Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
This morning’s minor league update turned into an interesting discussion of who the Jays might call up when the rosters expand. With September about two weeks away, I decided to take a look at the issue more closely and see what history might reveal about names we can expect to see in Toronto blue in September.


Several names were bandied about in the thread, with John Northey suggesting Jeremy Accardo, John Parrish, Brian Wolfe and Robinzon Diaz were locks, while WillRain thought those four plus Davis Romero and Scott Richmond would all come up. Whiterasta80 suggested Ricky Romero and David Smith to go along with Davis Romero and Diaz. Tstaddon proposed an extensive list of callups that included Accardo, Parrish, Richmond, R. Romero, Wolfe, Diaz, Smith, Buck Coats and Scott Campbell. John Northey and WillRain also raised Curtis Thigpen and Russ Adams as possibilities.

I think it’s at least worth looking at who the Jays have called up in previous Septembers while JP has been in charge. This list is only looking at players who were promoted to the big team during the first week of September. A couple of times the Jays have promoted players in the middle of September, but those were usually direct injury replacements. For example, this occurred last year when Joe Inglett replaced Troy Glaus when Glaus went on the DL in the middle of September and John-Ford Griffin did the same when Wells went on the DL a week later.

So, here is the list of the players the Jays have called up each of the previous six seasons:

2007: 6 – Josh Banks, Joe Kennedy, Brandon League, Sal Fasano, Hector Luna, Adam Lind
2006: 5 – Dustin McGowan, Francisco Rosario, Josh Towers, Kevin Barker, Lind
2005: 3 – Shaun Marcum, Ken Huckaby, Griffin (4 if you want to count activating Ted Lilly from the DL during the first week of September)
2004: 5 – Chad Gaudin, Ryan Glynn, Guilermo Quiroz, Eric Crozier, Russ Adams
2003: 4 – Brian Bowles, Vinny Chulk, Dan Reichart, Howie Clark
2002: 5 – Jason Kershner, Scott Wiggins, Kevin Cash, Felipe Lopez, Jayson Werth

The Jays actually called more players up last year than they had any of the previous five seasons. The lowest total is 3 (or four) and the average is 4.66.

There are a few patterns that emerge, such as that the Jays have called up a third catcher any year they’ve had a reasonable option at the position. As Diaz is a strong candidate to be the backup catcher in 2009, has passed Thigpen on the depth chart, and there seems to be little gained from calling up Jeroloman at this point, I think it’s clear that Diaz will join the Jays in early September.

The Jays have usually added three pitchers and the only year they didn't add at least two was 2005. As speculated in the thread by every poster, Wolfe is a lock to join the team when rosters expand. He’ll almost certainly be joined by Accardo or whomever goes to Triple-A if Accardo comes off the DL in the next two weeks. However, that leaves the team with one pitcher in order to reach the highest previous total of three.

There are at least three obvious candidates in Parrish, Richmond and Davis Romero, plus Ricky Romero is the one dark-horse candidate I could reasonably see getting a call. As I speculated in the thread, there simply aren’t enough innings for the Jays to go with an twelve-man bullpen, which is what would be happen if they called up Richmond, Parrish and Davis Romero. I said in the other thread that I can’t see more than two of them getting the call and I stand by that statement. I wouldn’t be surprised if it was only one, but the Jays won’t add more than four pitchers to the staff. I’d list the four contenders with Parrish as the most likely to come up in September, followed by Richmond and I wouldn’t be surprised to see Ricky Romero ahead of Davis Romero.

The Jays have always added at least one position player who isn’t a catcher. Also, if you’ll notice, this is one position where they sometimes will add players who clearly don’t have a long-term future with the team, such as Kevin Barker, Eric Crozier or even Hector Luna. The Jays used to do that with pitchers, as the team called up Wiggins, Glynn and Reichart, but they have tended not to do that any more. I think this is partially a reflection of the organisation’s pitching depth in that players who might otherwise get cups of coffee are squeezed out by legitimate pitching prospects. So, although there are no outstanding candidates on this year’s roster, I think the Jays will call up someone from Triple-A who is a position player.

