Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine

The Jays are in a slump right now and with yesterday being an off-day it gave me the opportunity to think about what I have seen in this team.  With apologies to all those who have done this before me, here are then things I think about the Blue Jays.



1. Brad Arnsberg is not a genius

When Brad Arnsberg was the Marlins pitching coach he was reported to have developed a great rapport with his young pitchers, Josh Beckett, AJ Burnett, Carl Pavano and Matt Clement.  When the Jays hired Arnsberg he came with the reputation of fostering good relationships and excellent results with the pitchers.  He might have great relationships with the Blue Jays pitchers but I don't see evidence that he is any more than an average pitching coach.  His star pupil, AJ Burnett, does not appear to be a much different pitcher today than he was when he signed with the Jays.  The other starters, Towers, Chacin, Lilly, Okha, Zambrano, etc. don't appear to have developed much.  Being a major league pitching coach is a hard job, and sometimes it is more important to be in the right place at the right time, but I don't see any reclamations or turn-arounds that Arnsberg will put on his resume when he eventually leaves.

2. Can we have one lineup for a while please?

First it was Alex Rios, then Adam Lind, now Aaron Hill in the lead-off spot.  Wells has been hitting second and third; Overbay all over and Clayton anywhere from sixth to ninth.  I think it would settle the players if we had one lineup for righties and one for lefties rather than drawing straws as it appears to be at the moment.

3. Alex Rios is not a gold glove candidate

Alex Rios has a very good arm and the speed to chase down fly balls, but he has dropped or missed several balls this season and missed the cut-off man several other times.  Last season the Jays outfield was considered one of the best in the majors, but not this year.  Some players arrive in the major leagues with the confidence to fit in from the start, Aaron Hill for one.  Rios still looks like he doesn't believe he should be in the major leagues and looks to me like he is playing scared.  I don't know what the answer is but I hope the Jays can figure it out.

4. Sometimes quality does beat quantity

JP Ricciardi was unsuccessful over the winter in his pursuit of Gil Meche and Ted Lilly.  Plan B was to sign Tomo Okha, John Thomson, Victor Zambrano to go with Josh Towers and Gustavo Chacin and hope two guys step up and take the jobs.  Okha, Zambrano, Towers and Chacin each have an ERA around 5.50, which is not terrible but not replacing Ted Lilly's 4.31 from last year or not as good as Chacin, Janssen and Marcum who were about half a run better last season. 

5. What is an AL East pitcher?

When David Bush was traded one of the reasons given was that he couldn't succeed in the AL East.  Other pitchers have been passed over by the Jays for the same reason.  If we assume that reasoning is correct how do Tomo Okha and Victor Zambrano qualify as AL East pitchers?  What is the definition of a pitcher who won't suceed in the AL?  If Aaron Small can win 10 games for the Yankees, if Julian Tavarez can succeed, If the 2005 version of Josh Towers can succeed is there a real definition of an AL East pitcher?

6. Frank Thomas sits middle-in

Frank Thomas looks for an inside pitch to hit.  I used to think Vernon Wells was a pull hitter but Frank Thomas makes him look like Ichiro.  Other teams know this too and pitch Thomas away all the time but Frank doesn't go with the pitch.  If the pitcher misses, and the ball comes back over the middle of the plate, Frank will hit a line drive to left or left centre.  Very few pitchers will come inside on Thomas and at this stage Thomas has to be considered a mistake hitter.  When Thomas next gets a base hit to right field it will be his first of the season.

7. Jason Smith has a hole in his swing

This one is not really news but Jason Smith is vulnerable to a good fastball and particularly a high fastball.  If he cannot fix it those pitches will be all he sees and his value to the Jays will plummet.

8. Small things win ball games, the Jays are built for big things

Frank Thomas and Matt Stairs can hit but cannot run or field.  Jason Phillips cannot run.  Troy Glaus cannot run and has trouble moving laterally in the field.  There are very few five tool players and this not a terminal problem but when your dollars are limited you can get better value if you have players who provide flexibility and multiple ways to win.  The Jays are built to slug their way to victory and when they are not slugging they are not winning.  

9. BJ Ryan and Brandon League's injuries are the biggest losses

Reed Johnson has been replaced by Adam Lind who has hit reasonably well and played a better than expected defense.  Greg Zaun was hitting under .200 when he was injured and Jason Philips has hit better than I expected.  Dustin McGowan looks like he can fill in for Gus Chacin, but BJ Ryan and Brandon League were a strong eighth and ninth inning combination last season and the Jays have no replacements.  With their injuries the Jays have no closer, Jason Frasor has not succeeded, neither has Shaun Marcum, or anyone else.  If the Jays have a save situation this week who will save it?  Who will pitch the eighth inning.  This could get worse before it gets better.

10. This team might not be that good

Good teams minimize the negative and manage their losses.  Good teams rarely lose five in a row, not to mind doing it twice in three weeks.  All teams go through ups and downs, and the Jays will get better and win lots of games, but they are unlikely to win 95 games. 

Ten Things I Think | 80 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Dave Till - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 09:32 AM EDT (#167458) #
Great article.

One thing I'm wondering about Thomas: I don't recall any teams playing an extreme shift against him, the way they do with Ortiz. If he is pulling everything, will defenses be adjusted accordingly?

Christopher - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 09:33 AM EDT (#167459) #

Ten Things I Agree With

See above.

Mike Green - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 09:38 AM EDT (#167461) #
I agree with almost everything Gerry has said, except for  "Alex Rios is not a Gold Glove candidate".  Yes, he makes errors of omission and commission.  But, he makes more plays than any other rightfielder in the league and he throws better than any other rightfielder in the league.  Range and arm trump inconsistency.

"Alex Rios is prone to lapses of concentration which are frustrating for fans" is something I could definitely buy. 

Mike D - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 10:18 AM EDT (#167462) #

I generally agree with you, Gerry.

Never mind his value "plummeting" -- Jason Smith has almost no value to this team, and should not be with the big club.  With Johnny Mac and Clayton already on hand and two -- maybe three if you count Lind -- outfielders who can defend the position at a big-league level -- Smith really does need to be replaced by an outfielder.

As far as this team not being that good...I think theoretically, i.e., if everyone were healthy, this is a good enough team to avoid such a pronounced cold spell.  But the effort to cover for these injuries by management has been very poor, in my opinion; there have been many games in which a not-that-good team took the field, that's for sure.

