Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
With the ownership situation settled, and Paul DePodesta taking over as General Manager, the Dodgers can finally get down to business. While it is unfortunate that he did not arrive in time to engineer a big trade or free agent signing, DePodesta's General Managerial acumen will help. The formula for 2004 is simple enough: score more runs. In 2003, the Dodgers had the National League's worst offence and best pitching. That does not account for park factor, but Chavez Ravine is the hand that they were dealt: no Jacks. Maybe it was not such a good idea for this team to trade its Ace to the Yankees.


The 2003 Season

2003 W-L Record: 85 - 77Runs Scored: 574, last in NL
2nd, NL WestRuns Allowed: 556, first in NL
Att.:3,138,626Pythagorean Record: 83 - 79


Who's in, Who's out

Players AcquiredPlayers Lost
Juan Encarnacion (Fla)Kevin Brown (NYY)
Jeremy Giambi (Bos)Jeromy Burnitz (Col)
Jose Hernandez (Pit)Chad Hermansen (Tor)
Jose Lima (KC)Brian Jordan (Tex)
Tanyon Sturtze (Tor)Mike Kinkade (Jpn)
Bubba Trammell (NYY)Fred McGriff (TB)
Jeff Weaver (NYY)Paul Quantrill (NYY)
Rick White (Hou)Daryle Ward (Pit)


The National League West figures to be a very tight division in 2004. The Padres have begun anew with Brian Giles, Ramon Hernandez and David Wells. The Diamond Backs have added offence to play behind Randy Johnson and groundball-inducing phenom Brandon Webb. The Giants still have Barry Bonds. One man even thinks that the Rockies can compete.

Save for the Rockies, all the teams in the National League West seem likely to win between 80 and 89 games. 87 wins could land the Dodgers in the playoffs, 83 wins could land them in fourth place in the Division.

How can the Dodgers do it? To improve to 89 wins, they would have to maintain the lofty status-quo of their 2003 runs allowed, and score approximately 50 more runs.

Can the pitching be as good as it was in 2003? Losing Kevin Brown is going to hurt, but adding Jeff Weaver and getting a full season out of either Wilson Alvarez, Darren Driefort or Edwin Jackson would certainly help. Regression toward career performance mean holds that Hideo Nomo will likely fall short of his 2003 performance, but that Odalis Perez will pick up the slack by surpassing his 2003 numbers. The bullpen, even without Paul Quantrill, still figures to be dominant.

Can the offence improve by 50 runs? Here is a little game that I like to play: looking at the baseball-reference most similar players through the current age of each member of the starting lineup, and using the subsequent age season of each comparable to construct a lineup. Listed below is each player in the Dodgers' 2004 starting lineup, his age and runs created per 27 outs in 2003, his most similar player up to that age, and that most similar player's runs created per 27 outs in the following season.

Player             Age  RC/27  Most Similar      Age  RC/27
Lo Duca, Paul 31 4.20 Harper, Brian 32 5.04
Ventura, Robin 35 4.60 Davis, Chilli 36 6.85
Cora, Alex 27 3.16 Relaford, Desi 28 4.29
Beltre, Adrian 24 4.11 Santo, Ron 25 6.94
Izturis, Cesar 23 3.00 Berry, Jack 24 3.76
Encarnacion, Juan 27 4.72 Hendrick, George 28 5.50
Roberts, Dave 31 3.31 Outlaw, Jimmy 32 3.89
Green, Shawn 30 5.68 Murphy, Dale 31 8.66


The method is PECOTA's sloppy step-brother, entailing little predictive value; but it is fun and does show that the Dodgers' offence is not completely hopeless.

Manager

During Jim Tracy's three year managerial career, all with the Dodgers, he has compiled a .541 winning percentage. Tracy was one of only four managers to call for over 100 sacrifices in 2003; the others were Art Howe, Lloyd McClendon and Tony LaRussa. Tracy, Howe and McClendon can be forgiven for trading outs for bases, because they manage teams that were likely to give up their outs involuntarily anyway. LaRussa, who was held in very high esteem before the statistical revolution, has no excuse for exchanging outs for bases with the Cardinals' monster offence.

