Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
If the players who are the core of a great team are not worthy of Hall of Fame selection, then who is?
-- Bill James, Historical Baseball Abstract (first edition)

I think that's a hell of a question.

What, you think I want to talk about the Blue Jays? Look, it's May and they're seven games under .500 - when's the last time somebody was seven games under .500 in May and made it to the post-season?

Last year? Last June? The Twins were 25-33...? Allright, allright. But this is the AL East. That hasn't happened here since... 2005 when the Yankees were eight games under in May? OK - but that was just a strange year. You may remember that Oakland was 13 games under .500 on the first of June, and they ended up winning 88 games...

Two things about last night's game. I've been watching Josh Towers for years, good times and bad. Last night was as if some alien had taken over his body. I don't know how much of this, if any, came through on the broadcast. But his body language last night was completely, utterly different from what I've grown accustomed to seeing. When you see Towers in person, pitching at the ball park, he always looks like he's had an extra espresso or two - he usually looks wired on the mound. Not last night. Last night, he was slow, deliberate, almost sullen - he looked like a man with a deep, profound conviction that absolutely nothing in the universe had any meaning and that nothing mattered, not in the slightest. Not exactly like a man who doesn't care - more like a man beyond caring, a man possessed of that existential despair that Kierkegaard wrote about. It was very weird. And under these circumstances, when nothing makes any difference whatsoever, why not experiment a little - let's see what happens if we throw the slider here, let's see what happens if we throw the fastball there. What difference does it make anyway? The only animation at all came in those rare moments of interaction with his teammates. Extremely disturbing.

He has got to go.

If both he and Gibbons are still around in three weeks... I dunno. There could be bloodshed. Towers looks ready to shoot a man in Reno, just to watch him die.

On a happier note, I absolutely love having Sal Fasano around. It's like having Abe Vigoda on your team, except Sal's not quite as quick. Best moment of the game last night was when Towers got Ortiz to hit that little foul popup in front of the Jays dugout for what should have been the third out of the eighth inning. Except for the fact that with the shift in effect, there wasn't a fielder within 60 feet of the ball - except for poor Sal, chasing desperately after it on his 35 year old legs, lugging around all that gear, sprawling headlong after it... and coming up empty. How can you not cheer for Abe Vigoda anyway? It's just too bad that Phillips is one of the manager's favourites, meaning that Fasano will be dispatched back to AAA when Zaun returns.

OK, back to our originally scheduled program....

Bill James, in the quote given above, was commenting on the fact that Joe Tinker, Johnny Evers, and Frank Chance all have plaques in the Hall of Fame despite the fact that there is a case to be made that there are many better players at their positions who have been overlooked. Tinker, Evers, and Chance were the core of one of the greatest and most dominant teams in the history of the game - that trio, along with Mordecai Brown, represent them at Cooperstown.

I got to thinking about this yesterday, when the mention of John Smoltz' name prompted the usual discussion of his Hall of Fame prospects. When Mike Green, our resident Hall Watcher, last addressed this issue, the almost unanimous consensus was that Smoltz was very much a longshot to actually make the grade, especially in light of the crowd of outstanding starters from his era who will probably all become eligible around the same time. Whether Smoltz actually deserves induction was considerably more clouded even then - he's been building on what was already a pretty impressive resume and could clear 200 wins by the end of this month.

I wanted to come back to the question from James' perspective, because I find it's one I seem to automatically assent to. I assume that the Bobby Cox Braves were one of the greatest teams ever; it seems natural to me that the core of such a team should find its way to Cooperstown. In the case of those Braves, we'd be looking at Maddux, Glavine, Smoltz, and the Jones boys. All five could conceivably make it, and certainly no power on earth will bar Maddux and Glavine.

But is five Hall of Famers from a single team a lot? Even for a great team?

What about some other great teams?