Sherrystar - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 10:23 AM EDT (#167463) #
I agree that Thomas is a dead pull hitter but I know for a fact he does have at leas 1 hit to right field... I think it was a blooper double against Cleveland...
chips - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 10:48 AM EDT (#167465) #
Jason Smith is taking up a valuable roster spot right now and at 29 yrs old, he is who he is. I say send him back to the Cubs, promote Wayne Lydon to lead off some games and platoon Lind with Rios to light a fire under Rios' behind.
Pistol - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 10:48 AM EDT (#167466) #
I don't recall any teams playing an extreme shift against him, the way they do with Ortiz

There's several LH hitters that have extreme shifts put on (Bonds, Ortiz, Giambi, Delgado), but I can't remember ever seeing it for a RH hitter.  I suppose it's because the throw from short LF would be difficult to get the runner, while a throw from short RF is doable.
Avail - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 11:32 AM EDT (#167467) #
Agree with most of your points, but I agree with the comment that Rios' problem is not that he lacks Gold Glove caliber defense, but that he seems to have mental lapses where he leaves the game for a little while.

I expect that the plunge for the Jays will continue, and this team will struggle to finish at .500 this year. Simply put, this team not the pieces to contend. And what pieces it DOES have are being horribly misused.

Barry Bonnell - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 11:48 AM EDT (#167469) #

I suspect that save situations will be handled by Accardo for the near future. Set-up looks like Janssen. Frasor and Marcum will handle low leverage situations until their confidence is back up. I think Frasor should be left out of consideration for the closer spot. He doesn't seem to have the mentality of a closer. Blown saves seem to last days with him.

I suspect the Jays will finish with about 85 wins. As has been their pattern they will have a strong September with no pressure as they will be well out of it by then.

At some point I hope they admit the season is lost and put McGowan and Jannsen in the starting rotation on a permanent basis. Heck, bring up Purcey too. Let's see what the kids can do.

There's always next year.

Dave Till - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 11:48 AM EDT (#167470) #
Of course - no one ever puts a shift on for a right-handed hitter. I should have figured that out myself.
Paul D - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 12:00 PM EDT (#167471) #
What's changed with Frason since his rookie year?  The experiencemeans that he no longer has a closer's mentality, but in his first year he could handle it?
Mick Doherty - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 12:04 PM EDT (#167473) #

There's always next year.

Dang -- not to pick on you BB, this is an attitude I am seeing all over Da Box and it's actually moderately positive, all things considered. But with more than 80 percent of the season still to be played and the Jays having a better record than last season's World Series champs (granted, 13-18 and 7.5 GB is nothing to be proud of), there is every possibility that Toronto turns it around.

Ain't no mojo here but bad mojo, Jays fans. And I am speaking as a not-Jays-fan, recall, so at least moderately impartially. 85-88 wins could get Toronto in the post-season, and from there -- ask the '88 Dodgers -- sometimes one genuine starting pitcher is enough!

Next year is faaaar away.

A - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 12:11 PM EDT (#167475) #

I'd like to know where the training staff come in here. Obviously I'm not privy to what's going on in the doctor's office but it seems to me that the Blue Jays don't make a particularly concerted effort to ensure their players are doing the right things to ensure (to the greatest degree possible) their health and resilliancy in the off-season. For example, how does the training/medical staff get off not paying attention to things like Brandan League's unhealthy training habits? And, from the sounds of it, BJ Ryan's pain was known about during spring training (possibly earlier) and he was essentially told to pitch through it instead of having it diagnosed and treated properly from the beginning.

When the 25 men on the roster are your greatest asset and you're paying them tens of millions of dollars combined the least I'd expect is to invest in medical and training staff who check in with every guy once a week during the off-season to be sure that their workouts are appropriate, that any injuries are nursed appropriately, etc. From the sounds of it, Reed Johnson took more of an interest in his teammates' training than the team did this winter and now we're seeing the consequences.

Ryan Day - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 12:16 PM EDT (#167476) #

The Jays have obviously been hit hard by injuries - not many teams who don't play in New York can replace their left fielder, catcher, closer, and setup guy for extended periods of time.

On the other hand, I'm not sure they're adapting well, even considering the circumstances. Putting Zambrano in the rotation after he pitched all of five innings in April; sticking with Jason Smith even though he's now got a career 200/250/267 line; continuing to pretend that Matt Stairs is a fourth outfielder; keeping Smith, McDonald, and Clayton on the roster even though they're essentially the same player (and John McDonald might be the best of them!). I wasn't thrilled with the bench to start the season, and it's gotten even worse as they've been forced to play more.

 On top of that, Gibbons' bullpen management is uninspired at best and downright baffling on a regular basis. The current bullpen construction actually lends itself to some creative usage, but Gibbons can't seem to see beyond by-the-book LOOGY and closer strategies, and doesn't take advantage of former starters who can actually pitch multiple innings at a time.

 It's true that the season isn't over yet, and that the team isn't really this bad. But Ricciardi's got to do something to improve the team, or the Red Sox and Yankees are going to be 15 games ahead by the time the team snaps out of its funk.

tstaddon - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 12:16 PM EDT (#167477) #
In trying to find any sliver of hope available, I stumbled upon something interesting today. Zambrano's always walked a lot of guys -- way more than we Jays fans deem acceptable -- but he's actually been strangely difficult to take deep, surrendering just more than 1HR/9IP over the 700 innings of his career. One would think that'd be significant pitching at Rogers Centre. It's certainly a better number than Chacin's or Ohka's. And, for the record, Zam's career ERA is still <4.50. He probably shouldn't be in the rotation at this point, but if he can develop his arm strength, one has to believe he could resemble a useful 4/5 this year and next.

I admire Ohka's guts but his stuff is worse than Towers'. If the bullpen wasn't such a sieve, I'd be leading the 'Save Shaun Marcum' campaign. He hasn't been able to develop the rhythm in relief that he had last fall as a starter. I have a feeling that the resilience (or lack thereof) Toronto shows in this BoSox series will tell us a lot about what to expect over the next four months. Because, so far, the fightin' jays spirit has been sadly absent. Thoughts?
Barry Bonnell - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 12:22 PM EDT (#167479) #

What's changed with Frason since his rookie year?  The experiencemeans that he no longer has a closer's mentality, but in his first year he could handle it?

Frasor has said in his first year he had no idea what he was doing. He would just throw as hard as he could and hope for the best. Plus, being a rookie he was probably overwhelmed and excited to just be in "The Show."

