Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
I thought I'd look at the Earl Weaver Clause in the official rule book. It's some windy baseball lore, for a day with no baseball.


Rule 5.11 (a) (2) reads as follows:

The Designated Hitter named in the starting lineup must come to bat at least one time, unless the opposing Club changes pitchers.

If you think about it - why would this clause even be necessary? Was there a rash of managers changing their minds about who their DH was going to be after they'd handed in the lineup card?

No. There was only Weaver, causing trouble. In August 1980, Weaver began writing one of his pitchers into the starting lineup as the DH. He would then pinch-hit for his "DH" as soon as his turn in the order came up. He did this in 21 of the Orioles final 24 games.

What was the point of this, you wonder? Well, Weaver was platooning at DH in 1980. If the Tigers started a RH pitcher, like Jack Morris, Weaver's usual DH was Terry Crowley who'd bat in the 6 or 7 spot in the order. But what if the Orioles knocked Morris out of the game in the very first inning, and brought in a LH reliever? Pat Underwood, or someone like him. Weaver would either be stuck with Crowley as his DH against a southpaw, or he'd lose one of his better hitters without even getting him into the game.

Weaver actually worried about these things. It's what made him special. Hence his solution, surely marvellous in its originality. With Morris on the mound for the Tigers, Weaver named his own ace starter, Steve Stone, as that day's DH. And when Stone's turn in the batting order came up (in the second inning, as it turned out), Crowley pinch hit for him against Morris and became the new DH.

How did this gambit work out for him? (This is the good part!) Weaver wrote a pitcher into the lineup as the DH 12 games in a row - and nothing happened. The Orioles never once knocked the opposition starter out of the game early. They managed to plate a single run, but no more, in just three of the 12 games (7 of which were played against a Toronto team that would lose 95 games that year.)

So, in the 13th game, Weaver abandoned his stratagem and started LH Pat Kelly as the DH (in the 2 hole) against Boston RH Steve Crawford.

And wouldn't you know it. Crawford lasted just five batters, and was replaced by a southpaw (Bruce Hurst). Hurst didn't last long enough to face Kelly, but Weaver resumed writing in a pitcher as his DH the very next day. He did this for 9 more games, and once more the Orioles never did put together a high scoring first inning.

So Weaver's clever idea never had any actual impact, it never did pay off for him in a game. It just produced some oddities at the end of the year. AL Cy Young winner Steve Stone started 12 games as the DH. Jim Palmer and Mike Flanagan both made 3 lineup appearances as the starting DH, Dennis Martinez, Tippy Martinez, and Scott McGregor one apiece.

And the rule was rewritten that off-season so that no one would ever do it again. Made a mockery of the game, blah blah blah...


Earl Weaver and the DH | 26 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
scottt - Monday, April 19 2021 @ 08:10 AM EDT (#396361) #
Interesting stuff.

Thanks Magpie.
Chuck - Monday, April 19 2021 @ 12:40 PM EDT (#396366) #
Did Weaver not once DH a pitcher who was not even in the same city?
Magpie - Monday, April 19 2021 @ 01:29 PM EDT (#396370) #
This would have been the time. Let's see - I think the idea was that if you were in the midst of a road trip and had a pitcher starting the first game of a series, you'd have him arrive in the new town a day early instead of flying out with the rest of the team. So... we'd want a pitcher who was a) DH in the last game in one city b) starting pitcher in the first game in a different city, on c) the following day.

BINGO! This situation coms up just once but it was also the very first time Weaver pulled this trick. Steve Stone was the DH on Wednesday night in Tiger Stadium (10 September) and the starting pitcher on Thursday night at the Ex in Toronto (when Dennis Martinez was the DH.) So Stone probably wasn't still in Detroit on the Wednesday night, when he was the DH, and people took notice!

There was only one other road trip while all this was going on, and the trip from one town to another came between a Sunday afternoon game in Cleveland and a Monday night game in Boston, and Weaver likely didn't bother sending his pitcher ahead early.
Chuck - Monday, April 19 2021 @ 01:39 PM EDT (#396371) #
Good sleuthing. Some further googling got me this.
earlweaverfan - Monday, April 19 2021 @ 02:42 PM EDT (#396373) #
This is why, since way before the Blue Jays existed, I started out as an Oriole fan and increasingly as the years went by, an earlweaverfan! He was constantly trying to understand how the game worked and how to work the game. He understood small-m moneyball before Billy Beane, and which plays, rosters and lineups made sense before Bill James or sabremetrics, The best thing about his teams was how well they stepped it up in the last weeks of each regular season. You can read about all that in his book: Weaver on Strategy (which I am assuming most of you have read). A man of his time but also a man before his time.
Magpie - Monday, April 19 2021 @ 02:47 PM EDT (#396374) #
Some further googling got me this.