Joe Torre's Yankees come quickly to mind. I think it's safe at this point to assume that Derek Jeter and Mariano Rivera are definitely Hall of Famers. Roger Clemens built his resume elsewhere, but barring some kind of McGwire-esque scandal (a fellow may be permitted to dream), he's going in as well. Mike Mussina missed the championship seasons, and like Smoltz, he's fighting his way through the pack of 90s starters. His chances still look pretty good, I hate to say. This may apply as well to Andy Pettitte, who as a bonus was on hand for all four WS victories. Mussina and Pettitte are still padding their credentials, of course. Jorge Posada and Bernie Williams can both present a pretty decent case as well.

The last team to win three straight titles before Torre's Yankees were the Oakland A's of 1972-74. That team has placed three men in the Hall - Reggie Jackson, Jim Hunter, and Rollie Fingers. While he was active, Vida Blue was certainly regarded as a Hall of Fame talent but rather like Ron Guidry, his career accomplishments fell short. Joe Rudi, Ken Holtzman, Sal Bando, and Bert Campaneris all have a spot in the Hall of the Very Good.

Perhaps the outfit most comparable to Cox's Braves would be Earl Weaver's Orioles, who likewise had a fifteen year run of more or less uniform excellence. Weaver's team only won the Big Enchilada once. It's curious that he didn't receive nearly as much grief for that shortcoming as Cox and the Braves have. When Weaver took over in 1968, the Orioles had Hall of Famers Brooks Robinson and Frank Robinson in the starting lineup and Jim Palmer on the Disabled List. F-Robby moved on a couple of years later, but Brooks was around for most of Weaver's tenure, and Palmer actually won a World Series game for Weaver's successor. Eddie Murray came aboard in 1977, around the time Brooks became a bench player. Reggie Jackson stopped by for a single season, and Weaver's last season (ignoring his ill-fated comeback a few years later, which I strongly recommend) was Cal Ripken's rookie year. Bobby Grich was certainly a HoF quality player, but he did none of the things that actually impress the voters. So the most at any moment was generally three: Jackson, Palmer, and Robinson or Murray, Ripken, and Palmer.

The Dodgers and Cardinals both won two titles in the 1960s. The Dodgers had just two Hall of Famers - Koufax and Drysdale. It was all they needed though they also had an MVP (Wills) and a two-time batting champ (Tommy Davis.) All of the Cardinals teams of that era featured Brock and Gibson. They would add Orlando Cepeda (who I think is a slightly dubious choice for the HoF), and the young Steve Carlton - both were an essential part of the 1967-68 teams, bringing them up to four Hall of Famers.

The great team of the 1950s, obviously, was Casey's Yankees. It's hard to improve on ten pennants in twelve seasons. Mickey Mantle, Yogi Berra, and Whitey Ford are in the Hall, and they were the core of that team, year after year. Joe DiMaggio was still around at the beginning of that run, and Phil Rizzuto really was a hell of a player. Johnny Mize and Enos Slaughter, who built their Hall resumes elsewhere, dropped in as role players along the way. The team effectively topped at four HoF players (Mantle, DiMaggio, and Ford never played together, oddly enough - Ford was in military service in 1951, Mantle's rookie season and DiMaggio's last year.)

Joe McCarthy's Yankees may have been the greatest team ever - they're one of just two teams to ever win four championships in a row. That run began in 1936, which was Joe DiMaggio's rookie year. Bill Dickey, Lou Gehrig, and Tony Lazzeri were also on that team, which meant they put four Hall of Famers on the field every day. They had two more in the rotation - Lefty Gomez and Red Ruffing. Six Hall of Famers on your roster is a lot. Lazzeri was gone by 1939, which was also the year Gehrig's health broke down. Of course, Lazzeri was replaced by Joe Gordon, who has an excellent Hall of Fame case of his own, in my opinion. And Charlie Keller had arrived by then - Keller was definitely a HoF quality player, although he didn't last long enough.

