Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
Recently, I figured out why people buy lottery tickets.

I once believed people played the lottery because they weren't smart enough to calculate the odds. Since the chances of winning are so poor, the rational choice is always to keep your money in your pocket. For this reason, I thought of the lottery as a tax on stupid people.

(What does this have to do with baseball, you ask? Bear with me two more paragraphs, please.)

It occurred to me the other day that most lottery purchasers are fully aware that the odds are stacked against them. But lottery tickets offer hope: after all, somebody has to win the big prize. And many people have no rational source of hope in life, so they go to their local lottery retailer to buy some irrational hope. A few dollars a week for a little bit of hope is a tradeoff many people are willing to make.

(There's baseball in the next paragraph. I promise.)

Baseball fans, being human, need hope too. As I write this, virtually every team in the majors has at least a slim chance of making it to the post-season. And almost all of those who are out of contention have some talented young players who offer hope for next season. (There are exceptions. If you're reading this, and you're an Orioles fan, all I can say is: I'm so sorry.) This hope - that something wonderful is going to happen some day, and we're going to get to be a part of it - keeps us watching the games, writing to web sites like this one, and generally caring about baseball and the Blue Jays. And caring and hope are Good Things.

And this is why I don't like the output of certain Toronto baseball columnists. It's not because they're cranky and sarcastic - many of the best people are cranky, sarcastic, or both. And it's certainly not because they write negative things about my beloved Blue Jays: diehard fans often bash the Jays harder than even the meanest-spirited writer does. No, the reason I don't like what certain writers write is because they seem to see their job as Myth Debunker, or Reality Therapy Specialist.

These writers believe that it is their duty to explain, clearly and rationally, why the local team hasn't a snowball's chance in hell of succeeding. (You've seen those dreary calculations: "The Jays have to play 46-5 ball between now and the end of September, while everybody else plays .500 or worse, to have even a slim chance of making it to the postseason. Where they're likely to be stomped by the Yankees anyway. Have a nice day.") When they do this, they are trying to take away my hope. That is why I don't like them.

And there is hope, by God. Sure, the odds are against the Jays. The Jays need to have several bats wake up all at the same time. There are a lot of teams ahead of them. And George Steinbrenner needs to keep his wallet tightly chained. But these things could happen. The Jays could win, and so could your lottery ticket. Hang in there; don't give up.
Lottery tickets, the pennant race, and the need for hope | 32 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
FanfromTheIsland - Monday, June 25 2007 @ 07:46 PM EDT (#170608) #
*nods*  Well said, and agreed.
VBF - Monday, June 25 2007 @ 08:14 PM EDT (#170612) #
First I'll say that I'm a really, really big fan of the 590 Morning Show and they have very well balanced coverage. Landry is a pretty well-rounded sports fan and Stellick does an admirable job as well. But today they seemed bent on the Jays being sellers, and selling, in particular, Troy Glaus.

Now, if their reasoning was that Glaus is on the verge of eroding into a pile of sand, I could buy that point. But he's under contract for three more years, has an incredible bat, and if we do anything in the next year or two, will likely have a big part to play in it. But to be a seller simply because you're out of the race, seems like a very silly approach to the deadline.

If this was Glaus' contract year that would be an entirely different story. It's not like there's a plethora of young third basemen in the franchise.

Now, back to the original question of the Jays being buyers or sellers, I really don't see anyone in the organization right now that you would want to move before the 31st deadline. This team really seems to be set for next year, minus the shortstop.

GrrBear - Monday, June 25 2007 @ 08:25 PM EDT (#170613) #

If you told any Toronto fan before the season that the Jays would be a half game up on the Yankees on June 25th, well, I can think of much worse fates than that.

These Jays remind me of the Twins and Athletics of the last several years: really good pitching, good defense, and an offense that sputters a bit but can often come through when needed.  After the comeback against the Rockies on Friday night, I was grinning like an idiot all weekend.  McGowan's one-hitter was just the icing on the cake.  How can you not watch those games and feel hope swell within you?  Guys like Bob Elliott and Richard Griffin can't set aside their prejudices long enough to enjoy the team we have.  Today's Elliott column focuses mostly on the dearly departed scouts that helped select Dustin McGowan in 2000 instead of, uh, Dustin himself.  Can't waste an opportunity to stick it to J.P., right?

I'm with Mr. Till.  It's still frickin' June.  How about let's keep the hope train moving, chuckleheads?  Leave the doom and gloom crap to Steve Simmons, who is probably the only media personality in Toronto who knows less about baseball than Bob McCown.