The article already existed? I spend all this time messing around on bb-ref....

Man, I need a life.
Chuck - Monday, April 19 2021 @ 02:52 PM EDT (#396375) #
Man, I need a life.

I needed to google "Steve Stone DH" to find the piece in question. The Steve Stone part was the key, which you unearthed.

John Northey - Monday, April 19 2021 @ 04:46 PM EDT (#396377) #
There were some smart managers back then - sneaky smart, not book smart. Weaver as mentioned, and Billy Martin come to mind. Martin would hold onto stuff in his mind for years if needed just to pull it out when needed - like the pine tar rule to get Brett out. He also had a pitcher DH in a game because he wanted the platoon advantage. The pitcher (who wasn't pitching that day) got a sac fly and the Yankees won so it worked. Then you had Gene Mauch who figured out OBP was more important than speed from a leadoff hitter years before everyone else did (had Brian Downing who was slow lead off due to his 370+ OBP) sadly he also was addicted to the sac bunt (in 1985 had 99 of them in a DH only league, while the Jays Bobby Cox had just 21). 1985 was a fun year. Martin in NY, Cox here in Toronto, Anderson in Detroit, Herzog in St Louis (a 100 SB guy in LF, 314 overall for that team with only their catcher and 1B not stealing 15+), Mauch in California, so much fun with so many styles of play going on. Teams that loved bunts, teams that hated them, teams that stole at the drop of a hat, teams that didn't like to steal under any conditions (Boston - 66 with 3 guys over 10, #1 their first baseman Bill Buckner - yes, that Buckner, with 18).

If only we'd see some more variety in styles again. Sigh. The one thing I like about Tampa is how they'll try almost anything. I really hope they deaden the ball more so guys like Vlad keep pounding them out but others have to adjust to hit for a better average to stick around.
hypobole - Monday, April 19 2021 @ 05:14 PM EDT (#396378) #
As a long ago hockey fan, reminded me of the late, great Roger Neilson, who caused 3 rule changes.
Gerry - Tuesday, April 20 2021 @ 08:36 AM EDT (#396383) #
I liked Weaver even though he was ornery.

Weaver was ahead of his time. I remember reading one or two of his books, Weaver on strategy and the aptly titled "its what you learn after you know it all that counts". Plus he was entertaining on the field, when he argued with the umpires.

Also my kids enjoyed playing Earl Weaver baseball.
Chuck - Tuesday, April 20 2021 @ 08:46 AM EDT (#396384) #
Weaver chose Don Stanhouse, he of the absurd walk rate, to be his closer for a couple of years, like he needed to add further stressors to his life. He would be unable to watch Stanhouse in action, at least wide-eyed and from a front-row seat, so he'd hide in the dugout runway smoking a cigarette.
Magpie - Tuesday, April 20 2021 @ 09:44 AM EDT (#396390) #
If only we'd see some more variety in styles again. Sigh.

The argument, at least on the offensive side of the game, is largely over. Weaver's views have prevailed. You used to be able to make a distinction between managers who played for a big inning, and built their teams around power hitters and getting people on base in front of them - Weaver, Martin, Cox - and managers who played for a single run - Mauch, obviously. Walter Alston.

I think now variety in game managing is found around the margins - approaches to pinch-hitting and base stealing. And how they run the pitching staff (where there has always been a great deal of variety.)
Magpie - Tuesday, April 20 2021 @ 10:09 AM EDT (#396392) #
The article Chuck linked to also clarifies something I didn't even notice. One of Weaver's pitcher-DHs was Tippy Martinez. Tippy, as Jays fans will certainly remember, was not a starting pitcher. He was an important part of the bullpen, and Weaver would lose him for the game after pinch-hitting for him. But Weaver didn't mind on the day in question, because Tippy wasn't with the team that day. He was back home in Colorado for a family funeral.
Chuck - Tuesday, April 20 2021 @ 10:20 AM EDT (#396394) #
And how they run the pitching staff

I think this aspect of the game has easily become the manager's biggest job, by far.