The Murderers Row Yankees of a decade earlier featured a younger Gehrig and Lazzeri. Two Hall of Famers roamed the outfield: centre fielder Earle Combs, and some fellow named Ruth. Two more Hall of Famers were in the rotation - Herb Pennock and Waite Hoyt. This Group of Six were joined by Leo Durocher in 1928, but the Lip isn't in Cooperstown because of his playing career.

Connie Mack built two great teams in Philadelphia. The team that dethroned the Ruth-Gehrig Yankees and won back-to-back titles in 1929-30 starred the great Lefty Grove, one of the greatest pitchers to ever throw a baseball (nine ERA titles? Nine?). He wasn't alone - Mickey Cochrane and Jimmie Foxx are probably both among the five greatest players ever at their positions. Al Simmons wasn't as good as that, but he certainly earned his ticket to the Hall. So it's a team with four Hall of Famers (although if you want to get technical, Eddie Collins also played for those Philadelphia teams but he was mainly a coach, with just 9 at bats in two years.)

Mack's first great team won four pennants and three championships in the 1910-14 period. Eddie Collins and Frank Baker, of the famed $100,000 infield took the field every day - Eddie Plank and Chief Bender were in the rotation. Another team with four Hall of Famers. Which brings us back to the Ancient Cubs, with their four Hall of Famers - Tinker, Evers, Chance, and Brown.

I found at least one team with more.

The 1924 New York Giants featured George Kelly, Frank Frisch, and Travis Jackson in the infield. Ross Youngs and Hack Wilson were in the outfield. The 18 year old rookie Fred Lindstrom would play an infamous role in that year's World Series. They also had a young first baseman named Bill Terry, who hadn't yet established himself as a regular. Which brings us up to seven, and you're probably wondering just how in hell Kelly, Jackson, Youngs, and Lindstrom made it into the Hall anyway. As it happened, Frank Frisch chaired the Veterans Committee in the 1960s and early 1970s, and he took care of his old teammates.

By the way, the managers of most of these teams are also in the Hall of Fame - Chance, Mack, Huggins, McCarthy, Stengel, Alston, Weaver - and Cox and Torre are sure to follow as well. Johnny Keane, who managed the 1964 Cardinals, isn't in the Hall but Red Schoendienst, who replaced him, is (although this was really more in recognition of a very fine playing career.) Only the Oakland skippers - Dick Williams and Al Dark - aren't represented. Dark's HoF case is quite a bit like Schoendienst, as it happens - both won about 1000 games as a manager and one championship; both had very fine careers as National League infielders, and both had .289 career batting averages. But because of the war, Dark's playing career got off to a late start (he was 26 when he won Rookie of the Year) and his counting totals aren't as good as Schoendienst's.

Are there any other teams worth considering? Can we top the 1924 Giants' seven Hall of Famers? This was, after all, a very casual and cursory Jaunt through the Ages, so I won't be at all surprised if we do. Should we even count the Giants seven? Not just the Frisch Factor - I am mostly interested in effective Hall of Famers, players who were reasonably important parts of the team, and with the 1924 Giants, Lindstrom and Terry were not especially central to that team. I'm much more impressed by the 1936 Yankees - but then again, how can you not be impressed by the 1936 Yankees... I mean, everybody who played for that team is dead, and they still scare the crap out of me.
10 May 2007: Guys in the Hall | 39 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Mick Doherty - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 10:22 AM EDT (#167681) #

Great piece. But I admit, I grew up in Ohio in the 1970s and am still searching for the words "Bench, Perez, Morgan, Rose" (yes, the latter isn't in, nor should he be, but certainly he had a HOF career) ... Gullett was a HOF talent who didn't last, Concepcion was at least arguably a borderline HOFer and you have the daddy of another HOFer in RF, in Ken Griffey Sr.

It's not seven, but it is three plus one ineligible plus two others worth more than a glance.

