Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
Per Jason Stark on SportsCenter. Presumably one less team to trade for Burnett.

The A's get Sean Gallagher, Matt Murton, Eric Patterson and Josh Donaldson.




Harden and Gaudin to Cubs | 35 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Glevin - Tuesday, July 08 2008 @ 06:48 PM EDT (#188561) #
Wow, the A's got a whole bunch of talented young players there. A good trade for them. Also, a good pickup for the Cubs who didn't have to give up anything they will miss.
Thomas - Tuesday, July 08 2008 @ 06:50 PM EDT (#188562) #
I'm less than overwhelmed with the package, but I think I also have too many visions of healthy Harden floating in my head and am not considering his injury history enough.

Thomas - Tuesday, July 08 2008 @ 06:54 PM EDT (#188563) #
Thinking it over, I'm still not impressed with the return. Does not bode well for Burnett, IMO, unless the Jays can get a bidding war started between a couple of teams on the cusp in the last week of July.

I still have trouble believing they couldn't get a better package.

Gerry - Tuesday, July 08 2008 @ 07:11 PM EDT (#188565) #
Just checked my BA prospect handbook.  Gallagher was the Cubs #5 prospect and is only 22; Donaldson was #7 although his 2008 doesn't appear to be as good as 2007; and Eric Patterson was #12.  Beane also went for the pool of prospects in the winter deal with the A's for Haren.  Maybe Beane's approach to prospects is quantity of A/B prospects trumps A prospects.
jgadfly - Tuesday, July 08 2008 @ 07:14 PM EDT (#188566) #
Remind me again , who did the Jays get for Gaudin ?
Jdog - Tuesday, July 08 2008 @ 07:31 PM EDT (#188567) #

I think that was  Dustin Majewski ( bad spelling i know).

Im not too impressed with this package. the ceilings of the prospects are all faily low here.

Thomas - Tuesday, July 08 2008 @ 07:32 PM EDT (#188568) #
But the A's got young and high-upside prospects in the Haren deal, such as Gonzalez and Brett Anderson. Gallagher is probably the best prospect the A's got, and he profiles as a mid-rotation starter. If Patterson can actually play second he can replace Ellis, but he's 25 and has never been thought of particularly highly. Murton deserves more of a chance than he's had, but he's not an impact bat and Donaldson is a B prospect having a rough year.

I guess Beane sees something in these guys he likes, but it's surprising he wasn't able to get Vitters in the deal. The A's got quantity in the Haren deal, but they also got quality. Here they seem to have got quantity, but the quality seems somewhat lacking. The prospects they got all seem to be secondary pieces, but the trade appears to be lacking a centerpiece.

Thomas - Tuesday, July 08 2008 @ 07:37 PM EDT (#188569) #
I should clarify, because Murton's limited to corner outfield spots, he isn't an impact bat. He's the sort of player who would be much more valuable if he could handle centre, but he's below-average offensively in the corners.
Glevin - Tuesday, July 08 2008 @ 07:38 PM EDT (#188570) #
"Here they seem to have got quantity, but the quality seems somewhat lacking. The prospects they got all seem to be secondary pieces, but the trade appears to be lacking a centerpiece."

That is true, but Harden is so incredibly injury-prone that this was probably as much value as he'll have. Still, the A's probably got their starting 2Bman for next year in patterson, a starting OFer in Murton, and a mid-rotation starter in Gallagher. So, even though they lack the top prospect, they rebuilt a lot of their team in the move.
robertdudek - Tuesday, July 08 2008 @ 07:40 PM EDT (#188571) #
The timing of this deal is very strange. After all, the A's are still within easy reach of a playoff spot and the trading of your best pitcher when healthy is usually the move of a team that is well and truly out of it.
Mike Green - Tuesday, July 08 2008 @ 09:09 PM EDT (#188577) #
Perhaps the A's know more about Harden's health than they are letting on.  He's thrown under 100 pitches each of the last 6 starts, after 4 starts of more than 100.  Three starts ago, he had a shutout through 8 innings and had thrown 95 pitches and they pulled him. 
China fan - Tuesday, July 08 2008 @ 09:39 PM EDT (#188580) #
Before we calculate the trade value of AJ Burnett, it might be worth considering that McGowan just got injured.  A shoulder or neck, according to Gameday.
So the trade of Burnett would leave the rotation with only two of its original five members, for the time being anyway.
And if the Jays mount a few more seventh-inning comebacks like today, their pitchers might be worth keeping....

Shane - Tuesday, July 08 2008 @ 10:13 PM EDT (#188582) #

And if the Jays mount a few more seventh-inning comebacks like today, their pitchers might be worth keeping....