Maybe now he is overthinking things and having already been sent back to minors last year perhaps he is feeling extra pressure as he knows he can be sent back down. Plus, the team we had a few years ago was not expected to contend. This year there is a lot more pressure on the players to perform and contend.

Barry Bonnell - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 12:28 PM EDT (#167481) #

I'd like to know where the training staff come in here. Obviously I'm not privy to what's going on in the doctor's office but it seems to me that the Blue Jays don't make a particularly concerted effort to ensure their players are doing the right things to ensure (to the greatest degree possible) their health and resilliancy in the off-season. For example, how does the training/medical staff get off not paying attention to things like Brandan League's unhealthy training habits? And, from the sounds of it, BJ Ryan's pain was known about during spring training (possibly earlier) and he was essentially told to pitch through it instead of having it diagnosed and treated properly from the beginning.

With regards to Ryan I believe that sore elbows, shoulders, etc are fairly common for pitchers and in most cases the problem heals itself. They probably thought that shutting him down for a couple weeks in spring training would rectify the problem. I don't have a big problem with the way they handled Ryan.

With League it is hard to have an opinion because no one knows what really went wrong. If he did lift weights during the off season and added too much muscle to his arm I think it is insane that no one from the Jays was monitoring his off season regiment and advising him.

John Northey - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 12:34 PM EDT (#167482) #
Right now many of us (me included) feel the Jays are in a hole that will be extremely difficult to climb out of and are starting to look to next year. But should we?

Right now Boston is #1 in the AL, #2 is Cleveland with Detroit having the wild card at 19-11 and #4 is the AL West leading LA Angels. #2 for the wild card is Seattle at 14-13.

In other words the Jays are 3 games back of second for the playoffs. Right now the Jays just need to play decent to move into second for either the Wild Card or AL East slots. Once in second all you need is for someone who is leading to slip and odds are Detroit or Boston (or Cleveland for that matter) will slump and come back to the pack.

Is the route to the playoffs easy? Heck no. However, the Jays should be getting Ryan and Johnson and Zaun all back around the time Clemens joins the Yankees (1 1/2 ahead of the Jays right now). If (big if) we see someone get a shot at the #3-5 slot and grab ahold of it (Janssen or McGowan are my bets) the Jays could jump fast from bad to good. The 3 games back from leading the also rans is not much. Hoping for one of Cleveland/Detroit/Boston to slide is not asking much either.

Can we hope still? Yup. Is there still a shot? Yup.

FYI - Baseball Prospectus Postseason Odds
Basic version - 19.6% chance at playoffs
ELO version - 8.2% chance at playoffs
PECOTA version - 12.4% chance at playoffs

As proof there is some validity the Washington Nationals are below 1% in all 3 methods while the Royals are already below 1.5% in all methods. So remember, it could be worse.
GregJP - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 12:36 PM EDT (#167484) #
85-88 wins is going to get no where near a playoff spot this year.  (assuming the Jays even win that many games)  The Red Sox are virtually guaranteed to win at least 92-95 games and after that you would need the Yankees plus the rest of non-division winners to ALL win less than 90 games.

If you really believe that is even a remote possibility than you are thinking with your heart and not your head.

I would say that right now the Vegas line would be 50-1 and maybe even higher odds than that.



Barry Bonnell - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 12:40 PM EDT (#167485) #

Dang -- not to pick on you BB, this is an attitude I am seeing all over Da Box and it's actually moderately positive, all things considered. But with more than 80 percent of the season still to be played and the Jays having a better record than last season's World Series champs (granted, 13-18 and 7.5 GB is nothing to be proud of), there is every possibility that Toronto turns it around.

It's hard to be optimistic with our starting rotation. Clearly we need to go on a couple of long winning streaks which is something we haven't been able to do even once in the last couple years.  Halladay is gold and I still believe in A.J (and you said I wasn't positive!) but I can't see a back end rotation of Chacin/Zambrano and Okha contributing to any lengthy winning streak.

Couple that with the Red Sox's insanely good starting rotation and the Yankee's much improved rotation (Wang, Pettite, Clemens and Mussina seems pretty sweet!) and I forsee another long summer.

Another disappointment for me is to see the Yanks dip into their minor league system for arms to add to the starting rotation and seeing these kids pitch solid games. Where are our guys like that?

GregJP - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 12:44 PM EDT (#167486) #
Taking the 8.2% chance (i think even that is realistically too high) means about 12 to 1 odds. 

I would bet against that (risking $12 to win $1) and feel like I was making money in the long run.

When you consider talent level, record to date, and the injury situation, this is a 0.500 team.  To win the wild card this year year you are going to have to be AT LEAST a 0.580 team.  That is a HUGE difference.

ahitisahit - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 01:10 PM EDT (#167487) #
I agree with most of what was said, but there was no mention of John Gibbons getting the axe. I'm not sure the players respect him, and they sure as hell didn't want to play for him last week. I don't know who they would get. He challenged 2 players to fights last season.
Ryan Day - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 01:10 PM EDT (#167489) #

The Red Sox aren't necessarily going to be this good all year. A DL stint or two for Shilling or Papelbon wouldn't be a huge shock, and Beckett isn't a sure thing. (On the other hand, they've gotten this far without substantial contributions from Manny, Drew, and Lugo). And who knows what the Yankees will look like by mid-season - maybe this is the year Clemens finally loses it, and Pettite could easily join Mussina on the DL.

It doesn't look good, of course, but it ain't over 'til it's over.

GregJP - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 01:25 PM EDT (#167490) #
I laugh when someone says "the players didn't want to play for him last week"

OK, so let's say as an example that player A doesn't really like Gibbons and/or doesn't respect him.

So when said player comes to the plate does he think "I hate that Gibbons, so I'm not even trying to get a hit"  That is just absurd. 

I think the manager of a baseball team has much less effect on a teams overall performance than most people think.

Gitz - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 01:38 PM EDT (#167491) #
<i>I think the manager of a baseball team has much less effect on a teams overall performance than most people think.</i>

You know, I used to think this, too. (And actually, I suspect most people think managers and coaches don't have much influence on a player's performance.) But years and years spent watching Dusty Baker (seemingly) motivate some pretty mediocre SF teams made me wonder. I think BP did something about all the players who had career years playing for Baker, both on the Giants and Cubs, but I can't recall specific names.