Mick Doherty - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 10:23 AM EDT (#167682) #
And Sparky Anderson managing!
Ryan Day - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 10:56 AM EDT (#167684) #

One thing I'm finding interesting is that J.P. apparently knew what free agents to go after this year.The general consenus around here was that Lugo was a huge upgrade and Gil Meche was an overrated mediocrity, but it looks like J.P. knew what he was doing: Meche is 3-1 (For the Royals!), 42 Ks, 14 bb, 2.15 ERA. Lugo, on the other hand, is crawilng along at 228/302/333. Admittedly, he's still probably better than Royce Clayton, but not exactly $6 million better.

Mind you, I'm still not sure I'd want to Meche on the team five years from now, but he'd sure improve the 2007 Jays.

AWeb - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 12:29 PM EDT (#167689) #
Looking back at the Jays "dynasty" years (85-93), it's funny that the only HoFers were those brought as short-term guys (Molitor, Winfield, Henderson).

Alomar and Kent (and Delgado, if he recovers from his awful start this year) might still make it (note I think Alomar and Kent should make it but don't know if they will), and the non-HoFers on the teams would make one hell of a pitching staff, with Stieb, Morris, Key, Wells, Cone, Alexander, Henke, Ward, Timlin, Hentgen. Throw in the not quite good enough for the hall batters like Carter, Olerud, Fernandez,  Bell, McGriff (good enough, won't make it), Fielder, ....

Sorry, I fell into "remember the good old days" there. But it was fun. Maybe I should just track down old game tapes and watch those instead. Or put Carter's HR on a loop instead of having the game on right now.

Joanna - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 12:31 PM EDT (#167690) #

Sal is fun and everything, but he lost a fan in my father last night.  We were watching and Fasano sets up inside for Towers against Papi.  My dad says "Anywhere but there." Towers, because he is a good little soldier or was perhaps questioning the existence of God, pitches it right to Sal's glove.  Only Papi's bat got in the way and the ball is in the seats.

Save us, Doc!

tstaddon - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 01:12 PM EDT (#167691) #
From the "That Didn't Take Long" files, Keith Law began today's ESPN chat by writing:

"I have a confession to make. When I told you all in spring training that my back hurt, what I really meant ... is that my back hurt."
CaramonLS - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 01:46 PM EDT (#167692) #
One thing I'm finding interesting is that J.P. apparently knew what free agents to go after this year.The general consenus around here was that Lugo was a huge upgrade and Gil Meche was an overrated mediocrity, but it looks like J.P. knew what he was doing: Meche is 3-1 (For the Royals!), 42 Ks, 14 bb, 2.15 ERA. Lugo, on the other hand, is crawilng along at 228/302/333. Admittedly, he's still probably better than Royce Clayton, but not exactly $6 million better.

Spin it any way you want, but this will probably be the first time in the modern era where a player who has absolutely no track record of success, gets overpaid and somehow actually lives up to the potential shown in him.  Of course, still got a ways to go in the season, so we'll see how this plays out.
tstaddon - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 01:46 PM EDT (#167693) #
He's not really slowing up either.

1:22: "The problem is the roster, not the coaches."
1:34: (when asked about the Rays' chances in '09 and '10) "Could be very good, even though Niemann will miss one or both of those years with a 'back injury.'"
tstaddon - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 01:58 PM EDT (#167694) #
1:46: "The Burnett deal was lambasted, at least within the industry. And if you compare Burnett's deal to that winter's market, then compare Meche's deal to this winter's market, there is no comparison - the Burnett deal is far more irresponsible."
1:52: (can McGowan be a #3) "Yes, although I'm starting to wonder if it is possible without a change of teams. When was the last time Toronto developed a starting pitcher? Chad Gaudin doesn't count."

gee, keith. tell us how you really feel. entire chat, by the way, can be found at: http://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/chatESPN?event_id=15758
Ryan Day - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 02:11 PM EDT (#167696) #

Spin it any way you want, but this will probably be the first time in the modern era where a player who has absolutely no track record of success, gets overpaid and somehow actually lives up to the potential shown in him. 

