Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine

Two new Blue Jays made their Toronto debuts in the weekend series against the Chicago White Sox.  Not only do Bryan Bullington and Brian Burres have the same first name (though spelled differently) and the same initials, their surnames have the same first two letters, they're also pitchers and they're both 28 years old.   Their arrivals give Toronto three pitchers named Brian, joining Brian Tallet.  No truth to the rumour he'll change his name from Tallet to Bullet.  Now that would be cool.  Brian Bullet!  Kinda like this guy.

This is just more of the hard-hitting analysis you've come to expect here and we're proud to pass on the savings to you in these challenging economic times.



Bullington had the misfortune of being the number one pick in the 2002 amateur draft, selected ahead of the likes of B.J. Upton, Prince Fielder, Scott Kazmir, and Cole Hamels.  The Pirates selected Bullington because he was considered to be an easy sign.  It was believed then-scouting director Ed Creech wanted Upton but he was overruled by then-GM David Littlefield and then-owner Kevin McClatchy.   Still, Bullington wasn't exactly chopped liver coming out of college as the righthander from Ball State went 11-3 in his draft season with an impressive 139-18 K/BB total in 104 innings.  The 6-foot-5, 220 pounder came to the Bucs as a four-pitch pitcher whose fastball was clocked in the low-to-mid 90's to go along with a mid 80's slider, curve, and changeup.  Baseball America said he had the best breaking ball among college pitchers in the draft.

Despite mysteriously losing the velocity on his fastball and bite on his slider once he entered pro ball, Bullington won 34 games in his first three seasons in the minors as he rose to AAA in 2005.  He made his major league debut that same year with the Pirates by making one relief appearance. 

The South Korean born righthander wound up missing the entire 2006 season with shoulder surgery.  He went 11-9 with a 4.00 ERA in 2007 with AAA Indianapolis but was 0-3 with a 5.29 mark with the Pirates in five appearances.  In 2008, he won just four of ten decisions in Indy with an ERA of just five-and-a-half and he was designated for assignment.  From the Indy Indians, he went to the Cleveland Indians after some time at AAA Buffalo.  He was 0-2 with an ERA of nearly 5.00 in 14 2/3 innings with the Tribe but had a K/BB mark of 12-2.   His best outing came in late September against Boston when he struck out six in five innings or relief.

However, that wasn't enough for Cleveland to keep him around and he was claimed on waivers by Toronto last October.  Bullington started this season in Las Vegas where he was 1-1 with a 1.86 ERA in four apperances, with a nice K/BB mark of 10-1 in 9 2/3 innings.  He made his Jays debut Friday and also appeared Saturday against the White Sox.  His WHIP after two innings was 3.00 (four hits and two walks) but his ERA is remarkably still zero thanks to five strikeouts.  He worked a third inning in relief during Monday's night loss to Kansas City and only issued one walk.  His fastball has topped out at 90 MPH and has also used a low 80's slider and a high 70's curve.  Wearing number 36 in your game day program, Bullington is hoping to pick up his first major league victory with Toronto.

Joining Bullington on the big club is lefty Brian Burres, who made the start and took the loss in Saturday's 10-2 setback to the White Sox.   A 31st round pick of the San Francisco Giants out of junior college in the 2000 amateur draft, the 6-1, 180 pound Burres got as far as AA Norwich in his fifth season with the Giants. 

The Oregon native joined the Baltimore organization in 2006 where he played with the AAA Ottawa Lynx and went 10-6 with a 3.76 ERA.  He was called up to the O's, where he recorded a 2.25 ERA in 11 appearances out of the pen.  Burres stuck around in Baltimore for 2007 and made three starts against the Jays where he went 1-1, including seven shutout innings at Rogers Centre in September.  The Jays did give him some payback 11 days later.  He finished up that season at 6-8 and followed that up with a 7-10 mark in 2008.  His career ERA to this point is a tick under 6.00.  He was off to a rough start in Las Vegas before his call-up as he was 0-2 with a 6.97 ERA along with a 7-2 K/BB mark in 11 innings.

A four pitch pitcher whose changeup serves as his best pitch, Burres is not a pitcher who throws gas as his fastball tops out in the mid-80's and maybe high 80's on a good day.   Number 14 for the Jays is expected to make his second start on Thursday against the Royals.  

Introducing The Killer BB's | 28 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
John Northey - Tuesday, April 28 2009 @ 01:55 PM EDT (#199045) #

Today is a sad day in Blue Jay land.  The Red Sox are percentage points ahead and we are in either a first place tie (games ahead/behind) or 2nd place (winning percentage, Jays played 2 more games with a win and a loss).