Catcher

I think, based on a couple of pieces of evidence, that Paul Lo Duca might be playing too much. The first is that he tends to fall off in the second half. In 2003, the Dodgers got production to the tune of .318/.368/.454 from Lo Duca in the first half; not too shabby. In the second half, he turned into a .229/.284/.302 sinkhole. The second piece of evidence for the assertion that Lo Duca is playing too much can be found in his at bats since his career year. In 2001, Lo Duca was very productive: .320/.374/.543, in 125 games and 460 at bats. In 2002, his playing time was increased to 149 games, 580 at bats, and his production fell to .281/.330/.402; in 2003, he played 147 games, got 568 at bats, and went .273/.335/.377.

First Base

There have been some rumblings that Shawn Green will move to first base, but for the purposes of this preview, let's say that he remains in right field. That means that the first base duties will likely be handed over to Robin Ventura, who played 42 games at first in 2003. Last season, Ventura posted his lowest slugging percentage - .401 - since 1990; that is inadequate for a first baseman, even at Dodger Stadium. Ventura has not had a positive runs above replacement since 1999, and with the position switch and his age, he is unlikely to reach replacement level again.

Second Base

Alex Cora was reasonably productive in limited playing time in 2002 posting a .291/.371/.434 season in 258 at bats. For whatever reason, despite getting 219 more at bats in 2003 than in 2002, he drew 11 fewer walks, thus driving his on-base percentage down to .287. Cora (a left-handed hitter) has a reverse platoon split: in the last three seasons, his batting averages vs. lefties are .293, .318 and .308. Fellow left-handed hitting second baseman Todd Walker, who was a free agent this offseason until signing with the Cubs, would have made an excellent platoon partner for Cora as he has not hit below .300 vs. righties in any of the last three seasons. But alas, DePodesta arrived too late.

Third Base

Adrian Beltre's career began while he was still a teenager. That was six seasons and over 3000 plate appearances ago, and Beltre's growth as a player has been lateral at best. This is just his age 26 season, and he did hit 17 homeruns in the second half of 2003, so there is certainly still hope for Beltre to become the productive third baseman that he was in 2000 (.290/.360/.475).

Shortstop

Jim Tracy has publicly mused about hitting Cesar Izturis second in the batting order this season. That would be, to employ my favourite Kent Brockman quote, "a veritable orgasm of poor planning". The former Blue Jay's career line of .251/.282/.315 ought to be enough to land him on the bench. The Dodgers signed Jose Hernandez during the offseason, and although Hernandez ought to be the starting shortstop, all indications are that Izturis will be. Over the last three seasons, Izturis has created 2.89 runs per 27 outs, and Hernandez has created 4.53 runs per 27 outs. What about the defence? Hernandez has a better range factor than Izturis as a shortstop since 2001. Starting Hernandez at shortstop in lieu of Izturis would go a long way toward making up the 50 or so runs that the Dodgers need to add to win the division title, while not sacrificing defence.

Left Field

Juan Encarnacion was brought in during the offseason to augment the offence. He has not been up to replacement level since 2000. Of course, "replacement level" takes on a different meaning when you are a Dodger. If the alternatives are Jason Romano and Bubba Trammell, then Encarnacion is, in fact, likely to live up to the Dodgers' contextual replacement level.

Centre Field

Dave Roberts has been a good base-stealer, posting a career .77 success rate, well above the magical .70 threshold. He has decent on-base skills (.331 in 2003), but virtually no extra-base power (.307 slugging percentage).

