk and replacing him with a different type B) is a very poor outcome vs intent of the system.

Yeah, this has been annoying me (Boston and the Angels in particular) for years. The Supplemental picks should not be protected in this process. It allows wealthier teams to pad themselves with picks by churning through a few pick-eligible free agents every year.

Spifficus - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 05:27 PM EDT (#222677) #

If the shiny 2010 stats would earn him a handsome arbitration award shouldn't it earn him a decent contract too? Jose Valverde made 8m in 2009 and declined arbitration, and Billy Wagner did the same after making 10.5m. I bet people in Atlanta were also worried about the award Mike Gonzalez would make in arbitration before he promptly declined as well.

I get what you're saying, but the comps don't work for me. Valverde had been anywhere between good and very good for 4 of the past 5 years. Wagner wasn't going to be a closer in Boston, and this was clearly more important to him. Gonzalez had consistently been dominant when healthy. Gregg just isn't in the same class as these three either in terms of reliability or dominance, but some of the shiny totals he put up could make arbitration appealing to him. What would he get in arbitration? $5M might be the floor, and his agent's research may say $6. What would his agent have to believe he can get to turn down arb? 2 years for $10 Mil? Is that out there with the recovery cooling? I have no idea, but these are the questions I'd be asking before deciding.

Shrike - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 05:58 PM EDT (#222679) #
I'm excited. I used to go to C's games in their heyday: the Angels put some stellar prospects through Vancouver back in the day, and I still remember the likes of Erstad, Anderson, Percival et al. at the Nat. You just knew those guys would succeed in the bigs.

I can't wait to see the Jays prospects in person.
ayjackson - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 06:03 PM EDT (#222680) #
The arbitration award is not guaranteed salary either.  Rafael Soriano was an interesting case last year as he somewhat surprising accepted the Braves' arbitration offer and negotiated a lower salary ($6m v. $8m?) upon being traded to the Rays.
SJE - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 07:01 PM EDT (#222681) #
This will be even more exciting for the fans in Vancouver in a couple of years once the MLB tightens up the August 15 signing date. As it is now the top college players are signing late and thus Missing the short A season.
robertdudek - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 07:11 PM EDT (#222682) #
AA is impossible for Vancouver - geographically, they don't fit into any of the AA leagues (Texas, Southern, Eastern).

Only the PCL (AAA) , NWL(A-) or the Pioneer (R+) are possibilities.

I think the Jays should explore a AA franchise for southwest Ontario when the Fisher Cats contract expires. I'm thinking Hamilton, K-W or London.

robertdudek - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 07:19 PM EDT (#222683) #
Great news to hear, and a few of the remarks have me thinking: why don't they have all their minor leaguers in Canada? Van city makes sense for short season, and as others have said, there are lots of other potential cities. From a "branding" perspective, it would seem like a no-brainer to me.

Weather is the biggest problem, in my opinion. April outdoor baseball in Ottawa or Edmonton is not something that players or fans generally enjoy. For short season teams that is obviously not a big problem. I'm thinking that Lethbridge could be a good spot for a Pioneer League affiliate.

Dunedin is a must, since the spring training complex is there.
SJE - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 07:22 PM EDT (#222684) #
It`s obvious the Jays really dont want any part of Vegas. Rather than get stuck with 2 more years of having a AAA team where you don`t want to send your prospects, is it possible and maybe easier to have 2 AA teams in two different leagues.
Lugnut Fan - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 08:03 PM EDT (#222685) #

I don't think the Tigers would allow a minor league team in Windsor.  The reason is that the Tigers would have the ability to veto that (I don't think there can be a minor league team within 50 miles of a MLB team).  If Windsor was to get a team, the only way I see Detroit letting it work is if the Windsor team was a Detroit affiliate.  It would be similar to the agreement that Cincinnatti has with Dayton and Cleveland has with Lake County and Akron. 

The other thing against that is there is an independent league team in the northern suburbs of Detroit as well (The Oakland County Cruisers I believe is their name).  There would just be to many teams in that area.

cybercavalier - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 08:42 PM EDT (#222686) #
I see short season as the hope for minor league teams in Canada generally, with a AAA team in Ottawa or Montreal the only higher level with a shot as I think the Jays have to be affiliated for it to work in Canada long term, or it has to be an indy league one ala Winnipeg. [...] AA is impossible for Vancouver - geographically, they don't fit into any of the AA leagues (Texas, Southern, Eastern). Only the PCL (AAA) , NWL(A-) or the Pioneer (R+) are possibilities. [...] Weather is the biggest problem, in my opinion. April outdoor baseball in Ottawa or Edmonton is not something that players or fans generally enjoy. For short season teams that is obviously not a big problem. I'm thinking that Lethbridge could be a good spot for a Pioneer League affiliate. Dunedin is a must, since the spring training complex is there. [...] I don't think the Tigers would allow a minor league team in Windsor.  The reason is that the Tigers would have the ability to veto that (I don't think there can be a minor league team within 50 miles of a MLB team).  If Windsor was to get a team, the only way I see Detroit letting it work is if the Windsor team was a Detroit affiliate.  It would be similar to the agreement that Cincinnatti has with Dayton and Cleveland has with Lake County and Akron. The other thing against that is there is an independent league team in the northern suburbs of Detroit as well (The Oakland County Cruisers I believe is their name).  There would just be to many teams in that area.

