Jays hire John Gibbons:
| Approve |  119 (58.62%) |
| Do not approve | 11 (5.42%) |
| Meh | 49 (24.14%) |
| OK, but this "rides again" business better not lead to Farrell, Act Two | 24 (11.82%) |
203 votes | 2 featured comments
Chose the 4th option. I am also opposed to the return of Tim Johnson or Carlos Tosca. Freaking boomers made a wreck of the economy and the environment; don't they know when to retire for good?
I voted approve.
Basically I do not know who was approached. I can understand Cox wanting to stay retired. Hargrove & Cito would have been better choices for me but I will assume they did not want the job as well.
This makes Gibbons an acceptable choice because I do not think he will take a talented team and screw it up. He has the experience to get 88-92+ wins from this 2013 team.
Basically I do not know who was approached. I can understand Cox wanting to stay retired. Hargrove & Cito would have been better choices for me but I will assume they did not want the job as well.
This makes Gibbons an acceptable choice because I do not think he will take a talented team and screw it up. He has the experience to get 88-92+ wins from this 2013 team.