Ya, right. I can smell a turn around coming. Here we come playoffs.

Paul Godfrey on TSN's Off the Record tonight, failed to dismiss the "rumour" that he is considering stepping down from his position (i'm assuming seasons end). And that he "thinks" if he had to fire JP Ricciardi, he would still be around after the smoke clears. One deserves and should leave with the other. A major sweeping of the management ranks likely has to happen in order to bring someone in do the work it would take to re-construct this roster.

Sherrystar - Tuesday, July 08 2008 @ 10:28 PM EDT (#188583) #

And if the Jays mount a few more seventh-inning comebacks like today, their pitchers might be worth keeping....

I hope you were kidding. Isn't this unfounded optimism part of the reason the Jays are such a mediocre team? (i.e. not trading anyone before July 31st thinking they are still "in it")

The season is done. On to bigger and better things in 2009 (hopefully!)

vodkadog - Tuesday, July 08 2008 @ 10:42 PM EDT (#188586) #

since throwing 128 pitches on june 10, these are mcgowan's logs:

 

4-4-4-4-0-5  5-9-4-3-1-2  7-8-4-4-3-4  6-6-4-4-1-5  4-4-4-2-1-2  = 26-31-20-17-6-18 = 5.89 era

now a sore shoulder

 

JayFan0912 - Tuesday, July 08 2008 @ 10:43 PM EDT (#188587) #
The jays would need to play extremely well, on a consistent basis -- better than the red sox, yankees, and devil rays, and they can't do it with this roster since they dug too deep a hole.

Out of the likely suitors for burnett, I think the phillies make the best trading partner. I think jason donald would be a really nice return for a player which will anyway leave after this year, perhaps too good a return. He has a strong minor league record and is blocked on the big league club, and this might make the phillies desperate enough to overpay.



The_Game - Wednesday, July 09 2008 @ 05:34 AM EDT (#188591) #

Great sell-high by the A's. They get rid of the injury prone Harden who I'm not sure will ever pitch a full healthy season for several players that can step in and make significant contributions right away. Oakland is still very much in the AL West race despite trading their best pitcher away.

As for AJ Burnett, I think this is a great sign. If they can get a return of something close to this or better, it will be fantastic. Don't focus on a position like shortstop however, take the best possible player(s) available.

There is a rumour that the Dodgers were offering up a package of Matt Kemp and a few other prospects for Sabathia. Maybe it's too crazy to suggest a Kemp for Burnett and Eckstein deal? But then again, teams can get pretty desperate to make a move come the trade deadline while seeing every other team around them do something.

The_Game - Wednesday, July 09 2008 @ 05:38 AM EDT (#188592) #

Also, I am just ecstatic that AJ could possibly bring in such good players considering how bad he's been this year.

China fan - Wednesday, July 09 2008 @ 07:23 AM EDT (#188594) #

Some people seem almost gleeful at the struggles of the Jays.  I suppose it's more exciting for some people to hope that this team is "blown up" and "rebuilt" because of all the fun to be had from speculating about trades, prospects, etc.    Personally I think it's a complete myth to think that a mid-season trade will make any difference to the fate of this team.  And trading Burnett (which is likely to net a couple of mid-level prospects who might possibly pan out in 2010 or 2011) isn't going to change anything either.   My point is this:  if Marcum and McGowan are both injured, I'd rather keep Burnett around this season -- unless by some wild chance the Dodgers are offering Matt Kemp for him, but I suspect that's another unfounded myth.

Nobody scores any genius points by predicting that the Jays are unlikely to win this year.  But I'd still rather see them win games, rather than lose games, for the remainder of 2008.   And if the Jays are going to win in 2009 and 2010, it's going to be because of a return to form by Wells, Rios, Hill, Overbay and Rolen, along with the development of prospects who are already in the system, plus a free agent or two -- not because of a couple of minor prospects from trading Burnett.

The_Game - Wednesday, July 09 2008 @ 08:34 AM EDT (#188595) #

I'm going to just assume you're talking about me.

No, I'm not exactly gleeful that the Jays are losing as often as they are. Obviously, I would prefer victories. However, I dealt with the fact that this team wasn't going to make the playoffs a long time ago. I didn't think they had much of a chance as soon as they released Frank Thomas and refused to sign Barry Bonds. It was a sign that they cared about their budget and their money more than actually winning. This organization accepts mediocrity, and the fans let them get away with it. Even if everyone had performed up to expectations, was it really a playoff team without a really power hitter? Certainly not. And when you're that close to being a good, and possibly great team, and you refuse to do something like signing Barry Bonds for fear of the poor media attention it will bring, it's absolutely sickening.