Of course, it took an 11 game winning streak for the Sox to catch the Jays, which is a good thing that it took that much.  The Jays +33 run difference is the best in the AL by 1 and just 2 behind the ML leaders, the LA Dodgers.  4 games up on the Yanks, 4 1/2 vs the Orioles and 5 1/2 vs Tampa Bay.  2 games up on KC for the Wild Card (Boston/Seattle/Detroit are leading). 

And in the 'all is right with the world' the ex-Expos are now the worst team in baseball by 2 games with 3 fewer wins than anyone else and after 8 home games just 2 cracked 20k, opening day and the next game where they had 20,494.  Lets hope it keeps on dropping to the sub-10k level (no, I'm not bitter at all).

vw_fan17 - Tuesday, April 28 2009 @ 02:11 PM EDT (#199046) #
And don't forget: except for the Cards at 14-6 (one day behind the Jays? :-), the #2 team in the AL East would be in first place anywhere else. Again.
Maldoff - Tuesday, April 28 2009 @ 03:06 PM EDT (#199047) #
Ever since Litsch and Romero went down, I seriously worried about how long this team would be able to keep up their solid play. It's one thing to have mediocre starters, it is a completely different ballgame when your starters are well below average (as 3/5s of our rotation is right now). While the offense has improved since last season, expecting this team to score more than 5 runs per game is quite a stretch. The way I see it, we will be lucky to win 1 game in this series in K.C. (I assume we will lose to Meche and Grienke), and we have to hope to play .500 ball until our rotation gets healthy.
Gerry - Tuesday, April 28 2009 @ 03:40 PM EDT (#199049) #

I assume we will lose to Meche and Grienke

There is the beauty of baseball, you never know.  Roy Halladay has lost a game this season, every pitcher has a bad start now and then and sometimes a pitcher loses a 1-0 or a 2-1 game.  Greinke is on the cover of this weeks SI so the jinx is in.  I think the Jays will win one of those two games.

John Northey - Tuesday, April 28 2009 @ 03:47 PM EDT (#199051) #

3/5ths well below average? 

Halladay: One of the best there is
Richmond: 43 1/3 ML IP with a 118 ERA+, can't call that well below average
Tallet: 0.82 ERA in 2 starts, so far so good, won't stay there but again, can't say 'well below'
Purcey: 7.01 ERA...OK, that sucks
Burres: 76 ERA+ lifetime, 6 runs in 4 1/3 IP his one start, yeah, that sucks too

I see two guys as well below average so far, with the other 3 not.  Tallet and Richmond should be able to be around average given their history and results so far in 2009.  The big question is how many starts Purcey gets before being given a boot in the butt and when someone gets healthy enough to send Burres back down (assuming he doesn't suddenly figure it out after 40 starts in the majors with a 5.73 ERA).

Once Romero and Litsch get back Burres and Purcey should be back in AAA (if Purcey out of options perhaps it is time to see if he does well in relief).  Tallet and Richmond both are earning their slots and until they fall I'd keep sending them out.

Mike Green - Tuesday, April 28 2009 @ 03:55 PM EDT (#199052) #
What Gerry said.  Greinke and Meche are good pitchers, but the big thing so far is that they have not given up any homers.  That will change.  It wouldn't surprise me at all if the Jays beat both of them and then lost to Kyle Davies with the Burres/Chavez battery. 
Glevin - Tuesday, April 28 2009 @ 05:10 PM EDT (#199055) #
"What Gerry said.  Greinke and Meche are good pitchers, but the big thing so far is that they have not given up any homers. "

Greinke has looked unbelievable so far and for those of you without MLB Extra innings, it will be a treat to watch him. That said, anybody is beatable at any time. Bob Gibson lost 9 games with a 1.12 ERA in 1968.  As for Richmond's career ERA+ of 118. His minor league ERA was 4.39 over 413.67 innings so it seems highly improbable that he'll be this good for long.
Mick Doherty - Tuesday, April 28 2009 @ 05:15 PM EDT (#199056) #

Saw Greinke pitch against the Rangers and the kid looked like Cy Freaking Young (okay, I never saw Young pitch, but you get the idea) ... absolutely the best young pitcher I've seen in five years.

Speaking of young pitchers, wouldn't these "Killer BB's" (per the headline) be well-nicknamed "The BB Guns"?

