Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
So what to talk about? Jays are kind of stuck right now waiting on Teoscar, Santander, and Burnes to make up their minds as to who they go to, and maybe waiting on Bregman as well

So for fun, who are some oddballs at different positions over the years? Using the Lahman database and lowest percentage of games played at any one position...
  • C: Carlos Delgado - 2 games out of 1423 in Toronto played at C
  • 1B: Damaso Garcia - 1 game out of 902 played was at 1B
  • 2B: George Bell - 1 game out of 1181 here was played at 2B (plus 8 at 3B)
  • 3B: Pat Borders - 1 game out of 747 was at 3B, plus 1 at 2B as well
  • SS: Brett Lawrie - 1 game out of 345 was at SS
  • OF: Manuel Lee - 1 game out of 753 was in the OF
  • P: Ryan Goins - 1 game out of 448 was on the mound
There were guys with just 1 game at catcher (Tom Lawless for example, plus Mike & Ken Macha, 1 game at C each - the two are unrelated) but none played over 1000 games here.

Always love oddities like that. Useful if you are playing Immaculate Grid and they have a Jays slot open.

Sigh. If only Burnes or Teoscar could just make up their minds and get things moving again. The Vlad watch is dull as it gets - Jays offered $340 mil over 10, he wants $500+ over whatever.
Fresh Thread | 236 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
pooks137 - Tuesday, December 24 2024 @ 10:28 AM EST (#454790) #
I remember John Gibbons starting Troy Glaus at SS for 8 games in 2006 to try to go all-out offense when starting flyball pitchers.

The Jays were otherwise running out sub .600 John McDonald for most of the year.

Troy had played 10 games at SS as a younger giant for the Angels, but never started.

I don’t recall any horrors and remember he didn't see much traffic there.

BBRef says he even finished 3 games there.
pooks137 - Tuesday, December 24 2024 @ 10:30 AM EST (#454791) #
Glaus' line at SS in 2006:

55.1 innings, 18 assists, 5 putouts, 2 DPs, 0 errors.
lexomatic - Tuesday, December 24 2024 @ 10:37 AM EST (#454792) #
Saw some translation of recent Guerrero Jr interview on Twitter, and not at all sure there's a relationship to repair there. It feels inevitable that he will be traded/ leave.
I don't see a way to succesfully thread the needle. Even winning & letting people leave (and falling back 2026) feels like it will have huge repercussions for years. FO is in a corner holding paint & brushes.
soupman - Tuesday, December 24 2024 @ 01:37 PM EST (#454793) #
Russ Martin played SS with the Jays, and Pitched - we know this, but he also played a game in RF with the Pirates, and he had innings at 2B/3B throughout his career.

RE: the Vlad situation - I read the comments. I think it is entirely like that his price probably looks like a "F off price" to the front office. He spoke publicly about Atkins not showing up to his arb hearing, about the way the team went after Ohtani and Soto compared to how they've dealt with him including being blunt with him about coming to camp fat and out of shape among other things. So, like lexomatic said: this is a corner they painted themselves into.

Gonna be weird seeing another player the Jays developed go into the Hall with a non-Jays cap.
bpoz - Tuesday, December 24 2024 @ 01:47 PM EST (#454794) #
That is accurate soupman. Being out of shape was Vlad's fault but the FO has to take some blame for other things.
ISLAND BOY - Tuesday, December 24 2024 @ 03:18 PM EST (#454795) #
I saw excerpts from the same interview as lexomatic and Vlad's asking price went up after each of the Ohtani and Soto deals. He also stated that he was dealing with personal and emotional issues in 2022 and 2023. I know his mother was very sick during the 2023 season so that weighed on him.

It seemed like there was a more mature version of Vlad last year, still having fun but also more focused. I was in the "sign him at all costs camp" but now I also wonder if a huge contract to him would cripple the team down the road. Besides seeing the youngsters perform, Vlad was the only reason to watch the Jays at times last year. I am conflicted now about what is the best strategy going forward regarding him now.
John Northey - Tuesday, December 24 2024 @ 04:45 PM EST (#454796) #
Looking at past Jay star 1B (Delgado, Olerud, McGriff, Fielder) you can see that odds are Vlad will produce around 30-40 more WAR over his career, which sounds fantastic but for $500 mil? Is it worth it?

Vlad is at 17.0 fWAR right now through age 25. Let's look at guys within 5 of that (12-22) through age 25. You get 261 players all-time from Yasiel Puig to Robin Yount. Of those 261 the best post age 25 was Mike Schmidt with 87.1 to go (wow). Cut out active guys (such as Bo) and we are down to 242 players.
  • Below 0 WAR: 5 (Ruben Sierra, Carlos Baerga, etc.)
  • 0-9.9 fWAR: 61 (Pablo Sandoval, Ellis Valentine, Tony Kubek, Yasiel Puig, Adam Dunn, Delino DeShields, Mike Greenwell, etc.)
  • 10-29.9 fWAR: 100 (Willie Horton, Travis Fryman, Nick Markakis, Prince Fielder, Nomar Garciaparra, Bill Mazeroski, Troy Glaus, Rick Monday, Don Mattingly, Troy Tulowitzki, many others)
  • 30-49.9 fWAR: 61 (Robin Ventura, Keith Hernandez, Andre Dawson, John Olerud, Fred McGriff, Dave Winfield, Ernie Banks, Gary Carter, etc.)
  • 50+ fWAR: 15 (Willie McCovey, Rod Carew, Jeff Bagwell, Brooks Robinson, Chipper Jones, Carl Yastrzemski, Mike Schmidt, Joe Morgan, etc.)
Basically you get 30+ after age 25 and you are a HOF or damn close to it after a solid start like Vlad has had. Didn't expect as clear a bell curve as we got with this. The 10-30 range is clearly the odds on area to end up, with equal odds of being sub 10 to being 30-50 range. If the Jays do a 15 year deal they are betting on the 30+, ideally 50+ fWAR from Vlad (but 50+ being unlikely). Prince Fielder is the guy most look to as a 'oh crap' for the Jays but it is unlikely Vlad would also get C4-C5 herniations in his neck (that is what ended Fielder's career).

So, imo, from a pure baseball POV signing Vlad for a 15/$500 deal is risky and I'd hesitate to do it. From a PR POV it is a no-brainer to do it. Would a $34 mil a year loss should Vlad get hurt or become ineffective kill the Jays? No, but it would hurt (around 15% of the budget). The longer the Jays wait the more expensive it has become. Well past time to just bite the bullet and sign him.
pooks137 - Wednesday, December 25 2024 @ 01:02 AM EST (#454797) #
There were also those two infamous games in 1988 with Jimy "One M" Williams on May 2nd against Seattle and May 5th against Oakland where Kelly Graber & Cecil Fielder were switched back & forth depending on batter handedness.

This bizarre experiment gave a young, 24 y/o pre-Japan Cecil Fielder his two career games at 2B.
dalimon5 - Wednesday, December 25 2024 @ 02:29 AM EST (#454798) #
If he wants to be here and will take a fair market deal or less then sign him. If he feels no obligation to stay here besides the money then trade him as you won't be able to resign him without overpaying. He was terrible to decent in '22 and '23.
vw_fan17 - Wednesday, December 25 2024 @ 02:13 PM EST (#454799) #
Nice list, John. What if you filter by position? How many in each group were pure 1B for their entire career? Not players moved to 1B as they aged and their skills deteriorated to 1B levels? Prince Fielder is one, IIRC.
If that list has like 3 names on it, then you have to wonder if Vlad is one if the best 3 or 4 1Bmen ever - and my guess is there are almost none in the top tier.
vw_fan17 - Wednesday, December 25 2024 @ 02:17 PM EST (#454800) #
Sorry, couldn't look at the list while posting. I see McGriff and Olerud in the second tier. How were their DRS values (or DWAR) compared to Vlad?
I.e. can you be "elite" while a net negative in the field?
lexomatic - Wednesday, December 25 2024 @ 03:47 PM EST (#454801) #
I had a nightmare the Jays let Guerrero Jr walk as FA and sign Arraez to replace him for the Atkins hit tool fetish
John Northey - Wednesday, December 25 2024 @ 05:38 PM EST (#454802) #
Excellent question on defense. Olerud ranks worse than I remember him - he always looked good in the field and didn't have a -10 until age 33 but no wow figured until post Toronto. McGriff was thought of as a butcher in the field, a -12 at 23 supports that, and a lot worse as he aged. Delgado was also ugly on defense with 3 years at -10 or worse by 25. Vlad is worse though with a -20 and a few -10s despite the gold glove.
bpoz - Thursday, December 26 2024 @ 10:09 AM EST (#454803) #
IMO the O of Olerud, McGriff, Delgado and Vlad contributed a lot to the success of the team. The D & O of T Fernandez, R Alomar and K Gruber also contributed a lot to the success of the team. I expect the D of Varsho and Gimenez to contribute going forward.
soupman - Thursday, December 26 2024 @ 02:33 PM EST (#454804) #
I wonder how much of Vlad’s struggles are self inflicted. He chewed through several gloves which led to errors in routine throws. He makes a lot of ill advised throws. I think he’s at least average scooping balls in - my eye suggests that the same issues are present in his running…he’s not as slow as he looks but he’s not as fast as he thinks.

If he could just be league average - something that seems entirely within his power to do - he’d be a much more complete player. I was not at all convinced he had the makeup or drive to do that until last year. It will be interesting to see what happens. Given the Jays are a ship without a rudder if he leaves I think it would be difficult to let him walk despite the obvious risks. At the same time I think watching this front office work without a perennial mvp and with the draft lottery preventing full scale tanking as a strategy will also provide more insight as to their “true talent”
BlueJaysLifer - Friday, December 27 2024 @ 08:47 AM EST (#454805) #
I guess the answer to this question is if you believe a management team that has been atrocious at drafting, can draft elite talent?
The next management team for this club will have a ton of work to do. But at least there is be plenty of payroll to use.
pooks137 - Friday, December 27 2024 @ 09:04 AM EST (#454806) #
But at least there is be plenty of payroll to use.

No guarantees that future Jays teams in the wilderness remain a luxury tax team.

The Canadian dollar recently dipped below 70 cents. There's also recent halo effects from the 2020-2023 playoff teams and the mini-renovations.

Shapiro always prefaced that payroll reflects revenue. That the money had to be there first.

If weekday attendance returns to the 10k level, the Jays may no longer be allowed to spend like a Top 10-15 club anymore.

Gerry - Friday, December 27 2024 @ 10:45 AM EST (#454807) #
Gleyber Torres to the Tigers on a one year $15M deal.
dalimon5 - Friday, December 27 2024 @ 11:14 AM EST (#454808) #
I don't expect the Jays to be a top payroll team in the future without someone at the FO like Shapiro who can ensure growth and income to cover the payroll increases.
ISLAND BOY - Friday, December 27 2024 @ 11:24 AM EST (#454809) #
" Shapiro always prefaced that payroll reflects revenue."


It's a bit of whether the chicken or egg came first. His idea is that if revenue goes down, then payroll will be cut, but, of course, if you maintain or increase payroll you hopefully will have a better team and more revenue from increased attendance.

There's also a vicious cycle where team owners want more revenue so customers are gouged where ever they turn: tickets, concessions, parking, team apparel, etc., then players see the owners making more money and want a share. The owners say salaries have gone up and then increase prices yet again. There is an NBA owner who recently decreased the price of everything sold in the concession stands in his arena to $2.00 across the board. It's too bad there weren't more like him.
dalimon5 - Friday, December 27 2024 @ 01:49 PM EST (#454810) #
For anyone criticizing the Gimenez deal, all I have to say is ... your argument got a lot stronger after the Tigers signing of Torres today.
Michael - Friday, December 27 2024 @ 04:09 PM EST (#454811) #
Cheap concessions are good, but the Jays already have loonie dog deals as one form of that. More are nice, but we have some.
John Northey - Friday, December 27 2024 @ 06:04 PM EST (#454812) #
Torres was a heck of a deal - $15 mil for a guy FanGraphs projects at 2.8 fWAR for 2025. But, he was a 1.7 last year, but a 3.6 the year before. A negative on defense his value is almost all in his bat (-11 DRS last year at 2B, -14 lifetime at 2B, so his fielding really collapsed last year). Giménez is all glove +20 DRS last year, +58 lifetime at 2B, but did have that 'wow' year in '22 with a 141 wRC+. Projected at 3.5 bWAR, Cot's has him at $15.2 mil for CBT purposes (some dispute on that, could be $19.4).

Just waiting for the shoe to drop on Santander, Teoscar, and Burnes - the big 3 still out there. Has anyone heard rumors on other hitters the Jays might be able to chase down (non-free agents)? Bregman and Alonso are other interesting free agents, but I don't see either coming here. Profar seems a higher possibility. Ha-Seong Kim seems the type the Jays would love (all D, meh O). Get Burns and any of these guys and I'd be very, very happy. Bregman I fear will demand too many years to make any sense, Santander demanding 5 years makes me uncomfortable, heck, 3 for Teoscar isn't ideal either for that matter. But right now I think we all just want something to happen. Sadly I see a 0% chance of getting Nolan Arenado as he rejected a trade to Texas so I can't see him accepting one to Toronto.
dalimon5 - Friday, December 27 2024 @ 06:36 PM EST (#454813) #
Teoscar to LAD.
Marc Hulet - Friday, December 27 2024 @ 06:50 PM EST (#454814) #
I hear Ross Atkins is still opening his stocking so the Jays couldn't counter-offer...

I watched a lot of Dodger games in 2025 and will continue to do so in 2025 so I'm OK with this. Likely mixing in the Tigers, too... don't love the Gleyber signing (but also don't hate it)... they have some good things starting to happen there.
uglyone - Friday, December 27 2024 @ 06:54 PM EST (#454815) #
pretty confident we were runners up tho!
Gerry - Friday, December 27 2024 @ 06:56 PM EST (#454816) #
Teoscar got 3 years and $66M.
bpoz - Friday, December 27 2024 @ 07:00 PM EST (#454817) #
Happy for Teo. LAD may not be done yet.
dalimon5 - Friday, December 27 2024 @ 07:02 PM EST (#454818) #
At this point and these overpays i'd look for the best deals out there for power. Hello Alonso if nobody else wants him.
Petey Baseball - Friday, December 27 2024 @ 07:23 PM EST (#454819) #
Boy, we are really doing this again are we? Sure, it’s very possible Teo was asking for another year and/or more AAV to return to the Jays. But again, at what point do you just have to get the player because of the need, regardless of the cost?

This coupled with the Gleyber Torres news that he signed for a year…a perfect opportunity for the Jays, is not what we needed at all.






John Northey - Friday, December 27 2024 @ 07:31 PM EST (#454820) #
Sadly, not a shocker. I think we'd all have loved to get Teo back but of note is that his projection for 2025 is 1.9 fWAR (steamer) which isn't great by any means, and likely to go down for 2026/27. Emotionally he is a great fit, but logically not as much. The Dodgers are in a pure win now stage so that means they will blow whatever they need to, sigh. I miss those days in 91-93 when the Jays were willing to have the highest payroll in the game, and every free agent wanted to come here so they'd have a shot at a WS title.

Just hoping either a surprise trade happens or they get Santander, Burnes, whatever. My guess is more likely Kim (tripling down on defense), Profar (should be cheap enough as I doubt anyone buys his 'wow' year in '24), and AAAA filler. If unlimited budget then Bregman-Burnes-Santander would fill in the big holes, but we all know it isn't, so if they get one of those 3 it'll be nice.
scottt - Friday, December 27 2024 @ 07:58 PM EST (#454821) #
Torres is a bad clubhouse guy. He's a right hitting middle infielder with bad defense and a poor attitude.
He was looking for a 1 year contract to rebuild value.
No interest. 

I'm curious to see how leaving the Yankees will affect his appearance.
More facial tattoos? Maybe growing a beard like Odor? Or just wearing a dozen gold chains.
Can't wait.
Nigel - Friday, December 27 2024 @ 08:55 PM EST (#454822) #
I haven’t been posting much but have been reading. Happy holidays to all. I’ve been a little surprised at the board’s expectations that the FO was going to “do something” this offseason. The FO did nothing last offseason. If they didn’t believe in this core last offseason why on earth would they do so now? Last offseason was the inflection point. They chose against investing in the team (and that may have been the right “baseball” decision) but they just did the renos so, from a marketing perspective, a tear down was/is impossible. We’re just playing out the string until next offseason. Like 2017, they are trapped by revenue generation from starting the rebuild. And, youneverknow, so it is what it is. But “do nothing” was always the play this offseason no matter how often they say that they “were in” on Soto, Teo….
Eephus - Friday, December 27 2024 @ 09:40 PM EST (#454823) #

uglyone - Friday, December 27 2024 @ 09:46 PM EST (#454824) #
My #1 target is still on the board!

i like our chances!
Eephus - Friday, December 27 2024 @ 10:02 PM EST (#454825) #
My comment got eaten! Perhaps my analogy was too smelly. Oh well. To summarize: I don't think this front office is completely clueless, but I'm also not convinced anymore that they aren't? 

I fear they might be lost in their own valuations without seeing the critical bigger picture at this point in time for the franchise. Several people I know are already swearing they won't go to any games this year if this off-season result is similar to last year, and I doubt this is an uncommon sentiment. Angst and disdain, or apathy are not what you want from a target audience. Fingers crossed they aren't so clueless: fancy renos or not we all know that stadium gets awfully empty when the team isn't any good.  
soupman - Friday, December 27 2024 @ 10:44 PM EST (#454826) #
I said since day one of Shapiro being hired that he is too risk averse and not creative enough to win in this division. I appreciate that they tried to field an elite defensive team with great pitching. JPR tried that…with teams everyone fondly remembers as third place finishers when that didn’t net you a “postseason” spot. /s

Seems to me like “good enough” is good enough for most fans in Toronto. I don’t understand why fans don’t demand that Rogers makes this the Yankees/Dodgers of the North - but I know this is a minority opinion. I also spend more time watching other teams- Skenes’ starts are appointment viewing for me.

They aren’t going to fold the franchise. All these trams are way too valuable and MLB hasn’t even let the petro dollars in yet. As usual Rogers won’t invest in the team and told everyone it renovated out of its pocket. I’d like to see the lease, please. I’m going to go out on a limb here and suggest those were leasehold improvements they were required to make and not the largesse of RCI- a company that didn’t get to where it is by spending half a billion dollars on installing linoleum wood floors and subway tile “updates”
pooks137 - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 12:35 AM EST (#454827) #
I appreciate that they tried to field an elite defensive team with great pitching. JPR tried that…with teams everyone fondly remembers as third place finishers when that didn’t net you a “postseason” spot. /s

JPR's teams of the aughts certainly were remembered as chronic 3rd place finishers. But were they known for their elite defense?