The team already has a lefty bat off the bench in Wilkerson/Stairs and a righty bat in Mench and doesn’t seem to need an outfielder with those two on the bench. Therefore, an infielder makes the most sense, especially if Rolen gets shut down early, as WillRain alluded to. Thus, I think we might see the return of Russ Adams. He’ll work with Butterfield to see if he can still play the infield aside from 2B, will get a few starts and will do some pinch-running. Coats is another candidate and he is useful as a bench player, but I think he’s just going to fall victim to the fact that there are too many outfielders on the team, and guys who can simply play a competent outfield, such as Scutaro and Inglett. Plus, I think the Jays might want to get one last look at Adams before going into the offseason, when they’re going to have to seriously think about removing him from the 40-man roster or giving him some sort of major league role.

There you have it. The 2008 September call-ups, barring injury: Accardo, Wolfe and Diaz are certain to be promoted. My prediction is that they are joined by Parrish and Adams. Other possibilities include Richmond, both Romeros and Buck Coats, but I don't see any of them getting the call. Agreements? Disagreements? While this is my prediction of what will happen, do you think some other players should get promoted?

September Promotions: Who Might We See? | 33 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
TamRa - Sunday, August 17 2008 @ 06:49 PM EDT (#190793) #
To clarify, I THINK Richmond will go to the AFL and NOT be with the Jays in September, but I noted if I'm wrong about the AFL that he would be a likely suspect for the list.


TamRa - Sunday, August 17 2008 @ 06:59 PM EDT (#190794) #
To your main point, I agree with your basic conclusion if I',m reading it as this order of probability:

1. diaz
2. Wolfe
2a. Accardo
4. Parrish

for the first four guys...i think that's a solid conclusion.

Having said I think Rickey Ro and Richmond will go to the AFL  that means it's a simple "either/or" to promote Davis Romero, not a competion vs another choice. I'd hesitate to PREDICT that he will, I'd classify it more as thinking he's done all he needs to in order to earn a look. I can see the numbers squeezing him out though. The most I can say is that, among pitchers, I think he's next in line.

(BTW, for those who would ask "why not D-Ro to the AFL?" - my understanding is that the AFL only allows a team one foreign-born player and Campbell is already ticketed)

As for Adams, I think you make good points and I think that JP probably has some remaining emotional attachment to Adams. I like rewarding him for his hot second half, and I prefer him to the other alternatives (Thigpen, Smith, Luna, et al). I'm not sure I'm confident enough to PREDICT he'll be up though.


Thomas - Sunday, August 17 2008 @ 07:07 PM EDT (#190795) #
To clarify, I THINK Richmond will go to the AFL and NOT be with the Jays in September, but I noted if I'm wrong about the AFL that he would be a likely suspect for the list.

My apologies for misinterpreting your statement.
Thomas - Sunday, August 17 2008 @ 07:20 PM EDT (#190796) #
if I',m reading it as this order of probability:

You do. I think Parrish is the most probable of the four pitchers being discussed and I think at least one will join Accardo and Wolfe on the major league team. I do predict a second position player will join the team along with Diaz and I think Adams is the most likely candidate.
CaramonLS - Sunday, August 17 2008 @ 07:40 PM EDT (#190797) #
I'd really like to see Scott Campbell get a couple ABs to see what he can do.
Nolan - Sunday, August 17 2008 @ 08:22 PM EDT (#190798) #
I'm a little ignorant on the ins and outs of a player's service clock works, so I'm not sure how this plays out in that regard, but I'd like to see the Jays call up Snider. 

I realize that he's not ready for the Majors and won't be a contributor on the big league club until next August at the earliest, but it might be a nice reward for him [as opposed to taking him out of a playoff race in AA and putting him on a mediocre Syracuse team].  Bring him up for a week or two and let him follow Wells, Overbay, Doc, etc around for a while, getting a taste of what he's working toward and what he needs to do to get there. 

He probably should only play sparingly so as to not get too overwhelmed; it would be better if the Jays could call him up later than the others or send him down sooner in order to keep him playing semi-regularly.