Matthew E - Monday, June 25 2007 @ 08:50 PM EDT (#170614) #
But to be a seller simply because you're out of the race, seems like a very silly approach to the deadline.

It is, of course. It's reductionist thinking. Two options: go for it, or blow it up. It's not likely the Jays can go for it, therefore they must blow it up. Never mind that this roster is well set up to take a run next year; that's too abstract a nuance.

For that matter, let's say the Jays do get more obviously into the race by the trade deadline. If they were, I'd still make a trade that might be classified as 'selling' if it improved the team enough in the short or long run. Whatever's advantageous.
Alex0888 - Monday, June 25 2007 @ 09:41 PM EDT (#170615) #
Well since I have turned 18 I have made about a 100 dollar profit off of OLG so I would be in the pool of actually thinking I have a strategy.
jeff mcl - Monday, June 25 2007 @ 09:55 PM EDT (#170616) #
Several years ago, a French family from Lille won the lottery for the second time--playing the same numbers.  Weirder things than an odds-defying second half Jays' push have happened.
3RunHomer - Monday, June 25 2007 @ 10:04 PM EDT (#170619) #

I sometimes pop into a couple Devil Rays blogs and I'm always surprised at the lack of hope. They've got more talented young pitchers and hitters than anyone in the division, but they've been disappointed too many times to see it. Sad really. I blame it on that awful heckler at their awful stadium.

There are exceptions. If you're reading this, and you're an Orioles fan, all I can say is: I'm so sorry

Orioles fans (I'm one of those) aren't nearly as bad. We know the team stinks and the management is full of morons, but every spring there's an upwelling of hope. We grew up with great teams in orange and black so we know that winning is possible.

PS - Bedard, Loewen, Guthrie, Cabrera, Ray, Hoey, Markakis and Roberts say hi. It ain't a lot, but at least our team isn't the one trotting out Josh F. Towers anymore. Ha ha!

PPS - We've got your Canadians and we're not giving them back. 8P

jeff mcl - Monday, June 25 2007 @ 10:26 PM EDT (#170622) #
PPS - We've got your Canadians and we're not giving them back. 8P

Just give us Adam Stern.  Come on...
Dave Till - Monday, June 25 2007 @ 11:26 PM EDT (#170624) #
3RunHomer: no one can accuse you of being a fair-weather fan.

It ain't a lot, but at least our team isn't the one trotting out Josh F. Towers anymore. Ha ha!

Towers is on life support now: the Jays are seriously thinking of keeping Taubenheim and jettisoning Towers yet again. He has allowed 11 home runs and 9 walks this year, which pretty much describes him right there.

The frightening part is that he is actually better than some of the alternatives: Ohka is almost exactly the same pitcher, but with poorer control. As for The Ghost Of Victor Zambrano, some things are best left unmentioned.
tstaddon - Monday, June 25 2007 @ 11:33 PM EDT (#170625) #
Now if only we could convince Baltimore that they need Royce Clayton to hold the fort at shortstop until Tejada comes back...
actionjackson - Tuesday, June 26 2007 @ 12:41 AM EDT (#170627) #
Leave the doom and gloom crap to Steve Simmons, who is probably the only media personality in Toronto who knows less about baseball than Bob McCown.
 
Do hockey writers from Buffalo who frequent "Prime Time Sports" count? If they do Jim Kelly is the hands down winner of the 1st annual Most Ignorant Toronto Media Personality (Baseball Chapter). He's a hockey writer for cryin' out loud, but it doesn't stop him from sticking it to the Jays every chance he gets. I think the latest one came when the Yankees passed the Jays in the standings and therefore the Jays were in their familiar 3rd place standing (It might have been last Friday, which would mean the Jays are 4-0 since his latest pronouncement. Keep it up Jim!). That's all he sees. Oh, the Yankees have passed the Jays again. Here comes another 3rd place finish, better rip 'em in my parting shot. Jim, it's so easy to do. There are no callers to disagree with and a studio full of baseball ignorati, who will just nod their heads in agreement and Bob McCown will trot out the usual: "All I see is a .500 ballclub blah blah blah."