Right Field

Shawn Green ought to have spent some time on the disabled list with shoulder problems in 2003, but for whatever reason he played through the pain and posted his least productive season since 1996. Green had been very good during his three previous seasons as a Dodger, so there is really no reason to believe that a healthy Shawn Green could not return to his more productive self in 2004, even in the National League's worst run scoring environment. This preview does not have a "stadium" section, so I might as well write this here: Dodger Stadium does not have a negative impact on homeruns; its 2002-2003 homerun factor is 107, the same as Bank One Ballpark and greater than Minute Maid Park.

Bench

Backing up Paul Lo Duca (which, for Lo Duca's sake, ought to be a more prolific gig than it was in 2002 or 2003) will likely be Dave Ross. The 27 year-old catcher has a more-than-adequate (especially for a Dodger) career line of .254/.340/.560. Jeremy Giambi figures to be the backup first baseman, although one can easily envision a scenario in which Ventura falters badly and yields the starting spot to Giambi. Is that .259/.414/.550 2002 still hiding in there somewhere, or is that dream torn like his labrum? Uber-sub Jolbert Cabrera seems like a lock to make the team, if for no other reason than his Tony Phillips-like versatility. Cabrera played every non-battery position in 2003, but he is a career .253/.303/.353 hitter no matter where he plays. Bubba Trammell's seventh season in the Major Leagues was hampered by lack of playing time and depression. From 1999-2001, Trammell had a nice little replacement level career going, but the last two seasons have not been as kind. If Trammell took some grounds with any amount of success, he could make for a nifty platoon partner for Robin Ventura at first base, as both players have rather dramatic platoon splits. Jose Hernandez appears to be set to back up the left side of the infield, although (as indicated in the Izturis module above) a compelling case can be made for him to be the starting shortstop. The inside track on the fifth outfielder position appears to belong to whomever embarrasses himself the least in spring training between Jason Romano and Wilkin Ruan.

Starting Rotation

While the countdown is on for Kevin Brown's first public profanity-laced vitriol about the infield defence in the Evil Empire, Hideo Nomo is left as the Dodgers' nominal ace. Despite allowing 1.2 homeruns and 4.15 walks per nine innings since 1999, Nomo has continued to eat copious amounts of innings at respectable ERA levels, culminating in 2003's 218.3 innings worth of 3.09 ERA.

The true performance level of Odalis Perez likely exists somewhere between his 3.00 ERA in 2002 and his 4.52 ERA in 2003. In each of his five seasons in the Major Leagues, Perez' Component ERA has been below his actual ERA; his ERC's for 2002 and 2003 were 2.31 and 4.07, respectively. Lowering his homerun rate from the 1.4 that he posted in 2003 would go a long way toward the restoration of his numbers' respectability.

Jeff Weaver must be very happy to be out of the American League East. The extra ERA that Kevin Brown finds in New York will have been left there by Weaver before he came to Los Angeles. Moving to Dodger Stadium, far away from the short right field porch and range-deprived infield of Yankee Stadium should improve Weaver's numbers.

Kaz Ishii walks batters with impunity, having handed out 214 free passes in the 301 innings of his two year Major League career. His career component ERA is 4.83, whereas his actual career ERA is 4.07. What gives?

The fifth and final rotation spot looks like it will go to Edwin Jackson, who is profiled below in the Prospects module.

Bullpen

Game Over. Montreal native Eric Gagne's 2003 season edges out John Hiller's 1973 as the greatest ever posted by a Canadian relief pitcher. The .133/.196/.173 line that hitters managed against the Dodgers' closer is simply amazing. The temptation is to say that Jim Tracy ought to squeeze 25 or so more innings out of Gagne per season, but tinkering with whatever it is that Eric has going right now is not a good idea. Quietly enough, Guillermo Mota became an elite setup man in 2003, keeping his ERA below 2.00 over 105 innings. Mota's peripherals were great in 2003, with a 2.2 walk rate, an 8.5 strikeout rate and a 0.6 homerun rate. Paul Shuey moves one rung up the ladder with the departure of Paul Quantrill; expect 75 innings of something more than competence but less than dominance from Shuey. Tom Martin is the resident LOOGY, and with good cause, as he held lefties to a .189 batting average in 2003. Martin had a less-than-stellar second half in 2003, posting an ERA nearly a point and a half greater than the first half. This may not be cause for great concern; when the sample size boogeyman bites 50 inning relief pitchers, it bites hard. The often-injured Darren Driefort and the always-rotund Wilson Alvarez would likely be battling for a rotation spot this spring but for Edwin Jackson. Each, especially Alvarez if he can dominate like he did in the second half of 2003, will be useful in long relief and available to start if either Jackson needs more seasoning or National League batters start to realize that they ought not to ever, ever swing at a Kaz Ishii pitch.