It would not, however, be the first time a pitcher begins to live up to his potential at a later age, which is clearly what GMs are thinking when they pursue these players.

"Absolutely no track record of success" is rather overstating it, too: Meche has been a pretty average pitcher for most of his career.

Mick Doherty - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 02:11 PM EDT (#167697) #
When was the last time?
Flex - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 02:17 PM EDT (#167698) #
Well, Roy Halladay is pretty good. And Gustavo Chacin is a starter as far as I know. So is Dave Bush.


Ryan Day - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 02:21 PM EDT (#167701) #
Casey Janssen looks pretty nifty.
timpinder - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 02:27 PM EDT (#167703) #
Meche started out hot last year too before getting hit in the second half, if memory serves me correctly.
Squiggy - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 02:32 PM EDT (#167704) #
Meche has good stuff, and has gotten hot before. All this Meche love from the popular press and even so-called analysts like Keith Law is a bit tiresome. He has pitched well, but is roughly 4% (4!!) of the way through his contract at present. I, for one, have a hard time making any pronouncements on the wisdom of spending $55 million with that tiny fraction of information.
Ryan Day - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 02:42 PM EDT (#167705) #

Wait, I thought the season was over. Weren't we assuming what was happening in early May would continue until the end of the season?

(A little bit facetious, I admit.)

GregJP - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 02:48 PM EDT (#167706) #
Jeff Weaver is sure making the Mariners decision to sign him look good so far.
Squiggy - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 02:53 PM EDT (#167707) #
well, i guess there are 2 separate questions then - 1) would you have wanted Meche's first few starts to have occurred with the 2007 Blue Jays, and 2) would you want him for 5 years at $55 million. The first question is an easy "yes", given all the duds currently in the Jays' rotation.

I am just of the opinion that the second question is no easier to answer now than it was in December. I just read an article on SI.com, where the Royals were praised for "wisely" signing Meche to that deal - by an author who derided the same deal in his column when it was signed. Just my pet peeve about small sample sizes.
Magpie - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 03:04 PM EDT (#167709) #

 

I forgot the Big Red Machine? Forgot?

Ryan Day - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 03:18 PM EDT (#167711) #

I thought the Meche deal was insane at the time, and I'll continue to be skeptical until he finishes the season.

Still, anyone can look at his numbers and conclude he's mediocre. A GM has to look beyond just the numbers, particularly when it comes to pitching. There are plenty of pitchers who have an "epiphany" later in their career - just look at Chris Carpenter.

Ron - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 03:19 PM EDT (#167712) #
The Jays need to go 82-47 to have a shot at the playoffs.

If this keeps up, the Jays might go down as one of the "best" worst teams in MLB history. A lot of teams would drool at the thought of having Doc/AJ/League/Ryan/Overbay/Thomas/Hill/Glaus/Johnson/Lind/Rios/Wells as the core of their team. If 2004 was the Season From Hell, 2007 is the Season From ____?

melondough - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 03:24 PM EDT (#167714) #

The Jays lies continue...

Not sure if this has been reported here but BJ Ryan had successful Tommy John surgery today and is out until spring.  This came via media info. from the Jays and will be made public shortly.

jsut - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 03:25 PM EDT (#167715) #
I'll try today's thread now...

BJ Ryan has Tommy John surgery
Bailey - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 03:26 PM EDT (#167716) #
melondough - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 03:31 PM EDT (#167719) #

Who is a free agent or redunant that can net the Jays some quality for next season?  I am very confident they will fix the pitching staff so maybe they can make next season a priority soon.  One name that comes to min is Reed Johnson once healthy (Lind is ready).  Or keep Reed and  move Rios for a top starter.