JPR was hired initially during the second wave of the Moneyball craze, in the midst of Delgado and Shawn Green leaving town over money. JP pitched that he could win on a mid-market budget like Beane with SABR magic.

This mostly materialized as drafting safe & cheap college players like Russ Adams and Aaron Hill while sticking to MLB draft slot recommendations for signing bonuses to keep Bud Selig happy and the Canadian dollar equalization cheques coming.

When this didn't work out, Rogers and Paul Godfrey let JPR sign AJ Burnett, Corey Koskie and BJ Ryan. They also traded for Troy Glaus and Lyle Overbay, taking on more salary.

I suppose a younger Vernon Wells was probably a decent defender in CF, but poor Vernon lost a step fairly quickly after signing his monster 7/127 extension. The Box complained for years that the best CF on the team was banished to RF in Alex Rios, who would later be dumped on waivers to the White Sox when his power disappeared.

Rios was considered a good defender with a great arm, but he rarely ever played CF as a Jay where it could be maximized.

Koskie was considered a decent glove at 3B, but his tenure with the Jays was injured and pretty miserable. They dumped him for nothing to the Brewers to make room for Glaus, a bat-first 3B.

Lyle Overbay was considered a good defensive 1B, but the metrics never liked him as much as the broadcasters did. He probably was hyped defensively considered he was a light-hitting 1B in the steroid era of 1B boppers.

John McDonald was great at short but didn't hit enough to keep in the lineup.

They eventually trade Glaus for Rolen, who came to town for Glaus after ?he requested a trade to get off the turf. Rolen moved north with a great defensive rep with declining offensive skills and trouble staying healthy. His D was a treat to watch, but he soon requested a trade as well leading to EE coming to town as a butcher of a 3B.

Gregg Zaun and Rod Barajas did a lot of the catching. I don't believe either was great at throwing out runners. They were mostly around because they came cheap.

The JPR Jays did have some great pitching in Halladay, Carpenter, Escobar, Burnett, Marcum, McGowan when healthy.

But I never thought of them as a great defensive club.

The Moneyball iterations on the cheap in the early aughts had bullpens all picked off the scrap heap.

The Wells-Rios-Glaus-Overbay more expensive versions that came in the later years were sort of a Texas Rangers-lite slugging teams with better pitching, but still playing too many cheaper second-division players against star-studded Yankees and Red Sox clubs in an era where only a single wildcard spot even existed.

Michael - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 01:05 AM EST (#454828) #
The Jays have had some great and good defense in the recent past and near future with Varsho, KK (past), Gimemez (future), Kirk, Clemente, Chapman (past). Really aside from Vlad and Bo everyone's pretty good defensively, and I think Vlad isn't quite as horrible to the eyes as he is to the stats - still below average, but I'm not sure when healthy he's really 10 runs a year below average at first.
uglyone - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 01:29 AM EST (#454829) #
lol Burnes to Arizona.

that was the one.

disaster offseason confirmed.
Sherrystar - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 01:46 AM EST (#454830) #
Got a good chuckle reading this. Can the rebuild start already?
soupman - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 02:42 AM EST (#454831) #
2006/7 were good defensive teams when a lot of teams were still just chasing OBP. I forget which of them had the best outfield in baseball. I think Reed Johnson was really good one year but it might just have been Wells being the key factor. As you say Rios was underrated and was consistently great in right.

Those are also the years MacDonald got lots of reps on the infield. Aaron hill was also a good defender most years.

I’ve always been convinced JPR saw defense as the market inefficiency at the time. Iirc they brought in some fly ball pitchers since Rios and Wells could run down almost anything in the air.

Reminds me of the place they’re at now for many reasons.
Jacob - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 04:14 AM EST (#454832) #

(Fantasy) Trade Thought Bubble of the Day: Offer Vlad Jr to Boston conditional on Boston working out an extentsion for Vlad (let's say $400m over 10 yrs). Jays throw in $50m reducing Boston's hit to $35m per year. Jays also send one of Jimenez, or Wagner to help the Sox with their middle infield.

In return the Jays ask for Marcelo Mayer, Tristan Casa and one of Roman Anthony and Kristian Campbell.

Then take the Vlad savings and plunge it (and more) into signing Bregman and Jack Flaherty. Of course, those two will also be off the board by the time the F.O. get back from their Christmas break.

Jays get their rebuild going with a 1B replacement, a top prospect at 2B or SS to pair with Gimenez, and a top tier OF prospect. By signing Bregman and Flaherty they still have a fun team to watch in 2025 and 2026. This also makes three positions less expensive for a few years.

Red Sox get Vlad and Devers back-to-back in their line-up and get a decent MI to go with Story. They keep Raffaela and have either Campbell or Anthony to foam the grass starting in 2025 or 2026.

Thought about this one before Burnes signed with AZ but might as well have some fun thinking about possibilities.
scottt - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 06:16 AM EST (#454833) #
Even if you got a good free agent cornered, if he doesn't want to come to Toronto, he can just accept a lesser offer with an opt out.
ISLAND BOY - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 08:16 AM EST (#454834) #
Burnes reportedly had higher offers from Toronto and San Francisco but took less from Arizona because of tax advantages there plus the fact that he lives in Arizona in the offseason. As said by others many times, the Blue Jays have to overpay their contracts, both in term and dollar amounts, to entice free agents to sign with them, and having a team that sucked last year is not attractive either.

I think, as a fandom, we are entering a dark, dark phase as Atkins and Shapiro maintain they were in on all the top free agents and finished a close second on many of them, forcing them to pivot to Plan B which is trading Vlad for the best defensive help available.
dalimon5 - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 09:02 AM EST (#454835) #
"disaster offseason confirmed."

Yup.

Jacob I like your proposal.

What can this FO honestly do now? Aside from trading Vlad and Bo for deals like Jacob mentions this is what I see now:

Move Vlad to 3B
Sign Alonso for 1B
Sign Santander for LF
Build monster bullpen
uglyone - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 09:27 AM EST (#454836) #
"#
Burnes reportedly had higher offers from Toronto and San Francisco but took less from Arizona because of tax advantages there plus the fact that he lives in Arizona in the offseason. As said by others many times, the Blue Jays have to overpay their contracts, both in term and dollar amounts, to entice free agents to sign with them, and having a team that sucked last year is not attractive either."


Was Burnes not aware of our new cupholders tho?
bpoz - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 10:18 AM EST (#454837) #
Not sure what disaster off season means. Maybe that expected player acquisitions did not materialize for individuals and media which I consider "speculation".

Shapiro and Atkins said nothing about what they would do this off season. If they say nothing and do nothing I consider that honest. But they still went out and acquired pitching for the pen and traded for Gimenez. IMO I consider this honest.

I personally consider "they were the runner up" to any FA to be almost impossible to prove so sort of being deceptive. Please be aware that I am not calling anyone a liar or stupid which is what AA did. ie "If you hear about it will not happen" which fulfills lying IMO. The people that believe the rumors after AA was clear about it not happening probably qualify as stupid. Sorry about the foul language "stupid & liars" but that was a very good point he made about 8-10 years ago and it has been proven each off season. I got fooled a lot so stupid me but I finally learned and I still don't know the details of what will happen. So going forward if/when I hear that the Jays are in on player X I know that player X is not coming to Toronto.
dalimon5 - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 10:23 AM EST (#454838) #
The scary thing right now is wondering where this team will be without Vlad, Bo and Bassitt next year.
uglyone - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 10:59 AM EST (#454839) #
Bpoz you might want to consider that baseball writers saying the Jays were runners up in all of these FA signings is something that blue jays management wants them to be saying and probably asks them to say it.

I.e. not honest
ISLAND BOY - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 11:26 AM EST (#454840) #
As an example, when Soto signed the Jays were said to have the next best offer but it was later revealed they were 4th, at best.
christaylor - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 11:30 AM EST (#454841) #
1. The Burnes decision sounds like the most human and understandable decision a FA could make. I've built a home in Cambridge, MA, but a lower but competitive job offer in Toronto or Hamilton would be hard to turn down.

This one is not on either the Giants or Jays FO.

2. I'm glad LA paid Teo for that contract. I've been against the idea of Santander, but some have projected him to be around 3/70. For rough equal AAV, Santander is a better value.

3. Torres to the Tigers for a cheap pillow doesn't change one of the key features of the Gimmenez deal: he's SS insurance for the likely outcome that Bo is not a Jay in 2026. It says the most about what they think of any internal SS options (including Nimmala).

For all the talk of desperate Blue Jays, I'm glad the front office hasn't done anything that reads as desperate, which is good.

I wonder what is being offered to the Jays in exchange for Vlad, especially after he's started negotiating via the media. I'd wager it's much less than people on this site suspect.

The roll the dice on 2025 and trade at the deadline, if they're not competitive, makes a lot of sense. Sure, it's not exciting, but Gillick had many not-very-exciting years that were good decisions.

I hope the FO has tried the strategy of offering contracts with opt-outs after years 1 and/or 2 with their offers. Maybe they have, and it's not worked, but it's a no-brainer with the uncertainty around 2025 and an underwhelming 2025 FA class.
christaylor - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 11:41 AM EST (#454842) #
Island Boy: The straightforward explanation is that the first reports were mere rumors, and more information was leaked.

uglyone: if I'm a reporter, wouldn't the bigger story would be being asked to lie? That's a scoop. We're familiar with how the front office speaks; they probably say, "We were in it until the end," and then folks leap to the conclusion that means "runners up" or the second highest offer. It's not JPR "It's not a lie if we know the truth." type stuff.

I believe the team has money, but it's wise not to blow the budget if they want to retain Vlad.

Go Leafs Go: a team that has pivoted to defense and looks all the better for it.
uglyone - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 11:45 AM EST (#454843) #
It's not being asked to lie.

I am sure they bid high. The question is whether they or the agents ever thought the bids were winners, or whether they were just leverage.
christaylor - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 12:02 PM EST (#454844) #
"blue jays management wants them to be saying and probably asks them to say it."

How is that not being asked to lie?
Nigel - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 12:15 PM EST (#454845) #
There is no chance they’re asked to lie. They will, of course, feel considerable pressure to report what their employer tell them and to paint their employer in a favourable light. As Jerry Jones recently said “what the hell am I employing these guys for otherwise?”
dalimon5 - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 12:56 PM EST (#454846) #
Everybody is wondering and waiting to see what the pivot is. No Soto, no Burnes, no commitment to core re-signing (yet). What happens next determines everything.
pooks137 - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 01:01 PM EST (#454847) #
Trade Thought Bubble of the Day: Offer Vlad Jr to Boston conditional on Boston working out an extentsion for Vlad (let's say $400m over 10 yrs). Jays throw in $50m reducing Boston's hit to $35m per year. Jays also send one of Jimenez, or Wagner to help the Sox with their middle infield.

The problem with any Vlad trade scenarios is that the receiving team has the same problem that the Jays do - there's virtually no incentive for Vlad to sign an extension presently at this point and give up the ability go to the highest bidder next winter in FA.

The only incentive for Vlad to sign an extension this point is that he specifically wants to stay in one city. Which right now, despite all the fuzzy platitudes in the media, doesn't seem to be the case.

The trade-&-sign format works better for a pending FA when it's their walk year and they are leaving a team like Oakland or Tampa with no intention whatsoever of submitting a competitive extension offer.

soupman - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 01:02 PM EST (#454848) #
Santander as a guy that can’t hit .240 would fit right in on this team.
dalimon5 - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 02:17 PM EST (#454849) #
Unless the Jays can bring two top of the order bats into the fold loke Santander and Alonso, I am walking back my thoughts on the Gimenez trade. Total bad move to improve defense, weaken offense and increase payroll.

So far vs 2024:

Offense is weaker without Horwitz and no position for Wagner to play
Pitching rotation is weaker without Kikuchi
Bullpen is about the same

This team was not competitive most nights last year either due to lack of offense or bullpen or both.
Joe - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 02:36 PM EST (#454850) #
As usual Rogers won’t invest in the team and told everyone it renovated out of its pocket. I’d like to see the lease, please. I’m going to go out on a limb here and suggest those were leasehold improvements they were required to make and not the largesse of RCI- a company that didn’t get to where it is by spending half a billion dollars on installing linoleum wood floors and subway tile “updates”
Rogers owns the SkyDome outright (but not the hotel or the land it sits on). There's no "lease" other than maybe from one Rogers subsidiary to another.

I simply don't get how people can criticize current ownership for "not investing." Criticize them for whatever else you like, but in the past 4 seasons the Jays have been in the top half of spending, and the past 2 have been top 10.

One thing that Shapiro can be unambiguously commended on: he's convinced Ed to substantially open the pursestrings.

uglyone - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 02:43 PM EST (#454851) #
"How is that not being asked to lie?"

how is it a lie?

the jays made a bid. the jays wanted them to report the bid publicly.

there's no lie.

the question is whether they preferred to win the bid or just be seen to bid.
Joe - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 03:06 PM EST (#454852) #
there's close to zero value in being seen to bid with no intention of winning. The Blue Jays are selling to the mass market, not baseball sickos like us. why incur the cost and effort when you could just as easily do nothing and get about the same economic result (at the turnstiles/in sportsnet subscriptions)?
scottt - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 03:30 PM EST (#454853) #
That's kinda like calling me a liar because the rumours about me are untrue.

This front office is quite honest. Not very candid, but quite honest.
uglyone - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 03:34 PM EST (#454854) #
so the alternative then is that they've built such an unattractive situation here in toronto that even legitimiate good faith massive dollar high bids aren't enough for anyone to want to play here.
scottt - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 03:36 PM EST (#454855) #
I am still hoping for Santander and a closer.

I think about Belt from time to time.
He was only 35. He hit for a .858 OPS from the left side.
His career OPS is .817 and yet it ended there.
Nobody was interested in him last year.
What does that say about signing a short contract in Toronto?
soupman - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 03:55 PM EST (#454856) #
Exactly. The simpler explanation is that players don't want to come here for any number of reasons, and the front office isn't willing to change their mind by offering enough money to do so.

Just look at the lineup for 2026 as it stands today:

Springer .220
Varsho .214
Gimenez .252
Kirk .253

I don't blame anyone for not signing a long term deal with this organization.
dalimon5 - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 04:23 PM EST (#454857) #
Yeah that looks absolutely pathetic.

Alonso apparently has interest now from Giants.
85bluejay - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 05:16 PM EST (#454858) #
Quality free agents will be more likely to come to teams like the Blue Jays if the team is seen as a contender (money being competitive) which the current Jays squad is not viewed as. For me, the fatal flaw of the Shapiro/Atkins tenure is their failure to acquire (via draft, IFA, trades etc.) and develop young talent - In their almost decade at the helm, only Bo really qualifies (Vlad was already in the system). The 1983-93 golden era period was populated by homegrown talent and once the team was a contender, big trades augmented the team and top free agents were more receptive to signing with a contender. The 2015-2016 teams were anchored by Bautista & Encarnacion who emerged as Jays and the terrific Donaldson trade and then augmented by trades/Free agents. I said at the time that I didn't expect the Ricciardi splash (Glaus, Ryan, Burnett) or the AA splash (Miami & Mets trades) to work because they felt like trying to force feed the team into being a contender. I don't have much of a problem with Shapiro/Atkins efforts to sign big free agents but not surprised those players are reluctant to sign with a non-contender unless it's a legacy team (Yankees, Dodgers, Red Sox etc.) or a big overpay. I really hope the next FO can acquire and develop young talent but it will likely be Edward Rogers again who's leading the search and he's more likely to be seduced by a big name than a development type leader.
uglyone - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 06:01 PM EST (#454859) #
"and the front office isn't willing to change their mind by offering enough money to do so."

...but for some reason are very willing to be very public about large "competitive" offers they likely know were never enough to change their mind.

and we know they are willing because precise details leak almost instantly after each so-called target signs with someone else.

so we're back to square one.
bpoz - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 08:16 PM EST (#454860) #
For 2026 we need more than 4 players obviously. Springer is on the decline and it is the final year of his contract. Kirk, Varsho and Gimenez are still in their prime years. The Jays will need about another 12 players. IMO the farm will produce a few that are decent. 3-5 players? So the FO needs to find another 5-7 players. I probably will do a lot of speculation.

Groundwork for 2026 speculation: 1) Will D Schneider regain some shine by midway through 2025? 2) Will Orelvis, Barger, Leo, Wagner, Roden and Kasevich do well enough in 2025 for 2026 consideration? 3) There are others like J Clase, C McAdoo and Rainer Nunez. I feel that we will still have to get something from outside the org.

I agree with 85bluejay about not force feeding the team to be a contender. Did Shapiro/Atkins force feed the 2020-2024 teams? I think they used money (surpassing luxury tax levels) to do something of that sort. They and everyone else knows that having a shot in the last week of the season is financial success. Semien was an opportunistic move that turned out really well for him and the Jays. Just like Teo no QO penalty in the 2024 off season when he signed with LAD.
Eephus - Saturday, December 28 2024 @ 11:14 PM EST (#454861) #
To use a Simpsons reference... I feel like Bart in Kamp Krusty clutching a pillow and murmuring "Krusty is coming... Krusty is coming". 

My cold objective mind says: yeah Krusty ain't coming, neither are any of the obvious holes this Blue Jays team so needs to have filled. Even if they sign Santander (which I seriously doubt they will and even so I'm not a fan)... it is an absolute truth that this front office was gifted a pair of young stars that were relatively cheap, and could not win a single playoff game with them. Those are the facts.