Prospects

Stepping in to Pinch Hit on the Dodgers prospects is Wes Newton, a friend and class-mate of mine who knows more about prospects than I do. Take it away, Wes.

Paul DePodesta inherits a pair of elite pitching prospects in Edwin Jackson and Greg Miller who, if they can stay healthy, should provide the Dodgers with a cheap, effective and potentially dominant source of innings for the next few years. The top hitting prospect is Franklin Guitterrez, a five-tool centre fielder who should be an above average big leaguer when he arrives in a couple of seasons. Remember also the name of Joel Hanrahan, who posted excellent numbers as a 21 year old in AA and possesses a mid 90’s power sinker.

Edwin Jackson
RHP, Age 20

Edwin Jackson is widely regarded as the Dodger’s best pitching prospect since Pedro Martinez and is ranked the 4th best prospect in Baseball by Baseball America. He defeated Randy Johnson 4-1 in his big league debut last September on his 20th birthday. As a 19 year old in double AA Jacksonville he posted a 3-1 K/BB rate striking out 9.5 batters/9 over 148 1/3 innings.

Jackson throws consistent mid 90’s heat and a tight slider. He mixes in a change-up but doesn’t yet have a good feel for the pitch.

Likely to assume a spot in the Dodgers rotation out of the Spring expect Jackson to post impressive numbers early this season and slow somewhat as the league adjusts to his stuff. Jackson projects to be a true staff ace perhaps as soon as 2005.

Greg Miller*
LHP, Age 19

Miller’s key statistical ratio’s are essentially the same as Jackson’s: a 3:1 K/BB ratio with more than a K/IP and what’s more impressive is that he actually improved his ratio’s when summoned to AA, at the tender age of 18, late last season. Miller has added nearly 10 mph on his fastball since the summer of 2002 and can now regularly reach 95 mph with good movement. Miller also throws a plus power curve, a good change, and a sneaky slider. The only potential concern with Miller is durability as he had some minor shoulder problems last season. If Miller can remain healthy he should develop into a better pitcher than Jackson.

*Editor's note: Greg Miller will have arthroscopic surgery next week in an attempt to diagnose his left shoulder problem.

Franklin Gutierrez
OF, Age 21

Guittierrez, who was signed out of Venezuela in 2000, is a classic 5-tool prospect hitting for average and power (.282/.345/.513 with 20 HR and 17 SB in 425 Single A at bats), with 20 SB speed and strong defensive skills in Center. The major flaw in Gutierrez’s game is his propensity to strike out, whiffing at a disconcerting rate of once every four at bats last season. He can take a walk but unless he shortens his swing expect his batting averages to drop as he faces more advanced pitching. Gutierrez is likely a couple of seasons away from the bigs but when he arrives he should post strong power numbers while getting on base at an above average clip for a centre fielder.

Joel Hanrahan
RHP, Age 22

Another impressive Dodger pitching prospect, Hanrahan possesses what is fast becoming my favourite pitch in the major leagues, a low -mid 90’s power sinker. He keeps the ball down in the zone and doesn’t yield taters. Hanrahan gets ahead with fastballs and sinkers using a plus mid 80’s slider as his K pitch. Think Brandon Webb.