While probably you're right, that managers and coaches are only as good as the players they have -- and of course Baker had Bonds and Kent -- but as with so many "intangibles," simply because you can't measure it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. As you say, I can't imagine many, if any, professional baseball player consciously saying, "I'm going to stick it that chump manager and strike out four times today," but on the other hand I do think it's possible some players play harder for certain managers.
Ryan Day - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 01:45 PM EDT (#167492) #

I think it's pretty simple, really: If you're happy in your job, you'll probably work harder than if you feel underappreciated or overworked. A good manager, in any field, knows how to get the best out of his/her employees.

That said, none of us are in the dugout, and we don't know who's happy and who's not. We don't know who's trying hard and who's slacking off, and it's silly to think we can glean these things from watching a player walk back to the dugout or sit on the bench.

I'm sure some players love Gibbons, some can't stand him, and some don't care a whole lot. Frankly, it's the sort of thing that can only be evaluated from the inside.

His bullpen management, on the other hand...

Mike Green - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 01:57 PM EDT (#167493) #
on the other hand I do think it's possible some players play harder for certain managers.

...
or conversely that some players are more easily discouraged by poor management (which might be the responsibility of either the GM or the Manager or both) than others.

In the case of acquisition and utilization of pitchers, the GM, the Manager and pitching coach all play a role.  There have definitely been issues with the club this year in this regard, but sorting out who has most of the responsibility for the problems from the outsider's point of view is pretty much impossible.
Chuck - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 02:06 PM EDT (#167494) #

I'm sure some players love Gibbons, some can't stand him, and some don't care a whole lot. Frankly, it's the sort of thing that can only be evaluated from the inside.

And even if you could know that a particular player doesn't like Gibbons, that piece of information may be largely irrelevant. Brian Tallet, for instance, is a fringe major leaguer. He has to do his very best, such as it is, to succeed at a level for which he is often overmatched. Even if he detests Gibbons, he can't allow that to affect his play. And save for a handful of vets on longterm contracts, who really could? Most of these guys are too busy fighting for their careers or their next big pay day to even entertain the idea of Operation Shutdown.

John Northey - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 02:25 PM EDT (#167495) #
People keep saying it'll take a 580 record (94 wins) to make the playoffs. I think we could see a sub-90 wildcard though. Why? Because of all the solid teams.

Viewed as having shots at 90+ wins...
AL East: Boston, New York, Toronto
AL Central: Detroit, Cleveland, Minnesota, Chicago
AL West: Oakland, Anaheim

There are a lot of teams listed there. In fact, more than 1/2 the league. I could easily see them beating up on each other and a 550 team (89 wins) winning a division while another is the wild card.

As to the Jays 13-18 record lets look at May 8th 2006...
Minnesota - 13-19, went on to win the Central with 96 wins
Anaheim - 14-19, went on to win 89 games, 4 games out
Dodgers - 15-17 last in the NL West would win that division

That is just checking the most recent season. 13-18 is not a doomed position. The Twins in '06 were Santana and that was it early on. Liriano was in the pen and had a 4.24 ERA at this point. Of course, their pen saved them later but I'm sure Silva (75 ERA+), Baker (70) plus Lohse (63) and Garza (78) all getting 8 or more starts in the season didn't help. Radke (103) and Bonser (106) were decent to go with the two aces.

So, the Jays really need a couple of starters to become mediocre (AJ and Ohka best bets right now) and someone to step up (I'm betting on Janssen) to be a second ace. Accardo, Ryan (once healthy), Downs in the pen would be nice, plus League once his arm has recovered. Everyone else is just spare parts out there.

OK, I'm being an optimist but isn't that part of being a fan?
Gitz - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 03:10 PM EDT (#167496) #
... conversely that some players are more easily discouraged by poor management ...

I see that point, and every one has bad days no matter who they are, what they do, where they are, etc., but it still strikes me as unlikely that "discouragement" will lead to "deliberately not playing hard." There is no question it would be discouraging to be a Devil Ray or Royal or Pirate, but -- and perhaps this is me being naive and idealistic -- I'd like to think that the players are still giving it their all, as best as they can, every day. The same can be said when you're working for a crappy boss. You do the work, you go home, you grumble about it to anyone who will listen (read: nobody), and you hope to get the hell out as soon as you can. But deliberately doing a crappy job so your boss gets canned? That reflects on you as much as on the boss. And then some. The difference is that in sports if you're good enough you'll get another job, and probably a fat new salary, too! What a system!
Gerry - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 03:13 PM EDT (#167497) #

But years and years spent watching Dusty Baker (seemingly) motivate some pretty mediocre SF teams made me wonder.

I would throw Bobby Cox into that mix too.

Alex0888 - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 03:26 PM EDT (#167498) #
If you discount all of the injuries, then this is a winning team. You can't say the Yankees are not a good team even though they went on a 7 game losing streak. They might be the best team in the AL East if they didn't have to rely on subpar pitching.
actionjackson - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 03:26 PM EDT (#167499) #
I don't buy this whole influence of crappy management on the players line for a second. Why? Because every player out there knows that even if things get really, really bad (think Royals, Nats) there are still representatives from other organizations in the stands who might be interested in them. As Josh Towers said when he got sent down last year: "I guess I'm playing for the other 29 teams now". Being rescued from a crappy situation (not saying the Jays are in one now) should be solid secondary motivation for any player, with the primary motivation being that there isn't a professional athlete out there that can stand losing at anything. Most of them have been the best players on the best teams until they got to the professional ranks, and losing eats them up and one way to ensure continued losing is to tank it. These guys are doing their best, whether it's injuries or roster construction or poor game management or all three that are getting in the way, I would look at those three factors before I question the effort, or suggest a pro athlete is "tanking it".
Jonathan - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 03:37 PM EDT (#167500) #
I'm fast and happy to square major blame on Riccardi for the roster construction of this year.  His majro bat pickups in the offseason (Thomas) did nothing to allieve the fact the Jays are already heavily right-handed.  He has assembled a group of bench players that are not worthy of AL East play by any stretch.  Not one of his SP potential projects (thompson, Okha, Zambrano) offer real upside that can help the Jays be any more than what they have shown in the standings year after year.  While only one start under his belt this year, I have no doubt that McGowan will once again be poorly managed and then the team will truly be out of options with this once-talent at year end.  Riccardi got this job by saying he could win on the cheap; he's instead gone to be mediocre in the same way his predecessor was.  At least Ash had a solid record of drafting, which is largely responsible for the bright lights on this team today.
Newton - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 03:39 PM EDT (#167501) #

From a fan's perspective it is certainly too early to write off the season just yet, particularly given the Yankees sluggish start, but that time will be soon upon us if the Jays current performance level continues for even another couple weeks.

