Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
Sometimes all you need is a timeout. Instead of going out there again and again, and screwing up again and again - just stop. Take a walk. Clear your mind. Change your routine.

If the problem is in your head, it's as good a solution as any. Ted Lilly insisted that there was nothing wrong with his arm, and I was inclined to believe him. I was at one of his disastrous starts, and he was stinging the radar gun as much as he ever does. His fastball looked the same, his big curve looked the same. He hadn't lost his ability to throw strikes, at least not until his very last start, the one that finally got him pulled from the rotation for a week. He just kept making terrible pitches, for no apparent reason.

What was the problem? Who the hell knows. Fordin had his notebook out, and asked the right questions, but the answers weren't all that illuminating:

It was certainly mental, to some extent. And there were some physical things I was doing to make it awfully tough.

And in the Star this morning, Mark Zwolinski reports that Lilly, who has long had a reputation for listening to no one, has in fact been seeking help. Which is all addicts know, is a Necessary Thing:

"Being able to talk to (Halladay) as someone who can relate to what I was going through, really helped," said Lilly, who also talked to Dave Bush...

Surely few people know as well as Roy Halladay what it means to seemeingly lose all your ability and come back. But seeking help and advice from a young fellow with less than a year in the big leagues? This isn't the Lilly we've heard about, and surely it also says something about how Dave Bush is regarded by his teammates.

Anyway. It was an evil pattern, that kept repeating itself, and it had to be broken. And now it has been broken. What was especially encouraging was that when Lilly did get into trouble, he didn't suddenly cough up a three run homer. That had certainly been part of the evil pattern. But this night, in the second inning when the Nats got two men on, he retired Schneider on a fly ball to left. In the fourth, after a double and two singles had put Washington up 1-0, he struck out Schneider and Guzman with two men on to end the threat. He didn't allow another runner after that.

And so Ted Lilly was the best news of the day, and is hereby awarded the Box Game MVP salute - and the Magpie is duly grateful that his own win total has, like Lilly's, just doubled - but there was other stuff to enjoy, as there is usually is when the team wins. It was a night for clearing away some bad mojo, for exorcising the random wicked sprites and pixies that from time to time... oh, this metaphor's going nowhere. Anyway, that home run against Cleveland on Sunday seems to have broken whatever evil spell Vernon Wells had been under. In the five games he's played this week, he's hit .350 with 4 HR and 9 RBI. Eric Hinske had gone a week without an RBI or an extra-base hit, so it was good to see the Dude go 2-3 with a walk and a double. And Aaron Hill certainly had himself a memorable major league debut. It wasn't Junior Felix homering on the very first pitch he saw, but who needs another Junior Felix anyway. How Hill gets used will be... interesting. As I recall, he's played 10 games at 3B in his life, in the Arizona Fall league. Those of you who have actually seen him play short can tell us a bit about his defensive tools. Let's hear from you!

Hillenbrand has far more experience at third, but Shea isn't exactly a Gold Glover at the spot and at least one scout thinks he's hitting much better this year precisely because he's not playing as much third base. I don't think it's much of a factor myself. Hillenbrand has always hit much better in the first half of the season; it's possible, however, that he's one of those guys who wears down a bit and DHing as much as he has may pay dividends for him in August and September.

For some reason, I'm in the mood to do a Roundup. Think of it as...oh, I don't know... homage to my esteemed colleague Pepper ("The Wild Horse of the Economics Department") Moffatt. It will be my first! Let's see... what have we got?

Zwolinski's game story in the Star: Nationals cure what ails Jays

Richard Griffin on the new boy: Ricciardi plums Hill, Adams just wanna play

Rutsey's game story in the Sun: Jays' lost lefty finally finds way

Also in the Sun, Bob Elliott on Corey Koskie's latest misfortune: Koskie can't believe luck

ESPN's game report, by A. Nonymous: Wells launches two home runs against Washington

The handsome and talented Spencer Fordin (I'm in the press box today) does his usual bang-up job at mlb.com: Jays down former Canadian rivals

Also at mlb.com, Ian Harrison from the Nats' perspective: Nationals greeted rudely by Blue Jays

Finally, the Washington Post (registration required) has a game story from Barry Svrluga: Vargas Exposed In Fourth Inning

And, yes, assembling all of those links is truly tedious. So everybody - get out your bookmarks!