Denoit - Tuesday, April 28 2009 @ 05:48 PM EDT (#199059) #

Zach Grienke has been compared to Greg Maddux, has control of everything and can throw any pitch whenever he wants. The mental side has been his problem, looks like he has it straightned out though

Jays are in tough against KC, they have a great pitching staff, we will see what the offence is really made of in the next two games

brent - Tuesday, April 28 2009 @ 07:39 PM EDT (#199063) #

http://presspass.mlb.com/pp_viewer.asp?d=44602

This is a little gem hiding on mlb's site. I love all these little factoids!

Maldoff - Tuesday, April 28 2009 @ 09:38 PM EDT (#199064) #
So maybe I was wrong about Meche.......
Chuck - Tuesday, April 28 2009 @ 09:52 PM EDT (#199065) #
Was that really Meche? With all that nibbling and stalling and pitching afraid it looked more like Miguel Batista.
Waveburner - Tuesday, April 28 2009 @ 10:51 PM EDT (#199070) #
Well that sucks. Joe Nathan just served up a pinch-hit homer to Ben Zobrist of all people to let the Rays tie.
TamRa - Tuesday, April 28 2009 @ 11:08 PM EDT (#199072) #
it is a completely different ballgame when your starters are well below average (as 3/5s of our rotation is right now).

As long as Scott and Brian are pitching like they are now I'm NOT going to ASSUME they are "well below average" starters.

I'll show them the respect of making them show me well below average results first.

The way I see it, we will be lucky to win 1 game in this series in K.C. (I assume we will lose to Meche and Grienke)

Hows that working out for ya?

;)


TamRa - Tuesday, April 28 2009 @ 11:23 PM EDT (#199073) #
Richmond: 43 1/3 ML IP with a 118 ERA+, can't call that well below average
Tallet: 0.82 ERA in 2 starts, so far so good, won't stay there but again, can't say 'well below'
Purcey: 7.01 ERA...OK, that sucks

 too I see two guys as well below average so far, with the other 3 not.  Tallet and Richmond should be able to be around average given their history and results so far in 2009.  The big question is how many starts Purcey gets before being given a boot in the butt


The other flaw in that "3/5 Sucks" argument is that the very same logic which suggests Tallet won't STAY at 0.82 also suggests Purcey won't stay at 7.01

So if a person is going to say Tallet (or Richmond) is "well below average" based on the future they assume, then they likewise have to evaluate Purcey based on his potential future and not his current numbers - or else do both on their current numbers.

Richmond now has 23.1 IP and 7 earned runs allowed.
Purcey has 25.2 IP and 20 earned runs allowed.

That's 49 IP in all and 27 ER - that's a 4.96 ERA combined.

Is there anyone here who would have said - had I predicted it before the season - that it would be an unreasonably high expectation to state that Purcey and Richmond would combine for an ERA of almost 5?

I doubt it. We may be surprised at who turned out to be the horse in that equation but the total combined effort isn't unreasonable at all.


pooks137 - Tuesday, April 28 2009 @ 11:34 PM EDT (#199074) #

Thank you Brad Penny!  The Jays are back in 1st for at least another day.

Penny has been pretty awful so far, striking out only 6 over 17 innings.  The Red Sox did a great job structuring his contract though, as his performance bonuses don't kick in until he hits 160 innings according to Cot's. They can cut their losses on him by mid-season without taking any financial hit.

Another example of how useless wins are as a stat, as he still sits 2-0 on the season with an ERA over 8.00

Waveburner - Tuesday, April 28 2009 @ 11:45 PM EDT (#199075) #
All is well in the end as Morneau wins it with a walk-off fielders choice. And the Red Sox winning streak comes to an end because the pitcher dropped the ball covering first base in the ninth. A walk-off reached on error?
greenfrog - Tuesday, April 28 2009 @ 11:57 PM EDT (#199077) #
Exchange posted today on BP's latest chat with John Perotta:

Bill (Toronto): I know it's early but aren't the Jays shooting themselves in the foot by starting Brian Burres when they have Cecil, Mills and Fabio Castro waiting in the minors? I realize the first two aren't lighting the world on fire but does any major league team, let alone one that was in first, have any business giving Burres starts?