Christopher - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 03:35 PM EDT (#167720) #

From the Globe link:

Ryan underwent Tommy John surgery on Thursday to repair the ulnar collateral ligament in his right elbow and will not be ready to pitch until next spring.

Is that a typo, or was it his right elbow that's been bothering him all along? 

Seamus - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 03:36 PM EDT (#167721) #
Wow.. Yeah this season is toast.

They may not be this horrible all year, but without BJ I don't think they're going to have a miraculous turn around.

Retool for 08, and maybe we'll see some nice surprises the second half of this year.  I can live with that.

Mike D - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 03:40 PM EDT (#167723) #

Who is a free agent or redunant that can net the Jays some quality for next season? 

If Thomas gets hot, there might be AL contenders willing to take him on for a year and a half come the trade deadline.  The one thing I desperately don't want to see is one of JP's Anything To Offset A Sunk Cost specials, in which he trades (say) Glaus for a 33-year-old A-ball pitcher and throws in half of his salary besides.

Joanna - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 03:41 PM EDT (#167725) #
haha-right elbow.  Anyway, what the hell?  Is this why JP dropped that whole "I lied" thing, to distract from the fact that BJ was no longer sitting on the bench in his hoodie and a forlorn look.  This is certainly bad,  but it's the starting pitching that is way worse than the bullpen right now. 
Seamus - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 03:47 PM EDT (#167726) #
How long is a typical Tommy John recovery?  About 12 months right?  So BJ will probably miss April 08, I'm guessing?

CaramonLS - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 03:50 PM EDT (#167727) #
"Absolutely no track record of success" is rather overstating it, too: Meche has been a pretty average pitcher for most of his career.

Below average IMO when you factor in the fact he has pitched in the best pitcher's park in the AL for his entire career, his road ERA has been pretty unwholesome.  Combine that with some injuries, lack of innings pitched over seasons... Nothing that comes close to this type of performance which he has been projecting to date. 

Oh well, we'll see what the numbers say when the season is over.




John Northey - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 04:07 PM EDT (#167731) #
In the Globe story it also mentions some good news. Zambrano is going on the DL on Thursday (forearm strain - I'd call it homeritis myself) with Marcum taking his slot in the rotation.

Vermilyea has been called up to sit on the bench...er...throw long relief for now.
CaramonLS - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 04:12 PM EDT (#167732) #
TSN has it as the "left elbow".
JayFan0912 - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 04:23 PM EDT (#167736) #
I'd be skeptical he comes back by nest spring -- I mean the back pain isn't solved yet. This sort of news makes you double question the 47 million given to him a year ago ... the worst case scenerio is that he never pitches effectively for the rest of his career. Another concern, especially with tj surgeries, is that the pitcher takes 2 years to fully recover. In this case, the jays spent 47 million on a closer for three years ... what a waste.  I think jp should be fired - he failed at achieving any of the goals he set out back in 2001.

I think the season was already over, so hopefully we can convert glaus and burnett into something useful in 08 and beyond. Laroche, kemp, etc. would look pretty good in a jays uniform.



GregJP - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 04:41 PM EDT (#167742) #
So last night he's on the radio knowing that BJ is having the surgery today and mentions nothing.  I wonder what he would have said if asked directly about Ryan.

Sometimes all of this secrecy and crap makes me laugh.  It's just a freaking baseball team JP, not international espionage.  You aren't with the CIA or Scotland yard, you are just running a baseball team (or at least attempting to)

Man, this guy is starting to annoy me.

GregJP - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 06:09 PM EDT (#167759) #
JP talking to Brad Fay and looking kind of sad/distracted.  LOL

Sounds like League won't be back any sooner than Ryan.  When asked about closing games he mentioned Downs, Accardo, Janssen, and Frasor in that order.

I think the best approach would be not having a closer and going with the best matchup in each circumstance.  I know it didn't seem to work for the Sox a couple of years ago, but I get the sense with this group that it might be the best way to go.

 
10 May 2007: Guys in the Hall | 39 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.