What they do with Vlad (please extend him, his value expands beyond on the field) or Bo (who knows) at this point is secondary to the situation. They have failed thus far, and it seems like they're doubling down on a foolish hand. 
John Northey - Sunday, December 29 2024 @ 09:43 AM EST (#454862) #
Might be time to think about 'what if no one signs'.
  • C: Kirk/Heineman - decent, might even be top 10 if Kirk has a decent year.
  • 1B: Vlad - always nice.
  • 2B: Giménez - wow fielding will be fun, bat could be ugly or nice or wow, super variable expectations
  • 3B: Clement - was solid in '24, hard to predict '25. I'm hoping Barger or another kid can emerge by mid-season and take over
  • SS: Bo - was a lock for a 120's wRC+ and meh defense, but after last year is he anymore? Guess we'll find out.
  • LF: Loperfido probably gets first shot, with Schneider platooning with him and Lukes hanging around to fill in when needed. Roden has the best projection (110 wRC+) but is unlikely to start the year here
  • Varsho - wow defense, meh offense. Odds are while hurt Lukes fills in with Clase a possibility.
  • RF: Springer - hoping for a dead cat bounce that makes him attractive in a mid-season trade ala Vernon Wells all those years ago. If not we'll get OK defense, OK offense probably, around a 1-2 WAR guy now. not a nightmare but not an asset either.
  • DH: Wagner maybe? As he has nowhere on the field to play and deserves playing time. He might be tried out in the OF and 1B so Vlad and Springer can have DH time.
  • SP: Gausman-Berrios-Bassitt-Francis-Rodriguez, solid but if injuries hit oh boy. Lets hope Manoah heals quickly, or Bloss develops, or Yesavage is a super-fast learner.
  • RP: Green-Garcia-Swanson-Sandlin-Burr-Little-Pop-live body. This is the biggest question mark there is, can this motley crew be solid or at least provide good trade pieces mid-season? Guess we'll find out. Last years look rock solid going into the year and wasn't, so maybe this weak looking group will be solid? Hey, we can dream it is December.
Not a WOW by any stretch, but not a horrid team with any luck, we could be looking at the average 1994-2014 team - a club in the mid 70s-low 80's for wins, dancing around 500 most of the year threatening to be a contender but never really in it. Attendance will drop, viewership will drop, and Rogers will get pissed. I just hope if a change at the top happens that we don't get another Ash or JPR. I'd chase down the Dodgers and Rays front offices for talent.

Could be worse - we could be cheering on the White Sox where they will be hoping the team doesn't lose 110+ games. Or be Oakland fans who no longer have a team. Or the Rockies stuck in the Dodgers division and 3 straight years of last place after 2 years of 4th, yet still get 2 1/2 million fans at the games each year somehow (those fans deserve a lot better).
John Northey - Sunday, December 29 2024 @ 10:28 AM EST (#454863) #
Who is worth signing might be another good question.
  • QO: 4 left - Bregman, Santander, Alonso, Pivetta
    • Pivetta is a solid pitcher - 1.5 to 2.3 fWAR with 140+ IP each year for the past 4 years. Kind of surprised he got a QO though, and that he didn't take it. Guys like him tend to get $15 mil a year deals, not $20+. I'd be shocked if the Jays signed him
    • Bregman - the last big gun left imo - this is a guy you can pencil in for 3-4 WAR a year, solid D and solid O. But some health issues exist and he appeared to want to stay in Houston and wanted an insane 7 year deal despite being in his 30's. On a 5 year deal I'd look at him, but not more (ages 31-35).
    • Santander - Looks like a perfect fit - switch hitting power, can play LF, entering age 30 season. Sounds like he wants a 5 year deal, but most teams offering 3 max. Jays could swoop in here ala Springer and just give more years than anyone else and accept that the last year or two will be write offs.
    • Alonso - 1B/DH, signing him would be preparing to let Vlad go. His best year by a mile was his rookie season (2019) but even then he wasn't as good as Vlad's 2 best years. I'd hesitate here, wait and see if his price goes down and then grab him.
  • Non-QO so cost only cash, nothing else.
    • Profar - damn good fit, DH/LF, switch hitter, but alternatives good and bad years (wRC+ last 8 years 36-107-90-113-87-110-78-139) which makes one very nervous when predicting the future
    • Flaherty - RHSP, just 29 in '25, very good 2024, but injury issues in St Louis in 21-22, last started 30+ in '19. Could be a solid starter, but I'd want the medical team to do a deep check on him first.
    • Kim - fits the teams MO with high end defense, meh offense. Still can't believe they didn't sign him out of Korea 5 years ago. He will miss April and likely May due to injury so very limited value. Still, an interesting piece potentially. Still would be surprised if the Jays sign him.
    • Jeff Hoffman - a top rated reliever going in, but no one has signed him, nor have I read many rumors about him. I'd knock on his agents door and see what he is after. Same applies to about a dozen other relievers. I suspect some decent ones will be available for under $10 mil a season come February.
Trades are hard to predict unless a team makes it obvious they are about to dump someone (salary, personality, contract running out, whatever) ala Soto last winter. Right now I'm guessing the Jays are keeping an eye on a few dozen players and waiting them out, with an 'acceptable' price tag on each. They've probably let a few know what price they are willing to pay (more or less) and are just waiting for someone to say 'OK'. The QO guys I'd be surprised to see sign here now.
bpoz - Sunday, December 29 2024 @ 10:48 AM EST (#454864) #
Very nice post John N. If no extension for Vlad there will be PR fallout. For Bo possibly little to no PR fallout.

Your post had some V nice positive views. I prefer positive to gloom and doom.

2 unknowns are 1) How will we perform in 1 run games? 2) How will the players with track records play?

Will we go over the luxury tax?

Questions about roster construction: 1) Why would Loperfido, Schneider and Lukes get (probably) the 1st shot in the OF? What has Roden done so far and still needs to do to get a callup? 2) To answer question #1. Are the Jays worried about 40 man manipulation or service time issues? I don't know but hope the best lineup is used.

Our rotation is good. Moves have been made to improve the pen. So overall not a bad pitching staff. But will they perform to expectations or over/under expectations? This is speculative analysis on my part where I am trying to be neutral.
dalimon5 - Sunday, December 29 2024 @ 10:55 AM EST (#454865) #
John, James Click ran the Astros and before that cut his teeth in the Rays system with Andrew Friedman and Chaim Bloom for 15 years. He and Bloom worked at Baseball Prospectus together. Rogers already had a guy from the Dodgers/Rays mold. I think the issue is everything gets funnelled through Shapiro until he is replaced by a Click.
ayjackson - Sunday, December 29 2024 @ 12:26 PM EST (#454866) #
Trading Vlad and Bonand signing Bregman and maybe Alonso seems like a decent play at this point. I assume shatkins have all but completely botched the possibility of signing Vlad.
ayjackson - Sunday, December 29 2024 @ 12:28 PM EST (#454867) #
An edit! An edit! My kingdom for an edit!
scottt - Sunday, December 29 2024 @ 01:03 PM EST (#454868) #
The Jays need a middle of the order left bat and Profar isn't that.
Bregman is a right bat and a dead pull hitter. That doesn't fit this lineup at all.

Grichuk is still available. He's only 33. He had a .875 OPS last year in Arizona.
He's a career .274 .324 .509 hitter against left handed pitching. I could work that in the mix.
dalimon5 - Sunday, December 29 2024 @ 01:05 PM EST (#454869) #
I'm actually cooling down on Vlad. He's had some mediocre seasons and poor performances for an all world elite player. I'm okay with trading him provided the haul is good (better than Tucker who costs half as much salary wise) and money is re-spent on power like Santander or Alonso. Harder to make sense of the Horwitz deal if they don't keep Vlad.

At the same time I think Bo is the guy to extend at this point.l and it hurts that he has no interest without Vlad signed, according to his latest comments.

Bo, Alonso, Santander can be a decent top 3 provided that there is still a top 4 bat missing to compete with others. That's what I would do if I had to follow a budget.
scottt - Sunday, December 29 2024 @ 01:08 PM EST (#454870) #
Guerrero is .136 .240 .182 in playoffs games.
So, yes it's an absolute truth that they failed to win any games and wasted his .422 OPS.

Bichette has been better, but a .638 OPS isn't quite enough to carry a team, I don't think.
uglyone - Sunday, December 29 2024 @ 01:13 PM EST (#454871) #
The one strength of this team right now is a very gooe depth of potentially solid bats.

Overpaying an ok bat in free agency is maybe the most inefficient possible use of our payroll.
bpoz - Sunday, December 29 2024 @ 01:24 PM EST (#454872) #
Agree with UO about us having a lot of potentially good bats. There exists a lot of minor league stats to back that up. I would prefer these players be given a fair chance. If we sign Bregman there is a possibility that he blocks younger 3B options. Also as he ages he most likely declines possibly to Springer levels.

Miggy played for many years in Detroit as a declining player. Stanton is declining in NY. Judge could also start consistently declining in NY after 3 years.
Marc Hulet - Sunday, December 29 2024 @ 01:47 PM EST (#454873) #
They need to move Springer to LF and give Barger a run in RF where his arm makes him a potential weapon.

Varsho, given the type of surgery, will likely be out longer than people realize and hitters often take a year to get back to full strength so he's probably coming back with little to no pop.

I'm OK with giving Loperfido (who i have zero faith in as a big league hitter, Berroa, and Lukes a competition for CF but they may want to consider more depth there.

I doubt Santander is a good fit. He's a terrible defensive OF and would negate a lot of the value Varsho has... and the former Oriole has also said he doesn't want to be a DH.

John mentioned trying Wagner at 1B but he actually has more than 50 pro games worth of experience at the position... so he can slide there easily when Guerrero plays 3B or DH.

Current roster construction (they're sadly probably going to be close to this) should be:

C: Kirk, 1B Vladdy, 2B Gimenez, 3B Clement, SS Bichette, DH Wagner (rotation), LF Springer, CF Lukes, RF Barger; Bench: Heineman, Berroa, vet INF (drop Nance), vet OF (drop de Geus)

Possible vets: Ty France, Mark Canha, Nicky Lopez, Amed Rosario, Nick Senzel, Austin Hays, Dylan Carlson, Garrett Hampson, Michael Taylor
uglyone - Sunday, December 29 2024 @ 01:56 PM EST (#454874) #
I assume you mean Varsho in CF there marc.

but overall mostly i agree - except for me, Lukes and Roden slot in ahead of Loperfido and Berroa on the OF depth chart. And i think i still slot Schneider ahead of those two as well.
Marc Hulet - Sunday, December 29 2024 @ 02:10 PM EST (#454875) #
No if you read through my comments, I address Varsho and how the Jays probably can't rely much on him in 2025.

Rodon is a corner OF so he's no help in CF... Berroa has a chance to help; he just never got an opportunity to play a bunch of games in a row like everyone else.
uglyone - Sunday, December 29 2024 @ 02:12 PM EST (#454876) #
yeah my bad i somehow skipped the sentence you talked directly about varsho. my bad.
Marc Hulet - Sunday, December 29 2024 @ 02:45 PM EST (#454877) #
Rotator cuff surgery among hitters is rare (Joey Votto, Austin Kearns) but you get back about 80% range of motion after a year, up to 90% in 2-3 years but players have to adjust to decrease range of motion and the shoulder just moves differently after surgery so adjustments will need to be made:

https://www.eclipsewellnessnova.com/post/rotator-cuff-tears-in-baseball-players

https://www.drcarofino.com/blog/one-year-after-a-rotator-cuff-surgery#:~:text=Research%20studies%20have%20shown%20that,and%20approach%2090%25%20of%20normal.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31311750/
scottt - Sunday, December 29 2024 @ 02:54 PM EST (#454878) #
I don't see Springer playing in LF.
uglyone - Sunday, December 29 2024 @ 02:59 PM EST (#454879) #
I wonder if the shoulder side matters.

Votto had left shoulder surgery as a lefty hitter.

Kearns had right shoulder surgery as a righty hitter.

Varsho is having right shoulder surgery as a lefty hitter.
Michael - Sunday, December 29 2024 @ 03:57 PM EST (#454880) #
I'd think that is worse for Varsho than the others as I'd think there's more motion/stress on the shoulder closest to the pitcher when you bat (so right for lefties, and left for righties), but I'm just basing that on intuition, not any medical knowledge.
lexomatic - Sunday, December 29 2024 @ 04:23 PM EST (#454881) #
Marc, you don't think Taylor wouldnt want to play over Lukes in CF for veteranness and defensive reputation, even if thats gone. That could be a cool platoon, but I dont see it happening.
Im not sure any of the veteran IF on your liat offers mpre than Jimenez. Though I guess with Gimenez theres no more need for backup SS.
This team really is a mess.
uglyone - Sunday, December 29 2024 @ 04:54 PM EST (#454882) #
for me it's Springer and Lukes that are the cover for CF in Varsho's absence.
Marc Hulet - Sunday, December 29 2024 @ 05:32 PM EST (#454883) #
Yeah if they get Taylor than Lukes probably becomes the backup... and I'd rather see Jimenez get everyday reps since he received the 4th milb option for this year. He's a solid option to take over 2B or SS if/when Bo leaves (to pair with Gimenez).
John Northey - Sunday, December 29 2024 @ 11:04 PM EST (#454884) #
The Red Sox show that spending isn't always the smart thing - they officially signed Walker Buehler to a 1 year $21.05 mil deal which seems nuts to me. The guy missed all of 2023, and had a 5.38 ERA in 2024, 5.54 FIP so not just bad luck, just bad pitching. In 2021 he was doing great but then injuries and general suckitude hit. They also have signed Chapman (the scumbag reliever) for $10.75 mil, and Patrick Sandoval for 2 years $9.13 mil per year (he was non-tendered by the Angels due to injury...the freaking Angels dumped him). I look at those 3 signings and go 'thank goodness the Jays didn't do that'. I'd only bet on Chapman being someone who might do better than options the Jays already have but I'd rather they lose 122 games than use guys like that (see Osuna a few years ago to see how this management team handles scum - may not like a lot of choices they've made but that was the right one - of course, I have 4 daughters and have seen what scumbags like those guys do to women, being fed to a woodchipper would be a more appropriate reward for them imo).

Boston also this winter traded a stack (4) of minor leaguers to the White Sox for Garrett Crochet who converted to a starter with the WS last year and did damn fine, even if he averaged under 5 IP per game. They also traded for a guy with a 65 OPS+ lifetime (backup catcher who did hit well in AAA), and for a reliever who missed 2024 and sucked in '23 but was great in '22 as a rookie (Jovani Morán). Crochet I'd love to have gotten, but the rest are 'meh' at best.

So yeah, the Red Sox have been active and put a lot of cash out but really only got 1 guy I'd like the Jays to have gotten in Crochet.

Yankees have done a lot better - I like Devin Williams the reliever they got for Cortes, Max Fried signed for a fortune, Cody Bellinger, traded for meh reliever Fernando Cruz (high K high BB always scares me, could become an ace closer or could blow up), and Alex Jackson (backup catcher with that type of bat 27 OPS+ lifetime...yikes). A few other minor pieces that are nothings now but who knows - the Yankees seem to have some magic fairy dust at times. If the Jays had gotten Williams, Fried, and Bellinger I suspect many here would've been very, very happy. Rogers maybe not with the budget jump.

Baltimore got Tyler O'Neill (good), Gary Sánchez (backup catcher who can actually hit a bit and often is a regular), Matt Bowman (reliever who is a 7-9 guy IMO was with 4 teams in 2024), Vimael Machín (62 OPS+ lifetime, backup IF). For a team that has been in the playoffs 2 years running and is damn good but desperately needs starting pitching this is kind of pathetic. Especially given they are projected at under $150 mil for CBT purposes in 2025. Their fans must be furious. I remember when the O's were spending in the 90's and had Gillick running them - they were damn good and scary, now I'm guessing they are just cheap and hoping the kids keep coming.

Tampa is Tampa - they don't spend, they do trades that often don't make sense at the time, but a few years later look like steals. I won't even look at what they've done as it is so depressing to know even bad looking moves often work out for them.

I really, really would love realignment putting the Jays in a division with the Tigers and Guardians. I get sick of the Yankees and Red Sox.
SK in NJ - Monday, December 30 2024 @ 07:48 AM EST (#454885) #
If the Jays missing out on their alleged free agent targets means that they will instead give playing time to younger players, rather than hoard them in the minors because they have options, then it’s probably the best pivot they can take given their realistic chances this season. I’d much rather see Roden starting in LF and Barger at 3B and living with the consequences than plugging some 1 WAR veterans to hold the fort down until the team sells at the deadline.

If they do plan to spend money on real upgrades, then I’d go with Flaherty and Profar. Big downsides due to injury history and track record but upside is also there, and that’s what the Jays need to be banking on if they want to even pretend to be a 2025 contender. It’s not going to happen with Austin Hays and Spencer Turnbull.
Marc Hulet - Monday, December 30 2024 @ 08:52 AM EST (#454886) #
I actually really dig what the Sox are doing. They went big for a big arm, took on some low-risk 1- and 2-year deals (with upside) and really solidified their pitching depth. They also have 3+ young bats with massive upsides almost MLB-ready and they haven't blocked them.

At this point, the 2025 season (and beyond) really can't be saved with what's left in free agency or what the Jays could get in trades unless they deal Vladdy... but then good luck selling tickets and merchandise.
dalimon5 - Monday, December 30 2024 @ 09:30 AM EST (#454887) #
Would you rather pay to see Vladdy on a losing team or pay to see a winning team? I don't think Vlad sells tickets. If Clemens, Delgado, Halladay etc all couldn't do it then...
SK in NJ - Monday, December 30 2024 @ 09:42 AM EST (#454888) #
Vlad’s impact on attendance is overstated. Fan interest would drop as trading him would signify a losing season before it starts (rather than the ability to sell hope, which is what Rogers/the front office is going for) but I doubt people would stop coming specifically for Vlad. The FO made this same mistake in 2017-18, and instead of learning from it they have decided to repeat it. The mark of excellence.
Eephus - Monday, December 30 2024 @ 11:21 AM EST (#454889) #
While I understand the reluctance to extend an obviously very good but flawed player in Guerrero Jr.... well what exactly are we even doing here? You have a likeable, marketable young star who is objectively fun to watch (and this is an entertainment product don't forget)... this isn't like Atlanta letting Freddie Freeman walk (Freeman was older and had just won WS MVP of course). This franchise is in a real bad spot at the moment and then simply shrugging and losing Vlad and Bo for picks would be a generational-level blunder.

Maybe a long term Vlad Jr. contract won't look so good, maybe it will who knows? It would at least send a message to a very angst-filled fanbase that these guys at least recognize the situation and that there is intangible value beyond projections and dollars-per-WAR. I'd rather watch a 76 win team with Vlad than an 81 win team without him, personally. Both options are terrible, obviously... but after spending my youth watching the best years of Halladay and King Carlos go for naught, I'm sick of this story already. I love baseball but I don't love the Blue Jays nearly that much.