Elsewhere in the AL East, the Orioles lost to the Phillies to drop closer to the pack, what with the Red Sox, Yankees, and Blue Jays all winning. Interleague play kicked off tonight, with what I suppose is "Natural Rivals" weekend. The Yankees were playing the Mets, the Cubs were playing the White Sox, and so on and so forth. Baltimore played Philadelphia while Toronto played Washington - presumably this is one Natural Rivalry that will be reassessed. And I don't know what to make of Detroit vs Arizona.

Tomorrow's game is the first 4:00 PM Saturday start time this season - I'm glad I just checked, I'd feel pretty silly showing up at 11:30 - and I understand that I can expect to hear some cowbell. I'm looking forward to it. The Doctor will be in.

Jays 6, Nationals 1 | 30 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Dave Till - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 08:30 AM EDT (#117309) #
I wasn't watching too closely, but I seem to recall that Lilly was throwing mostly fastballs in the early innings. Once he realized that he could get hitters out by locating his fastball, his confidence came back, and everything clicked into place. I don't think he's completely out of the woods yet, but he's won back his spot in the rotation.

Some thoughts on Hill:

- He's faster than I expected he would be.

- Is he using a larger bat than most of the other Jays? That looked like a seriously large chunk of wood he was carrying up there.

- I think that he will probably get off to an excellent start, as pitchers seem to want to challenge newbies with fastballs, and it looks like Hill can hit them. But recall what happened when Josh Phelps and Jose Cruz Jr. first came up: they proved they could hit fastballs, and then started having trouble when pitchers threw weird bendy things at them. We won't know how good Hill is until pitchers start compiling a book on him.

- Does Hill have a fairly long swing? (Not Josh Phelps long, but slightly longer than average.) Can someone confirm this, or am I just seeing things?

- Overall, I'd say that Russ Adams (currently at .229), has got to be a little worried right now.

Nice to see Vernon go long twice!
PeterG - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 10:24 AM EDT (#117313) #
Russ Adams has nothing to worry about. Orlando Hudson will be the odd man out here, possibly before the end of the season-certainly before the beginning of next. Packaged with Gabe Gross or another prospect, he might bring the power hitter that is needed to play lf.
danjulien - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 10:50 AM EDT (#117317) #
From my seats, I thought that Hill had a long swing(or he was taking big hacks) and had a bigger bat but I can't really confirm...
What a game that was, I don't remember giving so many standing Os to guys at a ballgame that wasn't playoff related.
Does anyone have a pic of the on-the-field hug between Hudson and Hill when Hill scored after his triple? I think that was one of those moments that just proves how close this team is
Mosely - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 11:07 AM EDT (#117319) #
Who pied Hill after the game? I stepped out for a second.
Maldoff - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 11:42 AM EDT (#117323) #
It was V-Dub who pied him.

Is it just me, or does this Hill/Adams debate seem eerily familiar to the Izruis/Lopez debate at the beginning of the JP era? And we all know how that turned out (we drafted 2 shortstops, both the players were traded, and currently are solid big leaguers).
Flex - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 11:43 AM EDT (#117324) #
I didn't see the pie, but undoubtedly it was Wells. It's always Wells.

That Wells!

So, it seems a widely held view that Hudson's going to be gone and Adams and Hill will be staying. If so, it would mean Ricciardi values cheap potential over proven contribution and on-field leadership. Heading into "the contending years," I can't see it, myself. Unless a package such as Hudson and Gross brings back something extraordinary, I think this team would be taking a major step back in trading off one of its biggest infield and team assets. Apart from his D, you just have to watch Hudson directing Hinske on positioning, and see his interaction with teammates, to know how important this guy is to the team the Jays can become.

I don't know what it means that Ricciardi hasn't finalized a long-term deal with Hudson, but it would make more sense, in my view, to keep Hudson nailed to second and trade off one of Adams or Hill. And unless we see a sudden offensive flowering from both of them, I suspect that's what's going to happen, .
Rob - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 12:00 PM EDT (#117325) #
Wilner said last night that he thought Adams/Hill would one day share 2B/SS, but now he thinks Hill might play 3B. This puts Koskie at DH for the rest of his contract, to cut down on the injury risk.
VBF - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 12:00 PM EDT (#117326) #
I don't think we'll see a long term deal anytime soon. I think it was mentioned here before, but if you're O-Dog's agent, you're going to wait until he potentially becomes an All-Star or a Gold Glover to drive up his pricetag and then sign a deal.