Unlike in the 1970s, when I started paying close attention to baseball, when teams had 15 position players and thus numerous lineup decisions to consider, benches are so short now that lineups write themselves. Any of us could easily anticipate tonight's lineup.

Pitching staffs used to have their 4 or 5 starters and, barring injury, a cadence would set in allowing bullpen usage became the biggest focus. Sure, a manager would futz around with the back end of the rotation, but bullpen sizes didn't grow until the Rockies decided that they needed to do something, and it was their home park that forced that change.

Now, and the pandemic has certainly heightened this, you've got more arms on your roster than you've ever had, and you are keeping a close eye on the minors or taxi squad because you know you're going to need those guys as well. Even a jillion pitchers isn't enough. You're now losing games in the last inning because you are throwing your waiver wire acquisition, even with a nine-man bullpen.

Magpie - Tuesday, April 20 2021 @ 10:22 AM EDT (#396395) #
Don Stanhouse, he of the absurd walk rate, to be his closer for a couple of years,

Stan the Man Unusual. Spent two years as Weaver's closer, saved 45 games with a 2.87 ERA, and in 147.1 IP he struck out 76 and walked 103.
Magpie - Tuesday, April 20 2021 @ 10:32 AM EDT (#396396) #
Any of us could easily anticipate tonight's lineup.

And because the benches are so short, pinch-hitting and pinch-running have practically disappeared.

Managers used to have far more input into roster composition as well. Not so much anymore, and never here in Toronto, where the rosters were always the GM's creation. But certainly Weaver and Herzog had a lot to say about who was on the roster. (Weaver did once say the biggest part of his job was not screwing up all the smart stuff his GM did over the winter. But Weaver said lots of things!)

You used to be able to see managers struggle with sentimentality - getting too attached to players who had given them good work once upon a time and could provide it no longer. This never troubled Whitey Herzog, but Weaver agonized over taking Brooks Robinson out of the everyday lineup. He felt awful about it, but he did it. Whereas Cito Gaston, who was absolutely ruthless when it came to pitchers, stuck far too long with hitters who could no longer hit enough to justify holding a job.

Billy Martin never lasted long enough in a job to get attached to anyone, of course.
ISLAND BOY - Tuesday, April 20 2021 @ 11:22 AM EDT (#396398) #
" Tippy, as Jays fans will certainly remember, was not a starting pitcher."

Yeah, didn't he have a decent pickoff move or something ?
Chuck - Tuesday, April 20 2021 @ 11:24 AM EDT (#396399) #
didn't he have a decent pickoff move or something ?

Much to Lenn Sakata's relief.

Chuck - Tuesday, April 20 2021 @ 11:31 AM EDT (#396400) #
I'll let Buck explain that historic inning.
Magpie - Tuesday, April 20 2021 @ 11:56 AM EDT (#396401) #
didn't he have a decent pickoff move or something ?

He did that night. He only picked off 9 runners over the rest of his career.
Nigel - Tuesday, April 20 2021 @ 12:24 PM EDT (#396402) #
That game (hell, that whole Baltimore series) is imprinted on my brain even though it was almost 30 years ago. I was working a summer job at a graveyard. Mostly groundskeeping work but the occasional digging of a grave was required. In August I would do the heavy labour in the evenings to avoid the heat so I was listening to that game digging a hole in the ground. The Jays and I were pretty much in sync at that moment. I threw my shovel I was so mad that they could get three guys picked off in one inning.
Chuck - Tuesday, April 20 2021 @ 12:48 PM EDT (#396405) #
imprinted on my brain even though it was almost 30 years ago.

Picture me in a hooded cloak, carrying a scythe. That was almost 40 years ago.

Nigel - Tuesday, April 20 2021 @ 12:51 PM EDT (#396406) #
Crap - apparently simple arithmetic is one of the first skills to go - although that's one of the benefits of old age - 30 versus 40 doesn't really matter:)
Magpie - Tuesday, April 20 2021 @ 01:03 PM EDT (#396408) #
Clearly, we shall carry these scars forever.
mathesond - Tuesday, April 20 2021 @ 02:13 PM EDT (#396410) #
30 is the new 40 after all, Nigel!
ISLAND BOY - Tuesday, April 20 2021 @ 07:09 PM EDT (#396418) #
" I was working a summer job at a graveyard."

Sounds like a great job. You must have had a lot of people under you.

Old joke, I'll see myself out.
Earl Weaver and the DH | 26 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.