Geez what a mess. This front office has no one but themselves to blame. Lets see if they can get out of it.         
John Northey - Monday, December 30 2024 @ 12:35 PM EST (#454890) #
The big question with Vlad is can the Jays justify the cost and not be in a Delgado 2002 situation?  In 2002-2004 Delgado was eating a very big part of the payroll, which JPR used as an excuse for not spending elsewhere. After 2004 Delgado left as a free agent, and the Jays didn't even offer him arbitration (what a QO was back then) thus got nothing, not even a draft pick, when he signed with the Marlins.  They even insulted him with an offer of 3 years at $7 mil per, vs his old contract which was at $18.5 mil per. The team president was Paul Godfrey at the time and he was quoted "they told me $6 mil isn't enough, they didn't tell us what was enough" - heck, he was lucky they didn't spit in his face at that offer. The Jays projected payroll for 2005 at the time was $52 mil. Yeah, they were being super-cheap then. The deal he eventually got from Miami was $52 mil over 4 years ($13 mil per year). Of note - his last Jays deal was a record breaker signed by a desperate Ash (who was near the end of his rope) - $68 mil over 4 years, highest average at $17 mil per season but was quickly broken as A-Rod hit free agency that winter (10/$252 mil which shattered any expectation).

So looking back was it right to do that first record breaking deal? Over those 4 years he produced 18.2 bWAR, ranging from a 2.9 his final year (a level he never again reached) to a 5.9 in 2003. The other 2 years were 4's and it covered ages 29-32. From a pure baseball POV it was very smart to do that deal then to let him go - would've been even smarter to trade him after 2003 but odds are that big contract made it hard as I'd bet JPR would've happily dealt him at any point for anything that gave salary relief.  The Godfrey/JPR years were painful to put it mildly.

What happened to attendance? In 2004 with Delgado and a 67-94 record the Jays got 1.9 mil fans to show up. In 2005 no Delgado and a 80-82 record they had 2.0 mil. The Jays didn't drop back sub 2 mil until 2009 with a 75-87 record despite a 'wow' year from Halladay (as always) and having Cito v2 around. They dumped Halladay that winter (and JPR) and saw attendance drop to 1.495 mil with Bautista hitting 54 HR and becoming a star - the mood was the Jays were doomed pre-season despite finishing 85-77 to finish Cito's managing career. With the fresh hope via Bautista fans came back in '11, up to 1.8 mil, cracked 2 mil in '12, 2.5 in '13 after winning the off-season but coming in last in the AL East (so much for the value of a great off-season), dropped a bit in '14, 2.7 mil in '15, 3.39 in '16, 3.2 in '17 then fans figured out a rebuild was happening as they lost a lot of fans, down to 2.3 in '18 and 1.75 in '19 (despite tons of hype around Vlad & Bo), then COVID hit. Took until 2022 to get a full season at home (2.65 mil), then cracked 3 mil in '23 before dropping in '24 to 2.68 again via a last place finish.   Before 2016 the last 3+ mil attendance was 1993 (WS win #2), although 1994 would've been if a few more games were played before the strike (2-3 home dates away from it).

Winning is what matters. Not stars.  If dealing Vlad, Bo, whoever helps win more games then it is the smart move. Emotionally I hate it, but realistically I get it. If I ran the Jays and wanted to keep my job I'd probably be doing what they are doing. Wait Vlad out. If he has a great 2025 he might jump to $600+ mil, but if he has a 'meh' year he might go for a 5 year deal which would make a ton more sense for the Jays. Signing guys for their 30's is rarely a good idea unless you get a great discount for their 20's as part of the package. Vlad might be a star for 5 more years, then might have 5 more productive years before being a burden on the team so any deal needs to consider that. You'd do a 15 year deal just to spread the cash and luxury tax impact out.  Smartest might be trading him now to the Mets who are desperate for even more star power and want to kill the Yankees in the media (ego-maniac billionaire owner will do that).  The Mets have 5 prospects in the top 100 according to MLB.com - 1 pitcher, a SS/OF, and 3 OF's.  I could see the Jays saying they want top Mets prospect Brandon Sproat (RHP 3.40 ERA over 3 levels last year at age 24, his first pro season, 116 IP, could be ready mid-season) and 2 others from that group of 5. Then to push it along, sign Alonso so the Mets need a 1B and to avoid the bad press losing a popular player comes with.  Jett Williams, the SS/OF (CF in '23, mostly SS otherwise) who is just 21 and in AAA now (hit everywhere but AA) - get him and Sproat and I'd be happy as they could be key pieces of a solid team in 26-30. If needed then the Jays could take Starling Marte off their hands (makes $20.75 mil in 2025, but had a 104 OPS+ last year, 74 the year before in RF) to improve the quality of prospects back (remember the Mets are at the max tax now so a $20 mil deal is costing them $42 mil - 110% tax rate).  They have the money, but $42 mil is a lot for a guy worth under 1 WAR - if it gets more prospects back then wonderful.
dalimon5 - Monday, December 30 2024 @ 12:49 PM EST (#454891) #
Does anybody know if the FO has tried to sign Vlad and Bo or of they are just set on letting them walk? New rumour is that Rogers wants to desperately resign Vlad and Bo and they are both refusing to forego the market unless they are overpaid. If this is the case then all of the complaints about "they dod this to themselves," etc are misdirected and inaccurate.

Its entirely possible Vlad is telling them "I want 500 million before spring training or i'm testing the market," and this FO will just go to market and don't think he will command that much.

Also highly likely Bo is telling this FO "i'm not signing until Vlad does first and I want 30 million per year for x years."

Combine that with Corbin Burnes turning you down and other free agents like Santander snd Teoscar using you for leverage to go somewhere else and all of a sudden you can see a different side to the story where the only fair criticism becomes "why don't you trade them now?"

I now believe Vlad and Bo would require Vernon Wellsesque contracts to stay here and these guys both are riskier bets over even longer terms even if they are younger.
dalimon5 - Monday, December 30 2024 @ 12:50 PM EST (#454892) #
Also, mobile web user here with touchscreen and no auto correct enabled. Apologies for the typos.
Eephus - Monday, December 30 2024 @ 12:54 PM EST (#454893) #
I'm certainly not advocating for "just give Vlad whatever he wants" because there has to be a point where you walk away. Problem is, he has all the leverage at the moment (good for him, honestly) and if you're this front office trying to evaluate the, um, value of such a long term contract... you're kind of in a lose-lose scenario. Pay him and the contract could be a crippling albatross (it shouldn't be but we've seen where they stop the payroll line already)... or let him prove it again and risk losing him for basically nothing, which would be a total disaster. 

It's a bad spot to be in!
dalimon5 - Monday, December 30 2024 @ 01:46 PM EST (#454894) #
Eephus it's true, but this doesn't meant it was avoidable. He had down years and probably refused to sign below what he felt was his ceiling in 2022 or 2023. I'm wondering if there was never a scenario where he signed at any point unless he felt he could not get more on the open market. He's probably like Judge and Soto and was never planning or willing to sign before he hits free agency unless his agents told him "you will never get a better deal than this so take it."

They should have traded him last offseason or this offseason if this is the case otherwise it is crazy to lose half a decade of potential good to great future major leaguers for one season of Vlad where you can't seem to augment him in the line up for lack of certainty in your clubs future.
dalimon5 - Monday, December 30 2024 @ 01:59 PM EST (#454895) #
BTW Judge has 7 years at 40 million per year left on his deal entering his age 33 season. I give him until 36 years max until he's an average player with at least 120 million left on his deal still at that point. His early performance will make the contract value fulfillable from a WAR value until then. Once the decline begins and the value starts to become a negative then it will look bad.
Chuck - Monday, December 30 2024 @ 02:07 PM EST (#454896) #
he has all the leverage at the moment

Guerrero's camp is seeing an opening for the Yankees after 2025, potentially one with the Mets should they pass on Alonso, and with Boston. And maybe with the Cubs. So yes, leverage indeed.

Gerry - Monday, December 30 2024 @ 03:03 PM EST (#454897) #
Its a big risk for Guerrero as clubs are not opening the wallets for first basemen. It will all depend on his 2025 performance.
92-93 - Monday, December 30 2024 @ 04:06 PM EST (#454898) #
Guerrero was hitting .277/.363/.401 on June 22nd after 2 mediocre seasons (relative to his talent). If he wants to bet on himself having an MVP-calibre season, good for him, but there's certainly lots of risk involved assuming the Jays offer is currently in the 350-400MM range.
John Northey - Monday, December 30 2024 @ 05:40 PM EST (#454899) #
With players like Vlad you have to remember, they have massive egos - far beyond what most of us can dream of having. They've been told from an early age how great they are and they've done it. He has twice been among the best in the game, has won a HR derby, won a Gold Glove (thanks to a weak field, but he did win it), He feels he can play everyday at 3B too.  To him betting on doing well in '25 is just logical. I'm certain he thinks he can have a 180+ OPS+ season and if he does, more power to him (plus the mega contract he feels he deserves).  If he flops, well, that just isn't in his mindset. His agent has to be the voice of reason for him (and his dad and friends too) as he won't be reasonable for the same reason that he is a great ballplayer - the unwavering belief he is among the elite in the game.  A $400-$475 mil deal would be a great one for him, for the Jays a sub $400 mil deal would be ideal, but I suspect he really thinks he deserves $500+.  No way I see him signing now unless Rogers falls for the trap Ash fell into back in 2000/2001 offseason with Delgado.  Remember, Delgado in 2000 had a 181 OPS+ during the steroid era with no rumors about him, 13 points higher than Vlad ever has done - that is insane. That got him the biggest AAV contract ever, but just over 4 years which covered his final 3 super-valuable years and 1 year like the 22/23 Vlad was (2's WAR).  Delgado was Vlad but years earlier who had wasted years as a catcher due to the Jays being stupid about sunk costs (Joe Carter very washed up, but kept on as the star of 93, Molitor near his end but had value in trade but Ash wouldn't trade him - dump either of those 2 and there was space for Delgado to come up and be a star a year or two earlier).  But after losing him post-2004 the Jays went from last in the AL East to 3rd, then up to 87 wins in 2006.  Attendance climbed as did enthusiasm despite losing a generational home grown player who wanted to stay.

Winning is all that matters to the casual fan. Stars help, but not by a lot. Losing Vlad & Bo for something or nothing means little (Delgado got ziltch in return, not even a draft pick).  Heck, they traded Halladay, a HOF lock, for prospects who mostly flopped (d'Arnaud is still active, but rarely has been more than a backup catcher, Halladay had 2 years that each had more WAR than d'Arnaud has in his whole career post trade) but it didn't hurt attendance or anything outside of normal drop due to bad play (helped that Bautista developed out of nowhere right after Halladay was dumped, team was around 500 all year but never felt to be in it).

So yeah, the Jays should look at trading Vlad and Bo for top notch prospects as much as it'd hurt. 2025 becomes a write off and 2026 and beyond become the next window if done right. Done wrong and the next window is pushed back.  See 2017/18 choices where the Jays got damn lucky with Vlad & Bo developing fast along with Biggio and others to pull off playoffs in '20, nearly in '21, then playoffs in '22 and '23.  More than the Bell/Moseby/Barfield team got into ('85 was their only playoff together with '89 being arguable as Barfield was traded in season, matches the Alomar-Carter-White teams with 3 playoffs). Guaranteed 20 years from now kids today will be talking about how exciting 20-23 were and how watered down the playoffs are 'today' in 2040 with 16+ teams in every year out of the 36 or however many there are then.
electric carrot - Monday, December 30 2024 @ 06:02 PM EST (#454900) #
Vladdy became a new hitter in 2024. That is who he is now. You do not need to worry about Vladdy as a hitter. If you want to go back and examine some inconsistency in his early twenties, go ahead but those days are done. He has now married his innate talent with a good mindset. Anybody who watching him could see that. Also, the stats bear that out. I think you're crazy if you want to trade Vladdy at the very moment where he has put it all together. This coming year and the three or four that follow will be the very best hitting years of one MLB's most dangerous hitters. Do you really want to see him in a Red Sox uniform earning those outrageous numbers? I sure don't. I did advocate signing him long term last summer because that was the best time to sign him. But right now is the second best time and I think this front office knows that. They need to sign him and I think on the hitting side the risk is minimal. The risk in my mind is defense and potential injury. And I actually don't think there is such a big risk on defense. On defense, he is what he is: nothing spectacular, but I think we have seen incremental change over the last three years that is positive. Injury? That part I think is a real worry. He's not the kind of character who strikes me as overly safety conscious, and I could see the deal going sour because he hurts himself. But overall, I think it's worth the risk and I think the talk about his inconsistency as a hitter is a red herring. Give the man his money.
John Northey - Monday, December 30 2024 @ 06:34 PM EST (#454901) #
Is he worth it?  That is the big question. Will he provide enough wins to justify his salary vs what would be gained by a trade?  Look at what Saint AA did with Halladay - he got nearly nothing (they were good prospects but didn't develop). So will Vlad be worth $50 mil a year for 10 years?  It is unrealistic to assume any value for ages 35+ (few players are worth much at that stage, Bautista was a late bloomer, but was done at 35 [1.5 bWAR from 35-end], Delgado was a better hitter than Vlad in many respects but 2.1 bWAR ages 35-end. Olerud? 1.7 bWAR 35-end. Frank Thomas had a much better ending - 13.0 bWAR age 35-40 but I'd put that as the highest possible result outside of PED use or insane luck.  Can Vlad produce 50 WAR in 10 years?  5 per year for a decade?  Yes, it is possible, but not probable. Lets look at these guys 10 year peaks and ages 26-35
  • Bautista 28-37: 39.7 bWAR 134 OPS+, 26-35 38.8 bWAR 136 OPS+
  • Delgado 26-35: 40.2 bWAR 146 OPS+
  • Olerud  24-33: 46.9 bWAR 137 OPS+, 26-35 39.6 bWAR 126 OPS+
  • Thomas 23-32: 56.5 bWAR 168 OPS+, 26-35 42.5 bWAR 156 OPS+
Those 4 strongly suggest a 40's bWAR total is the most likely result. Frank Thomas was a monster early on. 22-25 he had 22.5 bWAR via a 177 OPS+ (higher than any Vlad season by 9 points) so he'd have appeared a better bet than Vlad going into his age 26 season but a 10 year deal would've given you 42.5 bWAR or around $400-450 mil of value. The full 15 year deal would've worked out with 51.3 bWAR but that was thanks to a good finishing kick which you should never, ever bet on.  Injuries can and do happen, betting they won't is foolish. I fully expect a few of these mega deals being done will look very bad in 5 years (Soto, Ohtani, Judge) but teams can accept it if they win a WS or get that insane Ohtani marketing bonus.

The Jays offer to Vlad made a ton of baseball sense - $340 mil over 10-15 years with an opt-out after 5 puts the Jays in perfect position. But I cannot blame Vlad for seeing Soto get that insane deal and saying "I want something like that".  Jays would be smart to not do that and to take offers on Vlad now - if they are really good then go for it, if not then hold onto him.  A top 50 prospect is mandatory for starting negotiations, ideally 3 top 100's from a team that desperately wants that bat at 1B (Mets come to mind immediately, Cubs have Michael Busch at 1B (2.3 fWAR last year via a 119 wRC+ at age 26). Giants have LaMonte Wade Jr. at 1B (never had 2 fWAR in a season, 113 wRC+ lifetime, going into age 31 season, peak of 120).  All 3 have money, need, and a desire to make a 'wow' move.  SF has Bryce Eldridge at #35 prospect, very young 1B (entering age 20 season) who has reached AAA at 1B, destroyed A+, but not as much at AA/AAA (17 games total).   Cubs have Matt Shaw at #22, a 3B/SS who has hit at all levels (906 OPS overall in 2 seasons, has reached AAA at age 22).  So yeah, each has someone worth grabbing if you can. Will any be a Vlad? Heck no. But if you can't sign him but you can get a solid future piece then do it unless you really think the Jays can win in '25.
Petey Baseball - Monday, December 30 2024 @ 08:57 PM EST (#454902) #
Well the Jays are 9th in baseball in expected RC+ for ‘25.
Add a Santander and you probably move up a slot or two.
I’ve talked myself into thinking Santander has some monster years in him. He’s definitely a bit of a late bloomer. If he learns to take a few more walks, all the better.
With him and a front end starter signed, plus a trade for a good lefty reliever, I might be mildly satisfied.
Jacob - Monday, December 30 2024 @ 09:09 PM EST (#454903) #
I can easily be convinced that Vlad's (and Bo's) value to the team would be much higher if the Jays sign Sasaki. Having a young, affordable front-of-the-rotation talent would make the hit from a Vlad extension fit better in terms the roster budget. Yes, a bit of a "duh" comment but also makes me think that it might be crickets on an extension until after Sasaki signs.

Even if the Jays know that they are out of the running, where Sasaki signs might open up a trade partner. Perhaps...
John Northey - Monday, December 30 2024 @ 10:30 PM EST (#454904) #
As many have noticed I tend to be a super-optimist around here but even I don't see the Jays signing Sasaki. I'd love it of course, but unless he really, really wants to play behind a great defense it ain't happening. He is going to the Dodgers, SD, SF, or maybe Seattle. Anyone else would be a surprise. Jays can offer cash under the table via the 1001 other things Rogers owns but they'd have to be super-careful about it as MLB will be watching for stuff like that. An international draft for sub 25 year old players would be nice at times like this, but that isn't happening (players don't want it for a lot of very good reasons).

The idea of waiting to see where he goes and if it frees up a starting pitcher from someone could make sense. I wouldn't be surprised if teams with pitching to trade are holding off until that is done so they lose 1 team but then all others looking for pitching will come knocking fast and hard.
christaylor - Tuesday, December 31 2024 @ 12:43 AM EST (#454905) #
I don't understand the push to trade Vlad now. Prospect valuation has changed and probably swung too far to teams holding on to prospects. The marginal difference between a trade now and in June/July, if the Jays are not competitive, is not that great. Also, they have to wait until mid-season to allow Bo to reestablish (or crater) his value. Teams, especially a team over performing in June may actually get a better prospect. Now the team might get more quantity, but the top end quality prospect for who Vlad is (even if he has turned a corner, which is an assertion that one ought to be skeptical of) has a cap.

I'm for an overpay for Vlad for a decade as he's likely got at least 7 very productive years in the 10, even if the other three are meh to blah.

The Jays should find the late off-season short bargain and hope for luck. Santander might land in that category, or even Bregman/Alonso. I wished they'd waited on Torres, but Gimmenez provides more value and both eliminates downside risk with a Bo injury or just leaving because he's unhappy.