An idea at least.

jgadfly - Sunday, August 17 2008 @ 08:36 PM EDT (#190799) #
"I think Adams is the most likely candidate" ... I would go along with Adams...In his 29 games since the IL all-star game he's hit .356 BA / .415 OB% / .558 SLG ...in his 14 games in August he's hit .455 BA/ .500 OB% / .745 Slg ... right now I think he'd be more valuable than Wilkerson or Epstein as he has a better arm (IMO) and is faster (IMO) and has better strike zone recognition (IMO)... his range at shortstop wasn't that bad and he didn't really have trouble with his throws (accuracy) until he started trying to emulate John McDonald's quick release... and he has bulked up for more power and he would not be out of his league defensively at 3rd, 2nd, ss or the corner OF positions (IMO) as late inning replacement ... I think that right now he would be as productive as any of Epstein, Wilkerson or Mench... and if there is a possibility of Hill not being ready next year then see what he can do at 2ndbase right now ... also if Wilkerson's  problems have anything to do with his shoulder then put him on the 15 day DL and bring Adams up now and play him and bring Wilkerson back healthy in September... FWIW my 2 cents ...
whiterasta80 - Sunday, August 17 2008 @ 08:38 PM EDT (#190800) #

I know that recently the Jays have been on the fringes of the playoff race, but assuming we come back to earth I think part of the callups depend on who we shut down as well.  Rolen is obviously a prime candidate to shut down, and that could merit bringing up either Adams (likely) or Campbell (less likely... AFL) and putting Scutaro at 3rd.  As someone already pointed out- Diaz may be able play some 3rd when he's not catching as well.  But if we are serious about looking to next year I'd consider shutting down Wells (Mr. health this year) and Shaun Marcum (no use adding innings to his arm if it doesn't count). That would mean an extra spot for an OF and a SP while keeping some milage off of key components of next years squad.

Magpie - Sunday, August 17 2008 @ 08:40 PM EDT (#190801) #
If you're on the active roster - and all the September call-ups go on the active roster - it's major league service time.
Magpie - Sunday, August 17 2008 @ 08:46 PM EDT (#190802) #
Anyway, I also expect to see Diaz, Wolfe, Accardo, Parrish, and Adams. Richmond and Davis Romero are long shots, unless another pitcher goes down before the end of August.

I will be shocked and surprised if we see Ricky Romero or Snyder.

Geoff - Sunday, August 17 2008 @ 09:08 PM EDT (#190804) #
The Jays really ought to find another guy named Overbay, or McDonald. Seems to be the new trend in recent months in MLB to have at least two guys with the same last name cover the infield. By my count, I already see
  • Pittsburgh, who have the Laroches at the corners; and they played today against the..
  • Mets, who featured two Reyes guys up the middle; then of course there's the
  • Yankees, who field a pair of Rodriguezes; then the
  • Padres, who cover the right side of the infield with two Gonzalezes; but that's not all. There's also the
  • Reds, who will plug Andy Phillips in at either corner of the infield to join Brandon. Andy's even spent three games and seven innings at 2B as one of Dusty's sick jokes.
How do scorers put up with all this confusion in the infield? And this is just infielders who have the same name and played together in the last month. Thankfully the Izturises and the Aybars don't share an infield. Or any of the other major league brothers: the Drews, Uptons, Molinas, Hairstons, Sowerses, etc, etc.

85bluejay - Sunday, August 17 2008 @ 10:03 PM EDT (#190805) #

With the new 4yrs college/5yrs high school rule for the 40 man roster, I don't think Snider,Cecil, Campbell etc. will get the sept. call. 

- Is Adams recent results just a hot streak or has he changed his approach to hitting? I think he deserves one last look especially if he can play 3rd base

effectively ( I would love to see the jays snoker someone into taking rolen's contract). A lefthanded backup to rolen would be great and if needed a

Scutaro/Adams 3rd base platoon might suffice.

- Given the organizations lack of power hitters, I would like to see Brian Dopriak go to the AFL ( especially  if he ends the season well at AA) - I know he

 is a longshot, but if he hits well in the AFL he may require a 40man roster spot.

-Also if  R. Romero finishes well, it may be time for him to get his feet wet especially with AJ's departure looming.

 

John Northey - Sunday, August 17 2008 @ 10:10 PM EDT (#190806) #
If all they have for the 40 man in additions this winter are Rickey Romero and Robert Ray then there is a chance of us seeing Snider and/or Jeroloman as both would be eating a roster slot early, but given the guys currently on the 40 man who are easily removed (Machi who isn't showing much while repeating AA, Bill Murphy who is wild at AAA with a 5.55 ERA, and Thigpen/Adams who both are losing prospect status).

However, given that I remembered that 60 day DL guys got to be added back onto the 40 man.  Aaron Hill and Casey Janssen to be exact so forget adding guys who would eat slots who don't need to.