Speaking of Mr. "Bad to the Bone" McCown, the other day he was actually arguing that Frank Thomas wasn't a legitimate candidate for the Hall of Fame because he, and I quote "isn't a .300 hitter". Well, hate to break it to ya B to the B, but a) he is a lifetime .300+ hitter and b) he is absolutely a legitimate 1st ballot Hall of Famer in this era of juiced HR totals and baseballs, because you'll notice he's about the same size as he was when he arrived and c) since when is being a lifetime .300 hitter grounds for entry into the Hall. If Juan Pierre somehow manages to hit .300+ for his career, does that make him Hall material? *shudder* If you're going to discuss baseball, shouldn't you at least have some knowledge of it? Ahh, the delights of talk (blowhard) radio.
westcoast dude - Tuesday, June 26 2007 @ 04:23 AM EDT (#170630) #
3RunHomer, you leave Joshua Towers alone. He is presently the Blue Jays Stopper of Record, in as much as the team hasn't lost a game since he took the mound last Friday. When the number 5 starter is the Stopper, things are all right, generally speaking. In fact, that happens to be the case. He can pitch 7 innings and hold the opposition to 5 runs, too. Think of him as the Pocket Doc, if it helps you to understand that for us, this year,  Josh is Mr. Intangibles. I'd take him over Tavarez any day; Mariners bounced him around but good tonight and then went back to back on Timlin, just for good measure.
scottt - Tuesday, June 26 2007 @ 06:49 AM EDT (#170631) #
Towers, Clayton, and Phillips would be traded if you could find a taker.

Matt Stairs should be available once we clear the DL. For the right price of course. He hasn't hit so well since 1999.



Squiggy - Tuesday, June 26 2007 @ 07:31 AM EDT (#170632) #
It is, of course. It's reductionist thinking. Two options: go for it, or blow it up. It's not likely the Jays can go for it, therefore they must blow it up. Never mind that this roster is well set up to take a run next year; that's too abstract a nuance.

But having said that, there is a third option - that of "reloading", a la Billy Beane. Taking Glaus off the table completely with an eye towards next year is also not prudent. If the right offer comes along, I would be completely in favour of moving him regardless of standings - he is an extremely valuable trading piece and some of the interested California teams have some real major-league talent to offer.

Mick Doherty - Tuesday, June 26 2007 @ 09:49 AM EDT (#170634) #

He hasn't hit so well since 1999.

Actually, the year he's having is extremely similar to his 2003 season with Pittsburgh, right down to the OPS+. But your point is pretty sound.

 

 

King Rat - Tuesday, June 26 2007 @ 11:35 AM EDT (#170647) #
I hate to sound like someone with an armful of lottery tickets, but it isn't time to give up on this season yet. I will grant that a number of things have to go right for the Jays to make the playoffs, but (touch wood) thus far they are going right. If the Jays take two of the remaining three against the Twins, which surely isn't something straight out of science fiction, they'll have passed the Twins. Then they have series against Oakland and Seattle, both of whom are within striking distance. We've been waiting to see this team healthy since the beginning of the season, and it's finally starting to happen, precisely as they start a stretch against the teams in front of them. Let's see how they do against the big boys before we debate whether we should sell, buy or stand pat, eh?
Ryan Day - Tuesday, June 26 2007 @ 11:50 AM EDT (#170650) #

After a couple months of frustration, mediocrity, and outright suckitude, the team finally seems to be on a hot streak. If it just lasts a week then it probably doesn't mean anything, but what if they can stay hot for a month or so?

And, as ever, I suspect the big question mark is hanging over Dustin McGowan's head. He's a young pitcher, and he'll probably continue to mix good and bad starts... but sometimes, something just clicks; what if McGowan suddenly turns into the pitcher everyone's been hoping he can be? I don't know if it's likely, but it 's possible.

Of course, the other questions include Reed Johnson, Lyle Overbay, and the inevitable (or not?) cooling off of Matt Stairs.

But hey, how about this bit of meaningless data: As a leadoff hitter, Vernon Wells is hitting 333/400/889. Take that, Rickey Henderson!

R Billie - Tuesday, June 26 2007 @ 12:24 PM EDT (#170655) #

If you can get a young player who legitimately looks like a major league regular or starter or closer for Matt Stairs in July, I think you would be crazy not to do it.

Now if the Jays go 15-4 over the next three weeks or so maybe I change my mind.  But if you're into mid-July and you're still in the neighbourhood of 5-6 games back with multiple teams ahead of you, it's just a fool's hope to hold on to these older guys who could bring you a long term piece of the puzzle.

The same with Glaus...if he can bring you a major league ready prospect or two who look like legit stars, I think you have to do it, especially if it makes it easier to keep younger and healthier guys like Rios around.  I'd rather have Rios' arbitration years bought out as well as another couple of good young players in the fold.

ayjackson - Tuesday, June 26 2007 @ 12:39 PM EDT (#170659) #

The same with Glaus...if he can bring you a major league ready prospect or two who look like legit stars, I think you have to do it, especially if it makes it easier to keep younger and healthier guys like Rios around.