The defense will mitigate any pitching issues, but I am disappointed losing out on Burnes. We could see Bo and Gimmenez rebound, Springer have a dead-cat bounce, and Varsho taking a step forward...yet, two SP could implode. Gausman is a concern. Bassitt a concern. Francis is a big question mark.

For those champing at the bit to tear down now, I don't see the urgency. Atkins did well with a mini in-season sell-off in 2024, and punting on 2025 seems premature. Yes, 2026 looks bleak, but OK; I'd rather have the slim chance that things break right for the 2025 Jays and they squeak in, add at the deadline, and make some noise in the playoffs.

They were frustrating last year and the year before, but they're not going to win the off-season, and the roster could look as good as it did going into 2024 (not great, but not bad).

Also, trading for prospects is a good way to stifle a team for years if they break wrong, which happens all the time.

Happy New Year!

Go, Leafs Go! (The Jays could easily be an afterthought with a deep Leafs playoff run. The goaltending and D are a breath of fresh air and seem poised to make noise this spring.

ayjackson - Tuesday, December 31 2024 @ 09:05 AM EST (#454906) #
I think the push to trade Vlad now is quite easy to understand: it's driven by a perceived reluctance on Vlad's part to sign an extension.

Regardless of whether the perception reflects reality in any way, it is the reason, I think, people are suggesting trade routes.
christaylor - Tuesday, December 31 2024 @ 11:18 AM EST (#454907) #
I don't see a justification for thinking Vlad will fetch much more now than at the deadline when the other side has both a better idea of his value and what they need to make a push for the playoffs.

That delta is too small to throw away the chance that things break right for the 2025 Jays. We're all frustrated, but unless you thought the 2024 had no hope of the playoffs (some here did, I admit) -- running it forward for 3 - 3 1/2 months is not a franchise killer.
pooks137 - Tuesday, December 31 2024 @ 11:23 AM EST (#454908) #
I think the push to trade Vlad now is quite easy to understand: it's driven by a perceived reluctance on Vlad's part to sign an extension.

There's also the relatively recent history of the injury risk factor that occurred with Josh Donaldson's departure.

Where Donaldson played 3rd on Opening Day with a shoulder ailment, barely able to sling the ball across the diamond. Then had a miserable season, was traded at the 11th hour while still hurt at the end of Aug for Julian Merriweather (resulting in future rule changes) and essentially no return for a former MVP.

bpoz - Tuesday, December 31 2024 @ 11:28 AM EST (#454909) #
Was Shapiro prevented from trading Donaldson earlier?
John Northey - Tuesday, December 31 2024 @ 12:36 PM EST (#454910) #
In the 2017/2018 offseason the Jays had a chance for a big trade Donaldson for Flaherty and someone else. Sadly they didn't take it as that would've been admitting that 2018 was a write off. Flaherty had a bad 4 year stretch (2020-23) but is seen as a top free agent this winter. In 2018/19 he was worth 9 bWAR total and would've helped make those nightmare years a bit better. Ah well.

With Vlad if they don't trade him I'm OK, if they trade him I'm OK. There are cases for each. If he can get a solid return and refuses to sign an extension at a reasonable price then sure, trade him. If not then keep him and see where the team is late July - if contending keep him and accept that we might lose him for a draft pick, if not then if he is healthy trade for what you can get if better than a draft pick. Same applies to Bo, except his value might climb by mid-season if he plays like he did pre-24.

Free Agents post 2025: Vlad, Bo, Bassitt, Green, Swanson
Post 2026: Springer, Gausman, Garcia, Varsho, Kirk, Berrios (player option to opt-out)
Post 2027: Manoah, Sandlin, Pop

Really post 2027 and beyond is secondary. The 5 who are free agents post this season are the big deal. If the Jays go into rebuild mode mid-season those 5 should fetch some nice prospects, with the Jays listening to offers on the post 26 crowd too.

I'm wondering if the Jays are working on extensions for Kirk and Varsho. Both key pieces and their strong defense gives the team a bit more of a cushion against bad play. IMO that'd be a smart move to make depending how bad Varsho's injuries are. Kirk didn't get the big payday when he first signed (under $50k) so he might be more open to an extension that is team friendly than most.
pooks137 - Tuesday, December 31 2024 @ 12:49 PM EST (#454911) #
Donaldson played the first 12 games of 2018 with a dead arm, was hurt between April 11th & May 3rd, then returned until May 28th, where he played his final Blue Jays game.

So he was hurt for the trade deadline.

He was still hurt when he was traded to the Indians at the very end of August (which is what made the trade controversial and suspect). Donaldson hadn't returned to play with the Jays at the time and didn't start playing with Cleveland until Sept 11th.

So any chance to trade Donaldson would've had to be pre-ST.

There's a risk to allowing your walk year FA stars play out the first half of the year hoping to either contend or cash in last minute in July.
John Northey - Tuesday, December 31 2024 @ 04:33 PM EST (#454912) #
Ouch. Bleacher Report has their farm system rankings out - Jays down near the bottom at #27 with Nimmala the only tier 1 prospect. Tiedemann, Orelvis, Yesavage, Bloss all tier 2's. Good news - Yankees are even worse at #29 (but have 2 tier 1's in Jasson Domínguez & Spencer Jones, just 1 tier 2 in Roderick Arias). The O's are down to #24 (!) with 2 tier 1's (Coby Mayo, Samuel Basallo), and 3 tier 2's (Chayce McDermott, Vance Honeycutt, and Enrique Bradfield Jr.). Boston is #13 with 4 tier 1's (gulp) and 2 tier 2's. Rays are #2 - shocking I know, with 4 tier 1's and 6+ tier 2's (they list a max of 10 guys per system).

So basically the Red Sox are in great position going forward. The Rays are the Rays. Yankees will need to spend, spend spend. The O's need to figure out long term deals with their key players before they get to free agency. Jays... well, we need a miracle.
Marc Hulet - Tuesday, December 31 2024 @ 05:43 PM EST (#454913) #
No offense but I think very little of Bleacher Report and their opinion on the Jays prospects, most of whom they've never seen play... I'm quite certain they know nothing about Daniel Guerra, Gilberto Batista, Cristopher Castro, Brock Tibbitts, etc. Other than their stat lines or what others have written...
bpoz - Tuesday, December 31 2024 @ 07:04 PM EST (#454914) #
I really like the 3 pitchers Marc.
Marc Hulet - Tuesday, December 31 2024 @ 07:43 PM EST (#454915) #
I do, too. Probably in the order that I wrote it. Luis Torres, too, especially if he adds some good weight/muscle.

Colby Holcombe, a college reliever with ugly numbers, looked more impressive than I expected as a starter and could stick in that role.
christaylor - Tuesday, December 31 2024 @ 08:39 PM EST (#454916) #
Donaldson is a terrible comp with Vlad. Not only is Vlad younger, but he didn't have to abuse his body as a catcher early in his career.

If we're inclined to believe the rumors, when Vlad was mediocre in 2022 and 2023, it could have been because he played through minor injuries. So, we've seen the bottom.
pooks137 - Wednesday, January 01 2025 @ 03:13 AM EST (#454917) #
I'm not predicting an injury based for Vlad based on Donaldson as a comp.

I was simply using Donaldson as a walk year disaster resulting in very little return for a pending former MVP FA in recent memory.

I was responding to another poster pondering out loud why anyone would prefer trading Vlad this offseason over one last low-prob Hail Mary contention run followed by dumping him at the deadline.

The Josh Donaldson example. That's why.
vw_fan17 - Wednesday, January 01 2025 @ 05:51 AM EST (#454918) #
So is Vlad's "bottom" 2 WAR or 4 WAR? 

If you prorate 2020, it seems he has 3 seasons of 2 WAR, 1 with 4 and 2 of 6.x. B-R has his "162 game average" as 4.3 WAR - that's around $32-35 M/year, IIRC. Not $50M/year. Soto, in contrast, is averaging 6.3 per 162 games, both through their age 25 seasons. That's a HUGE difference - easily $20-30M/year in additional value for the same player because of the non-linear nature of WAR. If Vlad truly wants Soto/Ohtani money, it's time to find the best trade and "oh well". If you give him $60M/year, you'll have $30-40M of negative value in the later years when his defense declines, his body wears and he's purely a DH, maybe even more. Would you have signed Miguel Cabrera to a 15-year deal after his age 25 season? Detroit effectively did that.. and during his last 7 years, he produced -2.7WAR. Sure, he some great years - but his contract was WAY out line overall with his production.

This post is quite interesting - it tries to list all COMPLETED $100M+ contracts (in adjusted dollars). There are a few HUGE winners, like Randy Johnson and Barry Bonds. But WAY more end up with HUGE negative value over the lifetime of the contract.
https://www.reddit.com/r/baseball/comments/17n80hb/with_detroit_declining_miguel_cabreras_option_his/

I'm not too comfortable with the idea that the team should throw in an extra $200M above what Vlad is worth, just because we're short of good players right now..
Randy - Wednesday, January 01 2025 @ 09:29 AM EST (#454919) #
Does anyone know if Hagen Danner was claimed after being DFA'd or did he pass through waivers and remains in Jays org?
dalimon5 - Wednesday, January 01 2025 @ 09:43 AM EST (#454920) #
Vw,

That is an amazing list.
scottt - Wednesday, January 01 2025 @ 09:43 AM EST (#454921) #
Neither. The DFA period has been frozen over the holidays.
Something will happen in a few more days.
Marc Hulet - Wednesday, January 01 2025 @ 12:48 PM EST (#454922) #
Rangers catcher Sam Huff was DFA'd recently and might be worth a look as a third-string catcher, back-up 1B, and platoon DH in an org low on upper-level C options (and power). Offensive consistency might improve with decreased focus on catching.
Cracka - Wednesday, January 01 2025 @ 01:24 PM EST (#454923) #
That is an amazing list.

Agreed. What was most notable to me is that 6 of the 9 worst contracts on the list are for plus-sized 1B/DH types: Cabrera (6'4, 267 lbs), Howard (6'4, 250), Fielder (5'11, 275), Davis (6'4, 255), Pujols (6'3, 235), and Vaughn (6'1, 225). Vlady is 6'2, 245.... caveat emptor!
John Northey - Wednesday, January 01 2025 @ 02:06 PM EST (#454924) #
Excellent point - A 5 year deal makes a TON of sense with Vlad. Each year you go past that is escalating risk. Thus it makes a lot of sense that he'd want a 10+ year deal (minimize his own risk). The Jays $340/10+ year deal made some sense - a bit of risk on the Jays part, but not insanely so. Lets do a quick check on when those guys became worthless...
  • Pujols: Last 3+ WAR season was age 35, last 2+ was age 42 (final season). Age 23-30 was 7.5+ WAR each season, 5.3 peak after that (at 31) 26-35 62.3 bWAR - yeah. Waaay above Vlad for quality, but worth noting the big drop after 30.
  • Miguel Cabrera: 5.1 bWAR at age 33, -2.7 age 34+ (never higher than 0.2 in any year). 26-35: 48.2 bWAR. 20-25 21.0 bWAR vs Vlad 21.5 - both used at 3B but teams figuring out they belong at 1B by the age of 25 - not that it stopped either club from putting them at 3B anyways (Miggie a full time 3B his 2 MVP seasons, just 11 at 3B after that)
  • Prince Fielder: Had a 2.0 at 31, career over at 32. 26-35: 13.1 bWAR - driven down by his neck injury which was very freakish and unlikely to be a factor for Vlad.
  • Ryan Howard: Only had 4 years of 2+ bWAR, thus his deal never made a lick of sense. 26-35: 12.5 bWAR, his peak was 25-29 16.8 bWAR, age 30+ he never had more than 1.2 bWAR in a season.
  • Chris Davis: Like Howard, his deal was totally illogical. 3 seasons over 2 WAR, 199+ K's in all 3. The red warning lights were flashing but the O's did the deal anyways. Age 30 his last positive WAR season (3.1), 26-30 his only good years 17.8 bWAR.
  • Mo Vaughn: Age 30 his last 2+ WAR season (5.6) but not worthless at 31/32 with 1.8 each year, then hurt and that was it. 26-35 24.5 bWAR, but only 3 seasons before that peaking at 3.2 bWAR (other 2 were negative).
IMO Cabrera is the best comparison point of all of these guys by a mile. Like Vlad he was used at 3B (but also OF) pre-age 26, and they have very similar WAR totals through age 25, both up at 20. He suggests a 10 year deal could work for around $450-$500 mil, but that is pushing it and leaves very little margin of error for the Jays should Vlad go more the Fielder, Davis, Howard, Vaughn route. Howard/Davis/Vaughn are not really comparable as all 3 were much lesser players than Vlad, while Pujols was a much better player. Fielder had just 10.8 bWAR through age 25, with 1 season of 6+ bWAR, not 2. His neck injury was a bit odd (herniated disc) but might have been aggravated by his playing all 162 games every chance he got (Vlad would do this but the team won't let him). I suspect if the Jays did sign Vlad they'd insist on him accepting time off here and there to ensure this never happens to him. In the end I'd be surprised if the Jays ever offer more than $450 mil over whatever time period. The risk is just too high. Someone else might be dumb enough to give him $500+ next winter, but I can't imagine the Jays doing that.
electric carrot - Wednesday, January 01 2025 @ 02:09 PM EST (#454925) #
I wonder how many of those contracts on the list started when the player was 25 years old or younger? This seems like a significant point.
John Northey - Wednesday, January 01 2025 @ 02:18 PM EST (#454926) #
Interesting that the only Jays contract on that list is Vernon Wells - a big negative. $153,636,306.35 producing just 6.8 bWAR, net value of -$90,824,706.35 - it is based on inflation adjusted figures (baseball inflation, not real world). Carlos Delgado's last contract here might qualify as $100 mil when you factor that inflation in - it was $68 mil for 4 years (2001-2004) - that was a good deal even if JPR hated it - 18.2 bWAR over 4 years is damn fine (4.55 bWAR per year, just one season sub 4.5). Adjustment for 2001 contracts is 2.06 so his $68 = $140.1 in modern dollars or 13 WAR/$100 million spent which puts it right around the 'mildly profitable' section of the chart on reddit. Interesting.
dalimon5 - Wednesday, January 01 2025 @ 02:26 PM EST (#454927) #
electric, I don't think it makes much of a difference because he's going to factor that into the length request of the deal. Most of the bad deals on the list 6 or 7 year deals ...there's only 3 10 year deals on the list total...definitely more contracts will show up as poor in a few years as the length has gone up.

Vlad will want to top Tatis, Bogaerts, Turner, Judge and come as close as he can to Ohtani and Soto. These players all signed recently or in a cooler market for 9, 10, 11, 14 and 15 years and they were all older than him.

If your point is "Vlad is only 25 so signing him for 7-10 years gives you his age 25 to 32/35 seasons which you can't compare to those other players from the list who signed when they were 5 years older" then yeah, I don't think you're wrong, BUT, I'm assuming Vladdy and his agents are asking for a deal of minimum 12 years and more likely 14 years. The only way I see that not being the case is if he does a shorter deal with multiple opt outs to benefit himself, in which case why would he bother when he can get a 15 year deal and minimum 30-35 million each year from NY, CHI, BOS or LA?
uglyone - Wednesday, January 01 2025 @ 03:12 PM EST (#454928) #
Signing him for 10yrs when he was, say, 22 or 23 might have been smart.
dalimon5 - Wednesday, January 01 2025 @ 03:43 PM EST (#454929) #
It would have been smart just like the Nationals signed Soto when he was 22 or 23. Acuna and Franco are the exceptions not the rule. I also don't think they sign those team friendly deals in today's market.

I'm not going to argue with you because I don't disagree with you either. Comparable players like Tatis Jr and Julio Rodriguez signed because those FO didn't tip toe the issue and for that this FO should be raked because Vlad 100% would have signed a 350 million deal 3 or 4 years ago I bet. This FO just don't see him as valuable as those other guys and at a certain point they have to own that. "He's not a generationL player. He's not worth the money," etc. Stop billing him and Bo as your core if you don't even believe in them yourself, and if you do believe then you gotta wear the collar of botching this whole thing.
SK in NJ - Wednesday, January 01 2025 @ 04:08 PM EST (#454930) #
"This FO just don't see him as valuable as those other guys"

I think is the right answer. It's not that they aren't trying to extend him, it's just likely that they have a certain idea of what they think he's worth and don't want to blow past that because they don't think he's on the same level as a superstar SS (at the time) in Tatis and Witt, or CF like Rodriguez, etc. I said a couple of years ago that the good thing about potentially losing Vlad and Bo, if it came to that, was that they have enough long-term risk (due to defense, baserunning, risky profile with Bo, etc) that as long as the team developed talent to replace them that the team would be okay. Unfortunately they haven't been able to develop that talent, so it's come to this.
John Northey - Wednesday, January 01 2025 @ 05:50 PM EST (#454931) #
Agreed 100% - any front office with any brains would agree, Vlad is NOT as valuable as Soto, Ohtani, Tatis, or Witt. Great bat, but nothing else and that bat has yet to reach the heights of Soto, Ohtani, or Judge. Vlad is a damn good player, but I agree with the front office that he isn't a generational player like Soto & Ohtani are. 25 years from now Jay fans will remember him, but average fans? No. Delgado was a damn good player, at peak more valuable than Vlad, but no HOF for him.

So what is likely to happen? Vlad becomes a free agent post 2025, along with Bo. Both go to the top bidder, whoever that may be. I'd love them to stick around but realistically the Jays will not go past a valuation that makes sense to the front office, whereas the Mets and others might go to stupid places. Jays stuck their necks out for Springer and Ryu and in both cases the extra year tagged on to get them was wasted money, as expected, but without those 2 I doubt we see the strong 4 year stretch we got (3 playoffs and a 91 win season that came up just short).
dalimon5 - Wednesday, January 01 2025 @ 06:56 PM EST (#454932) #
Also starting to realize that the overpays on Springer and Ryu were likely done with the fact that SS and 1B were incredibly underpaid at the time.
uglyone - Wednesday, January 01 2025 @ 07:01 PM EST (#454933) #
Yes let's all celebrate not committing the ultimate sin of moderately overpaying a charismatic young homegrown elite star player.
John Northey - Wednesday, January 01 2025 @ 07:43 PM EST (#454934) #
Moderate overpay? I'm guessing he is asking for about $10 mil a year more than he is expected to be worth. Past experience shows only 1 thing draws fans - winning. Charisma, history, etc. have never done the job.
uglyone - Wednesday, January 01 2025 @ 07:45 PM EST (#454935) #
and $10m buys you what kind of FA?
John Northey - Wednesday, January 01 2025 @ 09:48 PM EST (#454936) #
Well, logically if I spent 33% extra in pay on someone at an office vs what they were worth I'd be fired fairly quickly. $10 mil buys you a quality reliever, or a decent backup player, or is the difference between signing Corben Burnes and Luis Severino, or Teoscar Hernandez vs Max Kepler.