James Loney
1B, Age 19

A broken wrist sustained at the end of 2002 limited his ability to hit for power last season (.276/.337/.400 with 7 HR and 9 SB in 468 Single- A AB), but Loney is a terrific defensive 1st baseman who is considered to possess solid plate discipline and should develop the sort of power that could see him hit 30 HR at his peak. Loney projects as a serviceable big league 1st baseman in the Mark Grace mould.

Thanks Wes.

Projection

I think that the pitching does have the ability to be just as good in 2004 as it was in 2003, which means that the onus will belong to the hitters to step it up and score 50 or so more runs than last season. If they do, they stand a good chance of winning the National League West. Having a healthier (and thus, more productive) Shawn Green, keeping Paul Lo Duca below 500 plate appearances, and installing Jose Hernandez as the everyday shortstop would put the Dodgers well on their way toward scoring those 50 additional runs.
2004 Los Angeles Dodgers Preview | 16 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
_R Billie - Saturday, March 13 2004 @ 11:25 AM EST (#76199) #
I agree completely that the trade of Kevin Brown was very puzzling to me because Jeff Weaver isn't exactly on a low ticket and they turned around and spent the extra cash to put Juan Encarnacion on the roster who is useful in fantasy ball but represents much of what was wrong with the Dodgers in the real baseball world.

Now the master plan was actually to make room for Vlad Guerrero which supposedly would have happened if the ownership change did not block funds from being committed to signing the star. All I can say to that is the uncertainty over the ownership change was a known factor and it was very unadvisable for the front office to commit to trading Brown before they knew for sure if the second leg of their plan would come to fruitition.

So now here's a team that not only loses it's staff ace but it has to commit sharply increasing dollars to their star closer, lost a valuable mid reliever in Quantrill (though they'll be fine in the pen), and used up significant resources (almost 10% of the payroll) to bring back the devolving Adrian Beltre and trade for Encarnacion. Outside of letting Quantrill go I have a feeling DePodesta would not have made any of these moves were he starting the off-season from scratch. But this is now the hand he's dealt...he's out from under a large contract in Brown but like the Jays with Delgado, sometimes it's better to work around a high ticket star then to boot him and hope you can replace his production.

Unfortunately, I don't think it's going to be as easy as working out Canseco and signing Jeremy Giambi for Paul to right the offence. If they want to do something for this year they'll have to pursue some trades where most everyone would salivate over their top five or six prospects. Assuming Greg Miller's exploratory shoulder surgery turns up nothing significant.
_R Billie - Saturday, March 13 2004 @ 11:30 AM EST (#76200) #
Also Sturtze in a big ballpark with premium defence might actually be a useful innings eater. He wasn't the right fit for the Jays but a team in LA's situation can take bigger advantage of the replacement level talent like Sturtze.
_Ryan01 - Saturday, March 13 2004 @ 11:50 AM EST (#76201) #
I still can't believe they gave Bubba Trammell nearly $2 million. I think DePodesta can make a lot of upgrades to this team simply by acquiring more Jose Flores, Howie Clark, Simon Pond, Tom Wilson type guys. Then pick up one major bat via trade and this offense can go from putrid to moderately above average. Most importantly I think they need to keep all the pitching they possibly can.
Coach - Saturday, March 13 2004 @ 12:37 PM EST (#76202) #
I think they need to keep all the pitching they possibly can.

The young, cheap pitching, yes. It makes sense to deal at least one of the higher-priced starters for some hitting, which would also make room for Alvarez in the rotation. If I owned Gagne in fantasy ball, I'd be tempted to shop him around too, as I don't believe his value will ever be higher. I'm not sure I'd feel the same in a pennant race.

DePodesta's in a very good situation. If they don't win the West this year, it's not his fault; he was brought in way too late. If he makes a couple of smart moves and they have a great year, he's a hero.

Nice job, Leigh. You too, Wes.