Thus we have Hill, Janssen, Romero, and Ray to add while Machi and Murphy are likely removals.  I suspect Wilkerson will be removed as well as will Zaun and Eckstein (free agents).  Mench is a possible release and Frasor being let go wouldn't shock me too much.  That gives 7 potential slots without major damage to the short or long term future of the team, assuming Diaz will be ready to replace Zaun next year and the deep bullpen won't have need for an arbitration eligible Frasor (Ryan, Carlson, Downs, League, Tallet are locks plus Accardo and Camp, and who knows even before factoring in potential rotation guys Janssen, Wolfe, Richmond, and Parrish).  Hmmm.  On third thought maybe Snider can come up if the Jays don't mind starting his service clock (perhaps due to a long term deal ala Longoria).
TamRa - Sunday, August 17 2008 @ 11:55 PM EDT (#190809) #
September recalls do NOT start service time clocks.

Bastian reports Snider, Campbell, and JPA going to the AFL and traditionally such players don't make the September trip. The other three spots are reportedly pitchers (teams draft positions so you can't sub, for instance, a 1B instead of a pitcher) so Dopirak CAN'T go to the AFL. Rickey-Ro certainly will.

40 man roster crowding is not an issue, but the Jays will not unnecessarily add a young player when they don't have to. They would not consider it for anyone beyond Snider and they don't, IMO, have enough reason to do so for him to make it worthwhile.



whiterasta80 - Monday, August 18 2008 @ 01:01 AM EDT (#190810) #

Is it just me, or is it a little early for JPA in the AFL?  I would have thought he'd get that call this time next year.  Not that he isn't a big time prospect, but I'd like to see him hit the double digets in walks at AA before any sort of promotion. I agree that Dopirak might be worth putting on the 40-man (he's certainly began to prove himself again as a power hitting prospect).  Jean Machi, Bill Murphy, Buck Coats, Brad Wilkerson, and Kevin Mench are all guys that I don't see a need for on the 40-man and that is without mentioning Russ Adams and Curtis Thigpen who are borderline as well, or Eckstein and Frasor who are FA.

Magpie - Monday, August 18 2008 @ 01:45 AM EDT (#190811) #
September recalls do NOT start service time clocks.

I'm pretty sure they do, but you sound so positive! My source is the Jays Official Guide, where it says:

Major League Service
- is credited for each day the player appears on an active roster or major league disabled list or a suspended list.
- in the event of a player called up from the minors, is credited beginning with the day he physically reports.


Well, I'm working the Wednesday game - I'll probably see the GM, I'll make a point of asking him! (I'm assuming he'll know.)

The Jays PR department already thinks they count - coming into this season, they give Josh Banks 27 days of major league service. He was recalled on September 4.
TamRa - Monday, August 18 2008 @ 06:29 AM EDT (#190819) #
I can't find the specific referance at the moment but the closest i cam is a quote from a met's blog which seems to be quoting the source i saw originally:

A year of service is based on 150 days on the 25 man roster (September call ups do not count towards service time nor does being on the 60 day DL, 15 day DL does count towards service time).


you need to be careful when you ask the question though. do not confuse starting the major league clock in terms of years on the 40 man roster with major league service time. Some sources I saw DO refer to "starting the clock" in terms of the fact that a September recall requires a guy to be put on the 40 man roster which does have implications in terms of things like option years (to wit, if the jays recall Snider when they do not have to, they are throwing away an option year in theory).


That is NOT the same question as the question of service time in relation to arbitration and free agency.


Magpie - Monday, August 18 2008 @ 06:58 AM EDT (#190821) #
Yeah, I'm thinking of major league service - which has no direct bearing on option years, but is used to determine arbitration and FA eligibility. A major league "year" is 172 of those days (although the true year is more like 182.)

Coming into this season, Adam Lind is listed with 145 days of ML service: that  would be 31 from Sept 1 to Oct 1 2006, 84 from April 14 to July 6 2007 and 30 from Sept 1-30 2007.

In the case of Lind, he was added to the 40 man roster in September 2006. He was not optioned to the minors in 2006; they didn't need to option him out in April, as he wasn't on the 40 man roster - when he was added to the 40 man, he went straight to the active roster. It started his service clock, but it didn't use one of his option years. They used one of his option years in 2007 and another in 2008. Theoretically, they could send him out again next season.