One suggestion I have to shake things up is to immediately move Aaron Hill to SS.   Clayton has not impressed defensively and we should be able to pick up a solid 2nd baseman via trade at minimal expense (several fell through the cracks at bargain basement prices this offseason).

To show we're serious about competing acquiring a legitimate backup corner infielder and veteran reliever would be nice as well. 

Management throwing their hands up and pleading injuries is akin to capitulation.

Mylegacy - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 03:50 PM EDT (#167502) #

Panic, is greatly overrated. We still have a shot at both the division and the wildcard (more likely). My(legacy's) 1 to 10 comments.

1. Brad Arnsberg is not a genius

Genius and baseball, words that go together like hockey and teeth. I'll stick with Brad.

 2. Can we have one lineup for a while please?

This is the time of year to experiment. I expect Hill and Lind will end up 1 and 2 or 2 and 1. Rios moves back to a power position. We'll have a dominating 1 through 7.

3. Alex Rios is not a gold glove candidate

Rios will win a gold glove, not this year, but he will...mark my words.

4. Sometimes quality does beat quantity

Quality ALWAYS beats quantity. What's new. That's why Z/T/O were Plan B.

5. What is an AL East pitcher?

Will someone PLEASE bury Dave Bush...jeeze. AL pitchers include: Halladay, Burnett, McGowan, Janssen and one of Z/T/O (or thier ilk).

6. Frank Thomas sits middle-in

No question, Frank Thomas is a tad pull happy. When the weather warms up and his old bones loosen up... his problems will give us 30 homers from June on and a 380 OBP. We can live with it, thank you very much.

7. Jason Smith has a hole in his swing

Jason Smith has a swing? News to me. Another reason to NEVER believe the spring or September.

8. Small things win ball games, the Jays are built for big things

Small things win ball games...when you don't have big things. I'll take our offense and defense over at least 26 or so of the other 30. Not bad. 

9. BJ Ryan and Brandon League's injuries are the biggest losses

Duh...like the Pope's Catholic and too much cyanide can stunt your growth - permanently!

10. This team might not be that good

No team is "THAT" good. Heck, even the Maple Leafs had a few flaws. REALISTICALLY, we can still win the wild card.

11. I add to the list - Keep the faith!

Amen!

Joanna - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 03:52 PM EDT (#167504) #

A few questions/thoughts I have:

1.Halladay,Burnett,Lilly,Meche, Chacin.  Now that is a rotation!  Oh well.

2.  Arnsberg is an interesting case.  AJ loves him dearly and says he knows him as well as anyone.  He has a great rep from his Marlin days.  However, there are some pitching issues.  AJ + his changeup = AJ win.  Therefore, maybe AJ should be told to throw his changeup until it is imprinted on his brain.  And Doc should hit him with his copy of the ABC Mental Game of Pitching. Over the head.

Rance Mulliniks' explanation of '06 Towers was the best I heard.  His theory was as such: Towers had a slight flaw in his mechanics, and left his pitches up.  He got seriously tatooed and it got in his head.  He got scared. 

So, where was the pitching coach before the guy went 1-9 and an ERA of a billion?  Jason Frasor is another one who got a little messed up.  Is it not the pitching coach's job to make sure his guys are ready to go?

3. The big problem in the pen is that no one is scary.  The other teams' offense isn't in the dugout thinking "We have to score now, because against the 7/8/9 th inning guys, it's next to impossible".  If BJ's problem all along was his elbow,  why wasn't he shut down in the spring (like AJ was last year) and would now be on the point (hopefully) of returning?  Was this a mess up?

4. Rios' benefitted from the platoon.  He needs a little ass fire.

5.  David Wells, in his book, talks about when he first came up, he'd hum the ball in there and hope for the best.  It was Mike Flannagan, Dave Steib and Jimmy Key who took him aside and taught him how to pitch.  They'd watch his outings, discuss getting inside hitters heads, how to work guys, theoretical situations (ie "How does one pitch Wade Boggs?").  Essentially talk shop. Does this exist at all on this team? 

6. Could the Aaron Hill as lead off experiment end already?

Mike Green - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 03:57 PM EDT (#167505) #
I agree, Gitz.  I doubt that players deliberately put in less than a full effort when discouraged.  My thinking is that discouragement can lead to unintentional loss of  focus. Full focus is of course important in any kind of high performance athletics.
greenfrog - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 04:05 PM EDT (#167506) #
If BJ's problem all along was his elbow,  why wasn't he shut down in the spring (like AJ was last year)

This has been bothering me too. I also want to know why BJ was still pitching after his initial meltdown in Detroit. If management knew he had an elbow problem, wouldn't that outing have confirmed that there was potentially a serious problem?
China fan - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 04:10 PM EDT (#167507) #

     Jeff Blair, in today's Globe, seems to be hinting broadly that Gibbons might be on the verge of losing his job.  His story today says the Jays need to begin winning very soon if they want to save the skipper's job.   He also quotes Paul Godfrey, who seems to be saying that he won't allow the losing streak to continue "much longer" without changes -- presumably meaning Gibbons.  And the quotes from Gibbons himself suggest that he is very fatalistic about the distinct possibility of being fired.  So, reading between the lines, I'd conclude that Gibbons is gone if the Jays don't turn it around very soon.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20070508.BLAIR08/TPStory/Columnists

DH - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 04:16 PM EDT (#167508) #

Two things have been on my mind with respect to these struggles,

A) Will JP pull off a trade? And will it be as a buyer or a seller?

The Dodgers are apparently looking for a third baseman, and while I hate to capitulate, a bounty of young players would serve this team a lot more good than a mediocre 3rd or 4th place finish with Glaus in the lineup.

B) Halladay's last outing - ESPN notes that his velocity was down. Can anyone report?

laketrout - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 04:27 PM EDT (#167509) #

With League it is hard to have an opinion because no one knows what really went wrong. If he did lift weights during the off season and added too much muscle to his arm I think it is insane that no one from the Jays was monitoring his off season regiment and advising him.

I thought I had read that League had pulled/sprained/maybe torn his rotator cuff while paddling his surf board in the off season.  They did an MRI at the time on it and determined he didn't need surgery; instead he needed to rest it and strengthen the shoulder.  He then, as it seems with no supervision, built up too much muscle and that combined with not throw for months took about 10mph off his fastball.  (I've searched for a link but I'm coming up empty).