John Perrotto: Agreed 100 percent. If the Blue Jays are serious about making a run this year then they can't be messing around with guys like Brian Burress. Any of the other three would have been better choices, regardless of what they are doing at Las Vegas right now.
Alex Obal - Wednesday, April 29 2009 @ 01:20 AM EDT (#199079) #
Anyone got Runelvys Hernandez's phone number handy?
Alex Obal - Wednesday, April 29 2009 @ 01:30 AM EDT (#199080) #
Also: As a fan, and a blind optimist, I find situations like Thursday's impending Burres start incredibly awkward and frustrating. I want to see the Jays win. And as an overly nice guy, I want to see Burres succeed. But at the same time, as a Jays fan, I don't actually want him to do well, because if he does we're stuck watching him take the ball five days from now and he's very likely to be the same Brian Burres. It's annoying. I haven't had this problem since April 2007.
92-93 - Wednesday, April 29 2009 @ 02:18 AM EDT (#199081) #
Alex, I'm with you. I really wish Cito would have chosen Bullington to start and one of Wolfe/Accardo for the bullpen. Heck, I'd prefer Fabio Castro, who at least has big league experience and is pitching really well. Of course that's assuming Mills and Cecil are off limits, which shouldn't necessarily be the case. You don't risk them being a Super 2 if you only call them up for a few starts until Romero/Janssen/Litsch are ready. Purcey came up for spot starts twice last year before he got going. Brett Cecil's style of keeping the ball in the ground is going to play VERY WELL in front of this Jays defense. I wonder how many of the GB singles he gives up in Vegas would be outs in Toronto.
Richard S.S. - Wednesday, April 29 2009 @ 08:54 AM EDT (#199086) #
Doc is Doc; Purcey is 2 or 3 starts from being replaced; Burres is 1 or 2 starts from being replaced.  Janssen (4-6 starts), Romero (5-7 starts) and Litsch (6-8 starts) are not that close, they are 4 to 8 starts away (assuming normal progress).  Whoever is the hottest starter in the minors, in the next week or two, will be called up to bridge the gap.  It is highly unlikely Mills or Cecil makes the jump just yet.  Richmond and Tallet have always been good pitchers (they're here aren't they).  Possibly great defence, a strong offence, a strong bullpen and growing confidence might just make a good pitcher better?  Throw strikes, keep the team close, that all you need to pitch successfully here.  Patience people, good things will happen. 
China fan - Wednesday, April 29 2009 @ 09:29 AM EDT (#199087) #

Janssen (4-6 starts), Romero (5-7 starts) and Litsch (6-8 starts) are not that close....

Having pitched a very successful 4 innings for Dunedin on Monday night, Janssen should be fairly close to returning.  He might need another 2 or 3 rehab starts, but I fail to see why he would need up to 6 more starts in the minors.  Given the problems with Purcey and Burres, I would assume that the Jays will try to get him back fairly soon, even if he has a pitch limit.  Five solid innings from Janssen would be a very valuable commodity for the Jays at this point, and I would certainly take that option ahead of Purcey and Burres at this point.  Purcey really looks like he could benefit from a month or two at Las Vegas to work out the kinks.

China fan - Wednesday, April 29 2009 @ 09:38 AM EDT (#199088) #

Exchange posted today on BP's latest chat with John Perotta.....

It's hard to give much credence to Perotta's comments when he appears to believe that Fabio Castro is pitching at Las Vegas.  (I'll assume that his misspelling of "Burres" was just a typo.)

westcoast dude - Wednesday, April 29 2009 @ 10:40 AM EDT (#199090) #
There is a chance Ricky Romero will be back sooner, rather than later, God willing.  We should know more later today. Fingers crossed.
Mike Green - Wednesday, April 29 2009 @ 11:01 AM EDT (#199092) #
Alex, I don't quite share your ambivalence.  I do wish the organization would treat the Burres' starts as 5 innings maximum.  There is a shortage of noticeably better alternatives until Janssen/Litsch/Romero/Cecil get some more good innings under their belt.  I doubt though that Burres will be in the rotation after May 11 (the Jays next day off), regardless whether he pitches passably well or poorly.
Alex Obal - Wednesday, April 29 2009 @ 07:02 PM EDT (#199136) #
Yeah, that's fair. I remain optimistic in the wake of all the pitching injuries because I feel like the Jays can run out pretty much any pitcher with good control and not be too much worse off, in light of their offense and defense. Then Romero's replacement turned out to be a counterexample. I would've preferred to see Bullington (especially vs the Sox) or Castro or Cecil or, if he were in game shape, Davis Romero. But it's true there are so many internal options that this should sort itself out before too long regardless of how Burres does.
Alex Obal - Wednesday, April 29 2009 @ 07:04 PM EDT (#199137) #
... returning internal options, that should read.
Introducing The Killer BB's | 28 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.