Don't expect to see it happen, though.

We went through much of this a couple of years sorting out the Option Year rules - we weren't sure if John Olerud still had any. He does - if he makes a comeback, he can be optioned to AAA.

Magpie - Monday, August 18 2008 @ 07:05 AM EDT (#190822) #
So in the case of Snyder - if the Jays add him to the 40 man in September 1, he could go straight to the active roster. He would start accumulating service time. But it wouldn't use one of his option years.

But if they call him up today, and then send him back downnext week, he'd have to be optioned back to AAA.  Which would be a monumental waste of one of his option years.

That's my understanding, but I'll confirm as much as I can on Wednesday.

Frank Markotich - Monday, August 18 2008 @ 08:20 AM EDT (#190827) #

Service time is based on days on the active roster, period. That's the 25 man roster before September and whatever the size is for the particular team in September (maximum of 40, but teams don't generally call up the whole 40 man roster).

For major league service time there is NO DISTINCTION between time in September or any other time. Service time is service time, period. And it's days on the active roster, not the 40 man roster. Check the Basic Agreement (it's on the players' association website, among other places). No distinction is made for September callups. And a year is 172 days, not 150, regardless of what some Mets blog says.

And calling a player up doesn't use up an option year. An option year is used up when a player is sent to the minors while on the 40 man roster. If they call up Snider today, tomorrow or September it doesn't use an option year. To call him up they have to put him on the 40 man roster first (he isn't on it now). Thereafter, every time he is sent down an option year is used up.

Frank Markotich - Monday, August 18 2008 @ 08:24 AM EDT (#190828) #

And I should add that DL time counts as service time.

John Northey - Monday, August 18 2008 @ 09:29 AM EDT (#190830) #
I think  the DL confusion comes from the rookie of the year voting.  The 'Larry Walker Rule' is a guy on the 60 day DL does not lose 'rookie status' time (you can only be on the active roster for so long before losing rookie status).  Walker was on the DL for a full year without getting any ML playing time but was on the active roster when DL'ed in spring training thus received a big league paycheque and lost rookie status - the Expos complained about it and had it adjusted.
92-93 - Monday, August 18 2008 @ 02:55 PM EDT (#190879) #
Magpie, one more time and you'll strike out - it's SnIder.
TamRa - Monday, August 18 2008 @ 03:25 PM EDT (#190887) #
And calling a player up doesn't use up an option year. An option year is used up when a player is sent to the minors while on the 40 man roster. If they call up Snider today, tomorrow or September it doesn't use an option year. To call him up they have to put him on the 40 man roster first (he isn't on it now). Thereafter, every time he is sent down an option year is used up.

I wasn't saying that the initial call up uses an option year, I was saying that if he was added to the 40 man this year when he did not have to be, then he would have to be optioned next spring (if he doesn't make the team) where he would not have needed to be if he wasn't on the 40 and THAT would burn an option year.
I'm still not convinced on the September-call-up debate (and yes I spent an unhealthy amount of time digging through the Basic Agreement last night looking for a referance I couldn't find) but I am CERTAIN that the original source for what I quoted is an athoritative source, not just a blogger. I can't recall if it was BP or ESPN, or someone of the Keith Law variety, but it was a trustworthy source.

You are right though, that there doesn't appear to be an obvious specification on the point in the Basic Agreement.


Magpie - Monday, August 18 2008 @ 03:55 PM EDT (#190893) #
Magpie, one more time and you'll strike out - it's SnIder.

Ah - like Duke, not Cory!

I was saying that if he was added to the 40 man this year when he did not have to be, then he would have to be optioned next spring (if he doesn't make the team) where he would not have needed to be if he wasn't on the 40 and THAT would burn an option year.

Yes, absolutely correct. I see your point now. Snider doesn't have to be added to the 40 man until after the 2009 season, which would give him 2010, 2011, and 2012 as possible Option Years. If they call him up this September and he doesn't make the team next spring, they have to use one of his Option Years in 2009.

SO you would only do it if you were utterly confident that you wouldn't need to use all three of them.

92-93 - Monday, August 18 2008 @ 04:22 PM EDT (#190897) #
"You are right though, that there doesn't appear to be an obvious specification on the point in the Basic Agreement."