With the whispers that he may need surgery leads one to think that the rotator cuff injury did not heal and his stay on the DL has more to do with the injury than any reconditioning he did over the winter.

Whatever the truth is, Riccardi’s not saying.  Maybe League should think about taking up a knuckleball pitch...

Ryan Day - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 04:28 PM EDT (#167510) #

This has been bothering me too. I also want to know why BJ was still pitching after his initial meltdown in Detroit. If management knew he had an elbow problem, wouldn't that outing have confirmed that there was potentially a serious problem?

 Do you mean against Tampa? His first game against Detroit was fine: A hit and a walk along with 2 Ks. In his second outing (April 6), he coughed up three runs against Tampa, but then he came back the next night with a perfect inning for the save. He pitched another perfect inning against KC on the 11th, then lost it against the Tigers on the 14th and went on the DL. So even if it's maybe a little problem after that first loss, he came back with two strong games.

 It's easy to second guess, but unless B.J. announces that he was hurting real bad but Gibbons made him pitch anyway, it's hard to say it was definitely the wrong move. If B.J. finishes spring training and says he's feeling fine, do you shut him down just in case? In hindsight, yes, but it's a tough decision to make.

Mark - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 04:37 PM EDT (#167512) #
Coming into the year the Jays had to stay healthy to compete. They absolutely could not afford to lose Halladay, Burnett, Ryan or Glaus. The only position an injury might have been overcome was outfield/1B/ DH because of Lind.
The loss of Glaus for two weeks hurt but the loss of Ryan was/is decimating to the team. Even if League was healthy it would still be tough to overcome.

Without Ryan (or someone stepping up to be a lights out closer) the Jays will lose a lot of ball games. When the Jays lose their other deficiencies are exposed. Considering the two blown saves he had when he pitched and the 4 (or 5?) since he has been out there could be a 6 game difference in W/L.
They could easily be 18-13 instead and we wouldn't be talking about their porous bench, the problem at short and the inconsistency in the #2-5 spots in the rotation.

It is not just specific with the Jays either. It was Paplebon's injury last year that killed the Red Sox and dropped them to third.

I think firing Gibbons is probably the wrong move. And I think JP constructed a very good MLB team. I think the blame has to go to the direction JP took with the scouting and drafting. Aside from Lind the minors are disgustingly thin on + MLB talent. In 250 rounds of drafting over 5 years Hill, Lind, Bush Marcum, Janssen and Snider is not good enough. Especially when you consider how strong our minors and draft record was when he took over. It was the one area of the team that didn't need fixing. Of course he felt otherwise.
greenfrog - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 05:01 PM EDT (#167514) #
In his second outing (April 6), he coughed up three runs against Tampa

Yes, that's the game I was thinking of. He gave up 3 runs and 5 hits in 2/3 of an inning. If I'm the GM, and my closer was just shut down in spring training because of an elbow injury, that outing is a huge red flag.

It's easy to second guess

Um, isn't that what fans do? Besides, it's hard to first-guess when the GM lies about the nature of the player's injury.
DH - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 05:24 PM EDT (#167516) #
GregJP - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 07:35 PM EDT (#167518) #
Pathetic, just pathetic.  This is a complete and utterly embarrassing.

We "fans" can figure out that Zambrano in the rotation is a horrible idea, but the "general manager" can't.  Truly unbelievable.

DH - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 07:40 PM EDT (#167519) #

And Josh Towers did exactly what to be pulled from the rotation?

Glevin - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 08:04 PM EDT (#167521) #
I think all the problems come down to #10. The Jays just aren't that good. They were a team that needed everything to go right to win and very rarely does everything go right. This team just isn't a contender even with Ryan healthy. Their starting pitching is just awful.
robertdudek - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 08:09 PM EDT (#167522) #
I never second guess.

Roughly 90% of the Box faithful thought it was a bad idea the minute Towers was pulled from the rotation in favour of Zambrano. It was really more than that - it was ... shock ... dismay .... incredulity.

Ryan Day - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 08:13 PM EDT (#167523) #
And Josh Towers did exactly what to be pulled from the rotation?

 Well, he's given up 34 hits, including 6 homers, 2 triples, and three doubles (that's a .518 SLG against) in just 28 innings.

Victor Zambrano clearly isn't the answer, but Towers hasn't done much to prove he belongs in the rotation, either.
GregJP - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 08:16 PM EDT (#167524) #
So what does that say when the vast majority of us thought it was about as good a decision as the Nationals calling up Tony Batista today, and the general manager doesn't get something that obvious?

I realize that he wants to showcase players for trading purposes, blah, blah,, blah.....but it was plain and simple a stupid decision.

Mike Green - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 08:24 PM EDT (#167527) #
It might be an idea to let Marcum pitch 3 or 4 innings tonight. Stretch him out a little. Just in case.
John Northey - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 08:26 PM EDT (#167528) #
Oh my gawd.  I thought GregJP was joking when he said Washington called up Tony Batista.  They actually did though!  That just blows my mind.  A guy who looked done before he went to Japan a few years ago and then did nothing to disprove it last year is now playing for a team which has no playoff shot and which should be playing youngsters. 

Every time we think things are bad here just go look at the ex-Expos.  Brrrrr.

Ryan Day - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 08:50 PM EDT (#167530) #
So what does that say when the vast majority of us thought it was about as good a decision as the Nationals calling up Tony Batista today, and the general manager doesn't get something that obvious?

It says that he made a stupid mistake, as just about every GM tends to do at one time or another? Tony Batista, speak of the devil, managed to play in 50 games (178 AB) for the Twins last year, putting up a triumphant line of 236/303/388, yet I still think Terry Ryan is a pretty bright guy. Heck, Ryan even tried to squeeze whatever juice was left out of Ruben Sierra, to fairly predictable results.
the mick - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 10:10 PM EDT (#167531) #
I think J.P. has reached his expiry date.  I know it's easy to bail when the team is on a losing streak but the Jays, six years later, do not have a demonstrably better minor league system, have gone back to a higher payroll, and seem rudderless.  Gibby was hired and retained because of J.P.'s longtime relationship with him, and loyalty is a lovely thing, but was Gibby the best man for the job?  Gibby's almost sure to be fired while J.P. seems to have Godfrey's blessing.  I think Bryan Colangelo is an example of what a GM can do to turn around a team.  J.P. hasn't had that level of competition since he arrived in TO but, by comparision, he's looking mighty ineffective right now.
ayjackson - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 10:33 PM EDT (#167532) #
Bryan Colangelos are few and far between.
timpinder - Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 10:45 PM EDT (#167533) #

Marcum goes 2 innings, Janssen goes 1 inning.  Why aren't they being stretched out?  I would feel a lot better with a rotation of Halladay, Burnett, McGowan, Janssen and Marcum.  Zambrano just looks ridiculous.  Ohka doesn't seem much better. 