The method is PECOTA's sloppy step-brother

Yeah, but you're right -- it's fun. If Adrian Beltre is going to turn into Ron Santo this year, they should think twice about trading him.
Lucas - Saturday, March 13 2004 @ 03:44 PM EST (#76203) #
FWIW, Beltre's closest PECOTA comp is Aurilio Rodriguez. The Maz and Robin Yount are in the top four.
Mike D - Saturday, March 13 2004 @ 03:50 PM EST (#76204) #
Now, presenting "Most Predictable Post of the Year" for 2004: I weigh in on Jose Hernandez.

Leigh, I thought your preview was an enjoyable read...but I strongly disagree with your prescription of Hernandez as the cure for what ails the Dodgers.

First, I remain in the "there is not yet any definitive defensive metric" camp. That said, any measure that suggests that Jose Hernandez is a better defensive shortstop than Cesar Izturis is seriously flawed. Not to engage in a battle of whose statistics are bigger, but Izturis led the National League in defensive Win Shares at shortstop.

Considering all of baseball, check out the Defensive Win Shares per 1000 innings (min. 300 innings at SS):
1. Neifi Perez 9.66
2. "Yeah, That" Alex Gonzalez 7.37
3. "No, The Other" Alex Gonzalez 7.06
4. Cesar Izturis 6.97
26. Jose Hernandez 4.44

I'm not saying this is definitive either, but it at least calls the "no sacrifice of defence" premise into question. I don't think any knowledgeable fan who's seen National League baseball, regardless of how statistically oriented they might be, would ever agree that Hernandez is Izturis' equal with the glove. It's not true!

Now, Izturis is such a zero with the bat that your suggestion at least merits scrutiny. But you're stacking the deck, I might suggest, when you talk about "last three years" production of the Great Whiffer. Let's break it down:

2001 (Age 31): .249/.300/.443, 25 HR, 39 BB, 185 K
2002 (Age 32): .288/.356/.478, 24 HR, 52 BB, 188 K
2003 (Age 33): .225/.287/.347, 13 HR, 46 BB, 177 K

In 2002, Hernandez led the league in balls-in-play average, which suggests two conclusions. First, since his walks and strikeouts have been more or less constant, his 2002 numbers represent the absolute upper limit of his potential production, since he basically raked every pitch that he didn't swing at and miss. Second, much like we all expect Pat Burrell to bounce back this year from a season that featured a freakishly bad balls-in-play average, Hernandez's solid 2002 was very likely a fluke.

More to the point, what are the odds that Hernandez will have a resurgent offensive season when
a) he turns 35 in July, and
b) he goes from Miller Park, Coors Field, PNC Park and Wrigley Field as home parks to Dodger Stadium, merely the NL's #2 pitcher's park last season? His stats last year are especially horrible when you adjust for park.

I've beaten this dead horse countless times, but I'll say it again: Jose Hernandez has become a sympathetic figure to the analytical community, who warn against overvaluing batter's strikeouts. In my opinion, this sympathy has led these folks to undervalue the fact that Hernandez simply cannot lay off anything when facing a two-strike count.
robertdudek - Saturday, March 13 2004 @ 05:01 PM EST (#76205) #
Range Factor should be expunged from the English language. No offence intended, Leigh, just my opinion.
_Ryan01 - Saturday, March 13 2004 @ 06:13 PM EST (#76206) #
This year the dodgers will spend:

$3.55 million for Juan Encarnacion ($4.45 mil in 2005)
$1.85 million for Bubba Trammell
$6.50 million for Todd Hundley
$1.20 million for Robin Ventura
$5.00 million for Adrian Beltre
$1.30 million for Alex Cora