So the Jays have choices to make. Is Vlad worth that extra risk? I'd feel you need to hope he earns the entire contract in years 1-5, with years 6-10 being OK, but nothing special, while years 11-15 are write offs while he tries to reach magic numbers. Best case he is worth 6 WAR per year years 1-5 (big assumption) 30 WAR, then 6-10 2-3 WAR a year or 12.5 then assume 0 after that. So 42.5 bWAR which by most measures is worth about $425 mil. Now that pushing of WAR together in years 1-5 has bonus value, but it is hard to measure that, so lets say $450 mil as a figure the Jays could justify. If Vlad is demanding $500-$600 to sign then it makes zero sense to do so, at least if you are running the team and want to keep your job. I say that as there is the risk mentioned earlier that he gets hurt, drops back to 22/23 levels (2-3 WAR) and never climbs back to the 6 level. There is also a slim shot he grows into a 7-8+ WAR guy with a 180-200 OPS+. Betting on that though would be foolish to put it mildly.

As to signing him before now, odds are that wasn't going to happen. He had 1 really good year before 2024, so the idea of locking in $300 mil over 10+ years to him would've been a non-starter. Anything less and he'd have been insulted as he thought of himself as a top 5 player (and still does obviously). At this stage waiting until next offseason makes the most sense. If he has a 'wow' year, then he will get that crazy contract. If he doesn't, the Jays can sign him for $340 mil probably if they still want to. A mid-season trade wouldn't shock me at all, nor would Vlad playing at a higher level than ever to justify that mega deal he wants - thus pushing the Jays towards the playoffs. Remember, having Delgado playing at that level never got the Jays into the playoffs, nor did having Halladay win Cy's, it is a team game and that means the team can survive losing any player. Heck, the Edmonton Oilers won a cup after losing Gretzky for the ultimate 'how can we survive losing player xyz' situation. For baseball you get the Red Sox trading Nomar Garciaparra during 2004, then winning the WS despite losing arguably their biggest star. The Jays won it all in 1992 with Dave Winfield, the heart and soul of the team, they dumped him for Paul Molitor that winter and won a second title.
uglyone - Wednesday, January 01 2025 @ 10:28 PM EST (#454937) #
well i'm certainly happier with the current tirefire than the risk of not being able to pay a middle reliever.
dalimon5 - Thursday, January 02 2025 @ 12:15 AM EST (#454938) #
Different view points. I remember Ugly wanted David Price resigned. He's on the list in a negative light. Did it motivate Boston ownership to strip down the team and cut payroll or was it something else that caused it?
Michael - Thursday, January 02 2025 @ 03:48 AM EST (#454939) #
You don't want to overpay for people; however, you still need to actually find value. There are a limited number of people/positions etc. and having a bunch of people "worth" 8-10M on contracts of 2-5M is great "value" but if you don't have any actually valuable superstars that you use that value to acquire you will have a suboptimal non-competitive team. And sure, it is better to have a $100M non-competitive team than a $200M non-competitive team, but at the end of the day, a competitive team is best of all and there are generally less than 5 true superstars available each year, so your choices are few and far between.

It wasn't that long ago everyone was saying extend Bo and dump Vlad, so these things can change, but I don't think the Jays have a bunch of superstar choices, so I'd rather sign Vlad (and possibly Bo).
Katie - Thursday, January 02 2025 @ 09:33 AM EST (#454940) #
The idea that signing Vlad before this season was a non-starter is not something I agree with. In his age 22 season, Vlad put up an OPS over 1000. He had been an above average offensive player since coming to the big leagues at the age of 20, after being a highly-rated player since he signed.

Players don't put up 1000 OPS as a 22-year-old by fluke. A good percentage of those who do are future Hall of Famers.

Maybe they weren't able to agree on a number, but if the Jays could have gotten Vlad on a 10+ year contract for 340 million in 2022 or 2023, they absolutely should have done it. Maybe Vlad wanted 500 million, but any large FA contract involves a lot of risk and I'd rather take the risk on a homegrown superstar during the prime of his career. As we've seen, the alternative is making bids for the stars and falling short, or getting star players who are on the downside of their career.

a proactive front office would have explored extensions throughout the past three years. Maybe they did, but there's nothing to suggest it was seriously explored. Now, they didn't, so this is a somewhat pointless discussion, but Vlad was exactly the calculated risk this front office should take.
soupman - Thursday, January 02 2025 @ 10:02 AM EST (#454941) #
If I was a Boston fan I would trade 10/10 times winning the World Series in 2018 with Price and shipping Mookie over keeping Mookie and…maybe winning at some point.

The Jays should have kept Price and AA in 2015. Would they have won the 2016 World Series? I don’t know but I bet Dombrowski would have still taken him in a trade after 2016 or even 2017. I doubt the Jays would have eaten what the Red Sox ate to get rid of him.

dalimon5 - Thursday, January 02 2025 @ 10:22 AM EST (#454942) #
Michael that post is bang on and should be pinned at the top of every thread. It contextualizes what proponents of each side of the argument want and how both value and overpays can co-exist if done right.

Katie, this FO absolutely could have overpaid a few years ago for Vlad and Bo and then saves money by overpaying then instead of now. They decided not to and wanted Bo/Vlad to prove themselves without commitment and security from the FO.

This thread and the posts show how Shapiro and Atkins were right to not re-sign Vlad or Bo and also wrong to not re-sign them. Basically they now are im a position to show everyone how smart they really are because they need to do the following to "win":

1. Find at least two 4+ WAR offensive-minded players to sign long term at fair value
2. Find 2 strong SP for 2026 and beyond
3. Get a clean up hitter and other complimentary pieces to compete

No pressure but all this FO's own doing.
85bluejay - Thursday, January 02 2025 @ 10:32 AM EST (#454943) #
The Jays apparently offered Vlad 340/10 recently, which he declined - I would have given a thumbs down to that deal as a Jays fan - I have always felt that Vlad's body type will age poorly and so I think Vlad has maybe 5 star quality years left and paying 340m for that is a poor investment IMO. The Guardians moved on from Lindor, the Diamondbacks from Paul Goldschmidt, the Astros from Cole & Springer and those teams did all right because they kept acquiring & developing quality young talent and then augmented that core. With or without Vlad & Bo, the Jays future is bleak unless the team start acquiring and developing quality young talent - let's hope that last July's selloff is a positive start.
John Northey - Thursday, January 02 2025 @ 10:43 AM EST (#454944) #
In the end winning a WS is what it is all about. Each team has resources (cash) and has to decide how to use them. AA spent a lot on pro scouts so he'd know who the best marginal players were so he could hunt for more Bautista and Encarnacions (he didn't find any, but did get a few good half years out of guys). He also hired good international scouts (as seen by signing Vlad, and I'm assuming his scouts were the ones who recommended signing Kirk & Moreno the year after AA was gone).

Shapiro clearly made facilities a key part of his spending. Rebuilding the dome, and building up a high end training complex. IMO good spends, both should pay for themselves over time. But the question now is where do those dollars go - more international scouting? More to free agents/home grown stars? Clearly finding the gems in the IFA market is of extreme value, as is finding the top players to sign in the draft. Free agency and long term deals with home grown stars is very expensive and doesn't often provide extra value unless they are the final piece to winning. Given who is running the Jays I suspect they are hard after the long term most profitable plan, not the short term one. They chase free agents but with a price in mind which hasn't been found often the past 2 winters, and especially not on the high end players.

Rumor mill has Bergman for 7/$196 mil the latest (I can't imagine the Jays doing that for his age 31-37 seasons). Safe to say the Jays won't offer more than 5 years unless he is willing to get 5 years of pay spread over more years to lessen the luxury tax impact. At 4 WAR last year the optimistic view would be another 4, 3.5, 3, 2.5, 2, 1.5, 1 = 17.5 WAR over 7 years, less optimistic is 3.5-3-2.5-2-1.5-1-0.5 = 14 WAR - from what I've seen most projection systems see a steady 1/2 WAR drop per year post 30. If you go with a really pessimistic one, where he drops by 1 WAR per year at 35 and beyond, then you get 11-14.5 for the range, with worse still possible (injuries, quicker decline). Betting on guys in their 30's is a bad bet. Which brings us full circle back to Vlad. Entering age 26 season, I think it is reasonable to project any 10+ year deal to be worth 40+ WAR based on all the cases I've listed before. That is very solid, and would put him on the cusp of the HOF (60+ WAR). Odds of him doing it is better than the odds of getting 20 WAR from Bregman, do you risk throwing away $100 mil extra beyond his surface baseball value to get that? Also is that surface value correct? Each WAR past 2 is worth more than those first 2 based on some studies (and logic - finding a 0-2 WAR guy is far easier than a 2-4, which is easier than a 4-6, etc.). Sigh. I'm going to flip flop on Vlad non-stop aren't I? Lucky I'm not working in the Jays front office I guess. But if I was there I'd have tried to get a sit-down with him and his agent right after the WS to figure out a long term deal. I'd have had $400 mil as the max at that point (based on what we knew then - I certainly didn't see Soto getting $700+ mil) and told him how we want to get him signed to help us in the selling of the team to other free agents like Soto. Ah well, horse out of the barn and stuff. Now his price is $500+ mil. If he is at $600 then it is pure silliness to sign him (I see that as a 50% premium), I find it hard to imagine him providing that kind of value. $400 mil sounds right, $450 to give a premium. Going to $500+ is a marketing choice.
Michael - Thursday, January 02 2025 @ 01:56 PM EST (#454945) #
Some of that depends on years too, right. If $400M/10 years is fairish expected value for Vlad, is $500M/15 years better or worse than that? There may be desire for the highest number possible in "total contact numbers" which some people report on and chase. And Vlad may not be worth $100M/5 years for ages 35-40, but there is salary inflation over the next 10 years, the future present value of the salary (I.e., a way to deflate the real costs), and 33.3M/year against the salary cap instead of 40M/year against the salary cap.

There is also some question on does the current year count as part of the salary extension or not. If Vlad was a FA this year and planning to sign a 1 year FA contract only and shopping around what would teams offer for a 1 year contract for next year? I'm guessing $50M wouldn't be off the table when it is only 1 year and no continuing risk after the success of last year. He's going to get just under $30M in his last year of arbitration (28.8 I think I saw predicted) so there is ~20M of value that the Jays are capturing in value this year in some ways of measuring, so does the 10 year be including this year or not and is Vlad thinking a long term extension for around 40-45M/year should include this year or not? That is an additional consideration for an extension now or not.

In some sense eating some of that 15-20M additional value is the Jays premium for being able to exclusively negotiate with him now versus it being a free for all after this year (with the added info from this year which could cause his value to increase or decrease again).
soupman - Thursday, January 02 2025 @ 03:01 PM EST (#454946) #
Through Age 25:
Player A: 21.0 rWAR 175 HR 309/381/541 OPS+ 140
Player B: 21.5 rWAR 160 HR 288/363/500 OPS+ 137

Player A would follow that up with MVP finishes: 4,2,5,1,1 and is Miguel Cabrera.
Player B is, of course, Vlad.

Do you want peak Miguel Cabrera on the team, or do you want...I don't even know how anyone could think not having that type of player at any cost is not a wise decision.

Signing Vlad is an easy decision and he's going to get more next winter than he's asking now from one of the New York teams. Toronto is not serious about winning if, after seeing how much trouble it has had getting players to take its money, is too...confused (to put it kindly) to realize that Vlad is offering them a gift if he signs for any price here.

Or trade him, but the time to have done that was in 2021. If you still aren't sure if you believe in him, then you already messed up keeping him this long because out of 30 teams, there is someone that is going to look at the Miggy comp and decide that's a reasonable expectation.
dalimon5 - Thursday, January 02 2025 @ 03:10 PM EST (#454947) #
soupman did you look at the list posted earlier?
dalimon5 - Thursday, January 02 2025 @ 03:15 PM EST (#454948) #
Apparently Jays have made an offer of 4 years and 82 million to Santander.
Marc Hulet - Thursday, January 02 2025 @ 03:16 PM EST (#454949) #
In comparing through FanGraph data between Cabrera and Vlad, the former rated better at base running and at fielding... and was also more consistent with the bat.

I don't disagree Vlad will be close to worth a hefty contract for 5-8 years, but it's another 5-7 years after that... it could be org crippling.

Is this team deep enough (and would Rogers invest enough around Vlad) to win over those first 5-8 years because after that, competing will be tough for those next 5-7. They already blew the first 5 of Vladdy/Bo's career.

I don't think it's a good gamble. Sure, for the Yankees, Dodgers, etc that have most of the other pieces in place and decent pipelines... but the Jays have way too many holes and almost no pipeline.
soupman - Thursday, January 02 2025 @ 03:33 PM EST (#454950) #
they can either front or backload the deal. a front loaded deal would give him opt outs to max out earnings if the team can't stay competitive.

a backloaded deal would give the team the ability to keep middling away for a year or two and hopefully see his trade value rise while not having to actually part with the money.
John Northey - Thursday, January 02 2025 @ 04:04 PM EST (#454951) #
4/$82 is reasonable for Santander. MLBTR and FG had him pegged for 4/$80 pre-offseason. We've all heard he wants 5 years or more. If that is indeed the Jays offer then they are staying sane. Bregman is pegged for 6/$162 (FG) or 7/$182 (MLBTR) depending on the source, while I read somewhere (Sporting News I think) that the Jays were ready to offer 8/$196. I'd say TSN's estimate makes zero sense, and I can't see the Jays going to 7 or more years. I'd be surprised if this front office hasn't put a 5 year limit outside of extremely special cases (Soto, Ohtani, Vlad) in place. Going longer than that is a fools game that tends to get you burned unless the guy is 25 or younger and even then you can be badly burned.

I guess part of what is hitting me with Vlad and the idea of overpaying to lock him in is the memory of how the Jays tried that with Delgado and regretted it even though he produced (and that was just a 4 year deal). The Can$ crashed around that time and the Jays went super-cheap for an assortment of reasons (Rogers just bought the club in 2000, and put Godfrey in charge as the team was crashing in attendance and TV ratings). I hope they don't go cheap again, but with the dollar tanking again who knows?
dalimon5 - Thursday, January 02 2025 @ 05:07 PM EST (#454952) #
"I don't think it's a good gamble. Sure, for the Yankees, Dodgers, etc that have most of the other pieces in place and decent pipelines... but the Jays have way too many holes and almost no pipeline."

Pretty much. I'd agree with Uglyone on most of his criticisms and the need to sign these players to massive deals that will hurt you down the line if this org. could have a pipeline.
greenfrog - Thursday, January 02 2025 @ 07:41 PM EST (#454953) #
My suggestion would be to do both: extend Vladdy *and* build a better prospect pipeline (which might require a different front office).

Another thing. If the Blue Jays let Vladdy walk after 2025, he may well end up signing with the Yankees or Red Sox as a free agent. That could mean a double hit to the Blue Jays -- a loss of around 3-6 WAR annually for the next few years at least, with a key division rival adding those same premium WAR to its already-solid roster.
Petey Baseball - Thursday, January 02 2025 @ 07:55 PM EST (#454954) #
Santander will be a good add with a chance to be great. I get Bautista, Encarnacion late bloomer vibes from him. He can DH his final year, if the Jays are able to get him for the reported contract.

But the numbers say he doesn’t take enough walks to really make him elite.

I have no idea why they have reportedly put in an offer for Hyesong Kim, unless they plan on him being super utility this year and second next year after Bichette walks.

Should be an interesting few days as I assume Santander will choose soon.
uglyone - Thursday, January 02 2025 @ 08:30 PM EST (#454955) #
figures we get the name I wanted the least at that price.
Marc Hulet - Thursday, January 02 2025 @ 08:31 PM EST (#454956) #
I'd be fine with 4 years on Santander but he's holding out for 5... wouldn't do that and/or break $100M. His defence and base running are both big negatives, like Vladdy.
dalimon5 - Thursday, January 02 2025 @ 09:11 PM EST (#454957) #
greenfrog!
dalimon5 - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 08:48 AM EST (#454958) #
Richard Griffin and Sal Romano (both former employees of the Blue Jays recently) on their latest podcast have said that Vlad and Shapiro's comments are both smoke screens to control the message, essentially. They say that Rogers has been trying to resign Vlad and Bo for over three years now and the players have told them they are not interested in staying here. They also said that other players will be leaving when they get their chance, like Berrios with his opt out which they said is a done deal ever since the infamous playoff pull. According to them the players have stopped recruiting for the Blue Jays and they want out and its because of the culture cultivated by the front office.
ayjackson - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 09:39 AM EST (#454959) #
Impossible! Shapiro and Atkins are good looking fells who speak well!
Marc Hulet - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 10:04 AM EST (#454960) #
I dunno, Ross looked like he was cultivating a great culture on his boat yesterday while on vacation... rocking the Coca-Cola t-shirt.
uglyone - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 10:18 AM EST (#454961) #
if Rogers has been trying to sign them but they won't sign because of the FO culture then maybe Rogers should do something about the FO culture.
Marc Hulet - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 10:29 AM EST (#454962) #
In many dealings and escalations with Rogers (including to the "Office of the President"), I'm not sure Rogers knows was positive culture looks or sounds like...
uglyone - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 10:32 AM EST (#454963) #
dalimon5 - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 11:02 AM EST (#454964) #
To hear about the culture bombing from two recent employees who generally speak objectively and do not lambast this FO like everyone else...it says a lot. Makes a lot more sense now why the two parties are going back and forth to make it look like they are the one in control over the other "we don't want to overpay Vlad he's not a generational player" and "I gave them my request and they haven't matched..." these are ploys to help themselves before the break up but all it's doing is worsening the culture. Makes you wonder what Bo was whispering to Vlad during the 2023 elimination game after Berrios was pulled. Probably something along the lines of "Schneider is a puppet, this team is a joke and they better get us some help next year." Then Turner came on board.
ISLAND BOY - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 11:34 AM EST (#454965) #
I read somewhere about a month ago that a player agent said a few of his clients were asking him," Are the Blue Jays even trying to win?" I know there is a lot of fake news on the internet, but you got to wonder why the Jays aren't even attracting mid-level free agents, let alone superstars.