I don't think Glaus' situation is the same as Stairs'.  Glaus is under contract for next year, Stairs isn't.  If, in a month, the Jays consider 2007 a lost cause, they must look to 2008.  Obviously if they can get a prospect for Stairs, or anything else of future value, they will.

Glaus projects to provide a lot of value to this club in 2008.  It would be necessary to find, in a trade, a player or players who would provide equal value to Glaus in 2008.  Andy Laroche probably would not.  Howie Kendrick might.  Chad Billinglsy likely would.  I'd be very careful about what I accept as consideration if dealing Troy.

John Northey - Tuesday, June 26 2007 @ 12:41 PM EDT (#170660) #
As to what the Jays should do mid season (buyer, seller, reloader, etc.) I'm not really certain at this point.

The big plus is this 'death march' section of the schedule. Having 4 vs Boston and 4 vs the Yankees right after the All-Star break, then Seattle and Minnesota for 3 each will give JP a really clear picture on if this team can get to the playoffs this year with about a week left before the first trading deadline.

What is interesting is the start of August. They play vs teams that are sub-500 at the moment for the first 11 games. Late August could be a killer with Oakland and LA for 10 straight, 13 out of 16 games followed by 3 vs Seattle and 3 vs Boston.

Weird how that month is set eh? First have the team should (must) fatten up to be ready for the death match at the end.

Good news is the last 6 are against Baltimore and Tampa Bay so if the Jays are in it they have 6 games in a row that are very winnable while others should have tougher games, well except for the Yankees who have the exact same schedule in reverse (TB then Baltimore).
China fan - Tuesday, June 26 2007 @ 01:01 PM EDT (#170663) #

   On the subject of whether to trade Matt Stairs:  I would be wary of trading him away for a prospect, even if the Jays fall out of the race for the wild card.  Are we certain that he could not help the team next season?   Among all the regulars in the current Jays lineup, Stairs is the leader in batting average and SLG, and he is third in OBP.    This is not a total fluke either -- he produced similar numbers as recently as 2003, as someone else has noted.   Yes, his numbers might decline, but it's equally possible that they might not decline.   He obviously loves playing in Canada and he seems to be rejuvenated this season.  Why should we assume that his production will collapse in the future?   Given a choice between Stairs and a prospect in 2008, some of us might prefer Stairs.  (Unless the prospect is a guaranteed future star.)

   By the way, I've been defending Stairs from his Bauxite critics since the beginning of this season.  In case anyone is wondering:  I'm not related to him, I've never met the guy, I don't have any vested interests in his career.   I just like the guy and his attitude and his performance (not in the outfield, but offensively at least) and I think he has been underrated and undervalued for too long.

ayjackson - Tuesday, June 26 2007 @ 01:06 PM EDT (#170664) #
I'm not saying that Stairs would have no value to the Jays next year due to a certain production drop off.  I'm saying he would have no value because he isn't signed.  Trading him at the July deadline would have no bearing on whether he played for us next year or not.  How much money we offer him in the offseason will determine that.
China fan - Tuesday, June 26 2007 @ 01:07 PM EDT (#170665) #

   And just a footnote on my last post:   I realize, of course, that Stairs is unsigned for next year.  But I think we can be fairly confident that he would sign again with the Jays for next season, if the Jays offer him any kind of reasonable salary.  He's having a great time in Toronto and he's always made it very clear that he wants to play in Canada.

    Having said that, of course the Jays should wait until the end of the season to offer him another contract....   in case his production declines or he suffers an injury, like a heart attack while running for a fly ball in the outfield.....

King Rat - Tuesday, June 26 2007 @ 02:04 PM EDT (#170676) #
if you're into mid-July and you're still in the neighbourhood of 5-6 games back with multiple teams ahead of you, it's just a fool's hope to hold on to these older guys who could bring you a long term piece of the puzzle

This is why I'm so adamant that this isn't the time to talk about selling. I don't think there's much chance that the Jays are going to be 5-6 games back with multiple teams ahead of them; it's my belief that either they're going to make a move starting last night, or fall so out of it that even the most pie-eyed optimist has to concede that the season's lost. If they play poorly over the next 26 games, so be it, they aren't good enough to contend, and J.P. should look to improve the team long term however he can. But this is precisely the section of the season where we're going to find out how good the Jays really are, and I think we ought to see how that plays out before looking to see what we can get for Glaus, Stairs and everyone else.

Incidentally, I think a dose of moderation is called for when discussing the Jays' Canadian Content; he's been wonderful this year thus far, and deserves another year if he can keep this up, but whether he can is most certainly(</RanceMulliniks>) an open question. On the flip side, I have a hard time believing that anyone would give up significant players in trade for Stairs: the guy's 39 and coming off of a pretty mediocre year last year.