I am confident that O-Dog will be locked up long-term.
greenfrog - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 12:08 PM EDT (#117327) #
I agree--keep Hudson. He's young, a terrific defender, and a decent batter (although I wish his OPS were a bit higher). Hudson and Wells are currently the defensive anchors of a good defensive team.

Seeing Koskie go down with an injury reminded me how useful it is to have an extra infielder who is more than just a replacement-level player.

I noticed the same thing about Hill's swing. He'll have to make it more compact if he wants to hit .300 in the majors.
Flex - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 12:09 PM EDT (#117328) #
Hill at third, Adams at short, Hudson at second, Koskie at DH and spelling Hill from time to time -- I guess that works. I'd like to see Hill play there for a while before committing to that view, though. It'd be a shame to lose Koskie's glove. And I suspect, given how he plays, being full-time DH would make him kind of grumpy.
Jordan - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 12:11 PM EDT (#117329) #
This puts Koskie at DH for the rest of his contract, to cut down on the injury risk.

That would make sense if Koskie's injury arose from playing defence, but it didn't -- he fractured his thumb on the basepaths. Koskie's unlikely to injure himself in the field, as opposed to someone like Catalanotto, who risks pulling a hamstring every team he runs after a ball in the gap.

Koskie was signed for his glove almost as much as his bat, and we've already seen him flash the leather. DHing him would help solve the infield problem, but it would underutilize his skills. We need a full season from Adams and Hill in the bigs, as well as a look at the post-injury Koskie, before we can make any educated guesses on how the Jays will sort out the situation.

A - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 12:24 PM EDT (#117330) #
The one play that really bugged me last night was when Hudson went out and Rios came in for the run-scoring single that fell between them.

It bugs me because Rios may have had a play if went as hard as possible (as Hudson could have as well) except they both pulled up for fear of collision. IMO, Hudson's pursuit of the ball was overly ambitious because regardless of whether the out was recorded, the play was going to result in a run since O-Dog's momentum was carrying him out to RF (even if it was Old Man Castilla, he wouldn't have had the runner tagging). On the other hand, if Rios is able to go as hard as he can after that ball and make a shoe-string (or diving) catch, his momentum is going towards the plate and would probably scare Castilla back to third.

It turns out that made no difference in the outcome of the game but I hope there's better communication between fielders in the future so we aren't giving the opposition 28 outs per game.
A - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 12:27 PM EDT (#117331) #
This puts Koskie at DH for the rest of his contract, to cut down on the injury risk.

Rob, is this your conclusion or Wilner's conclusion?

Mark - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 12:47 PM EDT (#117332) #
Maybe it is unwise to mess around with a young player in terms of postion but it seems Hill can play 2b,ss,3b and I can assume 1b. As well as DH I think there can be room for all involved. It would create a super sub, similar to Chone Figgins. And it would only be for perhaps next year and a little of 2007 when Koskie can see more time at dh. Eventually he replaces Koskie. As a fan I've been waiting 10 years for someone like Hudson at second base, it would be a shame if we traded him
Mike Forbes - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 12:50 PM EDT (#117334) #
Its a wonder that no one has mentioned Koskie moving to First and Hinske (who actually might have a market) leaving.
That would leave Hill at 3b, Adams at SS, Hudson at 2b and keep Koskie's glove in the field at 1b. It makes alot've sense to me.
Rob - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 12:56 PM EDT (#117335) #
That play by Hudson bugged me too. Rios would have had a play at the plate -- did he not call the O-Dog off? It should have been the outfielder's ball, but I'll take the occasional misplay by Hudson if he plays like he has been this season.

RE: Koskie at first. I don't think that's a good idea. If you're going to put him in the field and risk whatever injuries come from a non-DH role, he has to be at third, where he's more valuable than at first. Besides, Hinske seems to be settling in nicely. (Random fact: Koskie played 25 games in RF in his first full season. I did not know that.)

And that line about Koskie moving to DH is what Wilner said. For the record, I don't agree with it -- Jordan has already expressed why.
Wildrose - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 01:35 PM EDT (#117338) #
A few thoughts;

- Hill will have no trouble playing third, he's got a strong arm and its generally an easier position than shortstop.

- Hill actually has a reputation of having a quick short stroke. Certainly on Thursday when he homered for Syracuse on a high ,tight, inside fastball he was quick to the ball. Having seen him only on a limited basis this is something I'll watch for though . Maybe he was juiced and over-swinging in his first MLB game?