Maybe it's because there's no reason to assume that September call-ups DON'T count as major league service time. If there were special September exemptions, wouldn't it be clearly noted?
Magpie - Monday, August 18 2008 @ 04:37 PM EDT (#190900) #
In a way, there are two clocks that get started. One is the service time clock, the 30 days on the active roster - which in the long run is unlikely to be a big deal. It could be, when we get down to arbitration and Super-2s and all that. But the far more significant clock comes from being added to the 40 man roster, whether he even gets a day of major league service or not. Because it starts the clock on his Option Years. You only get three of them after you're added to the 40 man.

Now it's probably never going to be as big a deal for a hitter like Snider as it was for a pitcher like McGowan. Who had surgery, and missed an entire season after he'd been added to the 40 man. The Jays had to petition MLB to get an extra Option Year for McGowan.

uglyone - Monday, August 18 2008 @ 06:16 PM EDT (#190911) #
not sure if it's been mentioned, but when Rolen comes back, that would usually mean that one of Wilkerson or Mench would have to be sent to AAA. Isn't it most likely that that guy just stays as the callup, instead of a Russ Adams kind of guy?
TamRa - Monday, August 18 2008 @ 09:42 PM EDT (#190919) #
Well, the guy at Cotts says September DOES count but he also says the 60 day DL counts which is another persistant disagreement.

So, in the absence of me finding a source which backs my position, or even the source i am claiming to have read it on, I have to back down until I can at least find a source that backs my position.

I look forward to finding out what Magpie found out from the "horse's mouth" though.


Magpie - Monday, August 18 2008 @ 10:12 PM EDT (#190920) #
he also says the 60 day DL counts which is another persistent disagreement.

By coincidence, I wanted to ask about all that while I was at it. The Jays Guide says that days spent on "a major league disabled list" count towards service time - but it also credits Davis Romero with just 46 days of major league service (which would represent Aug 17-Oct 1 2006.) That's what got my attention - Romero, of course, spent all of 2007 on the DL. I remember every time I went to the park last year and looked over the Game Notes, Romero's stats  (his line of zeroes) would be listed along along with all the other pitchers on the active roster and the ones on the DL. I remember thinking hey - at least he's making the ML minimum while he rehabs. It's happening all this year with Casey Janssen. Now that comes from the pre-game printouts prepared by "the MLB Baseball Information System" rather than the pre-game material prepared by the Blue Jays themselves.

Anyway, Romero actually opened 2007 on the 15 day DL and was transferred to the 60 day DL on April 15. Either way, I think it counts as service time. I suspect Romero's specific case is just an oversight. When Reed Johnson was hurt (April 13), he went straight to the 60 day DL, and I can't believe he didn't accumulate service time while he was there. And in fact, the Jays listed Johnson with 3 years 145 days in the 2007 Guide, and 4 years and 145 days in this year's Guide.  Ditto B.J. Ryan, who was moved from the 15 day to the 60 day (April 23). Ryan is listed with 7 years and 3 days in 2007, then 8 years and 3 days in 2008. So I think that after this season, Casey Janssen will have 2 years and 94 days of ML service.
Thomas - Tuesday, August 19 2008 @ 06:16 AM EDT (#190938) #
not sure if it's been mentioned, but when Rolen comes back, that would usually mean that one of Wilkerson or Mench would have to be sent to AAA. Isn't it most likely that that guy just stays as the callup, instead of a Russ Adams kind of guy?

That's a good point and one I forgot to mention, but I was operating on the assumption that Rolen's shoulder troubles might cause the Jays to shut him down early or that his playing time in September will be seriously reduced. If the Jays do intend to play Rolen in 80% of the games, I agree it's quite plausible they could send down Mench and then recall when rosters expand.
Frank Markotich - Tuesday, August 19 2008 @ 08:38 AM EDT (#190942) #

Page 82 of the Basic Agreement says that service time is credited if a player is on the disabled list. It does not draw any distinction between the 60 day and the 15 day DL.

If time on the 60 day DL wasn't accredited, wouldn't you think teams would be more aggressive about placing players there?

 

Magpie - Wednesday, August 20 2008 @ 06:41 PM EDT (#190999) #
Confirmed, it all counts. Days on the active roster after September 1, days on the DL (15 day and 60 day) count. Which means, by the way, that Davis Romero has 1 year and 46 days of major league service.
September Promotions: Who Might We See? | 33 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.