I've had quite enough of the Jays being 5-6 back going into the trade deadline, being minor buyers, or just sitting and not doing anything, and then finishing 10 games out of the playoffs every year. Now is finally the time to trade the players on this team that won't be around in the future (Burnett, Stairs, Zaun, Eckstein), and considering I've watched most of these guys perform poorly this year, I'm pretty happy that there's actually a market for them. At this point, Burnett is likely the top trading option left for a starting pitcher, and I think some team is going to end up paying a lot for him. It's kind of depressing that this may be the highlight of the season, but JP dug his own grave by refusing to fix this team's problems. I mean, did Shannon Stewart really need to get as many at bats as he did before Adam Lind got called up?

It's time to stop accepting mediocrity as a status quo in this organization. .500+ seasons bring false hope. Losing brings change. Change in personnel, change in management, and eventually, possibly even ownership. That's what losing can do for us this season. It can get rid of Ricciardi, and maybe, just maybe, the politician Paul Godfrey will actually leave as a result as well.

John Northey - Wednesday, July 09 2008 @ 10:26 AM EDT (#188599) #
It does look more and more like Godfrey is leaving after this season, probably to work on the NFL stuff.  Thus the biggest question for the future of this franchise is who takes over as president/guy hiring-firing GM's? 

I seriously doubt JP is in line for that position, as traditionally the president gets to be the person in front of the media trying to sell the team (Godfrey & Beeston were great at this) and removing some heat from the GM.  Not skills JP has shown.  Thus odds would be in favour of a full switch over.  New president, new GM.  Given the Jays/Rogers past odds are the new president would be someone with a non-baseball background who is known as a sports fan but has a bit of a profile in Toronto as well.  Any big names come to mind?  For entertainment value Mel Lastman would be fun but no way that would happen for many, many reasons.  Bill Davis is another politician who was a big time sports guy (pushed for the dome)  but is getting way too old for the role I suspect.  Nah, odds are it would be a business man who has time at the moment who can push bucks into Rogers pocket...hrm...get John Tory out of politics?  I think many PC's would be happy about that :)

Of course, now that I've speculated on politicians watch the Jays go get a real baseball person (wow, what a concept eh?).

jerjapan - Wednesday, July 09 2008 @ 11:48 AM EDT (#188605) #
Jamie Cambell and Pat Tabler kept talking about this last night, and I find it frustrating, saying that in conversations with Riccardi, nobody could have seen this offensive dry spell coming.  However, if we look at the career numbers and the recent injury history of Wells, Overbay and Rolen, the only surprise is Rios.  Yes the slg. is well down for the other 3  players - but all are past there age 27 peak year and coming off injury.  Overbay in particular screams 'career year' when you look at his 2006.

Wells
career avg.:  282/330/477
age 29 season:  284/326/448

Overbay
career avg.: 281/363/447
age 31 season:262/368/395

Rios
career avg.:  287/339/445
Age 27 season:  283/341/402

Rolen
career avg:  283/ 371 /504
age 33 season:  271/364/441

Except for Rios, I don't think we can expect much more from the core of the Jays offense going forward, and with only Lind, and hopefully Hill, in the fold as young players for 2009 (assuming Snider starts in AAA), we cannot assume this offense will be much better this year.

Given that we actually do boast a pleothera of pitching talent, it is serious mismanagement not to take advantage of that.  The bottom spots of our bullpen and rotation could be filled by young pitchers from AAA while our offensive holes can be addressed by dealing Downs and Burnett.

What concerns me is that Riccardi said that he 'hasn't been approached' by anybody about Burnett.  Shouldn't he, with a flawed roster and a seventh straight mediocre year, be approaching others?  Billy Beane doesn't keep the A's competitive by being passive. 

Thomas - Wednesday, July 09 2008 @ 12:33 PM EDT (#188606) #

Great sell-high by the A's. They get rid of the injury prone Harden who I'm not sure will ever pitch a full healthy season for several players that can step in and make significant contributions right away

Significant contributions? Gallagher's the prize and doesn't have the upside to be more than mid-rotation starter by all accounts. Murton is a below-average corner outfielder and Patterson is a fourth outfielder/AAAA player. Donaldson's an A-ball catcher with one good season under his belt and currently struggling. I'd be underwhelmed with that for Harden, let alone throwing Gaudin in, as well.

ayjackson - Wednesday, July 09 2008 @ 12:41 PM EDT (#188607) #

What concerns me is that Riccardi said that he 'hasn't been approached' by anybody about Burnett.  Shouldn't he, with a flawed roster and a seventh straight mediocre year, be approaching others?