Accardo, Downs, Frasor, Tallet, Ohka, Towers and somebody else like Gronk, Thorpe or Thomson I could stomach until Ryan and League get back. 

The bullpen would be weak until Ryan and League came back, but in my opinion the best pitchers should be starting and getting the most innings.

 

deep dish - Wednesday, May 09 2007 @ 12:24 AM EDT (#167539) #

http://deadspin.com/sports/good-thing-they-didn.t-schedule-this-on-bat-day/turn-your-head-order-a-beer-and-cough-258574.php

These aren't far behind in Toronto if the team keeps playing like this.  Ah, Gord Ash - never has one's image rehabilitated so quickly as yours has these last few weeks.  Here is another reason.

 

VBF - Wednesday, May 09 2007 @ 12:27 AM EDT (#167540) #
This is embarassing. As a unemployed University Student, usually I'd do whatever I could to get the money to take the GO Bus downtown because I felt that the team at least had some amount of dignity about them. I don't have the motivation to find ways to get downtown. Until I get a job, this team doesn't deserve my attendance.

Putting Zzzzzambrano out there for the 42,000 people that showed up was an embarrassment. The offense didn't help the situation.

We're not afraid to throw McGowan against one of the most lethal lineups in baseball but we're protecting him from the Red Sox. Does this make any sense? The guy is going to go over a week without throwing a pitch. What is wrong with these people?

I feel especially betrayed by Ricciardi. There's alot of people who stuck to his plan and believed in him. Now he's accepting zero responsibility while trotting out the same excuses he always has been. Enough is enough.

The sad thing is that Ricciardi and Godfrey seem to be packaged and Godfrey is really close to Rogers. The day that Rogers feels the need to fire Godfrey and therefore Ricciardi will be the day that they have lost hope in the franchise. And that's big, big trouble.

FREE PAUL DEPODESTA FROM UNEMPLOYMENT!

robertdudek - Wednesday, May 09 2007 @ 02:13 AM EDT (#167547) #
Okay,

I'm founding the DePodesta for Jays GM movement as of now. Then we can get a REAL "moneyballesque" approach to the franchise instead of the fake we've had the last few years.

And if I may address Mr. DePodesta directly... I work cheap.


Eric Purdy - Wednesday, May 09 2007 @ 03:04 AM EDT (#167550) #
FREE PAUL DEPODESTA FROM UNEMPLOYMENT!

DePo managed to alienate pretty much every person in the Dodger front office during his time there. Nobody wants to work for the man. Now if you want to be starting a Chris Antonetti campaign, I'm on-board.
BallGuy - Wednesday, May 09 2007 @ 05:47 AM EDT (#167553) #

One thing I know is that the Gilmore Girls Series Finale is on May 15. No more Lorelai. No more Rory. No more witty repartee. I know the "Girls" are a fave here at the Box and have been a topic of discussion and celebration in the past.

It will be a sad day.

Perhaps some sort of tribute is in order.

JustinD - Wednesday, May 09 2007 @ 07:36 AM EDT (#167554) #
Zambrano should not start another game for this team...I like that Towers was taken out of the rotation because he gave up too many homers. Is FOUR from Zambrano in one game, something Towers didn't do this year, enough to be taken out of the rotation????

And why the hell did Gibby burn through the pen in last nights game? It was way over, why didnt Towers come in and mop up? Probably saving him to come in today and mop up for Ohka?

The two biggest blows to this team were to Ryan and League. Put those two in the pen and then Janssen and Marcum could both be starting. Oh to have Halladay, Burnett, McGowan, Janssen and Marcum. That at least shows promise, that has potential for improvement. I am on strike from the Jays as well now until

1) Gibbons or Riccardi is fired
2) Just one of Janssen or Marcum is starting and Zambrano is banished.

Those arent crazy demands

laketrout - Wednesday, May 09 2007 @ 08:13 AM EDT (#167555) #

And why the hell did Gibby burn through the pen in last nights game? It was way over, why didnt Towers come in and mop up? Probably saving him to come in today and mop up for Ohka?

Even my 95 year grandma who has been watching baseball for 70 years commented the Gibbins is trying to out-manage the players.

DH - Wednesday, May 09 2007 @ 08:36 AM EDT (#167557) #

I would imagine a sweep to the Sox would leave to some major changes - notably in the rotation.

Marcum and Janssen both showed enough last year to merit another shot. Zambrano evidently needs to work on his stuff and velocity. He's got a cheap option year for 2008 though so I can't imagine he'd be released. A rotation with the three youngsters in it would offer up some hope for the future, and Ohka might even net a return in a trade. I believe Rosenthal at ESPN said as much in his latest rumour round up. Unfortunately next year's free agent crop isn't that promising so giving Marcum, McGowen and Janssen full time shots might be the best the Jays can do.

Thus, it might be time to blow things up. The offensive core is fine but glaring holes and a lack of minor league depth cries for a shakeup. Glaus, Chacin, Ohka, Clayton, should all be playing elsewhere come September. I hesitate to include Glaus but his hot bat/decent defence might be enough to spur either the Dodgers or Angels to pony up.

GregJP - Wednesday, May 09 2007 @ 11:11 AM EDT (#167566) #
I was going to say that Clayton has zero trade value and should probably retire at the end of the year, but as we speak Tony Batista is wearing a major league uniform. 

If I was a season ticket holder and Zambrano was starting on Sunday I just wouldn't attend the game.  The organization should be embarrassed about what happened last night in front of 40 000+ fans and a nation wide viewing audience.

timpinder - Wednesday, May 09 2007 @ 11:28 AM EDT (#167572) #

DH,

I would be alright with trading Glaus because of his injury history and 2009 player option, BUT a major league ready 3B would have to come back in the deal since the Jays don't have a replacement for Glaus (Santos is having a nice year and could be moved to 3B, but he's certainly not proven and hasn't even hit in AAA yet).  If a SS or 2B came back, Hill could move to 3B with Adams taking over at 2B, but it would have to be one heck of a deal, such as Brandon Wood coming to Toronto. 