- I think Adam's will eventually be the odd man out in this version of musical chairs. His arm strength really concerns me, if Hill is even a reasonable shortstop I think his superior bat will carry the day.

- And lastly ....while this has nothing to do with baseball, I'm just loving how good Steve Nash is playing right now!
Joseph Krengel - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 01:37 PM EDT (#117339) #
The Jays have a lot of options with their infield. Lets see Adams and Hill play a full season in the majors before we start predicting where they will be playing and when.

As for the Ricciardi "cheap potential" comments... lets not castigate a guy for a trade he hasn't made yet. If he makes such a trade anyways, we'd have to see what comes back before we judge it.
Wildrose - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 01:43 PM EDT (#117340) #
Actually Rob I like your idea , given that the new turf plays so slow, that either Koskie or Hinske could potentially play in the outfield if need be to solve this connundrum, both however are superior fielders at their current positions.
Flex - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 01:45 PM EDT (#117341) #
Actually I don't think I was castigating Ricciardi. I even made it clear I didn't think it was a move he would make.

Let's not start castigating a guy for castigating a guy when nobody's being castigated.
Wildrose - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 02:00 PM EDT (#117342) #
All this talk of castigating is making me nervous.....
PeterG - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 02:20 PM EDT (#117345) #
Another thought concerning which infielder is likely to be traded and when depends upon which one a potential trading partner might be most interested in and for which one a favourable deal can be consumated. I guess this is why JP is paid the big bucks - to make these decisions. If it was me(as previously stated) I would be looking to trade Hudson but, of course, would have to consider all options. It is my opinion that JP would probably prefer to keep both Hill and Adams but as others have pointed out there could be options involving Hinske or Koskie. These options are based on the premise that Hillenbrand will be moved which is likely but not necessarily a given(.300 hitters don't grow on trees). In any case, it will make for interesting speculation as the situation evolves.
Mick Doherty - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 02:41 PM EDT (#117346) #
And I don't know what to make of Detroit vs Arizona.

It's the "Karim Garcia for Luis Gonzalez Showdown." Or perhaps it's the Danny Klassen-Danny Bautista Bowl.

Jdog - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 03:11 PM EDT (#117349) #
Did I read "Hinske to the outfield"

Would his arm be comparable to our dear friend Shannon Stewart, in LF?
King Ryan - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 03:13 PM EDT (#117351) #
I found this on Rotoworld.com. Link: here

Losing Corey Koskie to a broken thumb Thursday afternoon is a tough break for the Blue Jays and their decision to call up prospect Aaron Hill to replace him is rather curious. With Shea Hillenbrand able to play third base, Toronto could have used Koskie’s injury as an opportunity to get a look at a young hitter like Gabe Gross, Eric Crozier or John Ford Griffin. Instead, they went with Hill, who had a 16-to-4 strikeout-to-walk ratio in 37 games at Triple-A and isn’t known for his bat.

What the hell is Gleeman talking about?

Rob - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 03:17 PM EDT (#117353) #
I am not in favour of Hinske or Koskie playing the outfield. I don't think Hinske could do it, though Koskie might be able to. The only reason I mentioned that is I was over at B-Ref checking out Koskie's career page, wondering if he ever played first. He hasn't.

I read that Gleeman article too, and I didn't know what Aaron meant. If Hill is "known for" anything, it's certainly not his defense at shortstop. He had a fine offensive year last year in a pitcher's park, one year after playing for LSU.
Jim - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 03:40 PM EDT (#117354) #
On topic, good to see Hill come up and see success. I am still shocked that BA didn't consider him the Jay's # prospect.

Off topic, anyone watching the Yankees/Mets? Koo just maybe the greatest inning I've ever seen for a pitcher at bat and on the bases. You have to throw out the fact that he was probably out at the plate.
Jim - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 03:41 PM EDT (#117355) #
Of course I was refering to Hill as the Jays #1 prospect in place of League.
Jobu - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 03:41 PM EDT (#117356) #
Anyone watching the NY/NY game? Koo is now my all time favourite NL pitcher.
Keith Talent - Saturday, May 21 2005 @ 11:38 PM EDT (#117383) #
Orlando Hudson is what you hope your draft picks will become. He's not the guy you move for unproven talent. He's a future franchise player. If anything, the Blue Jays learned from 2004 for depth is a valued commodity. Who wants to be a 60-day DL away from a division title? Let's have too many players: why not? We'll have the payroll for it.
Jays 6, Nationals 1 | 30 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.