1 win down, 26 games to go.
TamRa - Tuesday, June 26 2007 @ 03:09 PM EDT (#170684) #

A little number crunching.

In the 41 games since the horrific nine game losing streak, the Jays have been playing .610 ball. In all games outside the streak, the Jays are playing .576 ball.

Applying the former number to the remaining 87 games gets a win total of 91 wins, apply ing the latter gets you 88.

Now, here are the wild card standings, with their current record, games back, and projected finial record if they maintain their pace:

Cleveland .... 44-31.....X......95-67

Seattle.......40-33.....3......89-73

Oakland.....39-36.....5.....84-78

Minnisota.....38-36....5.5.....83-79

Toronto.....38-37......6.......

 NYY......36-37......7......79-83

SO - if the Jays continue on the pace of the past 7+ weeks - which is a reasonable supposition - they finish the season four games out from the Indians assuming the other teams neither surge or stumble.

I have long contended, without doing extensive research, that virtually every team that makes the playoffs (with the exception of those teams who are the best of a bad lot and win the division with 80-something wins) have at least one hot streak in their season when they win 8-9 games in a row (or something like 11 of 12 for example). Something the Jays with their newfound pitching groove are certainly capeable of.

In other words, this team is not in a hopeless state...but for the Streak, we would be but one game behind the Indians. Wh's to say they won't have a couple of cold weeks or that we won't have a couple of hot ones to counterbalance the effects of the Streak?

I'm not being irrational when I say this season is far from over. OTOH, the next month is probably critical in terms of beating the teams we need to beat. Our next TWENTY-SIX games are against teams ahead of us in the standings.  By July 27, we will know whether we are in or out of the race.

ayjackson - Tuesday, June 26 2007 @ 05:32 PM EDT (#170687) #

I'm not sure we could realized maximum value for Burnett if he's only made a handfull of starts coming off the DL.

If AJ makes 29-30 starts this year, I'd offer him $1-2m to defer his opt-out one more year.  If he declines, I'd take a look at his value in trade.

mcpherv - Wednesday, June 27 2007 @ 02:08 PM EDT (#170721) #

From the Syracuse Post Standard:
"Notes

Reliever Brandon League, in Syracuse on rehabilitation assignment, was recalled to Toronto on Tuesday. League, the Blue Jays' potential setup man, appeared in six games for the Chiefs. He was 0-0 with a 4.50 ERA. In his last outing, Monday at Scranton-Wilkes Barre, he pitched one inning and did not allow a hit or a run. "

ht tp://www.syracuse.com/articles/chiefs/index.ssf?/base/sports-0/1182935052159730.xml

I'm not sure I'm convinced he's ready to pitch in the majors quite yet, but it'll be interesting to see how he does. I watched part of one of the recent Syracuse games on milb.tv, and his velocity was around 93 peak, I think. Furthermore, he was getting under the ball and was elevating it a bit. His last outing was pretty good for the Cheifs, though - we shall see.

Chuck - Wednesday, June 27 2007 @ 04:43 PM EDT (#170741) #

I'm not sure I'm convinced he's ready to pitch in the majors quite yet, but it'll be interesting to see how he does.

I'm guessing he'll be eased in as 7th man in the pen, so he'll go from rehab to R&R, logging an inning a week.

subculture - Thursday, June 28 2007 @ 12:40 AM EDT (#170760) #
Barring more crazy injuries, the Jays this year will go as far as Marcum, McGowan, and Chacin take them.... and League would be icing on the cake. 

Even though Towers got the win tonight, I confess to hoping he'll have 3 great consecutive starts so we can trade him to the Rangers for Michael Young (or 100K, whichever they agree to ;)

I guess Tower's is acceptable as a 6th pitcher, but frankly I'd rather have kept Rosario for that purpose...  or if League can step in the set-up role, I'd give Janssen an extended run at starting...



ayjackson - Thursday, June 28 2007 @ 01:05 AM EDT (#170761) #

Rosario is hurt and has been unimpressive when healthy.  As much as I disagree with the way he was dismissed, it hasn't proved costly yet.

Meanwhile, I had to chuckle as Rotoworld chimed in on Ole Shea's upcoming DFA:

The Angels apparently will continue their attempts to trade him, but they haven't had any luck so far. The Yankees must figure that they'll be able to do better later on. And they're probably right. If Hillenbrand was half as good as he thought he was, he'd still be twice as good as he is.

For those scoring at home, I checked the math, and it means that Shea thinks he is four times the player he actually is.

Lottery tickets, the pennant race, and the need for hope | 32 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.