All the above ideas are really nice ones. So in the nutshell, only Vancouver, Ottawa and Montreal are viable for AAA level of baseball, with Vancouver in PCL and Ottawa and Montreal in IL. I notice that the viability of level of minor league baseball goes along with population of these metropilitian areas:
1) Calgary, Edmonton and Winnipeg and cities in the Prairies in general are more or less isolated from MLB and AAA baseball because there are no American metropolitian cities nearby or south of the border; and therefore these Canadian lands are fertile grounds for independent league baseball.
2) London, Windsor, K-W and Southern Ontario in general are close to nearby American populated areas; middle level minor league baseball (A,AA) are suitable there as balances of affiliation with the parent MLB teams, travel and financial structure of fanbase are required to support the frequent travel among cities where the minor league teams would have been located. Winnipeg is a interesting place because it sort of lies in the middle of the above two criteria.

Just out of interest, are expansions to the north say Barrie or Sudbury or to the east in Halifax feasible to both popularizing baseball in Atlantic Canada and staying away from the crowded southern Ontario, southern Quebec areas?

kinguy - Friday, September 17 2010 @ 09:03 PM EDT (#222687) #
No. Each team has to have one affiliate at each of the upper levels of the minors.  Up to the early 2000's, the Oakland A's had two High-A affiliates in the California League, but no Low-A affiliate, while Houston had two Low-A but no High A.

There is some allowable bending of that rule allowed at the Rookie and Short-Season A level to accommodate teams that participate in the GCL and Arizona Rookie leagues that are based in the spring training complexes.  Remember the Jays had a Rookie team in Pulaski from 2003-06 that they dropped in order to field a team in the GCL.


JustinD - Saturday, September 18 2010 @ 01:29 AM EDT (#222698) #
If Windsor was to get a team, the only way I see Detroit letting it work is if the Windsor team was a Detroit affiliate.  It would be similar to the agreement that Cincinnatti has with Dayton and Cleveland has with Lake County and Akron.

Let's not forget they already have the Toledo Mudhens, who are about 57.9 miles away as per google maps. ;)  But the 5 miles Windsor is from Detroit would have to be the closest of any AAA city to it's Major League affiliate.
#2JBrumfield - Saturday, September 18 2010 @ 08:32 AM EDT (#222705) #
The Vancouver Sun and Vancouver Province get comments from Jays officials about their affiliation with the Canadians.  The Vancouver Sun also raises the possibility the Jays may play some exhibition games at B.C. Place.
bpoz - Saturday, September 18 2010 @ 09:43 AM EDT (#222707) #
I am trying to rank the leagues that our short season teams play in.
Would the Northwest league be the strongest, then the APP and the GCL as the weakest? Also how would the NYPen league compare?
SJE - Saturday, September 18 2010 @ 01:00 PM EDT (#222712) #

What kind of park is it. Hitter or pitcher friendly. As long as it`s not like like Vegas where you seem to have to 45 homers with an OPS of 1500 to be considered a prospect.

CeeBee - Saturday, September 18 2010 @ 02:10 PM EDT (#222718) #
Pretty much a pitchers park I think. Team stats have them 6th out of 8 in homers and 5th in OPS. Pitchers were 2nd in ERA and 4th in WHIP.
http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?t=l_tba&lid=126&sid=t435
Original Ryan - Saturday, September 18 2010 @ 02:28 PM EDT (#222720) #
Would the Northwest league be the strongest, then the APP and the GCL as the weakest? Also how would the NYPen league compare?

Correct.  The Northwest League and the New York-Penn League are both Short-Season A, the highest level of the short-season teams.  The Appalachian League is Rookie-Advanced, while the Gulf Coast League is Rookie.
SJE - Saturday, September 18 2010 @ 03:01 PM EDT (#222721) #
I notice Vancouver Canadians website has some game highlights on it, which would be nice to see the prospects in action
ramone - Saturday, September 18 2010 @ 03:49 PM EDT (#222722) #

I notice Vancouver Canadians website has some game highlights on it, which would be nice to see the prospects in action

On sportsnet last night they mentioned the possibility that they may show some Canadians games on sportsnet one next year.

robertdudek - Tuesday, September 21 2010 @ 12:28 AM EDT (#222798) #
There was also a time, and it was not so long ago, that independent teams existed in the "affiliated" minor leagues.
Mike Green - Tuesday, September 21 2010 @ 09:27 AM EDT (#222801) #
With the Jays putting down a stake in Vancouver, I cannot help but think about the professional baseball situation in Montreal.  Amateur baseball is strong in Quebec, and the absence of any professional baseball there sticks out like a sore thumb.  Does "je me souviens" refer not only to Cartier and Champlain, but also to Loria and Selig?  Is there any realistic option with MLB out of the question for the foreseeable future?
Jays Invade Vancouver | 81 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.