Collectively that's 19.4 million dollars on what will quite possibly be 6 below replacement level position players. Plus Roberts and Izturis will be arbitration eligible after this season. There's a lot of fat to trim in this organization. That "one big bat" that Dodgers fans and players alike keep rambling on about will not be enough, IMO. I expect we'll see a full scale overhaul of the current Dodger lineup by this time next year.
Mike Green - Saturday, March 13 2004 @ 08:07 PM EST (#76207) #
Nice summary, Leigh. I have the Dodgers winning 86, thanks to improvements from Green and Beltre, to tie for the division championship with the Giants. The Giants probably win the 163rd game behind Jason Schmidt.
Gitz - Saturday, March 13 2004 @ 10:46 PM EST (#76208) #
My first year of spring training, I saw Jose Hernandez hit a tremendous home run to right-center field -- cleared the wall by a good 30-feet, a bit wind-aided, but he crushed the ball. He was a somewhat unknown quantity then (1994), but I was impressed by his power, and have been a fan of his ever since. He's also been solid defensively, he draws a few walks -- and you never heard about any lizards in his cellar, which doesn't affect the kind of player he is, of course, but it does make it easier to root for him. I agree with this much in terms of the analytical's community praise for Hernandez: teams clearly did not appreciate what Hernandez offered, outlined above, and only focused on what he didn't offer.

On the other hand, it was tossed around last year at this time that Hernandez would be a comparable replacement to Miguel Tejada. Granted, I was glib and emotional in my rationale for calling Tejada "irreplacable." But it was no less glib to suggest that Hernandez could be that replacement, because, strikeouts or no, he's going to struggle heavily in Los Angeles, as he would have in Oakland.

Improvement from Beltre? I'll believe it when I see it.
Gitz - Saturday, March 13 2004 @ 10:48 PM EST (#76209) #
Ah, the failure to preview. I meant to add that Hernandez at $1 million per is better than Tejada at $12 million per, but that doesn't mean he's a comparable replacement.
Leigh - Monday, March 15 2004 @ 09:45 AM EST (#76210) #
Range Factor should be expunged from the English language. No offence intended, Leigh, just my opinion.

I don't know much about defensive metrics, but Range Factor does seem a little simplistic.

The difference in their respective offensive capabilities means that Izturis would have to be a significantly better fielder - saving somewhere in the neighbourhood of an additional 30 runs relative to what Hernandez could do defensively - to warrant the playing time.

I am willing to accept - mostly because Robert seems to think so and Mike D has presented some compelling evidence, and because it intuitively makes sense - that Izturis is the better defensive shortstop. My question is: is he better by 30 runs (Hernandez' advantage on offence)?
Leigh - Monday, March 15 2004 @ 09:48 AM EST (#76211) #
Yeah, but you're right -- it's fun. If Adrian Beltre is going to turn into Ron Santo this year, they should think twice about trading him.

The method is all fun and games, Coach, until you try it with the Blue Jays. The Jays' list is as discouraging as the Dodgers' is encouraging.
Mike D - Monday, March 15 2004 @ 10:59 AM EST (#76212) #
is he better by 30 runs (Hernandez' advantage on offence)?

The advantage is 30 runs only if you think that 2003 was an aberration, rather than a trend, for Jose -- and that 2002 was not an aberration. Reasonable minds can differ, but I like my chances at Chavez Ravine.

I definitely agree, though, that Cesar should not be hitting second, or any number not named "8." I'm with you and Brockman on that one.
robertdudek - Monday, March 15 2004 @ 03:45 PM EST (#76213) #
The problem with Range Factor is that it's very likely to mislead the reader. Bill James, in the NHBA, confessed that RF was just about the worst idea he had ever come up with. Every team gets 27 outs, so the RF of a good defensive team is likely to be no better than a bad one.

But, if a team's pitchers strike out a lot of batters, the range factors of the fielders are likely to be lower (fewer outs in play).
_Matt - Monday, March 15 2004 @ 09:02 PM EST (#76214) #
The Dodgers aren't paying Trammell the entire $1.85 million. They're paying him the minimum and the league is taking care of the rest because of his case with the Yankees about his release last year.
2004 Los Angeles Dodgers Preview | 16 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.