Also, I don't think signing a good free-agent pitcher this off-season would be an option anyway.  I've looked at the budget at "hardballdollars", and with arbitration increases the Jays' 2008 budget should be over $90 million already, even if the Jays don't pick up a single player.  No, it seems any improvements will come from within or via trade.  Another reason why it's time to see McGowan, Janssen and Marcum get regular starts, and I'll cross my fingers on Purcey and Romero.  And speaking of trades, I don't think the likes of Towers, Clayton, Ohka, McDonald or Thomson will net the Jays anything of value.

DH - Wednesday, May 09 2007 @ 12:06 PM EDT (#167581) #

Tim - indeed, any deal would be contingent on getting a MLB ready left side infielder, as well as a potential starter. Both of the LA teams happen to flush with them. Dodgers with Laroche and Abreu (who has also played 2b and SS), and the Angels with any combination of Izturis, Aybar, McPherson, and Wood. Schmidth's return from injury might also loosen up the Dodgers to dealing from their rotation or Billingsley from the 'pen. The Angels is well documented.

But heck if that falls through next years free agent crop includes John Thompson, Tomo Okha ... oh wait.

But regardless the Jays need some guys who can go 6 innings - Marcum and perhaps Geremi Gonzalez might be inline for a call soon enough - only problem being a space on the 40man for GG.  

the mick - Wednesday, May 09 2007 @ 12:12 PM EDT (#167582) #
I'm no DePo fan but Tony LaCava is highly regarded as a GM candidate.  I think I'd rather see him running things, especially with the upcoming draft and the batch of picks the Jays have, instead of JP and his unsuccessful track record.  A lot of people at Da Box were crying for Maybin and we ended up with Romero.  And while Colangelo's are rare, they are out there.  Dombrowski did all right by the Tigers methinks.
China fan - Wednesday, May 09 2007 @ 01:34 PM EDT (#167590) #
  Gonzalez has a 2.78 ERA and 25 strikeouts (vs. 11 walks) in 22.2 innings in Syracuse.  He also looked good in spring training.   I'd give him a try on the major-league roster.   Finding a spot for him on the 40-man roster should not be a problem.  As discussed in previous days, there are several individuals on the 40-man that could be dropped without too much risk of losing them.
robertdudek - Wednesday, May 09 2007 @ 07:55 PM EDT (#167636) #
Apropos of nothing ...

I remember when Dombrowski was ridiculed in some quarters for signing Pudge Rodriguez after one of the worst seasons in history (why are they signing this veteran when they are so many years from contending? and similar sentiments).

I guess it wasn't such a dumb idea.


AWeb - Wednesday, May 09 2007 @ 09:21 PM EDT (#167651) #
The organization should be embarrassed about what happened last night in front of 40 000+ fans and a nation wide viewing audience.

Well, at least tonight, there aren't 40,000 in the stands. But there is another country watching in. If the Jays don't get back into this one, I'd start worrying if I were Gibbons (and maybe JP). Losing is one thing, but the in last 8 games to this point, it's 54-20 for the other guys. Embarassing losses and getting killed like this will quickly drive away viewers and fans, and it's a bottom line business. Something "might have to be done" to show the public (not people at Da Box, we follow anyway, although even a few here have bailed) that it won't be tolerated. Can't Gibbons at least pick a bad call and get in a huge argument about it, or something, to try and wake this team up?

Note: above statements null and void if Jays actually come back and win game tonight.

Eric Purdy - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 01:13 AM EDT (#167674) #
The critics of the Rodriguez signing have been correct, Robert. Pudge had a fabulous '04 with the Tigers, but he hasn't really come close to earning his money since then. The Magglio Ordonez contract is also one of the worst in baseball.

Four Seamer - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 09:26 AM EDT (#167679) #

The critics of the Rodriguez signing have been correct, Robert. Pudge had a fabulous '04 with the Tigers, but he hasn't really come close to earning his money since then. The Magglio Ordonez contract is also one of the worst in baseball.

I guess it's practically a miracle then that the Tigers won the American League pennant.  Thank goodness that isn't a problem the Jays have to deal with. 

the mick - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 10:07 AM EDT (#167680) #
The Star has a disturbing side column about losing streaks and how that team has fared at the end of the season.  The best the Jays could hope for, based on the past, is a season of 78-84.  The other finishes are even worse.  While the players and management will say the right thing, how the season is not lost, how it's played one game at a time, the Jays under J.P. have not, to my recollection, been a team to put together long winning streaks - it's definitely what held them back last year.  With a lost season and a huge payroll, Mr. Godfrtey best look at the two men at the top and what they have not done.  J.P. stuck by Gibby despite last year's embarrassments with Hillenbrand and Lilly, and J.P. assembled this team and has run the drafts since 2002.  It's five years later, the team is not demonstrably better, and the increase in television ratings will fade if this season turns even worse, and fans will stay away, creating a perfect storm of financial ugliness for Rogers.  A change must be made.
AWeb - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 11:02 AM EDT (#167686) #
It's five years later, the team is not demonstrably better.

I think this is the thing that might be starting to dawn on a lot of us. The minor leagues have not been restocked to any notable degree (middling at best), the minor league pitchers haven't panned out at all, only a few hitters have made it,  they're spending money and not getting great return, and are saddled with a few longterm contracts that could get ugly.

Oh, and they've lost 8 games in a row, dropped 9.5 games back in May, and don't appear to have any life in them at all lately.  Bravo, JP...Bravo.
Eric Purdy - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 06:00 PM EDT (#167756) #
I guess it's practically a miracle then that the Tigers won the American League pennant. Thank goodness that isn't a problem the Jays have to deal with.

I'm not saying that Dombrowski is a lousy GM. He's obviously done a good job with building a solid pitching & defense team that suits their home park very well. I just don't think he's any team's savior.

Eric Purdy - Thursday, May 10 2007 @ 06:09 PM EDT (#167760) #
Hmmm, I'm not quite happy with the way I worded that at the end there. What I really mean is that he's not infallible. He's done more than enough good things with that organization to be deserving of a ton of credit. I'd rather have him here than Ricciardi. It just irked me that Robert was pointing to the Pudge signing as one of his strong points. That's a little bit preposterous.
Ten Things I Think | 80 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.