Well first of all, if he is trying to be discreet, I applaud him.  Second, saying he "hasn't  being approached" does not mean he hasn't approached others.  Third, Godfrey said last week that they have been fielding calls for some time with regard to Burnett.

Flex - Wednesday, July 09 2008 @ 02:47 PM EDT (#188608) #
"Third, Godfrey said last week that they have been fielding calls for some time with regard to Burnett."

Sadly, all the things coming out of Paul Godfrey's mouth that I believe, I can fit on the point of a pin.


Mick Doherty - Wednesday, July 09 2008 @ 03:02 PM EDT (#188609) #
Context: late in spring training, the Cubs apparently showed interest in Marlon Byrd and offered Murton -- if local N. Tex. media reports are to be believed, the Rangers wanted Gallagher as well in that deal. Obviously the Cubs said no deal, but  I think projecting either of those guys as regulars, much less potential stars, is, at best, extremely and aggressively optimistic.
ayjackson - Wednesday, July 09 2008 @ 03:13 PM EDT (#188610) #

Sean Gallagher projects as a #3 starter, according to Baseball America, and was the Cubs' #5 prospect.  ZiPS projected a line of 289/.360/.465 for Murton this year - hardly 4th outfielder material.  The Cubs handling of Murton has been ridiculous.

These are not the type of players that the Jays need in return, but they suit the A's well.  We need higher ceiling prospects - not solid young pros (unless SS).  Sacrifice some projectability for some ceiling.

Mike Green - Wednesday, July 09 2008 @ 03:32 PM EDT (#188611) #
John Sickels had Gallagher as the Cubs #3 overall prospect going into the year, and with him dominating triple A at age 22, the assessment probably didn't change.  Sickels had Gallagher as the #41 pitching prospect in baseball just after Justin Masterson.  Here is Sickels' description of his stuff.

I like him, but then I liked Marcum. BA is not going to get excited about him because he lacks the 95mph fastball or the wicked off-speed stuff.

GrrBear - Wednesday, July 09 2008 @ 03:34 PM EDT (#188612) #

Since the Jays are in 'Wait until next year' mode if you believe the local media, can I make a suggestion to Jays fans?

Now that Rich Harden is pitching for the Cubs, that means that 40% of their starting rotation is Canadian.  Isn't that more than enough to consider the Cubs as a team to root for?  They already have scrappy Toronto fave Reed Johnson, and who among us can say the name 'Geovany Soto' without breaking into a grin?  Come on, it's the hundredth anniversary of their last World Series win.  The script's already been written for this Hollywood tale, now the Cubs just have to find a way to screw it all up. :)

- Grrbear, Cubs fan since 1983, Jays fan since 1986

braden - Wednesday, July 09 2008 @ 04:18 PM EDT (#188616) #

Jeff Blair is reporting that, although the team is still awaiting McGowan's MRI results, they've placed him on the 15-day DL.  Brian Wolfe has been recalled from Syracuse.

Am I the only one fearing a torn labrum?  Hell, the way this season is going, it wouldn't shock me if they reported his head fell off.

Chuck - Wednesday, July 09 2008 @ 04:53 PM EDT (#188619) #
it wouldn't shock me if they reported his head fell off.

Not the whole head, just the sideburns.
Mike Green - Wednesday, July 09 2008 @ 05:02 PM EDT (#188620) #
Some days you don't need to look to the bottom of the boxscore to find out which the wind was blowing in Fenway.
The_Game - Wednesday, July 09 2008 @ 06:39 PM EDT (#188627) #

Significant contributions? Gallagher's the prize and doesn't have the upside to be more than mid-rotation starter by all accounts. Murton is a below-average corner outfielder and Patterson is a fourth outfielder/AAAA player. Donaldson's an A-ball catcher with one good season under his belt and currently struggling. I'd be underwhelmed with that for Harden, let alone throwing Gaudin in, as well.

You are underrating Gallagher, check out his numbers in AA/AAA, he can be quite good in the future. Oakland also seems to be a great place to develop pitching. Murton is a proven hitter at the major league level, but was shafted by the Cubs organization for whatever reason. They basically brought in the same player in Fukudome for significantly more money. It's also far too early to say whether Patterson is a career AAAA player.

I think you are definitely overrating Rich Harden's value here. He hasn't even thrown 100 innings since 2005, and has never once been past 200. It's a good sell-high, and I suspect Beane had been waiting to do something like this for some time.

 

The_Game - Wednesday, July 09 2008 @ 06:40 PM EDT (#188628) #
Oops, meant to italicize Thomas' comment.
Harden and Gaudin to Cubs | 35 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.