If it's true that Vlad, Bo, and others want out, then ownership needs to do something. I'm not surprised if there is fallout from the early pull of Berrios in that playoff game. Between that and Schneider and Atkins trying to deflect blame from themselves afterwards, it added up to a fiasco and I don't know how Schneider kept his job. In the end, baseball players want to win and be happy where they're playing. If you have players not wanting to come to Toronto, and the players on the team looking longingly at the exit sign, then there's definitely something wrong, and it's only us, the fans, that are going to suffer.
SK in NJ - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 11:58 AM EST (#454966) #
The front office losing the clubhouse after the Berrios situation wouldn't surprise me at all. It was a bad decision on the field and probably worse in the clubhouse to see a highly respected veteran who was dominating his former team in a playoff game being taken out early due to a pre game "plan" rather than trusting him to continue. Atkins then threw Schneider under the bus, and even if the players knew it came from above Schneider's head, it seems pretty easy for the players to lose respect for someone who they now know doesn't have their backs. Whether that has impacted the team's ability to sign free agents is something we don't know, but the clubhouse being lost would be the least surprising thing to happen from that.

If it's true that Vlad and Bo both want out, then I'm not sure what the heck the Jays are doing at this point. Sure maybe the offers for Bo will be light due to his 2024 season so it's understandable if they want to hold on to him for a deadline trade, but Vlad should absolutely be traded if he has no intention to staying. The 2024 season was not a 90 win playoff team, it was a 70+ win last place team. There's nothing to hold on to.

I guess we will see if they succeed in signing Santander, and maybe their plan to cobble together a high 80's win wild card team might pay off in the end, but everything about this (if true) is insanity.
electric carrot - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 12:24 PM EST (#454967) #
Yes, if true this report about the team's attitude and especially Vladdy and Bo's position, it makes me sad. In general, I try to mostly ignore what is reported about negotiations etc ... because to me it often seems highly filtered to suit the agendas of its sources rather than genuine information. I hope this is noise too. In this case I'm not so sure.
greenfrog - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 12:24 PM EST (#454968) #
Another open question is whether the organization is putting players in the best position to have success on the field. It sounds as though Kiermaier was blown away in 2024 by how much more advanced pregame player prep was with the Dodgers compared to the Blue Jays. If you were a free agent, wouldn't you want to play for the more professional/cutting edge coaching staff and front office?
John Northey - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 12:34 PM EST (#454969) #
If this is all true then the Jays are in deep trouble. It makes zero sense to spend a fortune building up high end facilities then have a toxic work environment around it. If the environment around the Jays is toxic then Shapiro and Atkins need to go ASAP. There are 3 guys who were seen as top quality GM/president material who are in the front office now who could take over and do a good job - Tony Lacava, Andrew Tinnish, and especially James Click. Click won a WS with the Astros, after putting together a 106 win team after the garbage can mess. He had 3 years there as GM so no idea if he is good at building a farm system sadly due to the short nature of his tenure, but he clearly was handed a toxic work environment and cleaned it up fast (or at least in a way that allowed a title run). His 3 years were ALCS loss-WS loss-WS win.

It'll be interesting to see how Rogers handles this. If the players are wanting out enmass then it is time to change things. I've been on the side of staying put, as the team has done well (vs team history) - Playoffs in 20/22/23 is impressive with 91 wins in '21. 3 years of 89+ wins in a row only happened in 91-93, and 83-85 in Jays history. 10 playoffs in Jays history with 3 of those 100% under this group is impressive too (yeah, easier today than in the 80's, but they did do it), and they get at least partial credit for 2016.

Sucks, but if it is time to change, then I'd do it soon - by spring training, so any new group can try to sign Vlad before the next winter or at least have a shot at trading him mid-season. Leaving a toxic environment around too long will just make the recovery harder.
Nigel - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 12:46 PM EST (#454970) #
I don’t think you need to look very hard to see problems in leadership in this club (non baseball decision making). The Atkins post-Berrios presser was one of the worst examples of “leadership” you can find. I don’t have some of the baseball decision making issues with this FO as others - I think they are sort of average (with strengths and weaknesses) but I would have cleaned house after that presser.

I also highly doubt that it’s the leadership issue that is preventing free agents from coming here. The next 3-4 years look extremely bleak. This team is on the downward slope of the success curve with a very thin farm system. Why would a free agent sign up for that if they gave options?
uglyone - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 12:56 PM EST (#454971) #
Yeah i struggle to think of a single reason why any free agent would choose to ink a longterm deal here tbh.
JB21 - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 01:13 PM EST (#454972) #
How can they be so tone deaf to alienate their players and (seemingly) entire fan base?

The most frustrating part to me is how unlikable they are making this franchise. As a hardcore fan for 35 years I find myself actively rooting for the team to hit rock bottom so we can rid ourselves of these two.
bpoz - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 01:15 PM EST (#454973) #
After the early removal of Berrios in 2023, the 2024 season had much better on field managing. I know that Gausman went deep into games and threw over 100 pitches quite often. I strongly believe that on field managing has improved.

I blame Atkins for bringing KK back a 2nd time. KK cannot help the O but Belt and Turner are reputed to have strong O.

Bo had a very bad season and so did the pen. Also other players like Kirk had bad 1st halves. Atkins did get the payroll below the luxury tax threshold so I give him credit for that. Of our young/inexperienced players only Clement and Horwitz performed well. Wagner gets too much credit for his very hot August and no discredit for his cold Sept. If he can earn more playing time then we will know how good he is. D Schneider needs to rebound.
scottt - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 01:44 PM EST (#454974) #
Honestly. You can't fill up a podcast without making stuff up.
I imagine that Vlad wasn't happy when they traded Teoscar and Gurriel.
Hopefully, he's over that now.

The Berrios stuff has been discussed to death.
He knew starting the game that he was there to get exactly 12 outs--or whatever it was--if anything, the good results might have been the results of not pacing himself for 7 innings.
The exact same thing happened with Shoemaker and Ray in Tampa. Except nobody cared about how Shoemaker felt and unlike Berrios he was visibly upset.

Vlad is going to be the highest paid first baseman in 2025, making nearly 30M.
Nobody has ever signed a first baseman for 200M.
Might as well play the year and see.If Vlad has a great year, they should be competitive.
If Vlad has a poor year, I don't see anyone offering him 300M, let alone 400M.

pooks137 - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 01:58 PM EST (#454975) #
Lots of weight being placed on unsubstantiated gossip.

A big problem since the Ryu and Springer signings is that the fanbase now expects FA upgrades every year to vault the core into contention.

The Jays haven't developed any internal pieces since Vlad an Bo, which was six years ago now.

They signed Ryu before the contention window even began. They got him at a discount be he could never stay healthy. He did not.

They signed Springer as a proven winner big bat CF. But he aged out and will struggle to be even league average in RF.

They signed Semien to a pillow contract and he played like a MVP. But they couldn't afford him.

They went out and signed Gausman and Bassitt because they didn't develop pitching. They've pitched well, but are expensive and aging, now regressing towards league average.

The fanbase is disappointed that the FO hasn't gone out and continued the trend of acquiring fresh mercenaries in '24 & '25.

But the Jays have always used FA to complement the core, not used it to reload every year to try to contend anew.

Midmarket teams like the Jays can't build entire rosters through FA every winter.

The panic now is that there is no homegrown core and the graduating class from the last one in Vlad & Bo are about to leave for better promotions.
JB21 - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 02:10 PM EST (#454976) #
But they couldn't afford him.

Disagree!

I do agree that the podcast comments need to be taken with a huge grain of salt, but there's no doubt that the F.O. has a way of pissing off their fan base that is pretty special. Some of the moves they have made have worked out, others not, which is fine BUT the two biggest issues are their lack of developing internally and their public relations. They are pretty horrendous at both.
soupman - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 02:11 PM EST (#454977) #
I don't understand the obsession with Click. He was tossed by the owner that hated him and took credit for the WS because Click wouldn't pay Verlander when he was directly told to do so.

Click has never, as far as I know, even been to Canada so I'm not sure how much he is in the front office at least in a literal sense.

The team ought to hire someone young and ambitious, not another person coming here to retire on a Rogers pension. They would do well going and courting kids in third year at an Ivy taking Econ like top tier investment banks have done for as long as I can remember and the Rays did 20 years ago.

I'll restate what I said a month ago: get rid of them all before they do something stupid.
John Northey - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 02:21 PM EST (#454978) #
Here is a problem with the fanbase - the Jays are by any measure a large market team, one of the largest in baseball. Why do I say this? TV ratings, they get 500k+ every game when in contention or seen as being in contention (no other team gets ratings like this). Attendance - 3 mil+ when winning. Local market size - 3 million in Toronto, 6.7 in the GTA. Greater Boston is just 4.9 million for a comparison point (Boston itself is sub 1 mil). Yeah, NYC is massive (over 8 mil, with Greater NYC at 23.6 mil) but split between 2 teams and unlike the Jays they don't have another 30+ mil potential TV viewers who are exclusive to them.

The Jays pretending to be a mid market team is never good. They can and should have a payroll in the $300 mil range. If others can afford it, so can they. Yeah, the Canadian dollar is an issue, but it didn't stop them from having the #1 payroll in the early 90's when they won it all, nor should it stop them now. This isn't a Baltimore situation (massive revenue thanks to stealing from Washington). At the very least they need to spend like all teams outside of NY and LAD do. Being lower than top 5 in spending is a sign of profit taking. Last year the Phillies, Astros, and Rangers in addition to the Mets/Yankees/Dodgers spent more than the Jays.

Fans will pack the park if they can be contenders. 2025 will be difficult if kids don't emerge out of nowhere (ala Schneider in '23 and Wagner '24), or they fail to sign/trade for a big bat for 3B/LF/DH. Can Orelvis Martinez hit like he has shown he can in the minors (last 3 years OPS in minors 732-835-869)? Can Barger (OPS last 3 years in minors 933-745-857)? Loperfido was seen as a potential middle of the order bat at one time, can he emerge (last 3 years in minors OPS of 900-880-933 but in the PCL which is a hitters paradise)? There is potential, but will any of it be realized? Guess we'll find out as I seriously doubt Bregman or Santander will sign here (market shifted, and the Jays aren't willing to spend outside their comfort zone).
Marc Hulet - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 02:53 PM EST (#454979) #
Hye-seong Kim has signed with the Dodgers.
uglyone - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 03:02 PM EST (#454980) #
pretty sure we were runners up tho.
Marc Hulet - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 04:06 PM EST (#454981) #
Also BNS posted for the first time in quite a while and said the "Tigers are very motivated on Bregman" which is no doubt the powers-that-be managing fans' expectations for him. BNS said he had nothing to add on Santander, so read into that as you wish.
Nigel - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 04:34 PM EST (#454982) #
I don’t have a problem with the FO not adding expensive free agents to the team this offseason. From a purely baseball perspective, last offseason was the year to either invest or start divesting. I think it clear that the FO didn’t believe in the future of this core and decided not to add. That may or may not have been right but it wasn’t a crazy decision. What I think is also clear is that for revenue generation purposes they couldn’t sell the core so we’re just playing out the string until after this next season. From an ownership perspective it all makes sense but it is frustrating from a baseball decision making perspective. It’s 2017 all over again. Do nothing was always going to be the play this offseason.
dalimon5 - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 04:34 PM EST (#454983) #
One podcast note that I left out was Mike Wilner's Deep Left Field. Perhaps he reads our boards as he as really simmered down and even thrown some compliments the way of Shapiro and Atkins while remaining logically critical since that one episode with Chisholm.

Anyways...on his last podcast he had Alek Manoah who went into some details about attracting free agents to Toronto and about Chris Bassitt who felt compelled to sign in Toronto so he could be part of a staff with Gausman, Berrios and Manoah who all had lots of years of control.

This shows that players want more than simply $$$ as we all know and that having a team with 2 players signed beyond 2026 is scary for current free agents. I can see why Burnes would not want to sign with a team that has Manoah and Rodriguez signed long term and nobody else.
Nigel - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 04:36 PM EST (#454984) #
And there will almost certainly be a lipstick on the pig transaction or two to come so that will keep things interesting until the spring:). And youneverknow
Gerry - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 04:58 PM EST (#454985) #
I listened to (some of) the Griffin podcast. I also listened to (some of) their previous podcast recorded in mid December.

My first comment is that Mal Romanin seems very negative about the Jays. I know Atkins fired him, that could be a reason.

When I listened to the Vlad discussion I was listening for a comment such as my sources tell me. I didn't hear that. What I heard was that the two of them feel that because of Shapiro's comments at the end of the season, because nothing has been done yet, and because the FO has not asked Vladdy to participate in pitching for free agents such as Santander, he is as good as gone.

I listened to the previous episode to see if they held that same opinion in December. They did not, or at least Griff didn't. Griffin said if he was GM he would offer Vlad the third highest contract in history. $30M in 2025, five years at $35M and nine years at $40M. Total is $565M up to Vladdy's age 39 season.

No-one said that Vlad would not sign if the money was big enough. I think that the opinions in this weeks podcast are what I would call circumstantial evidence. They could be true but at the end of the day money talks.
pooks137 - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 05:14 PM EST (#454986) #
Anyways...on his last podcast he had Alek Manoah who went into some details about attracting free agents to Toronto and about Chris Bassitt who felt compelled to sign in Toronto so he could be part of a staff with Gausman, Berrios and Manoah who all had lots of years of control.

This shows that players want more than simply $$$ as we all know and that having a team with 2 players signed beyond 2026 is scary for current free agents. I can see why Burnes would not want to sign with a team that has Manoah and Rodriguez signed long term and nobody else.

Again, I think a lot of these off-the-cuff comments from players about free agency really have to be considered with a skeptical eye (or ear).

The top priorities for players (and agents) are 1) money 2) money 3) term 4) money. If the offers are close, geography, wife/family/ethnicity considerations may come into play as a tiebreaker.

But players aren't going to come out and say that in interviews. So they have to make up some BS about choosing Toronto because they wanted to pitch alongside Gausman and Manoah instead of the fact that they were offered 63 million as a late-blooming mid-30s SP.

dalimon5 - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 05:37 PM EST (#454987) #
Gerry and Pooks well said both.
dalimon5 - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 05:43 PM EST (#454988) #
Santander and Jays close to a deal. They are haggling over an extra year at 20 million.
Nigel - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 05:58 PM EST (#454989) #
Santander - lipstick on a pig:). Why one would be ok with paying Santander $20plus million a year for his 30-34 age years but not paying Vladdy his $400m plus is an interesting question. I can see the argument for doing both or doing neither but one and not the other?
John Northey - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 06:03 PM EST (#454990) #
Weird winter - O's just signed Charlie Morton for 1 year $15 mil - a guy entering his age 41 season, a 101 lifetime ERA+, 99 last year, 120 in '23. Stable signing but a guy who is a #3 at best. For a young team that is trying to contend and has pitching issues seems an odd choice, but cheap which fits that club.

Meanwhile the Dodgers signed Hyeseong Kim for 3/$12.5 mil total with 2 team option years total of $9.5 over those 2 years. Dang, that isn't much. FG has him as a backup infielder for them. Seen as a fantastic glove with a poor bat for the majors. Dodgers now just flexing muscle to get rock solid backup situations.

Bregman said to be wanting to go to Detroit. Santander has been begging for a 5th year all winter. It'll be interesting to see what happens with those 2. Right now if I had to guess I'd guess the Jays get neither. But they have been linked to Santander all winter, said to be hard on him from early on as a backup plan to Soto.

As to the sour grapes stuff towards the front office - as I said above, if real then Rogers needs to address it, fast. If not real then just keep ignoring it.
dalimon5 - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 06:14 PM EST (#454991) #
"Santander - lipstick on a pig:). Why one would be ok with paying Santander $20plus million a year for his 30-34 age years but not paying Vladdy his $400m plus is an interesting question. I can see the argument for doing both or doing neither but one and not the other?" These are separate items.

They are okay to sign Santander for those ages because that's the best option for power.

They are not okay to sign Vladdy, allegedly, because they will have to pay him through to his age 40 season never mind his ages 30-34 years. Also the reports that Vlad doesn't want to sign here.
greenfrog - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 06:20 PM EST (#454992) #
My guess is that a Vladdy extension is not happening (for whatever reason — money, team culture, poor relationship between the player and the front office). Signing someone like Santander would be part of the front office’s effort to scrape into the postseason in 2025 — or at least keep the team from falling out of the race early on. And generate some level of interest among the now-disenchanted fan base.

I don’t see Santander as someone who would make much of a difference to the team’s chances of making the postseason this year, at least without two or three other significant moves.

I would also like to see a new manager and/or coaching staff that adds value to the team’s on-field performance. Has anyone in MLB ever praised Schneider’s acumen as a manager over the last couple of years? Somehow the team needs to become more, not less than, the sum of its parts.

I guess real change is most likely to happen after the 2025 season.
SK in NJ - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 06:58 PM EST (#454993) #
"Santander - lipstick on a pig:). Why one would be ok with paying Santander $20plus million a year for his 30-34 age years but not paying Vladdy his $400m plus is an interesting question. I can see the argument for doing both or doing neither but one and not the other?"


My guess is that Vladdy doesn't want $400M, he wants a lot more. He sees himself as one of the best players in baseball, and just saw multiple $700M+ contracts signed in consecutive winters. If he's determined to test the market, then the difference between $80-100M for Santander and whatever Vladdy is asking for over a 10-15 year period is likely astronomical.
dalimon5 - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 08:18 PM EST (#454994) #
Rogers news:

"Rogers’s media business, which includes sports, television and radio programming, accounts for about 10 per cent of the company’s overall revenue, which was up 11 per cent in the third quarter. Higher revenues from subscribers and the Toronto Blue Jays were offset by costs related to renovations at the Rogers Centre stadium in Toronto."

Source: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-rogers-says-2024-revenue-growth-to-fall-short-of-forecast-due-to-media/
Nigel - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 08:39 PM EST (#454995) #
I probably was less than clear. If you can’t sign Vladdy what on earth is the purpose of signing Santander?
soupman - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 08:50 PM EST (#454996) #
Supposedly Wilner thinks Shapiro and his coterie of yes men are safe even if the team loses. No shock there. Fans keep spending so I’m not sure why they’d change course.

When I moved to the west coast I watched way more late games. Unless you count Canadians games I haven’t given money to this organization since 2015. I’ve been voting with my dollars and now I’ll go back to voting with my attention as well.

This is just what this fanbase tolerates. I think it’s a Canadian thing- and I don’t think that’s a good thing.
uglyone - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 08:53 PM EST (#454997) #
"If you can’t sign Vladdy what on earth is the purpose of signing Santander?"

Let's call it the Kendry Kope.
Marc Hulet - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 09:33 PM EST (#454998) #
I'm with you, Nigel... there are much better ways to fix the team with a soft rebuild that don't include needlessly flushing draft pick and international pool money for someone that's not going to move the needle on winning in 2025...

Club also has nine starting pitchers that are going to miss most, if not all, of 2025 due to TJ or internal brace surgery, which has a massive impact on their pitching depth over the next 2-3 years. Hopefully they've figured out what they were doing wrong and don't add another large group of arms to the sidelines in the coming season....
Nigel - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 09:33 PM EST (#454999) #
Or lipstick on the pig:)
Nigel - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 09:37 PM EST (#455000) #
I’ll go further. One of the key assets that a rebuilding team can use is payroll room. In 2025, why not take on a bad contract (and get assets to do so) rather than have Santander on the roster? It’s just such muddled team building.
greenfrog - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 10:20 PM EST (#455001) #
Probably the answer is money (maintaining certain level of revenue) and pressure to perform in the short term.

This is the very end of the 2020-2025 window of contention. (Arguably, the window has already closed.) Management is apparently going to give that lemon one last squeeze and hope for the best (4-6 WAR seasons from Vladdy, Bo, Gimenez, Gausman, etc). It doesn’t have a great chance of succeeding, but it’s all the front office has got. After 2025, it’s rebuild time — and the rest of the AL East looks to be ahead of the Blue Jays regarding 2026 and beyond, in terms of major-league talent and/or prospect talent.
John Northey - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 11:21 PM EST (#455002) #
The Yankee lineup last year had 4 guys with 2+ bWAR - Judge (32), Soto (gone), Volpe (23), Wells (24). Plus they traded for Cody Bellinger (2.2 28). Their staff had 4 2+'ers in Gil (26), Cortes (gone for Devin Williams, 29, reliever), Schmidt (28), and Cole (33) with Weaver (1.9 30) and Rodon (1.9 31) close. Plus they added Fried (3.5 30)

Their pitching looks sound, the offense less so. If Judge goes down (like in '23) they could be in deep trouble. But having Volpe and Wells so young, and adding Jazz Chisholm Jr. last year (2.7 @26) they might be scary again even if Judge goes down. Dang. No wonder their GM Brian Cashman will go straight to the HOF the minute he is eligible. Crap, I went into this expecting to see an old team, but they really aren't. Cashman really knows his stuff.

Yeah, this division sucks to be in. Just so damn strong. Yankees have cash and brains, Rays brains no cash, O's youth but cheap, Red Sox are just hard to know what to expect - 500 or worse 3 straight years, 4 of 5, but always seem to be on the edge of doing stuff (tons of cash, rabid fan base). I'm guessing all of them look at the Jays and see Bo & Vlad and cash up the wazoo. Really want the Jays to move to a central division of some kind with the Tigers, Guardians, and whatever else is needed.
Nigel - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 11:31 PM EST (#455003) #
Greenfrog - that may well be, but why be looking at free agents that want 4-5 year deals at $20m plus? That makes zero sense in a world in which you are all in on 2025 only and punting after that.
dalimon5 - Friday, January 03 2025 @ 11:53 PM EST (#455004) #
Nigel it's simple. It makes sense if the "all in" team in 2025 is not close to being good enough and you need to add a power bat.

It makes more sense when you know you won't be fielding a sub 100 million payroll in the future but likely have 80 million or more coming off the books next year.

I don't think you can assume that the team will do well profit wise by focusing on a rebuild with unproven players with upside. They're not Oakland or Miami and they have some of the highest ticket prices in the game. Your criticisms work with the assumption that there is a solid and sound alternative available to this FO that focuses on lowering payroll and improving the talent on the field at the same time. I don't see where or how you think they can do that by avoiding free agents. It's essentially a "you can't sign Vlad and Bo beyond 2025 so why bother signing anyone else now?" Point of view.
SK in NJ - Saturday, January 04 2025 @ 12:01 AM EST (#455005) #
Maybe I’m wrong, but I don’t think this team is going to rebuild after 2025, certainly not if Shapiro is sticking around.
dalimon5 - Saturday, January 04 2025 @ 10:27 AM EST (#455006) #
I am entering next decade of my life this weekend. I hope the Jays sign Santander, get Alonso on a Semien type one year deal and resign Vlad before spring training, all in that order. Vlad gets his overpay but with proper protection from Santander and Alonso he puts up even better numbers. Jays get their offense set for the next year and and their franchise player to build around. In 2026 they get Manoah fully healthy and Tiedeman plus a strong free agent SP market to pick from.

bpoz - Saturday, January 04 2025 @ 10:53 AM EST (#455007) #
Happy Birthday dalimon5.

Do you believe financial calculations are necessary for the Jays? I believe that there is a financial factor involved but I can be wrong. I will wait for the season to start to know the answer.
Marc Hulet - Saturday, January 04 2025 @ 11:11 AM EST (#455008) #
Paying $15-$20M a year for a defence-first 2B is still such an odd move when you have nothing else lined up... He's making Ketel Marte money and soon won't be far off Altuve money. Marte was a 6-win player last year.

Now, I've watched some 2024 Cleveland games recently to better understand Gimenez as a player and I can see a potential reason for acquiring him. He's a hard-nosed, always-hustling player who is lauded for his leadership on and off the field. It's possible it was a "change the clubhouse culture" move who could also relate to Guerrero Jr. and make it more attractive to stick around.

But with that said, it was a clear salary dump and I would have liked to see them find a way to also get a young starter like Joey Cantillo or Logan Allen in the deal rather than Sandlin (although Jays would have had to include more on their end... I'm expecting good things from Cantillo in 2025).

I agree Toronto won't ever go full-rebuild. But they're going to run the risk of ending up like the Angels or Rockies -- perennialy bad teams that never appear to have an actual plan and may never actually build a sustainable winner.
SK in NJ - Saturday, January 04 2025 @ 11:54 AM EST (#455009) #
I do see parallels between 2017-18 and 2024 but so far am not seeing it for 2025. Andres Gimenez is 26, has 5 years of control left, and is coming off his worst offensive season where he still put up a ~3 fWAR. There’s real upside there even if the type of player he is (glove first) wasn’t the move many, including me, wanted to see. Regardless, there’s impact player level upside there from a total value standpoint. That’s a far cry from Morales, Pearce, Granderson, Solarte, Garcia, etc, from 2017-18, and the dreaded Kiermaier-Turner-IKF off season from a year ago.

My guess is the team isn’t intentionally half-assing the off season prepping for a mid season teardown like they were 8 years ago. I think what we are seeing now is them sincerely trying to build a contending 2025 team within their budget without shooting past their internal valuation of players (meaning they’re not going to spend more than they think a player is worth). At the same time, Gimenez and (potentially) Santander would represent 2026-beyond options where they try to compete post-Vladdy.

If Shapiro is sticking around then I think we will see one of two things: 1) Jays contend in 2025 and are buying at the deadline, or 2) Jays sell impending FAs only at the deadline and then aim to compete in 2026. Whether that’s the right call is a different story. I think using logic would indicate that maximizing trade returns and prepping for a contending team a few years from now would be the smarter move, but I don’t think that’s the direction the team is heading in regardless of what happens in 2025.
John Northey - Saturday, January 04 2025 @ 12:01 PM EST (#455010) #
Marte signed in early 2022, after a year where he played just 90 games, he'd play 137 that year with a sub 2 WAR. Arizona timed that well, getting him to sign a 5 year $76 mil deal when his leverage was at its weakest. The team had control over him for 2 more years at $10 & $12 mil, so it really was a 3 year $54 mil deal. Full credit to that club for leveraging his bad year (injuries/whatever) to get him to sign for a few more. Marte rewarded them with a great 2023 and 24 which he won't be able to cash in on until after his age 34 season (a team option year at that).

Cleveland with Andrés Giménez did a much worse job on contract - signing him after a peak season early on but still for sub $20 mil per due to most years being arbitration or pre-arb. Yeah, the $23 mil a year coming up in '27 is a bit high if his bat doesn't get back to above a 100 OPS+ but great defense is a wonderful thing to have.

These 2 show the plus and minus of signing guys young. Marte developed, Gimenez didn't. Neither are the extreme negative where the player collapses (there are multiple cases of this). Teams love these deals as they lock in players at cheap rates often, but the risk is there. Halladay sorta got one early one from Ash before his 10.49 ERA season hit - that season made the deal look bad, $3.7 mil for 3 years signed before 2000 when he had under a year service time. Very, very dumb deal by Ash as he didn't buy out free agency years or even most arbitration years. For those who wonder why many here see Ash as the worst Jays GM this is 1 of the lesser examples of his bad moves.

Oy - just got me thinking about what Marc says just above - the 1994-2014 stretch saw the Jays perpetually in no-mans land of 73-86 wins a year - close enough to think you have a shot, but never actually having one. Never bad enough to justify a full rebuild (outside of 2004 and 1995), never good enough to justify 'going for it'. That is why I have accepted the current guys with 91-92-89-74 wins the past 4 years. 3 years where going for it made sense, one where it didn't. Yeah, it wasn't as nice as it should've been (that cursed game in 2022 leading 8-1 after 5, 9-5 after 7 and losing despite a strong pen at the time still hurts) but they still gave us fun Septembers where every game mattered vs that horrid stretch where September was no different than April or even March - just watching to see if anyone develops.
greenfrog - Saturday, January 04 2025 @ 01:05 PM EST (#455011) #
I can’t say exactly why, but in my opinion, there is something disappointing about the 2021-2023 teams, despite the decent win totals. The 2021 team was the best of the lot, but the front office failed to properly reinforce the bullpen at the trade deadline, adding Brad Hand (7.27 ERA with Toronto), apparently because Atkins/Shapiro weren’t enamoured with the asking prices for the better relievers that were available. Probably they thought they were at the beginning of a long window of contention and didn’t want to mortgage the farm for lan elite reliever rental. Big mistake, in retrospect. Also, Montoyo seems to have been the wrong manager for that ballclub, as Atkins later acknowledged.

The 2022 and 2023 teams had some very good players, but the front office wasn’t able to augment them in some key ways (adding a strong left-handed bat, notably). And there were the WC managerial debacles both seasons, and the strange accountability issues relating to the decision to pull Berrios.

The teams did fairly well in the regular season, but it feels like they (and the front office) underperformed in all three seasons. Although the FO did make some good moves like adding Gausman when Ray departed.

I don’t think Blue Jays fans will look back at 2021-2023 as a golden era in the team’s history. It was more frustrating than exciting. Maybe that also has to do with the high expectations that existed 4-5 years ago coupled with the downward trajectory that the team has been on since 2021.
uglyone - Saturday, January 04 2025 @ 01:43 PM EST (#455012) #
I think you said it exactly right actually. They never went "all in".
Dewey - Saturday, January 04 2025 @ 02:24 PM EST (#455013) #
They never went "all in".

It’s simply not in Shapiro’s, Atkin’s, or Ed Rogers’s nature to go ‘all in’. They’re risk-averse people (the first two even more than Rogers, ironically).
uglyone - Saturday, January 04 2025 @ 02:34 PM EST (#455014) #
there's never enough on paper value in those last over the top type moves to justify them. they're always an "overpay".
bpoz - Saturday, January 04 2025 @ 02:45 PM EST (#455015) #
I was looking at the top 100 prospect list. #3 is Roman Anthony who was picked #79 and signed for $2.5mil which was way above slot. We picked Toman #77 $2mil and C Doughty #78 $833,600. R Anthony is already in AAA and doing well and is about 5 months younger than Toman. I also looked at the comments for that day 1 2022 draft. We all loved Toman and considered him a steal. Very heartbreaking that we missed on R Anthony.
Nigel - Saturday, January 04 2025 @ 03:08 PM EST (#455016) #
The Jays biggest value to Rogers is eyeballs on its media platform in July, August and September when it has very little other content. The only thing a FO absolutely cannot let happen is a team so bad that no one watches. As such, it isn’t in Rogers’ interest to lean into either end of the success curve in any material way. If you empty the bucket during periods of success then you materially increase the necessity of a terrible team down the road and, as discussed ad naseum, there is zero chance of the Jays digging in for a tear down and rebuild. There’s a reason that the risk aversion of this front office is appealing to ownership.
scottt - Saturday, January 04 2025 @ 04:00 PM EST (#455017) #
There's nothing strange about pulling Berrios.
The Jays have tons of coaches assisting the manager.
It was a 2-game series. They decided to use Berrios as an opener for Kikuchi.
The decision was made well ahead of the game with input from the coaches.
It's the manager's decision, not the GM's decision.
Just because there's agreement doesn't redirect accountability. 
The turning point for me was Guerrero finally hitting a double and getting picked off.

The 2010-2015 was far from a golden era.
85 wins, 4th place.
81 wins, 4th place.
73 wins, 4th place.
74 wins, 4th place.
83 wins, 3rd place.
93 wins, 1st place. Miracle victory against Texas after dropping the first 2 games and trailing several times facing elimination. lost in 6 against KC. 
pooks137 - Saturday, January 04 2025 @ 04:20 PM EST (#455018) #
Maybe that also has to do with the high expectations that existed 4-5 years ago coupled with the downward trajectory that the team has been on since 2021.

I believe that only the most purist of Jays fans would consider the 2021 the apex of the Shapiro/Atkins contention window and "the best Jays team in recent memory".

As time fades, most Jays teams will simply be judged on a Pass/Fail for most casual fans on whether or not they made the postseason.

2020 was a wacky shortened COVID year where the playoffs were expanded to a NHL-like 8-team bracket.

The barely .500 60 game Jays club squeaked in for the 1st time in 5 years and went nowhere.

2021 was a great team with MVP-type years from Semien & Vlad. But ths Jays lost some big series against division rivals in Sept, leading to them not controlling their own fate when both NY & Bos won and eliminated them on the last day. This team was great but will ultimately be forgotten.

2022 was probably the high point with Bo, a breakout Manoah, a career year from Stripling and decent years from Hernandez, Gausman and Kirk.

The end of the 2020-25 contention run was really that Game 2 collision in the outfield against Seattle, causing concussions and blowing a 7-run lead.

greenfrog - Saturday, January 04 2025 @ 04:26 PM EST (#455019) #
KC got some favourable home plate umpiring late in Game 6 of the 2015 ALCS. Had that not occurred, the Blue Jays would have had a decent chance of making the World Series that year.
John Northey - Saturday, January 04 2025 @ 06:58 PM EST (#455020) #
No question the playoff games for 2020-2023 killed the feeling of 'wow' that we should've had. I wonder if they won that game in '22 that they led by so much and blew it, if that would've changed things or if they lost game 3 would've it just been 'they never won a playoff series' instead of 'they never won a playoff game'. Or if they won game 3 as well, then lost in the ALDS, I can still see a narrative of 'they just couldn't win when it mattered'.

Kind of surprised we never saw that around the 15/16 teams that couldn't get to the WS (tiny market KC and Cleveland beating them). I remember the frustration back in the 80's with those great teams that just couldn't get out of the ALCS in '85, '89, and '91. That led to Gillick saying 'screw it' and signing 2 guys thought of as clutch in Morris and Winfield (despite his Mr. May nickname from Steinbrenner) by going well beyond his comfort range to sign them (Morris was the 4th $5 mil per year player at the time for his age 37/38 seasons, Winfield was a 40 year old DH).

Bottom line, to make the playoffs and go deep you sometimes need to go past the comfort zone and risk losing value or prospects for nothing. Sometimes it works (2015, 1992) sometimes it doesn't (any Ash trade). But without taking risks you can't win. Atkins took a risk on Ryu and Springer by giving them each an extra year - with Ryu it worked sorta (his extra year he was key in the 2nd half to getting into the playoffs), not so much for Springer it seems, but things could still change with him. So do they go outside their zone to sign Santander (1 year $20 mil past their comfort zone), or to get Vlad on the dotted line ($160 mil extra it seems), or to do anything else this winter.

Funny thing is they could make fans very happy by just spending cash via Santander (LF/DH), Bregman (3B), and Flaherty (SP). The first 2 have QO which costs the Jays in the long run - $500k from IFA pool, and 2nd round pick for the first signed, 3rd round pick for the 2nd signed. Basically you sign one you might as well sign a second as the penalty for #2 is less than for #1. Note: Alonso (1B/DH) also has a QO as does Nick Pivetta (SP). There is nothing on MLB's site about what happens if you sign 3+ of these guys. Not that I think the Jays will sign 2+ high end free agents, but it is fun to speculate. They could still 'win the winter' if they are willing to blow the cash, but the hangover in a few years could be ugly.
ISLAND BOY - Sunday, January 05 2025 @ 12:48 PM EST (#455021) #
The dog days of the baseball offseason has reduced the faithful Blue Jay's flock into a contemplative silence.
uglyone - Sunday, January 05 2025 @ 01:51 PM EST (#455022) #
The winds of winter howl mournfully across the icy surface - a frozen masque struggling vainly to conceal jays fans' frigid despair.
vw_fan17 - Sunday, January 05 2025 @ 02:44 PM EST (#455023) #
The dog days of the baseball offseason has reduced the faithful Blue Jay's flock into a contemplative silence.

I've already stated my opinions:

1) about a month ago, I said we'd make a move for one 2-3 WAR player (Gimenez so far) and sign a few bullpen retreads (Garcia). If there are no further moves, this would hold up about as prescient as I've ever been about such predictions. Depending on if you view Gimenez as "asset re-allocation", since we traded Horwitz to get him who might also have put up 2-3 WAR, then signing Santander might arguably fit that as well, if it happens.

2) I think $500M+ is too much for Vlad would end up being one of the worst contracts of all time in terms of total negative $$
92-93 - Sunday, January 05 2025 @ 04:21 PM EST (#455024) #
"Nobody has ever signed a first baseman for 200M"

Pujols, Cabrera, Votto, and Fielder were each signed over a decade ago for more than 200M.
dalimon5 - Monday, January 13 2025 @ 04:22 PM EST (#455316) #
Sasaki Sweepstakes Watch

Rangers - out
NYY - out
Mets - out
Giants - out
Diamondbacks - were never in

Toronto, LAD and SD remain.


#No Chance
Fresh Thread | 236 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.